Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153635-3350.4,2461203.7477,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153635-3350.4 20260612.2477 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Lup-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lup-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494332 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494332 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits

renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2929.6199
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 815.1864
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3309.4883
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 914.4249
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3357.6504
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 949.6185
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.12966
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.037
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:56:06.9360613' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:56:06.9360613' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2473025001 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:56:16.8391475' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2474171179 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 234.780670579118 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -34.0000156858621 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1530555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.105555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75306808410769 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 185.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits :)
Spent 0.547783 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:56:48.9669213' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:56:48.9669213' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2477889583 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:56:58.8680795' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2479035649 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 234.780670567072 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -34.000015681465 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1247222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.258333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75653664133407 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :)
Spent 0.531577 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits

fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.74741824
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tIhdJDvlFi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fMLwRti1dW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9jIk6A9Q99
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Flgi6uNV9z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tIhdJDvlFi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=257 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fMLwRti1dW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9jIk6A9Q99 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, passed=3482
Got 3482 stars (including 3300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.087 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.306 n_q1=379 n_q2=131 n_q3=257 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.706
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Flgi6uNV9z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, passed=3345
Got 3345 stars (including 3144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.676 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.096 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.292 n_q1=365 n_q2=118 n_q3=244 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.595
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.080
ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.765 worst_q_ratio=1.706
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.810 worst_q_ratio=1.595
reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.71 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.76 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: 11.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9879 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5766 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 21274_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 11.00 | 15:55:59.54 -35:25:46.4 | 2709 4090 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 10.98 | 15:55:59.49 -35:25:47.4 | 2711 4087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 10.58 | 15:36:35.35 -33:50:22.4 | 5109 3087 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 10.58 | 15:36:35.39 -33:50:22.3 | 5111 3085 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SDh9SijqBV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38HSLjrOJy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.777nKxrQSb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dH36ljdTgG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.6 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SDh9SijqBV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.38HSLjrOJy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285
Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=187 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.777nKxrQSb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1283, passed=30513
Got 30513 stars (including 29198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.023 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.263 n_q1=394 n_q2=129 n_q3=267 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.675
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dH36ljdTgG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, passed=30602
Got 30602 stars (including 29078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29252 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29252 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.924 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.796 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.272 n_q1=386 n_q2=117 n_q3=254 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.609
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: 13.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: 13.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5001 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0953 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3673 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2779 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2492 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6079 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 10.07 | 15:18:22.01 -34:00:43.3 | 7398 3255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 87208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.23 | 15:33:32.58 -36:25:54.1 | 5470 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87389_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 87389_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.38 | 15:37:38.22 -36:40:58.6 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 87397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.72 | 15:47:59.85 -30:58:31.6 | 3643 1362 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
**** FOUND 15:47:59.76 -30:58:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89055_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 89055_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.44 | 15:27:46.42 -37:52:25.6 | 6148 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90168_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 90168_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 13.08 | 15:58:07.18 -30:28:03.2 | 2308 1096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.11 | 15:58:07.15 -30:28:01.9 | 2310 1093 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 90563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.08 | 15:17:02.73 -38:00:20.7 | 7432 5684 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
**** FOUND 15:17:02.65 -38:00:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91058_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 91058_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.26 | 15:57:19.03 -34:25:49.1 | 2521 3490 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
**** FOUND 15:57:19.09 -34:25:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91502_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 91502_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 13.33 | 15:59:56.72 -30:02:05.3 | 2054 0842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.42 | 15:59:56.59 -30:02:03.8 | 2057 0839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92056_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 92056_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 13.46 | 16:00:32.24 -30:00:09.9 | 1975 0826 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.57 | 16:00:32.21 -30:00:10.0 | 1977 0823 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92418_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 92418_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 13.23 | 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.4 | 2378 4298 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.27 | 15:58:44.11 -35:44:53.8 | 2381 4296 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 92450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 12.92 | 15:25:36.67 -34:30:46.6 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92639_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 92639_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24742 | 2461203.74742 | 13.33 | 15:59:24.74 -35:21:48.0 | 2284 4070 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 13.25 | 15:59:24.61 -35:21:50.9 | 2286 4067 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68717_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 68717_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 10.47 | 15:45:11.00 -32:22:30.3 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 11.51 | 15:26:26.78 -38:06:06.8 | 6303 5688 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
**** FOUND 15:26:26.81 -38:06:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24790 | 2461203.74790 | 10.94 | 15:25:47.81 -36:13:51.9 | 6418 4557 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits |
**** FOUND 15:25:47.79 -36:13:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3
########### Completed Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3
###################################################################################
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74741824 -observatory V36
07:06:03.51 +24:06:30.8 Mercury (0.3mag)
08:03:05.29 +22:30:20.2 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:01:24.84 +16:36:23.5 Mars (1.3mag)
07:51:50.59 +21:22:46.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:50:29.46 +02:54:42.6 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:01:09.92 +20:28:12.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:21.90 +00:18:01.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:07.21 -23:06:05.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
02:26:43.33 +18:33:35.3 Moon (-9.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 12 01:11 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74741824:
07:51:58.26 +21:22:22.3 Io (6.0mag)
07:51:59.38 +21:22:20.2 Europa (6.2mag)
07:52:07.99 +21:21:51.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:51:28.32 +21:23:49.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:51:53.35 +20:59:25.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:51:55.30 +21:22:30.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:51:46.04 +21:13:06.9 Elara (17.6mag)
07:54:13.63 +21:32:14.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:58:14.82 +21:24:47.4 Carme (18.9mag)
00:50:35.95 +02:54:19.2 Titan (8.6mag)
00:50:28.97 +02:54:56.5 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:50:58.20 +02:57:10.4 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:50:39.90 +02:54:14.7 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:51:06.71 +02:56:04.0 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 12 01:11 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74741824:
17:27:34.11 -35:32:31.9 JWST
18:22:49.13 +28:50:52.8 Chandra
19:24:42.24 +02:12:59.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 12 01:11 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74741824 -observatory V36
18:40:37.40 -32:56:34.2 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:57:28.58 -68:01:39.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:50:33.36 +32:01:18.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:13:06.52 +15:32:26.4 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:51:05.09 -46:47:21.1 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:11:39.03 +31:44:27.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:39:00.29 +26:59:44.0 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:32:41.32 +30:56:16.3 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:52:45.19 +04:07:07.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:25:33.73 +21:39:57.5 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:17:57.83 -11:01:09.5 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:12:52.49 +66:46:05.8 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:36:19.36 -07:05:32.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:44.81 +82:03:39.0 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:16:07.86 +64:26:59.9 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:53:22.64 +28:11:03.7 13.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:34:09.52 +13:51:55.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:10:11.91 +32:19:49.6 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:22:05.38 -15:36:18.6 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:09:40.95 +33:47:25.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:33:18.11 +52:30:37.2 17.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:49:40.77 -11:03:26.5 14.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:27:34.07 +23:16:45.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:41.25 +04:40:02.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:05:54.59 +75:58:22.2 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:07:34.39 +43:41:47.7 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:16.60 -02:21:27.7 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:30:59.28 -08:54:34.5 8.5mag 10P/Tempel
11:03:01.07 -01:01:58.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:17:59.13 +26:10:56.9 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:08:37.57 +22:36:06.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:30:19.80 -06:07:03.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:56:36.16 +33:47:57.7 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:18:59.78 +17:43:06.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:29:26.98 +05:42:47.3 15.6mag 88P/Howell
05:07:41.36 +30:34:25.4 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
02:54:31.92 +28:15:20.5 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:00:14.88 +32:52:26.3 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:57:15.64 +12:54:20.9 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:05:43.63 +19:30:46.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:41:37.07 +19:15:27.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
06:15:22.94 +18:09:35.6 15.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:18:15.33 +17:50:16.8 15.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:14:16.26 +16:40:09.8 12.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:00:30.28 -24:08:59.8 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:54:58.22 +25:23:53.5 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:01.01 +02:57:47.4 16.6mag 169P/NEAT
00:29:13.05 +03:14:47.1 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:49:09.14 -08:18:03.1 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:43:48.11 +35:18:31.8 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:43:01.23 -00:43:46.5 16.3mag 260P/McNaught
04:15:19.97 +33:11:54.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:16:25.96 -04:47:17.5 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:13:29.23 +07:56:42.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:10:23.91 +20:38:20.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:06:35.00 +41:24:19.6 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 12 01:11 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 12 01:11 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 12 01:11 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:07:51.250 +24:10:15.37 AT 2026ohe 2026-05-16.81 21.59
13:38:05.560 +19:24:23.06 AT 2026ohd 2026-05-16.80 21.01
14:00:47.770 +18:13:38.00 AT 2026ohc 2026-05-16.80 20.77
14:42:20.560 +46:34:25.14 AT 2026ohb 2026-05-12.86 21.63
15:37:36.080 +28:23:57.03 AT 2026oha 2026-05-12.85 21.38
13:11:47.430 +24:23:17.11 AT 2026ogz 2026-04-23.88 21.65
13:28:46.440 +04:10:17.43 AT 2026ogy 2026-05-22.72 21.45
13:19:13.090 +00:02:42.02 AT 2026ogx 2026-05-22.71 22.28
14:22:32.600 -00:42:16.67 AT 2026ogw 2026-05-22.70 21.87
13:41:54.970 +01:03:14.50 AT 2026ogv 2026-05-22.68 22.32
13:39:12.070 +02:04:49.22 AT 2026ogu 2026-05-21.69 22.02
14:31:27.720 +03:25:02.91 AT 2026ogt 2026-05-17.66 22.05
11:12:25.300 +01:12:09.84 AT 2026ogs 2026-05-17.60 22.13
10:57:06.470 -01:19:33.41 AT 2026ogr 2026-05-17.60 22.09
13:46:33.190 +02:44:41.49 AT 2026ogq 2026-05-11.62 22.84
11:13:33.080 +02:44:16.90 AT 2026ogp 2026-05-11.60 22.76
16:42:30.573 -13:46:07.58 AT 2026ogo 2026-05-24.19 21.5377
00:03:44.957 +08:28:44.28 AT 2026ogn 2026-06-05.44 19.2492
22:46:13.996 +03:59:51.65 AT 2026ogm 2026-06-04.43 18.9981
23:07:50.760 -12:36:34.14 AT 2026ogl 2026-06-05.45 19.2023
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 12 01:11 tns_transients_list.txt