This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.20 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9
137.63625 61.82634 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.345+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 12 04 26.87 +53 56 23.9 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.01 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4
159.05267 58.79444 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Gaia DR3 832933285570899584
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.260 G 13.290 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 58 46.07 +49 41 01.4 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 832933285570899584,2461203.7991,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 832933285570899584 20260612.2991 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.04 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1
157.32570 56.54100 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 837177915851182080
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.730 G 12.810 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 50 37.63 +51 45 01.1 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 837177915851182080,2461203.7991,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 837177915851182080 20260612.2991 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.00 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2
160.59029 58.89618 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 832699914227826048
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.360 G 13.390 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 56 28.99 +48 58 24.2 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 832699914227826048,2461203.7991,13.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 832699914227826048 20260612.2991 13.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 12.97 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0
157.76901 60.72462 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.411+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 11 10 35.30 +49 01 18.0 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.04 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2
159.70370 59.05095 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.346+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 58 50.99 +49 15 40.2 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.01 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5
156.60746 59.95329 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.441+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 11 09 10.75 +49 57 21.5 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.02 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9
159.24457 57.76558 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: M0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.679+/-0.035 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 53 10.88 +50 11 39.9 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 12.72 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9
161.50617 58.15461 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: M3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.379+/-0.035 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 51 06.36 +48 58 43.9 12.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.17 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7
159.90342 56.60980 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.397+/-0.035 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 45 54.36 +50 32 12.7 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.10 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6
155.57503 59.16706 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.360+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 11 07 31.74 +50 51 46.6 13.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.15 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2
159.81914 58.98254 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F6 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.343+/-0.035 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 58 17.84 +49 15 07.2 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 12.66 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0
160.18181 59.12749 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.427+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 58 22.27 +49 00 58.0 12.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 12.94 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8
157.94779 60.66840 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.616+/-0.029 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 11 09 59.16 +48 59 20.8 12.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.09 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2
160.06926 59.26871 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G7 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 10 59 16.70 +48 58 57.2 13.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2991 2461203.7991 13.10 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4
157.74314 60.74830 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.356+/-0.040 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2991* 11 10 44.94 +49 00 59.4 13.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7991,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2991 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last image: 2461203.79928867 12.06.2026 07:10:48.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6720
Objects passed selection criteria: 6698
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4914.25
Average stars matched: 4755.5 (96.7696 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 07:03:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461083.81439950 12.02.2026 07:32:34.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last image: 2461203.79928867 12.06.2026 07:10:48.541 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33605
Objects passed selection criteria: 33513
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25576
Average stars matched: 24721.8 (96.66 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 07:05:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.79888427
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00200 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uB1uzV6xCW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nXvqmGqmHD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XyhsVU8Zn9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.48yO3f6i0y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4177 deg
Loaded 5290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3503 out of 3676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3676 out of 6848 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.936100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.936100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7564 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4177 deg
Loaded 5290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3503 out of 3676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3676 out of 6848 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0172 to 183.7788 deg, Dec +47.6710 to +59.4178 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0172 to 183.7788 deg, Dec 47.6710 to 59.4178 deg
Loaded 5256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3492 out of 3674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 6962 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.3 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
13.8 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uB1uzV6xCW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, passed=6848
Got 6848 stars (including 6376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=246 n_q2=230 n_q3=257 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nXvqmGqmHD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=6962
Got 6962 stars (including 6476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=256 n_q2=233 n_q3=249 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XyhsVU8Zn9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=154, passed=3043
Got 3043 stars (including 2886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=263 n_q2=284 n_q3=170 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.48yO3f6i0y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=141, passed=2930
Got 2930 stars (including 2786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=255 n_q2=266 n_q3=169 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.252
ref2=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.139
new1=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.092
new2=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.124
reference average sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.1955
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 20400_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:08:09.08 +55:27:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0293 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:17:34.763 +53:59:49.75
Second-epoch image center 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:17:46.491 +53:59:28.39
Second-epoch second image center 11:17:45.925 +53:59:33.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00200 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cdTBSvidEC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hIEbMGQ02l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NRoeCwtuq0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wyBmRHx7sH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 35334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4343 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4343 deg
Loaded 5322 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3683 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3683 out of 35334 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 35334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec +47.5541 to +59.4343 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7655 deg, Dec 47.5541 to 59.4343 deg
Loaded 5322 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3363 out of 3683 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3683 out of 35334 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9051 to 183.7788 deg, Dec +47.5457 to +59.4324 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9051 to 183.7788 deg, Dec 47.5457 to 59.4324 deg
Loaded 5333 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3334 out of 3681 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3681 out of 34891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cdTBSvidEC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1452, passed=35315
Got 35315 stars (including 33791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=250 n_q2=228 n_q3=255 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hIEbMGQ02l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1579, passed=34870
Got 34870 stars (including 33236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34870 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=250 n_q2=232 n_q3=249 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NRoeCwtuq0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=396, passed=16652
Got 16652 stars (including 16227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16652 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=264 n_q2=278 n_q3=170 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wyBmRHx7sH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=322, passed=16170
Got 16170 stars (including 15816 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=253 n_q2=265 n_q3=169 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_022249_TTUQ1b1x1_1648771_ybObW9vq/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:26:29.32 +54:25:20.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:58:31.62 +54:28:57.1: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:26:29.32 +54:25:20.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:29.32 +54:25:20.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9442 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:58:31.62 +54:28:57.1: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:58:31.62 +54:28:57.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7904 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:58:46.07 +49:41:01.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0089 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:04:26.87 +53:56:23.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1707 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:50:37.63 +51:45:01.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0325 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:56:28.99 +48:58:24.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0026 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:10:35.30 +49:01:18.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9747 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:09:10.75 +49:57:21.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0103 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:53:10.88 +50:11:39.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0189 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:58:50.99 +49:15:40.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0266 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:52:14.30 +58:04:35.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:51:06.36 +48:58:43.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6652 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:52:14.30 +58:04:35.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:52:14.30 +58:04:35.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8351 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:45:54.36 +50:32:12.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1394 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:07:31.74 +50:51:46.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0730 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:58:17.84 +49:15:07.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1309 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:58:22.27 +49:00:58.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6635 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:09:59.16 +48:59:20.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9208 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-32-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:59:16.70 +48:58:57.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0927 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:10:44.94 +49:00:59.4: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0841 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01268.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02106.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02141.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02784.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04241.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 42s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 15s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52144_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52144_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52196_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52196_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52208_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52208_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52230_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52230_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52254_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52260_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52291_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52303_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52318_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52320_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52320_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52335_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52336_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52336_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52344_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52344_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52353_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52361_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52384_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52538_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:15.60 +51:30:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52545_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:08:30.94 +57:02:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52647_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:46.03 +49:26:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52704_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:34.77 +58:03:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52733_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:24.40 +51:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52738_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52789_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52851_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:33:52.61 +53:29:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52858_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52868_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:37.03 +57:04:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52907_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52930_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52957_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 52995_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:12:49.88 +54:54:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53038_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:14.86 +58:34:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53130_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53130_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53160_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 53237_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16804_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 16804_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04128_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 04128_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11396_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 11396_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02141_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 02141_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01327_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 01327_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02784_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 02784_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04241_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 04241_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06181_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 06181_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02578_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 02578_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50036_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 50036_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07929_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 07929_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16641_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 16641_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:09:24.05 +53:50:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07215_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 07215_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02812_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 02812_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02106_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 02106_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01268_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 01268_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17385_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 17385_fd_UMa-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-10-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
