This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 11.40 15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8
338.67214 30.99453 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 0 1 1 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 13.08 14:53:41.29 -12:51:01.0
343.41740 40.22117 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard 0 2 2 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:53:41.29 -12:51:01.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:53:41.29 -12:51:01.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 13.26 15:32:49.40 -13:20:52.5
352.13853 33.69049 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 1 1 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:32:49.40 -13:20:52.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:32:49.40 -13:20:52.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 13.36 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0
333.06052 35.21431 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 0 4 4 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0: 15.17 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 13.66 15:08:09.47 -15:58:19.1
344.56838 35.61758 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 1 1 2 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:08:09.47 -15:58:19.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:08:09.47 -15:58:19.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3099 2461203.8099 13.71 15:31:03.40 -22:31:59.5
344.67058 27.12023 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.3" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1204 Renzia 4 -0 4 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:31:03.40 -22:31:59.5: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:31:03.40 -22:31:59.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8099,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3099 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461203.81017080 12.06.2026 07:26:28.757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8209
Objects passed selection criteria: 8205
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7723.5
Average stars matched: 7505.5 (97.1774 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 02:43:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461203.81017080 12.06.2026 07:26:28.757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49363
Objects passed selection criteria: 49282
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46142
Average stars matched: 43928 (95.2018 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150120 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 02:46:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.80953278
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 930.5'x627.0' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.83"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:33.372 -17:58:14.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:33.372 -17:58:14.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0684 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0563 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:33.372 -17:58:14.90
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01249 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8772PAXhQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLYHiqAqnc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.39apOCCFhv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kYI1yWOsLh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Loaded 6114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4966 out of 5104 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5104 out of 8227 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
3.3 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
3.3 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8772PAXhQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=8201
Got 8201 stars (including 7705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.711 n_q1=244 n_q2=224 n_q3=262 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.555
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JLYHiqAqnc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=8227
Got 8227 stars (including 7762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=216 n_q2=289 n_q3=194 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.471
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.39apOCCFhv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=7335
Got 7335 stars (including 7024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 930.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 930.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012924 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010339 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 616 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.08"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 648 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.95"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 648 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 648 stars left (next iteration limit 677)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=648 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.037 sigma_q2_arcsec=9.195 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=13.413 n_q1=262 n_q2=68 n_q3=279 n_q4=39 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.953
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kYI1yWOsLh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, passed=7300
Got 7300 stars (including 6997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=263 n_q2=217 n_q3=275 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.555
ref2=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.471
new1=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits sigma_overall=3.393 worst_q_ratio=3.953
new2=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.217
reference average sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.513
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits) flagged: sigma=3.393 (ref avg 0.484), ratio=3.953 (ref avg 1.513), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6278 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1276343.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1276343.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 21.3534 (1.87779e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.651,-17.987), pixel scale 5.94203 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+-----+-+-------+-----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1276343.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1276343.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.662161, -17.986636) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:38.919, -17:59:11.891).
Field size: 15.6987 x 10.6182 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 02:45 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 02:45 out1276343.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1276343.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1276343.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (226.661,-17.9874)
log-odds ratio 21.3534 (1.87779e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.651,-17.987), pixel scale 5.94203 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+-----+-+-------+-----+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1276343.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1276343.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.662161, -17.986636) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:38.919, -17:59:11.891).
Field size: 15.6987 x 10.6182 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.556 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 02:45 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 02:45 out1276343.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 31403 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5593, 952.793] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 56.0135 (2.12008e+24), 15 match, 0 conflict, 109 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------------+------+-----+-+-----+-+-------+-------+-+-------------------------------------+-
--> log-odds 56.0135
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 197.308 (4.89757e+85), 36 match, 0 conflict, 157 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----------------++------+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+--+----+-+---+-+-----+---------+-----+---+-----+-
--> log-odds 197.308
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 405.15 (9.00423e+175), 67 match, 0 conflict, 151 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+--+--+-+--+----+-+---+-+-----+-------+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 405.15
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 676.305 (5.19398e+293), 129 match, 0 conflict, 340 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+--+--+-+--+----+-+---+-+-+---+-------+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 676.305
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1016.36 (inf), 211 match, 0 conflict, 506 distractors, 739 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+-----+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 1016.36
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1728.29 (inf), 435 match, 0 conflict, 1226 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++-----++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+-----+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 1728.29
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5593, 952.793] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 56.0135 (2.12008e+24), 15 match, 0 conflict, 109 distractors, 43 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -------------------+------+-----+-+-----+-+-------+-------+-+-------------------------------------+-
--> log-odds 56.0135
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 197.308 (4.89757e+85), 36 match, 0 conflict, 157 distractors, 94 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----------------++------+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+--+----+-+---+-+-----+---------+-----+---+-----+-
--> log-odds 197.308
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 405.15 (9.00423e+175), 67 match, 0 conflict, 151 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+-----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+--+--+-+--+----+-+---+-+-----+-------+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 405.15
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 676.305 (5.19398e+293), 129 match, 0 conflict, 340 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+--+--+-+--+----+-+---+-+-+---+-------+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 676.305
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1016.36 (inf), 211 match, 0 conflict, 506 distractors, 739 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++----+++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+-----+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 1016.36
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1728.29 (inf), 435 match, 0 conflict, 1226 distractors, 1459 index.
RA,Dec = (226.663,-17.9859), pixel scale 5.96988 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--++-----++----+-++------++----+-+-+---+-+-----+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-
--> log-odds 1728.29
Got 12 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.635235, -17.967318) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:32.456, -17:58:02.344).
Field size: 15.7939 x 10.5794 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.306 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 943.6'x629.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:32.234 -17:58:05.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7335 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1347271.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=7335
Got 7335 stars (including 7024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.18"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 979)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.738 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.219 n_q1=246 n_q2=216 n_q3=259 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.871
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 1st new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits): sigma 3.393->1.738, ratio 3.953->0.871; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits with order-2 result
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.738 -- 3.59x the reference average (0.484); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.95 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:10:05.86 -16:28:33.2: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:13:58.28 -13:58:52.1: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:13:58.28 -13:58:52.1: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:10:05.86 -16:28:33.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:58.28 -13:58:52.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9298 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:05.86 -16:28:33.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0234 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20653.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 20520_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:32.93 -14:13:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20627_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 20627_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.69 -21:10:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20653_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 20653_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 20668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.22 -20:19:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20743_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 20743_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20754_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 20754_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:47.88 -16:09:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.32 -17:39:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:02:49.41 -22:36:28.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 943.6'x629.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:32.234 -17:58:05.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:32.234 -17:58:05.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0732 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0563 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:32.234 -17:58:05.14
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:35.676 -17:58:45.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.amt2reHBLq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RwHeg8l8Rn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vTDq6CkVk3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CUB7lw6yrS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1726 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6592 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1726 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6592 deg
Loaded 6151 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5327 out of 52458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.611100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.611100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1726 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6592 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1726 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6592 deg
Loaded 6151 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5327 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5327 out of 52458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 53049 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2144 to 235.1499 deg, Dec -23.2704 to -12.6272 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2144 to 235.1499 deg, Dec -23.2704 to -12.6272 deg
Loaded 6147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4908 out of 5338 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5338 out of 53049 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.amt2reHBLq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2753, passed=52452
Got 52452 stars (including 49617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.748 n_q1=250 n_q2=218 n_q3=276 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.553
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RwHeg8l8Rn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2725, passed=53023
Got 53023 stars (including 50230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.790 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=221 n_q2=278 n_q3=200 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.549
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vTDq6CkVk3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1462, passed=40216
Got 40216 stars (including 38719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.11"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 975)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.789 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.448 n_q1=232 n_q2=215 n_q3=263 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.809
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CUB7lw6yrS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1476, passed=40158
Got 40158 stars (including 38637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=262 n_q2=212 n_q3=275 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-25-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_024049_TTUQ1b1x1_1058036_UzB8XmBh/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:22:39.92 -15:59:40.9: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:35.18 -14:56:48.1: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:53:41.29 -12:51:01.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:24:28.25 -19:56:37.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:37:56.11 -16:53:23.2: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:42:18.21 -14:02:18.0: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:22:39.92 -15:59:40.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:24:28.25 -19:56:37.4: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:39.92 -15:59:40.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6874 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:27:35.18 -14:56:48.1: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:28.25 -19:56:37.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0390 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:35.18 -14:56:48.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4598 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:19:18.95 -22:13:38.5: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:53:41.29 -12:51:01.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:37:56.11 -16:53:23.2: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:42:18.21 -14:02:18.0: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:56.11 -16:53:23.2: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2989 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:18.21 -14:02:18.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7664 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:56:38.60 -20:45:49.0: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:09:49.06 -21:44:55.9: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:19:18.95 -22:13:38.5: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:18.95 -22:13:38.5: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7422 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:32:49.40 -13:20:52.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:56:38.60 -20:45:49.0: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:38.60 -20:45:49.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1250 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:09:49.06 -21:44:55.9: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:49.06 -21:44:55.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2431 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:32:49.40 -13:20:52.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:13.93 -22:24:08.5: 13.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:17:22.95 -21:00:02.7: 14.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:29:54.91 -14:36:08.1: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:13.93 -22:24:08.5: 13.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:13.93 -22:24:08.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3301 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0: 15.17 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:36:01.22 -21:27:58.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.3533 delta=1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:33:01.27 -20:38:42.0: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:29:54.91 -14:36:08.1: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:54.91 -14:36:08.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6321 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:17:22.95 -21:00:02.7: 14.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:22.95 -21:00:02.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2932 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:33:01.27 -20:38:42.0: 14.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:01.27 -20:38:42.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5312 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:33:27.17 -21:56:34.3: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:33:42.99 -22:04:35.7: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:08:09.47 -15:58:19.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:31:03.40 -22:31:59.5: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:33:27.17 -21:56:34.3: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:33:42.99 -22:04:35.7: 14.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:42.99 -22:04:35.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7401 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:41.92 -22:20:24.2: 13.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:27.17 -21:56:34.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4361 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:08:09.47 -15:58:19.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:31:03.40 -22:31:59.5: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:04.53 -15:24:01.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:41.92 -22:20:24.2: 13.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:41.92 -22:20:24.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9491 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:36:07.79 -18:47:30.2: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:27:04.53 -15:24:01.0: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:04.53 -15:24:01.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2500 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:36:07.79 -18:47:30.2: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:07.79 -18:47:30.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1978 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:34:08.60 -15:54:41.7: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:04:09.50 -14:11:05.8: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:34:08.60 -15:54:41.7: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:35:38.27 -17:44:20.3: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:08.60 -15:54:41.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2951 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:22:42.48 -15:14:42.9: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:04:09.50 -14:11:05.8: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:09.50 -14:11:05.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3730 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:22:42.48 -15:14:42.9: 15.28 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:42.48 -15:14:42.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2520 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:35:38.27 -17:44:20.3: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:38.27 -17:44:20.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2427 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:04.00 -21:10:02.8: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:36:25.07 -22:00:21.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:10.90 -21:29:26.9: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:04.00 -21:10:02.8: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:36:25.07 -22:00:21.4: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:04.00 -21:10:02.8: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9198 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:25.07 -22:00:21.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5462 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:29.75 -22:00:51.2: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:10.90 -21:29:26.9: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:10.90 -21:29:26.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1938 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:29.75 -22:00:51.2: 10.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:29.75 -22:00:51.2: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0754 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:11.55 -22:10:55.0: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:36:29.15 -20:34:40.1: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:11.55 -22:10:55.0: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:36:29.15 -20:34:40.1: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:29.15 -20:34:40.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6114 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:11.55 -22:10:55.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5500 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:09.03 -20:28:38.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:49.65 -19:47:01.1: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:09.03 -20:28:38.9: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:09.03 -20:28:38.9: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2439 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:49.65 -19:47:01.1: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:49.65 -19:47:01.1: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8704 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:39:05.40 -21:57:18.7: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:35:43.79 -22:22:37.5: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:33:53.86 -21:08:29.0: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:37:11.81 -21:27:46.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:50.63 -21:12:31.9: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:35:43.79 -22:22:37.5: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:43.79 -22:22:37.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2445 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:39:05.40 -21:57:18.7: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:33:53.86 -21:08:29.0: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:05.40 -21:57:18.7: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7873 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:53.86 -21:08:29.0: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9481 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:37:11.81 -21:27:46.6: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:11.81 -21:27:46.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5095 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:50.63 -21:12:31.9: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:50.63 -21:12:31.9: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7543 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:36:17.34 -21:54:35.7: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:47.31 -19:47:46.0: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:34:25.25 -22:18:53.7: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:36:17.34 -21:54:35.7: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:47.31 -19:47:46.0: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:17.34 -21:54:35.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3521 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:47.31 -19:47:46.0: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9439 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:34:25.25 -22:18:53.7: 11.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:25.25 -22:18:53.7: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2617 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69976.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70087.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70408.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69417_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69417_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69421_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69421_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69423_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69423_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69557_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69557_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:49.42 -22:36:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69702_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69702_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69745_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69745_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69791_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69791_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 69957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:34.01 -18:55:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69976_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 69976_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70087_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 70087_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70090_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70090_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70151_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70151_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70216_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 70216_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70231_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70231_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70237_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70237_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70299_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70299_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70314_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70314_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70316_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70316_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.60 -14:30:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70336_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70336_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70339_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70339_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:34.03 -15:24:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70353_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70353_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70354_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70354_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70355_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70355_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70358_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70358_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70408_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 70408_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70487_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70487_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70536_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70536_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70537_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 70537_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70642_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70642_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70650_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70650_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70702_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70702_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70706_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70706_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70716_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70716_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70752_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70752_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:01.99 -20:49:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70755_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70755_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70760_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70760_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70809_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70809_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70844_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 70844_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40130_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40130_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40108_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40108_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 35341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 41462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40038_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40038_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 35150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:58.38 -22:15:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62566_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 62566_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:54.38 -17:10:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.24 -20:19:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 39515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39048_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 39048_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35829_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 35829_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:44:37.00 -19:32:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.30 -17:39:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.69 -21:10:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47267_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 47267_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50199_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 50199_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40879_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40879_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 39562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34570_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 34570_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42880_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 42880_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40548_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40548_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44155_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 44155_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43817_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 43817_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34687_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 34687_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40415_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 40415_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36503_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 36503_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34784_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 34784_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 39447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-26-28_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
