Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 14.2245  2461205.7245  14.79  11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4
153.84190  61.00673 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -crosshair 1912.98547 287.01349 image    wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -crosshair 1913.23206 287.28320 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22455 11 19 45.11 +50 15 36.4          14.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22434 11 19 44.83 +50 15 34.9          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22475 11 19 45.39 +50 15 38.0          14.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 14.2246*  11 19 45.11 +50 15 36.4  14.8 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7245,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2245 14.79CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 14.2245  2461205.7245  14.69  10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3
166.43259  53.79498 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -crosshair 7710.04883 1724.01660 image    wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -crosshair 7709.94141 1724.42871 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22455 10 19 56.26 +48 31 34.3          14.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22434 10 19 55.90 +48 31 33.5          14.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22475 10 19 56.63 +48 31 35.1          14.8 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 14.2246*  10 19 56.26 +48 31 34.3  14.7 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7245,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2245 14.69CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 14.2245  2461205.7245  14.88  11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5
169.41807  64.74162 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -crosshair 1966.70557 5131.98877 image    wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -crosshair 1967.21008 5131.99951 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22455 11 12 23.86 +42 21 57.5          14.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22434 11 12 23.61 +42 21 55.3          14.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22475 11 12 24.11 +42 21 59.7          15.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 14.2246*  11 12 23.86 +42 21 57.5  14.9 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7245,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2245 14.88CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 14.2245  2461205.7245  14.81  10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5
173.63149  54.60917 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.2" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -crosshair 8165.26416 4278.76611 image    wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -crosshair 8165.06152 4279.43262 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22455 10 16 24.65 +44 16 57.5          14.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22434 10 16 24.27 +44 16 57.4          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 14.22475 10 16 25.03 +44 16 57.6          14.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 14.2246*  10 16 24.65 +44 16 57.5  14.8 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7245,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2245 14.81CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461205.72474505 14.06.2026 05:23:27.972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6279
Objects passed selection criteria:  6275
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5658
Average stars matched: 5519.5 (97.5521 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun 14 00:29:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461205.72474505 14.06.2026 05:23:27.972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  30079
Objects passed selection criteria:  30000
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28054
Average stars matched: 27213.5 (97.004 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun 14 00:31:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 293601 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 293601 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits


renamed 'UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1174.8340
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 472.7418
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1173.3345
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 472.6069
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.72215
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-14T00:22:53.3184587' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-14T05:22:53.3184587' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61205.2242282177 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-14T05:23:03.2217811' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61205.2243428356 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     161.999537115317 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      45.999876708287 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     30.6166666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     307.413055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.95815261338565 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29485 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29485 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits :)

Spent 0.662833 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-14T00:23:27.9725099' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-14T05:23:27.9725099' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61205.2246293058 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-14T05:23:37.8739268' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61205.2247439004 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     161.999537130567 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9998767179496 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =              30.5225 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     307.449166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.96356747378585 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29485 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29485 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               898.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits :)

Spent 0.619236 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/d_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits



fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.72434396
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HacHn4XBEr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f8pz1d9qIT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CaV1C6dqL5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J0fmEncXFh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.930900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.930900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.47

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.47

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec +40.3419 to +51.2583 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec 40.3419 to 51.2583 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3285 out of 6367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.3 mag.  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  12.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HacHn4XBEr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, passed=6977
Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=223 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f8pz1d9qIT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=6367
Got 6367 stars (including 6003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.552 n_q1=214 n_q2=261 n_q3=243 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CaV1C6dqL5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=273, passed=4726
Got 4726 stars (including 4451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4726 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=231 n_q2=231 n_q3=265 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J0fmEncXFh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, passed=4713
Got 4713 stars (including 4458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4713 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=229 n_q2=231 n_q3=266 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.244
ref2=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.471 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new1=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.203
new2=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.157
reference average sigma_overall=0.4275 worst_q_ratio=1.2075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0358 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:13.034 +46:00:48.13
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:13.749 +46:00:52.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00239 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9f16NgtizL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JBOiS4wJld
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v9ZZc3iG4f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DEpgGnVIIY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec +40.3159 to +51.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec 40.3159 to 51.2658 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3297 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3297 out of 30481 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  14.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9f16NgtizL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1513, passed=34161
Got 34161 stars (including 32578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=222 n_q2=251 n_q3=249 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JBOiS4wJld (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1294, passed=30460
Got 30460 stars (including 29132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=223 n_q2=263 n_q3=238 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v9ZZc3iG4f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=710, passed=24251
Got 24251 stars (including 23507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=236 n_q2=232 n_q3=262 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DEpgGnVIIY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=814, passed=24250
Got 24250 stars (including 23398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24250 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=236 n_q2=235 n_q3=259 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:49:49.20 +44:37:30.1:  13.30 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:14:13.52 +48:18:49.3:  14.17 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:49:49.20 +44:37:30.1:  13.33 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:49:49.20 +44:37:30.1: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6646 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:18:55.61 +49:13:28.6:  13.94 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:29:28.01 +46:04:38.4:  13.97 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:14:13.52 +48:18:49.3:  14.17 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:13.52 +48:18:49.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8602 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:18:55.61 +49:13:28.6:  13.98 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:18:55.61 +49:13:28.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0267 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:29:28.01 +46:04:38.4:  13.94 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:28.01 +46:04:38.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1206 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:46:25.10 +44:07:02.0:  14.08 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:14:14.39 +43:50:55.4:  14.28 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:44:16.33 +44:41:00.5:  14.34 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:46:25.10 +44:07:02.0:  14.29 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:25.10 +44:07:02.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1898 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:14:14.39 +43:50:55.4:  14.26 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:19:14.39 +47:17:43.6:  14.82 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:14.39 +43:50:55.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2924 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:44:16.33 +44:41:00.5:  14.24 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:16.33 +44:41:00.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2873 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:19:14.39 +47:17:43.6:  14.87 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:14.39 +47:17:43.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6091 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4:  15.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:25:42.94 +48:17:23.4:  15.01 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:02:46.59 +49:44:08.3:  13.25 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:25:42.94 +48:17:23.4:  14.89 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:42.94 +48:17:23.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6901 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:02:46.59 +49:44:08.3:  13.48 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:46.59 +49:44:08.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1439 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52981.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53032.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52143_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.10    10:28:27.74 +49:50:31.3   6855 0944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:28:27.77 +49:50:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52193_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52193_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    10.37    10:05:30.28 +49:44:25.6   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52199_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52199_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    10.64    11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.9   2407 3901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:09:56.47 +44:28:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52287_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52287_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    11.96    10:54:18.01 +48:11:55.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52291_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    11.97    10:45:13.17 +43:10:18.8   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52300_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.22    11:32:04.09 +49:15:23.1   0605 0661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:32:04.07 +49:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52304_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.22    11:17:30.24 +49:07:41.0   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52310_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.27    11:16:46.05 +49:26:50.3   2127 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:16:46.05 +49:26:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52317_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.09    10:15:06.56 +48:54:11.1   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52328_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.27    10:42:27.61 +50:56:59.8   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52332_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.31    10:54:17.94 +49:08:57.5   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52351_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.56    11:03:02.00 +43:29:28.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.48    10:47:34.91 +48:49:59.1   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52361_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.56    10:17:34.34 +45:04:11.8   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52382_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    12.68    11:20:39.49 +45:00:35.1   1310 3416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:20:39.52 +45:00:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52450_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.06    10:59:42.59 +50:10:40.6   3837 0599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:42.59 +50:10:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52473_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.13    10:07:48.26 +43:59:29.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52478_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.24    11:19:33.51 +47:16:38.1   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52505_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.50    10:42:02.84 +42:22:24.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52525_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.51    11:16:28.26 +41:41:49.5   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52530_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.49    10:27:52.70 +42:58:49.2   6922 5090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:27:52.75 +42:58:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52532_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.39    11:26:05.50 +41:08:50.3   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.46    10:48:10.31 +46:43:27.6   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52540_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.55    11:00:14.54 +49:14:47.3   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52547_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.80    11:34:23.94 +50:04:31.3   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52551_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.67    10:58:28.47 +41:14:00.4   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52578_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    13.62    10:49:49.19 +44:37:30.9   4566 4018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.71    10:49:49.21 +44:37:29.3   4568 4019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52597_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.69    10:48:08.61 +49:18:36.3   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.72    11:24:45.08 +48:01:59.6   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52605_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.82    10:44:24.78 +49:10:44.8   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52620_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.17    11:32:08.78 +47:13:13.1   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52625_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.83    10:41:07.37 +47:57:55.2   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52632_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.64    10:05:17.63 +45:18:42.8   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52641_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    13.87    11:14:13.15 +48:18:48.3   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.85    11:14:13.90 +48:18:50.3   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52644_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.31    11:25:11.33 +47:12:05.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52645_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.80    10:56:10.49 +42:56:10.2   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52656_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.26    11:14:46.62 +45:57:45.6   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52672_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.05    10:07:06.77 +45:29:32.8   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52696_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.96    10:13:55.49 +43:34:51.7   8458 4695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:55.54 +43:34:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52706_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52706_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.78    10:05:53.94 +45:37:28.8   9258 3406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:05:53.92 +45:37:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52711_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.96    10:56:05.55 +43:25:24.0   3835 4690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:56:05.59 +43:25:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52714_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.10    10:54:31.76 +45:27:51.1   4106 3478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:54:31.68 +45:27:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52725_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.26    10:10:24.13 +41:14:45.7   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52726_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    13.98    10:18:55.67 +49:13:28.1   7799 1297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.09    10:18:55.55 +49:13:29.2   7800 1297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52729_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.16    11:19:45.14 +45:30:29.5   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52737_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.11    11:29:27.95 +46:04:37.3   0494 2612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.13    11:29:28.08 +46:04:39.5   0495 2613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52752_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.24    10:57:24.83 +43:55:54.9   3719 4372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:24.84 +43:55:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52754_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.30    11:25:31.13 +46:23:02.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52760_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.27    11:27:57.21 +42:32:04.1   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52778_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.34    11:30:25.24 +47:49:46.2   0600 1548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:30:25.27 +47:49:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52797_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.29    11:02:33.18 +48:09:30.4   3434 1785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  11:02:33.30 +48:09:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52798_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.36    10:15:56.66 +43:12:08.8   8244 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52802_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.19    10:16:17.20 +41:43:11.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52804_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.61    11:20:27.91 +49:00:40.4   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52808_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.32    11:32:14.63 +46:44:27.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52809_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.51    11:28:43.17 +48:48:29.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52824_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.26    10:46:25.22 +44:07:01.6   4913 4346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.13    10:46:24.99 +44:07:02.4   4914 4346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52825_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.68    11:09:18.86 +41:22:22.0   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52829_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.40    10:41:05.83 +48:39:31.7   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52833_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.35    11:14:14.49 +43:50:55.3   1891 4213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.24    11:14:14.29 +43:50:55.6   1892 4214   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52840_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.32    10:56:01.99 +42:31:25.1   3795 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52849_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.02    10:53:11.38 +50:59:56.0   4503 0158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

**** FOUND  10:53:11.42 +50:59:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52877_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.37    10:44:16.41 +44:40:59.8   5161 4017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.23    10:44:16.25 +44:41:01.1   5162 4018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52878_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.69    11:13:08.82 +43:12:35.7   1956 4614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52894_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.27    10:08:10.47 +41:24:24.7   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52914_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.22    10:37:22.08 +43:20:56.5   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52916_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.56    11:19:14.37 +47:17:45.4   1679 2072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.69    11:19:14.42 +47:17:41.8   1680 2074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52921_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52921_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.70    11:27:38.04 +43:01:11.2   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52924_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.37    11:29:28.90 +43:18:53.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52930_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.62    11:14:20.03 +42:40:27.2   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52935_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.45    10:08:59.52 +47:55:49.1   8839 2030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52939_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.65    11:20:44.90 +46:00:49.2   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52942_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.54    11:28:46.84 +44:11:08.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52945_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.45    10:28:57.18 +46:57:56.7   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52946_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.39    11:06:08.52 +49:50:01.0   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52959_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.54    10:57:18.57 +46:49:34.5   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52960_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.34    10:13:50.81 +49:21:35.9   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52972_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.65    11:23:16.01 +42:58:16.7   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52975_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.82    11:31:50.14 +46:46:49.7   0331 2145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 52981_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 52989_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.55    10:50:07.52 +51:06:37.7   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53000_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.65    11:15:12.78 +41:18:33.8   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53003_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.69    10:16:31.94 +48:31:11.3   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53006_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.35    10:42:48.86 +42:07:27.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53009_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53011_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.43    10:09:32.70 +44:56:45.5   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53019_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.69    11:01:20.93 +41:46:12.7   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53026_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.60    10:22:50.04 +48:26:53.1   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53032_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53035_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    15.01    10:40:34.43 +45:59:46.9   5587 3245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 53037_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53040_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.57    10:39:44.89 +48:33:13.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53052_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.48    10:10:32.37 +44:26:40.9   8802 4153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53059_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53059_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.45    10:23:57.77 +49:27:38.0   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53065_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.85    11:12:38.96 +41:33:33.9   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53068_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.64    11:18:52.52 +42:01:11.1   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53074_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    14.81    11:25:42.91 +48:17:23.1   1125 1364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.64    11:25:42.96 +48:17:23.7   1127 1365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53075_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.51    10:16:14.65 +44:48:50.2   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53100_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.79    11:22:21.62 +48:48:54.0   1516 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53102_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.97    10:57:33.31 +45:27:11.1   3787 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53113_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.96    10:34:58.99 +47:56:55.4   6195 2085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 53122_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    14.89    10:31:22.63 +49:19:02.1   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50042_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127
The candidate 50042_fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 14.22434    2461205.72434    13.14    10:02:46.63 +49:44:08.1   9389 0881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-22-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0126.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 14.22475    2461205.72475    13.14    10:02:46.55 +49:44:08.4   9390 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_002720_TTUQ1b1x1_852825_r46rMVY0/fd_UMa-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0127.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5
########### Completed UMa-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5
###################################################################################
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5  -- not a known variable star
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3  -- not a known variable star
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5  -- not a known variable star
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:16:24.65 +44:16:57.5
10:19:56.26 +48:31:34.3
11:12:23.86 +42:21:57.5
11:19:45.11 +50:15:36.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461205.72434396 -observatory V36
07:15:25.07 +23:34:29.1 Mercury (0.5mag)
08:12:48.89 +22:01:14.0 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:07:10.98 +17:01:29.5 Mars (1.3mag)
07:53:31.50 +21:18:22.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:00.37 +02:57:27.0 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:01:37.64 +20:29:31.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:27.73 +00:18:32.6 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:59.75 -23:06:52.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:29:23.28 +26:00:14.8 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 14 00:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461205.72434396:
07:53:36.43 +21:18:06.3 Io (6.0mag)
07:53:22.91 +21:18:49.7 Europa (6.2mag)
07:53:25.09 +21:18:38.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:53:03.19 +21:19:50.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:53:27.22 +20:55:17.5 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:53:35.88 +21:18:09.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:53:16.62 +21:08:08.9 Elara (17.6mag)
07:56:00.35 +21:26:46.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:59:50.28 +21:20:34.0 Carme (18.9mag)
00:51:12.11 +02:57:15.6 Titan (8.6mag)
00:50:59.90 +02:57:19.0 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:51:26.37 +02:59:58.9 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:51:14.99 +02:57:09.3 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:51:35.16 +02:58:31.1 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 14 00:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461205.72434396:
17:28:00.73 -35:36:12.1 JWST
17:18:17.17 +42:54:38.8 Chandra
19:12:47.20 -04:22:31.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 14 00:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461205.72434396 -observatory V36
18:39:08.50 -33:04:40.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:59:26.43 -68:00:53.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:51:17.33 +32:02:54.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:12:19.33 +15:37:18.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:10:55.04 -44:53:28.1 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:11:06.06 +31:48:31.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:41:24.95 +27:00:09.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:10.14 +30:51:53.0 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:53:51.42 +04:12:14.2 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:24:15.16 +21:41:09.8 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:17:18.85 -11:01:41.8 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:11:56.23 +66:52:39.8 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:31:23.28 -07:17:40.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:35.37 +81:35:54.5 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:18:59.31 +64:31:21.0 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:56:18.98 +28:20:41.9 13.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:32:40.30 +14:01:05.4 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:08:40.74 +32:54:09.5 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:24:04.07 -15:26:39.4 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:11:30.63 +33:27:05.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:46.38 +52:23:21.8 17.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:51:49.90 -11:09:09.1 14.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:18.01 +23:14:37.7 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:44.88 +04:38:52.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:02:04.02 +76:21:04.1 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:10:49.44 +43:49:39.8 16.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:51.10 -01:43:39.4 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:34:32.23 -09:07:03.4 8.4mag 10P/Tempel
11:03:33.72 -01:04:12.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:21:01.75 +26:26:22.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:12:50.45 +22:01:30.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:31:55.42 -06:00:15.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:03:01.95 +33:56:59.5 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:23:47.70 +17:57:02.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:33:35.76 +06:07:13.2 15.7mag 88P/Howell
05:14:02.36 +30:40:46.0 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
03:00:16.10 +28:32:48.1 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:05:00.33 +32:46:50.0 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:00:44.45 +12:03:53.9 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:08:59.43 +19:38:03.8 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:45:32.11 +19:19:56.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:23:27.00 +17:53:10.2 15.4mag 141P/Machholz
06:26:28.21 +17:52:50.1 15.4mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:23:55.30 +16:51:55.0 12.3mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:01:51.20 -23:53:31.5 16.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:01:35.64 +26:08:38.8 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:27.82 +03:35:52.9 16.5mag 169P/NEAT
00:34:29.32 +03:36:57.4 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:44.41 -08:14:01.2 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:48:14.52 +35:12:31.3 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:48:15.04 +00:07:56.4 16.2mag 260P/McNaught
04:20:49.46 +33:31:58.4 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:26:57.82 -02:36:01.7 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:12:41.57 +07:51:26.7 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:12:00.94 +20:34:59.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:09:48.24 +41:15:40.2 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 14 00:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50    2026-06-11 17.05
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50    2026-06-11 17.05
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 14 00:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 14 00:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:25:24.694 +28:06:12.15  AT 2026oke  2026-06-06.78 19.63
16:00:35.665 +40:33:28.48  AT 2026okd  2026-06-06.92 19.53
14:23:47.456 +75:46:01.44  AT 2026okc  2026-06-06.35 19.202
09:06:15.590 -05:53:46.80  AT 2026okb  2026-06-05.71 19.229
00:23:52.320 +36:21:31.09  AT 2026oka  2026-06-06.19 19.004
11:27:24.917 -04:39:24.73  AT 2026ojz  2026-06-05.80 19.208
08:40:07.303 -16:41:42.39  AT 2026ojy  2026-06-05.73 18.788
09:41:38.510 -12:30:07.46  AT 2026ojx  2026-06-04.26 19.393
14:21:14.441 +56:50:47.63  AT 2026ojw  2026-06-06.37 19.475
09:10:24.455 -13:57:44.58  AT 2026ojv  2026-06-05.73 19.004
10:12:37.525 +13:13:10.28  AT 2026oju  2026-06-05.26 19.164
13:19:00.470 +43:14:24.76  AT 2026ojt  2026-06-06.33 18.85
18:43:15.260 -08:47:37.40  AT 2026ojs  2026-06-06.73 17.82
00:35:11.496 -00:49:17.94  AT 2026ojr  2026-06-01.47 19.0273
13:27:16.739 -38:01:33.63  AT 2026ojq  2026-06-06.42 19.89
02:13:54.662 +31:51:42.05  AT 2026ojp  2026-05-31.48 18.5771
12:22:54.475 -14:25:27.09  AT 2026ojo  2026-06-06.37 20.1
12:12:13.424 -28:02:18.53  AT 2026ojn  2026-06-06.36 19.27
12:01:26.980 -21:29:06.86  AT 2026ojm  2026-06-06.37 19.41
10:54:17.334 -30:22:38.44  AT 2026ojl  2026-06-06.35 18.98
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 14 00:29 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Jun 14 00:29:16 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 31s (0.52 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 43s (0.72 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 83s (1.38 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 18s (0.30 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 68s (1.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 23s (0.38 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 113s (1.88 min)
FIELD_UMa-10-Q1b1x1: 212s (3.53 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 214s (3.57 min)
Finished: Sun Jun 14 00:32:50 CDT 2026