This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 10.89 11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4
274.59615 60.14269 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia 0 0 0 11.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 11 56 45.92 +00 18 49.4 10.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,10.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 10.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 13.32 12:01:06.66 +00:34:06.8
276.39514 60.82068 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 1 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:01:06.66 +00:34:06.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:01:06.66 +00:34:06.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 12 01 06.66 +00 34 06.8 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 13.16 12:18:50.19 -01:03:35.9
286.07350 60.74024 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto 0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:18:50.19 -01:03:35.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:18:50.19 -01:03:35.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 12 18 50.19 -01 03 35.9 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 14.01 11:43:19.88 -00:11:28.2
269.22632 58.15218 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea 1 0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:43:19.88 -00:11:28.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:43:19.88 -00:11:28.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 11 43 19.88 +00 11 28.2 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 13.76 12:21:30.81 -03:29:53.3
288.51597 58.53354 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja 0 0 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:21:30.81 -03:29:53.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:21:30.81 -03:29:53.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 12 21 30.81 -03 29 53.3 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 13.90 12:25:06.37 +02:25:54.2
287.49587 64.51141 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.238 Hypatia -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:25:06.37 +02:25:54.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:25:06.37 +02:25:54.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 12 25 06.37 +02 25 54.2 13.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 14.21 11:54:54.43 +00:51:02.0
273.28351 60.42663 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -0 0 0 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:54.43 +00:51:02.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:54.43 +00:51:02.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 11 54 54.43 +00 51 02.0 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2060 2461205.7060 14.66 11:59:40.98 -02:43:07.5
278.22548 57.64903 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.109 Felicitas -1 -1 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:40.98 -02:43:07.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:40.98 -02:43:07.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2060* 11 59 40.98 -02 43 07.5 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7060,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2060 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461205.70624830 14.06.2026 04:56:49.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5437
Objects passed selection criteria: 5429
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4664.75
Average stars matched: 4590.75 (98.4136 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:03:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461205.70624830 14.06.2026 04:56:49.853 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 141
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29413
Objects passed selection criteria: 29329
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27283.5
Average stars matched: 26455.5 (96.9652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:04:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.70582676
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0144 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V8e5gqiPch
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.krrdhe7o3B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6YxprTYOy0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HF9dIt6BTA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3118 out of 3206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3206 out of 5500 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V8e5gqiPch (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5769
Got 5769 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=240 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.krrdhe7o3B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5500
Got 5500 stars (including 5152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=242 n_q2=228 n_q3=245 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6YxprTYOy0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=231, passed=3738
Got 3738 stars (including 3500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3738 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=239 n_q2=233 n_q3=244 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HF9dIt6BTA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=229, passed=3795
Got 3795 stars (including 3555 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=249 n_q2=226 n_q3=249 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new1=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new2=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.034
reference average sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6328 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20209_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 20209_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 20258_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:56:45.92 +00:18:49.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0144 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.208 -01:59:46.84
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.483 -01:59:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wDyNTh8NC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dYxMDOqpSh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0kCsMX788O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gq1rDaZbYA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31480 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3710 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3069 out of 3283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3283 out of 31480 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.647700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.647700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31480 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3710 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3069 out of 3283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3283 out of 31480 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 29846 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1457 to 187.8899 deg, Dec -7.2611 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1457 to 187.8899 deg, Dec -7.2611 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3709 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3089 out of 3275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3275 out of 29846 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6wDyNTh8NC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1333, passed=31456
Got 31456 stars (including 30088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=239 n_q2=228 n_q3=251 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dYxMDOqpSh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1289, passed=29833
Got 29833 stars (including 28497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=242 n_q2=226 n_q3=252 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0kCsMX788O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=649, passed=24034
Got 24034 stars (including 23345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=245 n_q2=231 n_q3=243 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gq1rDaZbYA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=759, passed=24645
Got 24645 stars (including 23842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=255 n_q2=224 n_q3=248 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.007
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_000127_TTUQ1b1x1_286295_G63omW5T/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:06:11.26 +01:26:50.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:06:11.26 +01:26:50.6: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:11.26 +01:26:50.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0763 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:18:50.19 -01:03:35.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:01:06.66 +00:34:06.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.1: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:32:57.60 -02:53:05.2: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:18:50.19 -01:03:35.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:01:06.66 +00:34:06.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:37.07 -03:22:43.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2937 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:32:57.60 -02:53:05.2: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:14.51 -04:29:39.2: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:43:19.88 -00:11:28.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:57.60 -02:53:05.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6806 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:21:30.81 -03:29:53.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:14.51 -04:29:39.2: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:43:19.88 -00:11:28.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:14.51 -04:29:39.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8516 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:21:30.81 -03:29:53.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:25:06.37 +02:25:54.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:29:42.29 +00:19:24.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:06.20 -02:42:29.1: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:32:31.62 -06:30:50.5: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:25:06.37 +02:25:54.2: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:29:42.29 +00:19:24.2: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:42.29 +00:19:24.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1202 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:54.43 +00:51:02.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:06.20 -02:42:29.1: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:32:31.62 -06:30:50.5: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:06.20 -02:42:29.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2567 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:31.62 -06:30:50.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1726 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:47:28.63 +01:20:16.9: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:54.43 +00:51:02.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:47:28.63 +01:20:16.9: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:47:28.63 +01:20:16.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2664 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:38:57.60 +02:30:53.4: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:38:57.60 +02:30:53.4: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:57.60 +02:30:53.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3833 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:29:29.37 -02:04:56.6: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:29:29.37 -02:04:56.6: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:29.37 -02:04:56.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5368 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:15.85 +01:48:50.7: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:31:50.94 +00:10:04.7: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:31:53.73 -04:43:06.1: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:15.85 +01:48:50.7: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:15.85 +01:48:50.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5953 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:31:50.94 +00:10:04.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:50.94 +00:10:04.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5210 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:31:53.73 -04:43:06.1: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:53.73 -04:43:06.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3376 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:36:29.90 +02:40:23.5: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:12:19.06 +02:28:19.0: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:36:29.90 +02:40:23.5: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:29.90 +02:40:23.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5364 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:12:19.06 +02:28:19.0: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:19.06 +02:28:19.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7462 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:40.98 -02:43:07.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:40.98 -02:43:07.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:17.93 -00:28:54.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:17.93 -00:28:54.0: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:17.93 -00:28:54.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4460 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:30.21 +02:10:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:49.66 -05:51:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.85 +02:04:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:21.17 +01:09:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51738_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51738_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51775_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51775_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51795_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51795_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:45.91 +00:18:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51829_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51829_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51849_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51849_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.10 -05:38:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51860_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51865_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51865_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51870_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51870_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51880_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51880_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51907_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51907_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51915_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51915_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51919_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51919_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51922_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51922_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52011_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52011_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52032_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52032_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52037_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52037_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52044_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52053_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52053_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:50.15 -02:14:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52060_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52060_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52074_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52074_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:13.58 -05:22:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52086_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52103_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52118_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52122_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52122_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52128_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52128_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52158_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52158_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52166_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:58.17 -06:00:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52192_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52207_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52207_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52210_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52223_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52225_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52225_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:42.99 +02:07:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52248_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.70 -05:22:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52252_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52265_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:50.24 -04:54:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52268_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52272_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52272_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:22.57 +01:44:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52273_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52274_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52274_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:22.77 -05:40:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52281_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52290_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52321_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52321_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52341_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52346_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52347_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52357_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52359_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52385_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52389_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52394_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:44.18 +02:19:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52396_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52397_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52400_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52409_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52409_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52415_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52422_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52433_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52436_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52437_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52437_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52448_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52449_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52450_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52460_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52466_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52475_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52486_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52506_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52514_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52515_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52520_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52532_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52533_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52547_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52553_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52566_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52578_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52581_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52585_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52594_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52595_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52601_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52609_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52614_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52615_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52617_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52626_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52632_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52639_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52648_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52656_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52663_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52664_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52672_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52682_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52691_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52700_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52705_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52715_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52718_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52719_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52756_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52764_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52768_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52776_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50062_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 50062_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:30.16 -06:02:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50058_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 50058_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:41.69 -06:23:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50057_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 50057_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:28.50 -06:16:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50034_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 50034_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23379_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 23379_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-56-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
