This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2189 2461205.7189 12.80 16:55:03.51 -11:43:40.6
7.98480 19.33209 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha -1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:03.51 -11:43:40.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:03.51 -11:43:40.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7189,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2189 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2189 2461205.7189 13.45 16:46:15.41 -11:46:51.4
6.62338 21.06743 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia -0 -0 0 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:15.41 -11:46:51.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:15.41 -11:46:51.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7189,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2189 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461205.71918311 14.06.2026 05:15:27.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4464
Objects passed selection criteria: 4460
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3885.5
Average stars matched: 3868 (99.5496 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:22:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461205.71918311 14.06.2026 05:15:27.421 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 72
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46673
Objects passed selection criteria: 46612
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41842.8
Average stars matched: 41068.5 (98.1496 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:24:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.71853312
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pvuwuthqk1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vOPYaSfPl7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F09bl34pCK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.carDzV6dCm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pvuwuthqk1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=178 n_q2=358 n_q3=211 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.632
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vOPYaSfPl7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F09bl34pCK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, passed=3374
Got 3374 stars (including 3146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.918 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=182 n_q2=281 n_q3=284 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.carDzV6dCm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, passed=4118
Got 4118 stars (including 3871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4118 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.942 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.587 n_q1=200 n_q2=262 n_q3=273 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.746
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.632
ref2=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=0.607 worst_q_ratio=1.513
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.540 worst_q_ratio=1.746
reference average sigma_overall=0.5615 worst_q_ratio=1.5745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0119 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:32.790 -09:58:51.23
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:35.121 -09:59:12.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OU3XirTwIK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yj1xdn1FoH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XoD3j9Hnko
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l36DhCmmDD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.626150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.626150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OU3XirTwIK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4399, passed=72424
Got 72424 stars (including 67929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.916 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=198 n_q2=342 n_q3=199 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.557
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yj1xdn1FoH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3287, passed=62002
Got 62002 stars (including 58624 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=195 n_q2=353 n_q3=194 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XoD3j9Hnko (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1362, passed=36908
Got 36908 stars (including 35491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36908 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.882 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.624 n_q1=190 n_q2=288 n_q3=261 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l36DhCmmDD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1647, passed=42260
Got 42260 stars (including 40564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.817 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=210 n_q2=266 n_q3=256 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-14-31_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002042_TTUQ2b1x1_689536_zJz22oDv/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:03.51 -11:43:40.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:15.41 -11:46:51.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:38.26 -05:49:05.3: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:05.51 -08:52:07.1: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:52.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:25:09.07 -07:32:46.2: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:03.51 -11:43:40.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:15.41 -11:46:51.4: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:38.26 -05:49:05.3: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:05.51 -08:52:07.1: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:38.26 -05:49:05.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6484 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:05.51 -08:52:07.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2688 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:52.3: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:52.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7136 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:06.88 -07:27:38.3: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:25:09.07 -07:32:46.2: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:09.07 -07:32:46.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3797 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:42.18 -11:04:43.5: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:29.04 -05:44:06.2: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:06.88 -07:27:38.3: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:06.88 -07:27:38.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1595 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:42:17.40 -09:56:45.7: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:13.16 -07:43:55.5: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:01.29 -12:02:20.4: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:09.15 -11:04:08.7: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:42.18 -11:04:43.5: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:29.04 -05:44:06.2: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:42.18 -11:04:43.5: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0977 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:29.04 -05:44:06.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2598 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:16.25 -09:13:12.2: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:42:17.40 -09:56:45.7: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:13.16 -07:43:55.5: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:17.40 -09:56:45.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4127 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:13.16 -07:43:55.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3523 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:01.29 -12:02:20.4: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:09.15 -11:04:08.7: 14.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:01.29 -12:02:20.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3121 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:09.15 -11:04:08.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4426 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:42:21.33 -06:36:19.5: 15.07 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:16.25 -09:13:12.2: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:16.25 -09:13:12.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5027 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:57.41 -07:12:51.1: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:17.59 -11:21:10.6: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:42:21.33 -06:36:19.5: 15.13 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:21.33 -06:36:19.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6006 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:07.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:08.89 -12:33:58.7: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:44.61 -05:50:03.2: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:57:57.81 -06:37:14.1: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:17.59 -11:21:10.6: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:57.41 -07:12:51.1: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:17.59 -11:21:10.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5035 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:57.41 -07:12:51.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5891 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:08.89 -12:33:58.7: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:07.6: 15.14 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:21.38 -10:21:03.5: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:08.89 -12:33:58.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3406 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:07.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6863 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:44.61 -05:50:03.2: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:44.61 -05:50:03.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4971 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:57:57.81 -06:37:14.1: 15.18 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:57.81 -06:37:14.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6932 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:26.56 -09:52:53.8: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:21.38 -10:21:03.5: 15.00 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:21.38 -10:21:03.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5502 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:12:42.86 -06:34:16.3: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:26.56 -09:52:53.8: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:19.36 -10:20:00.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:26.56 -09:52:53.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4566 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:55.66 -10:45:22.7: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:21.77 -10:06:59.2: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:24.19 -07:48:25.4: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:25.52 -09:04:51.3: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:12:42.86 -06:34:16.3: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:42.86 -06:34:16.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5554 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:19.36 -10:20:00.7: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.36 -10:20:00.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5331 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:55.66 -10:45:22.7: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:21.77 -10:06:59.2: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:55.66 -10:45:22.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5978 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:21.77 -10:06:59.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4000 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:24.19 -07:48:25.4: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:24.19 -07:48:25.4: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7878 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:25.52 -09:04:51.3: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:25.52 -09:04:51.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6192 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84530_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84530_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84543_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84543_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:49.66 -09:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84547_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84547_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 84586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84602_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84602_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.07 -08:49:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84606_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84606_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:00.29 -13:47:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84609_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84609_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.67 -12:29:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84611_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 84611_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84618_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84618_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.27 -12:21:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84619_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84619_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.50 -11:48:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84627_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84627_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:32.25 -10:10:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84628_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84628_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.07 -11:02:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84644_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84644_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:21.00 -08:16:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84651_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84651_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84661_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84661_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.57 -09:41:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84665_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84665_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.71 -06:46:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84670_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84670_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84689_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84689_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.60 -14:03:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84690_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84690_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84704_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84704_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84710_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84710_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.72 -11:02:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84717_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84717_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84719_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84719_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84735_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84735_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84740_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84740_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84764_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84764_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84781_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84781_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84786_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84786_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84802_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84802_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84806_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84806_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84810_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84810_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84814_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84814_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84849_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84849_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84861_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84861_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84862_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84862_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84869_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84869_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84881_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84881_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84902_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 84902_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.81 -11:28:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.76 -08:34:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.23 -09:20:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-15-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks