This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 12.88 16:13:53.52 -04:24:10.0
8.08638 31.87508 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 0 -1 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:53.52 -04:24:10.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:53.52 -04:24:10.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8324,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3324 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 13.53 16:22:02.13 -01:31:18.5
12.23802 31.84663 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid -0 1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:02.13 -01:31:18.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:02.13 -01:31:18.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3323* 16 22 02.13 -01 31 18.5 13.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8324,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3324 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 13.75 16:20:24.56 -03:26:11.7
10.11294 31.10717 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -0 1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:24.56 -03:26:11.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:24.56 -03:26:11.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3323* 16 20 24.56 -03 26 11.7 13.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8324,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3324 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 14.80 16:26:09.11 -02:54:54.6
11.55320 30.21736 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1428 Mombasa 1 1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:09.11 -02:54:54.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:09.11 -02:54:54.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8324,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3324 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 12.44 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9
10.39538 29.54856 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0701 Oph
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.300 pg 16.000 pg 2438170.00000 148.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0701 Oph,2461203.8324,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0701 Oph 20260612.3324 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3324 2461203.8324 11.98 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9
13.71901 30.72915 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V2618 Oph
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 V 13.500 V 2452140.30000 129.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2618 Oph,2461203.8324,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2618 Oph 20260612.3324 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461203.83260672 12.06.2026 07:58:47.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9709
Objects passed selection criteria: 9707
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8821.25
Average stars matched: 8479.75 (96.1287 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 03:17:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461203.83260672 12.06.2026 07:58:47.221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 62 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59195
Objects passed selection criteria: 59081
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54446.8
Average stars matched: 52508.8 (96.4406 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157468 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 03:20:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.83210425
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0502 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01270 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r4au5oHfGh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2rRZ8gzjjE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MISeeNHVHr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W3MTUkszpZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 5101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4301 out of 4502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4502 out of 9216 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r4au5oHfGh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=9303
Got 9303 stars (including 8762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=303 n_q2=239 n_q3=203 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2rRZ8gzjjE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=594, passed=9216
Got 9216 stars (including 8610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=305 n_q2=238 n_q3=206 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MISeeNHVHr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=9140
Got 9140 stars (including 8742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=329 n_q2=236 n_q3=227 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W3MTUkszpZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=351, passed=7864
Got 7864 stars (including 7508 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7864 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=382 n_q2=226 n_q3=259 n_q4=99 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.357
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.393
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.118
reference average sigma_overall=0.4615 worst_q_ratio=1.375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:28.63 +00:38:09.7: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:24.06 +02:22:58.1: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:54.79 -06:29:37.6: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:32.95 -01:04:28.8: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:29:18.66 +01:57:34.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:23:04.75 -01:26:18.7: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:24.06 +02:22:58.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:32.95 -01:04:28.8: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:54.79 -06:29:37.6: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:24.06 +02:22:58.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2993 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:32.95 -01:04:28.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9761 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:54.79 -06:29:37.6: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3075 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:28.63 +00:38:09.7: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:28.63 +00:38:09.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1639 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:29:18.66 +01:57:34.3: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:18.66 +01:57:34.3: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2739 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:23:04.75 -01:26:18.7: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:04.75 -01:26:18.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2166 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20634_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.17 +01:57:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20685_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20685_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.28 -06:11:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20697_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20736_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20741_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20741_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20757_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20759_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20759_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:20.72 +01:55:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 20762_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.04 -05:08:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.12 +02:10:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0565 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0502 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:14.407 -01:56:54.28
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.844 -01:57:34.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01270 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nu2Qr96LyX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RjTYnuPLbp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ThUWB8FuHb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PpuBL99YJ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.505400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.505400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 59865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to +3.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to 3.2660 deg
Loaded 5107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4056 out of 4537 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4537 out of 59865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nu2Qr96LyX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3582, passed=62840
Got 62840 stars (including 59191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=305 n_q2=240 n_q3=206 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RjTYnuPLbp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3984, passed=59855
Got 59855 stars (including 55797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=315 n_q2=230 n_q3=221 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.413
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ThUWB8FuHb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2329, passed=50896
Got 50896 stars (including 48508 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=334 n_q2=236 n_q3=224 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PpuBL99YJ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2130, passed=45735
Got 45735 stars (including 43542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45735 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=369 n_q2=233 n_q3=264 n_q4=100 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_031454_TTUQ1b1x1_736666_NA3F40bq/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:00:57.44 +02:22:27.6: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:41:41.87 -03:02:57.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:44:20.88 +00:53:27.4: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:31:26.60 -03:25:39.1: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:03.38 +00:30:58.1: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:03.88 +02:26:30.9: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:01:04.19 +00:35:55.0: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:58:14.67 +01:53:01.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:41:41.87 -03:02:57.6: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:00:57.44 +02:22:27.6: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:03.38 +00:30:58.1: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:41.87 -03:02:57.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9576 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:57.44 +02:22:27.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1653 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:03.38 +00:30:58.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2144 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:31:26.60 -03:25:39.1: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:03.88 +02:26:30.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:26.60 -03:25:39.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6724 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:03.88 +02:26:30.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2096 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:44:20.88 +00:53:27.4: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:20.88 +00:53:27.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8846 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:01:04.19 +00:35:55.0: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:53.52 -04:24:10.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:58:14.67 +01:53:01.3: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:04.19 +00:35:55.0: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7899 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:14.67 +01:53:01.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6860 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:53.52 -04:24:10.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:47.71 -00:33:22.5: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:41.52 +00:00:02.4: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:43.21 -00:04:22.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:48:25.50 +01:28:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:02.13 -01:31:18.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:24.56 -03:26:11.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:47.71 -00:33:22.5: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:47.71 -00:33:22.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1960 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:41.52 +00:00:02.4: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:41.52 +00:00:02.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7508 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:43.21 -00:04:22.8: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:48:25.50 +01:28:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:25.50 +01:28:30.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:43.21 -00:04:22.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5573 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:02.13 -01:31:18.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:09.67 +02:25:17.7: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:37:37.46 +01:33:40.1: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:00.99 +02:53:59.3: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:24.56 -03:26:11.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:37:37.46 +01:33:40.1: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:37.46 +01:33:40.1: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0136 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:09.67 +02:25:17.7: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:00.99 +02:53:59.3: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:09.67 +02:25:17.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8758 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.99 +02:53:59.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9682 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:48:27.49 +00:21:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:45:34.22 +00:03:49.9: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:54:00.01 +03:13:11.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:58:23.95 +01:29:45.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:48:27.49 +00:21:26.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:27.49 +00:21:26.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:54:00.01 +03:13:11.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:00.01 +03:13:11.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:58:23.95 +01:29:45.4: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:23.95 +01:29:45.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9682 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:49:33.51 +02:08:39.6: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:45:34.22 +00:03:49.9: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:46:23.68 -06:49:22.4: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.22 +00:03:49.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1012 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:33.86 -02:04:57.7: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:46:23.68 -06:49:22.4: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:23.68 -06:49:22.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1961 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:49:33.51 +02:08:39.6: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:33.51 +02:08:39.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1607 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:33:19.30 +01:29:22.6: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:33.86 -02:04:57.7: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:33.86 -02:04:57.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2433 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:50:59.51 +02:40:27.8: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:17.62 -01:56:57.3: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:33:19.30 +01:29:22.6: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:19.30 +01:29:22.6: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2720 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:50:59.51 +02:40:27.8: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:59.51 +02:40:27.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2282 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:51:36.12 +03:10:44.9: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:24.88 +02:14:32.4: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:55:14.23 +01:51:47.3: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:17.62 -01:56:57.3: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:17.62 -01:56:57.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4154 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:51:36.12 +03:10:44.9: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:36.12 +03:10:44.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2109 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:24.88 +02:14:32.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.88 +02:14:32.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3944 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:55:14.23 +01:51:47.3: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:04.88 +02:25:39.7: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:14.23 +01:51:47.3: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3743 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:04.88 +02:25:39.7: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:26.36 -06:56:25.2: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:04.88 +02:25:39.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5647 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:01.77 +03:04:27.6: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:26.36 -06:56:25.2: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:26.36 -06:56:25.2: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3345 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:56:17.62 +02:44:04.4: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:01.77 +03:04:27.6: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:56:07.24 +02:04:22.5: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:01.77 +03:04:27.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3679 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:46:55.50 -05:37:25.1: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:44:58.89 +00:49:29.3: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:56:07.24 +02:04:22.5: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:32:46.56 -00:51:37.1: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:56:17.62 +02:44:04.4: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:46:55.50 -05:37:25.1: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:07.24 +02:04:22.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3743 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:55.50 -05:37:25.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5692 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:17.62 +02:44:04.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5424 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:44:58.89 +00:49:29.3: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:58.89 +00:49:29.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5844 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:32:46.56 -00:51:37.1: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:46.56 -00:51:37.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7128 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:55:42.54 +02:22:03.4: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:53:43.07 +02:43:12.8: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:55:42.54 +02:22:03.4: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:42.54 +02:22:03.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6496 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:13.25 -02:38:39.1: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:53:43.07 +02:43:12.8: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:43.07 +02:43:12.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5230 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:45:00.06 +01:08:20.7: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:56.04 +01:51:56.0: 14.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:08.50 +02:03:37.2: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:38.19 +00:18:55.4: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:13.25 -02:38:39.1: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:13.25 -02:38:39.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5630 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:56.04 +01:51:56.0: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:56.04 +01:51:56.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6442 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:45:00.06 +01:08:20.7: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:00.06 +01:08:20.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7993 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:55.28 -01:53:09.0: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:08.50 +02:03:37.2: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:08.50 +02:03:37.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5428 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:38.19 +00:18:55.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:53:48.70 +02:37:00.5: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:38.19 +00:18:55.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6653 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:55.28 -01:53:09.0: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:55.28 -01:53:09.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7912 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:53:15.35 +02:37:55.4: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:53:48.70 +02:37:00.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.70 +02:37:00.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3414 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:52.13 +01:24:15.0: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:06.01 +02:07:19.5: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:52.13 +01:24:15.0: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:52.13 +01:24:15.0: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5598 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:06.01 +02:07:19.5: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:50.00 -03:02:54.8: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:06.01 +02:07:19.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5177 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:53:15.35 +02:37:55.4: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:15.35 +02:37:55.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5402 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:56:03.55 +02:44:10.8: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:15:06.45 +02:55:45.0: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:50.00 -03:02:54.8: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:50.00 -03:02:54.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7200 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:45:59.32 +02:06:32.2: 15.29 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:55:11.57 +02:27:33.2: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:56:03.55 +02:44:10.8: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:15:06.45 +02:55:45.0: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:03.55 +02:44:10.8: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7269 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:06.45 +02:55:45.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7933 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:45:59.32 +02:06:32.2: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:55:11.57 +02:27:33.2: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:59.32 +02:06:32.2: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7107 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:11.57 +02:27:33.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5129 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:27.19 +00:50:14.9: 15.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:28.08 +03:04:55.2: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:15.51 +02:36:23.5: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:01:00.84 +02:30:59.1: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:27.19 +00:50:14.9: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:27.19 +00:50:14.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6617 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:56:35.04 +01:06:50.1: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:28.08 +03:04:55.2: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:28.08 +03:04:55.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8080 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:19:26.20 -02:56:33.4: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:01:00.84 +02:30:59.1: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:15.51 +02:36:23.5: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:00.84 +02:30:59.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4970 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:53.81 -05:29:37.1: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:15.51 +02:36:23.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7442 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:06:06.90 +01:57:02.0: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:56:35.04 +01:06:50.1: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:35.04 +01:06:50.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5312 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:09.11 -02:54:54.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:19:26.20 -02:56:33.4: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:26.20 -02:56:33.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8104 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:53.81 -05:29:37.1: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:53.81 -05:29:37.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8112 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:06:06.90 +01:57:02.0: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:09.11 -02:54:54.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:06.90 +01:57:02.0: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7393 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:26:06.39 -04:07:16.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4352 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:28:32.96 -01:04:28.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9797 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78440.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77567_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77567_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77573_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77579_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77579_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77582_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77582_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:11.93 +02:15:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77587_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77587_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77961_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 77961_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78054_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78054_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:27.55 +00:19:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78056_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 78056_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78072_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78072_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.45 +02:13:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78134_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78134_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78171_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78171_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78225_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78225_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78239_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78239_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78336_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 78336_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78359_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78359_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78440_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 78440_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78495_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78495_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:28.28 +01:22:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78505_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78505_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:07.69 +01:27:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78527_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78527_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78565_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78565_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78577_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78577_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78578_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78578_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78786_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78786_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78877_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78877_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78882_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78882_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78944_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78944_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78945_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78945_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78949_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78949_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79083_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79083_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79086_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79086_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79093_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79093_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79116_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79116_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79130_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79130_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79182_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79182_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79196_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79196_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79203_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79203_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79211_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79286_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79286_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79313_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79313_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79315_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79315_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79317_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79317_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79322_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79322_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79338_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79338_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79355_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79355_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79362_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79362_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79375_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79375_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79376_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79376_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79382_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79382_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79394_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79394_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79421_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79421_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79439_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79439_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79445_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79453_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79453_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79455_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79455_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79464_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79464_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79477_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79477_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79499_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79499_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79531_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79531_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79542_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79542_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79550_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79550_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79557_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79557_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79562_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79562_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79563_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79563_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79590_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 79590_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 79609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.04 -05:08:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.12 +02:10:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
Preparing report for the candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73051_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 73051_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:31.52 +02:58:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72964_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 72964_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:10.14 +01:55:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.28 -06:11:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03898_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131
The candidate 03898_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-58-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0131 did not pass the final checks