This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2643 2461203.7643 11.65 16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3
4.00789 22.00401 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -1 -0 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.7643,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.2643 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2643 2461203.7643 12.19 16:53:30.99 -05:10:03.8
13.62972 23.27434 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX16" CSS 140629:165332-050956
Type: UG
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.100 CV < 23.000 r'
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -0 0 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:30.99 -05:10:03.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:30.99 -05:10:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS 140629:165332-050956,2461203.7643,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS 140629:165332-050956 20260612.2643 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2643 2461203.7643 12.85 16:56:51.08 -11:36:29.6
8.35191 19.03750 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha -1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:51.08 -11:36:29.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:51.08 -11:36:29.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.7643,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.2643 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2643 2461203.7643 13.54 16:47:50.81 -11:43:26.5
6.91400 20.78281 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -1 2 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:50.81 -11:43:26.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:50.81 -11:43:26.5: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.7643,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.2643 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.7643,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.2643 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461203.76452944 12.06.2026 06:20:45.344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6525
Objects passed selection criteria: 6512
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5776.25
Average stars matched: 5688.75 (98.4852 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 01:25:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461203.76452944 12.06.2026 06:20:45.344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61996
Objects passed selection criteria: 61919
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55216.2
Average stars matched: 53749.2 (97.3432 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 162596 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 01:28:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.76402830
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0888 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01184 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JM2ZP8NG0m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GwRbP3aCiG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ABfMC7lfx0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uAsU3WD4Xm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JM2ZP8NG0m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GwRbP3aCiG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ABfMC7lfx0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=216, passed=4399
Got 4399 stars (including 4179 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=212 n_q2=252 n_q3=291 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uAsU3WD4Xm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, passed=4894
Got 4894 stars (including 4638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=210 n_q2=300 n_q3=253 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.159
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.166
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:17.33 -05:50:32.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:17.33 -05:50:32.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:17.33 -05:50:32.8: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9308 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20240.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20090_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20090_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20146_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20146_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.10 -06:23:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.89 -04:55:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20240_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20240_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.49 -13:46:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20281_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20281_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:46.01 -11:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:37:16.84 -13:11:37.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0777 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0888 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:19.221 -09:59:43.38
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:16.709 -10:00:04.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01184 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aMzdIEWIQC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l4y3V6Q8E1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLB764YpFq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jsx09x0pKq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aMzdIEWIQC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420
Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l4y3V6Q8E1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998
Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gLB764YpFq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1391, passed=41537
Got 41537 stars (including 40090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.359 n_q1=210 n_q2=254 n_q3=293 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Jsx09x0pKq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1716, passed=46825
Got 46825 stars (including 45051 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=203 n_q2=300 n_q3=259 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_012252_TTUQ1b1x1_2117347_pspOG1KI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:54.41 -05:10:20.2: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:12:42.80 -06:40:04.5: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:14:39.81 -11:42:47.7: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:49:47.72 -06:04:55.7: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:11.22 -08:53:11.9: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:01.66 -14:36:26.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:30.71 -12:15:50.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:49:47.72 -06:04:55.7: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:11.22 -08:53:11.9: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:14:39.81 -11:42:47.7: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:12:42.80 -06:40:04.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:54.41 -05:10:20.2: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:11.22 -08:53:11.9: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1726 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:01.66 -14:36:26.6: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:47.72 -06:04:55.7: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2212 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:54.41 -05:10:20.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6390 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:39.81 -11:42:47.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9621 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:42.80 -06:40:04.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0971 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:01.66 -14:36:26.6: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5022 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:30.71 -12:15:50.0: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:30.71 -12:15:50.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7440 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:30.99 -05:10:03.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:51.08 -11:36:29.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:30.99 -05:10:03.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:51.08 -11:36:29.6: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:50.81 -11:43:26.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:52.47 -10:28:37.4: 14.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:50.81 -11:43:26.5: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:52.47 -10:28:37.4: 14.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.47 -10:28:37.4: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8515 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:06:33.60 -10:48:11.2: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:06:33.60 -10:48:11.2: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:06.25 -04:50:52.9: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:35.56 -08:44:35.5: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:33.60 -10:48:11.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8129 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:22.23 -05:51:26.6: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:12.05 -04:45:37.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:35.56 -08:44:35.5: 14.02 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:35.56 -08:44:35.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9844 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:22.23 -05:51:26.6: 14.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:06.25 -04:50:52.9: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:22.23 -05:51:26.6: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3955 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:06.25 -04:50:52.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4278 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:40:59.57 -07:12:58.4: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:12.05 -04:45:37.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:12.05 -04:45:37.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:59.57 -07:21:29.0: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:40:59.57 -07:12:58.4: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.57 -07:12:58.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4422 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:59.57 -07:21:29.0: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:59.57 -07:21:29.0: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1894 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:34.60 -08:12:37.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:25.77 -08:23:20.2: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:40:17.13 -06:36:37.3: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:41.67 -04:48:36.7: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:34.60 -08:12:37.5: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:25.77 -08:23:20.2: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:34.60 -08:12:37.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3586 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:25.77 -08:23:20.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3777 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:57.16 -05:27:17.9: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:40:17.13 -06:36:37.3: 14.55 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:17.13 -06:36:37.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6464 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:08.67 -07:06:08.3: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:41.67 -04:48:36.7: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:41.67 -04:48:36.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4728 delta=-0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:57.16 -05:27:17.9: 14.74 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:57.16 -05:27:17.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3605 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:08.67 -07:06:08.3: 15.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:08.67 -07:06:08.3: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4127 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:58.29 -05:46:32.2: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:39:35.46 -07:41:45.7: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:21.64 -07:16:14.4: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:58.29 -05:46:32.2: 14.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:40.64 -06:16:49.8: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:58.29 -05:46:32.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6681 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:39:35.46 -07:41:45.7: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:35.46 -07:41:45.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6332 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:21.64 -07:16:14.4: 15.07 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:21.64 -07:16:14.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5378 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:40.64 -06:16:49.8: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:40.64 -06:16:49.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4773 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:35.44 -06:25:29.3: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:49.50 -06:59:48.2: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:43.96 -05:14:09.2: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:10.81 -06:25:43.4: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:35.44 -06:25:29.3: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:35.44 -06:25:29.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7248 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:07.84 -08:05:46.8: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:49.50 -06:59:48.2: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:49.50 -06:59:48.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5281 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:49:08.04 -05:28:57.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:43.96 -05:14:09.2: 15.32 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:10.81 -06:25:43.4: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:43.96 -05:14:09.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6847 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:10.81 -06:25:43.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7054 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:07.84 -08:05:46.8: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:07.84 -08:05:46.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4710 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:49:08.04 -05:28:57.1: 15.03 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:08.04 -05:28:57.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6577 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:26.12 -07:53:34.1: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:39:27.21 -07:06:34.1: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:00.37 -05:25:02.0: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:26.12 -07:53:34.1: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:26.12 -07:53:34.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4352 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:59:50.67 -08:19:39.9: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:34.02 -08:18:46.0: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:39:27.21 -07:06:34.1: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:27.21 -07:06:34.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5753 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:00.37 -05:25:02.0: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:00.37 -05:25:02.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6828 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:28.73 -09:00:12.1: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:59:50.67 -08:19:39.9: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:50.67 -08:19:39.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6286 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:34.02 -08:18:46.0: 15.40 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:34.02 -08:18:46.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5791 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:14.1: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:28.73 -09:00:12.1: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:28.73 -09:00:12.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5438 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:10.8: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:14.1: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:16.81 -07:45:28.4: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:14.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7360 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:57:06.72 -07:01:34.0: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:10.8: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:10.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5515 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:57.38 -07:12:53.0: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:16.81 -07:45:28.4: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:16.81 -07:45:28.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5783 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:17.41 -08:15:53.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:57:06.72 -07:01:34.0: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:06.72 -07:01:34.0: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6118 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:15:29.89 -12:48:18.8: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:57.38 -07:12:53.0: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:57.38 -07:12:53.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6670 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:17.41 -08:15:53.6: 15.19 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:17.41 -08:15:53.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6683 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:18.31 -08:46:41.1: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:15:29.89 -12:48:18.8: 15.05 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:29.89 -12:48:18.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3858 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:55.65 -08:54:57.9: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:18.31 -08:46:41.1: 15.15 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:05:30.56 -07:22:20.0: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:36.96 -10:46:19.9: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:18.31 -08:46:41.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6060 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:55.65 -08:54:57.9: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:55.65 -08:54:57.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5545 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:05:30.56 -07:22:20.0: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:36.96 -10:46:19.9: 15.34 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:30.56 -07:22:20.0: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5525 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:36.96 -10:46:19.9: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6464 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85984.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85765_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85765_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85770_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85770_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85774_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85774_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:13.18 -10:37:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85776_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85776_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:27.68 -13:55:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85777_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85777_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.18 -13:06:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:04.18 -08:55:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:55.14 -14:12:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:37.06 -14:57:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85786_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85786_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85787_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85787_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85788_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85788_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:45.10 -05:17:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:52.86 -06:14:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85790_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85790_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:49.54 -12:12:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85820_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85820_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.09 -06:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85946_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 85946_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:16.85 -13:11:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85984_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 85984_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86043_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86043_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:50.09 -13:29:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86185_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86185_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:31.50 -14:34:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86234_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86234_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:43.54 -14:55:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86277_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86277_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:20.33 -08:32:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86281_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86281_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.68 -14:40:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 86298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86303_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86303_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.61 -06:07:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86340_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86340_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:56.69 -06:46:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.58 -08:52:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86370_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86370_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.70 -07:33:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.70 -09:15:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86398_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86398_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.30 -12:21:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86426_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86426_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.61 -08:58:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.77 -07:07:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86548_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86548_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:54.59 -14:01:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 86604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86669_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86669_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:29.45 -11:51:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86681_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 86681_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86697_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86697_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.78 -05:04:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86712_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86712_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.09 -05:56:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86728_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86728_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.07 -06:50:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86761_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86761_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86798_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86798_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.60 -14:03:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:54.41 -06:37:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86840_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86840_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.50 -07:46:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:46.47 -08:27:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86869_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86869_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:44.59 -12:43:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86892_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86892_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.85 -06:46:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86898_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86898_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:09.39 -05:39:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86918_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86918_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.28 -11:05:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86920_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.85 -14:39:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86987_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86987_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:21.17 -08:16:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86996_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 86996_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87031_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87031_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87053_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87053_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87073_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87073_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:19.55 -07:39:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87092_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87092_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87093_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87093_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87102_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87102_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87123_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87123_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:34.81 -05:15:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87125_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87125_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87136_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87136_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87143_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87143_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87154_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87154_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87155_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87155_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87170_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87170_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87178_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87178_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87180_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87180_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87183_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87183_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:55.06 -06:22:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87189_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87189_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:39.14 -08:12:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87190_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87190_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87195_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87195_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87201_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87201_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87216_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87216_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87219_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87219_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87220_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87220_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:18.94 -10:43:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87221_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87221_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87233_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87233_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87234_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87234_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87244_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87244_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87249_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87249_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.48 -09:41:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87258_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87258_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87295_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87295_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87301_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87301_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87312_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87312_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87322_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87322_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:24.90 -09:19:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87361_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87361_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87366_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87366_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87373_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 87373_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.53 -05:49:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.82 -08:33:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.65 -10:38:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.74 -11:28:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 52550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:49.61 -05:29:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.63 -14:16:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.90 -04:55:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.06 -14:09:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.52 -06:11:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.72 -14:35:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.18 -14:20:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.12 -12:40:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.69 -10:00:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.18 -09:20:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.51 -13:46:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_01-20-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks