This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.09 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9
180.36145 42.05570 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.23 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2
179.23355 54.18395 galactic LMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.93 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5
178.05731 46.83672 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 31 24.64 +42 53 57.5 13.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.44 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9
176.18879 54.01108 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 10 11 09.92 +42 59 07.9 14.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.50 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2
175.95897 41.72684 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.62 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8
173.93740 52.84289 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 10 06 35.35 +44 33 38.8 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.77 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0
179.43945 44.59657 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 18 59.79 +42 03 23.0 13.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.66 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7
176.85642 43.73515 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.79 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5
180.66354 45.12540 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 13.79 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3
170.71608 42.22179 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 07 47.54 +48 31 39.3 13.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.29 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7
167.71644 45.50488 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 29 43.41 +50 10 18.7 14.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.31 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3
167.77079 47.47250 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 41 35.41 +49 41 43.3 14.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.54 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8
165.79143 50.44684 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 10 01 35.91 +50 05 10.8 14.5 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.22 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0
176.09842 46.55478 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 30 32.58 +44 15 47.0 14.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2025 2461205.7025 14.59 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6
174.64440 50.81908 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: M1 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2025* 09 54 57.85 +44 34 30.6 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7025,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2025 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last image: 2461205.70273051 14.06.2026 04:51:45.916 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7924
Objects passed selection criteria: 7880
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5538.25
Average stars matched: 5381.25 (97.1652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 23:59:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last image: 2461205.70273051 14.06.2026 04:51:45.916 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 165
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41730
Objects passed selection criteria: 41607
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31416.5
Average stars matched: 30301.5 (96.4509 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:00:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.70232995
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00140 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00140 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7T3PhgKluq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RYpQ4rrhlR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MAaQOnhxX3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UY2TQ8SiOy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
14.7 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7T3PhgKluq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RYpQ4rrhlR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=208 n_q2=265 n_q3=262 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MAaQOnhxX3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=179, passed=3014
Got 3014 stars (including 2831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=371 n_q2=167 n_q3=349 n_q4=84 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UY2TQ8SiOy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=160, passed=2891
Got 2891 stars (including 2727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=373 n_q2=152 n_q3=358 n_q4=86 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.348
reference average sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0244 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:06.126 +46:01:15.19
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:06.305 +46:01:19.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00140 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00140 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kBV2BIf26
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bYlPCEa44G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P0ygvanLpW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.86F6XOUheN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 145 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
14.6 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4kBV2BIf26 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=208 n_q2=259 n_q3=261 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bYlPCEa44G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P0ygvanLpW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=651, passed=19866
Got 19866 stars (including 19185 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=368 n_q2=168 n_q3=349 n_q4=84 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.86F6XOUheN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=455, passed=19239
Got 19239 stars (including 18755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=374 n_q2=150 n_q3=357 n_q4=87 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_235720_TTUQ1b1x1_125371_ftECu9d1/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:45:38.76 +45:58:43.7: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:12:39.34 +46:44:11.9: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:06.85 +42:15:42.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:45:38.76 +45:58:43.7: 13.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:06.85 +42:15:42.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:38.76 +45:58:43.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7002 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:06.85 +42:15:42.7: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0673 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:12:39.34 +46:44:11.9: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:12:39.34 +46:44:11.9: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9640 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:52:47.36 +46:57:10.3: 12.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:53:43.60 +43:28:50.5: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:52:47.36 +46:57:10.3: 12.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:52:47.36 +46:57:10.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0144 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:57:53.48 +45:29:26.9: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:56:47.18 +48:47:31.1: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:09:54.56 +50:08:34.2: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:53:43.60 +43:28:50.5: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:43.60 +43:28:50.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2318 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:57:53.48 +45:29:26.9: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:53.48 +45:29:26.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5640 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:56:47.18 +48:47:31.1: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:28.5: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:09:54.56 +50:08:34.2: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:56:47.18 +48:47:31.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6107 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:54.56 +50:08:34.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8126 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:14:41.52 +45:47:34.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:28.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:29.07 +41:45:28.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7624 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:14:41.52 +45:47:34.6: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:41.52 +45:47:34.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8789 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:05:22.34 +41:23:23.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:10:09.13 +41:12:06.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:31:24.64 +42:53:57.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:11:09.92 +42:59:07.9: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:03:33.88 +44:40:00.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:06:35.35 +44:33:38.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:18:59.79 +42:03:23.0: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:14:39.48 +43:56:21.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:21:42.95 +41:10:35.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:07:47.54 +48:31:39.3: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:29:43.41 +50:10:18.7: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:41:35.41 +49:41:43.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:01:35.91 +50:05:10.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:30:32.58 +44:15:47.0: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:33:42.94 +47:30:49.7: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:54:57.85 +44:34:30.6: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:33:42.94 +47:30:49.7: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:42.94 +47:30:49.7: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2760 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54123.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54124.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54191.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54222.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54230.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54237.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54275.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 52861_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 52864_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 52908_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 52982_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53007_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:52.39 +46:46:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53025_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53031_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53042_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53042_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53049_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53055_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53075_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53102_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53109_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53109_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53125_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53125_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53179_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53195_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53195_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53220_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53232_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53232_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:07.18 +50:00:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53266_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53269_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53296_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53306_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53344_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53361_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53381_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53385_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53385_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53404_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53430_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53432_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53434_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53448_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53448_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53450_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53463_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53466_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53475_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:43.26 +50:35:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53481_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53498_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:53.80 +45:37:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53527_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53527_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53537_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53544_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53552_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53564_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53567_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53568_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53570_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53598_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53598_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53602_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53609_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53614_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53618_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53625_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53635_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53643_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53651_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53662_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53665_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53665_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53670_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53670_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:57.56 +43:14:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53682_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53682_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53692_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53714_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53727_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53743_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53743_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53759_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53761_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53776_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53782_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53803_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 53832_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53833_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53842_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53844_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53844_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53847_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53856_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53872_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53872_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53873_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53876_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53876_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53891_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53891_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53901_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53904_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53906_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53911_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:56.39 +45:51:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53912_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53915_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53915_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53938_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53944_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53944_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53945_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53948_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54003_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54029_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54041_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54041_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54055_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54056_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54074_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54086_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54086_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54109_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54111_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54114_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54115_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54121_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54122_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54123_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54124_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54124_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54133_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54136_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54136_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54144_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54147_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54147_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54148_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54148_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54152_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54156_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54156_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54159_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54159_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54166_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54166_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54183_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54188_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54188_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54191_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54191_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54192_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54193_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54193_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54211_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54211_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54215_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54217_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54221_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54222_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54222_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54230_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54230_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54237_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54237_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54239_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54243_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54247_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54250_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54250_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54252_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54254_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54259_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54259_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54263_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54263_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54275_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54275_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54276_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54276_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54278_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54278_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54285_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54285_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54291_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54291_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54293_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54293_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-51-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
