NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Lup-01-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 04 16.31685    2461146.81685    11.72    15:36:35.15 -33:50:22.8   4471 3266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 05 19.23298    2461179.73298    11.28    15:36:35.33 -33:50:22.2   4469 3296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    10.57    15:36:35.36 -33:50:22.2   5109 3087   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.65    15:36:35.41 -33:50:22.3   5111 3085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 12.2477  2461203.7477  10.61  15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3
338.01900  17.54967 galactic  Lup  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.4 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 0"  ASAS J153635-3350.4           
Type: MISC
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    12.140   V       Y     0.700   V         2452392.10000        212.380920000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3:  11.74 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3:  11.32 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.54 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lup-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lup-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494332 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494332 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits

renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2929.6199 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 815.1864 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3309.4883 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 914.4249 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3357.6504 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 949.6185 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.12966 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.037 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:56:06.9360613' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:56:06.9360613' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2473025001 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:56:16.8391475' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2474171179 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.780670579118 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -34.0000156858621 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1530555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.105555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75306808410769 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.19 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 185.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits :) Spent 0.547783 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:56:48.9669213' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:56:48.9669213' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2477889583 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:56:58.8680795' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2479035649 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.780670567072 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -34.000015681465 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1247222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.258333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75653664133407 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.1100006103516 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :) Spent 0.531577 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits


fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.74741824 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tIhdJDvlFi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fMLwRti1dW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9jIk6A9Q99 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Flgi6uNV9z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.1 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 13.0 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.tIhdJDvlFi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114 Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=257 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fMLwRti1dW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203 Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9jIk6A9Q99 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, passed=3482 Got 3482 stars (including 3300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3482 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3313 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3312 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.087 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.306 n_q1=379 n_q2=131 n_q3=257 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.706 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Flgi6uNV9z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, passed=3345 Got 3345 stars (including 3144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3345 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.676 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.096 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.292 n_q1=365 n_q2=118 n_q3=244 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.595 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.080 ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558 new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.765 worst_q_ratio=1.706 new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.810 worst_q_ratio=1.595 reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.319 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.71 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.76 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: 11.17 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:59.51 -35:25:46.9: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9879 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:35.37 -33:50:22.4: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5766 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 21274_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    11.00    15:55:59.54 -35:25:46.4   2709 4090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.98    15:55:59.49 -35:25:47.4   2711 4087   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    10.58    15:36:35.35 -33:50:22.4   5109 3087   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.58    15:36:35.39 -33:50:22.3   5111 3085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 936.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.183 -34:01:10.77 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.216 -34:01:27.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00579 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SDh9SijqBV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38HSLjrOJy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.777nKxrQSb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dH36ljdTgG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 2.6 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.SDh9SijqBV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279 Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.38HSLjrOJy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285 Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=187 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.777nKxrQSb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1283, passed=30513 Got 30513 stars (including 29198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.023 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.714 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.263 n_q1=394 n_q2=129 n_q3=267 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.675 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dH36ljdTgG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, passed=30602 Got 30602 stars (including 29078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30602 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29252 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29252 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.924 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.796 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.272 n_q1=386 n_q2=117 n_q3=254 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.609 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: 13.84 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: 13.99 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:32.23 -30:00:10.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5001 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:07.17 -30:28:02.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0953 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:56.66 -30:02:04.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3673 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:24.67 -35:21:49.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2779 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2492 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6079 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.07    15:18:22.01 -34:00:43.3   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 87208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.23    15:33:32.58 -36:25:54.1   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87389_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 87389_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.38    15:37:38.22 -36:40:58.6   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 87397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.72    15:47:59.85 -30:58:31.6   3643 1362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 15:47:59.76 -30:58:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89055_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 89055_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.44    15:27:46.42 -37:52:25.6   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90168_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 90168_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    13.08    15:58:07.18 -30:28:03.2   2308 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.11    15:58:07.15 -30:28:01.9   2310 1093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 90563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 90563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.08    15:17:02.73 -38:00:20.7   7432 5684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 15:17:02.65 -38:00:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91058_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 91058_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.26    15:57:19.03 -34:25:49.1   2521 3490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 15:57:19.09 -34:25:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91502_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 91502_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    13.33    15:59:56.72 -30:02:05.3   2054 0842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.42    15:59:56.59 -30:02:03.8   2057 0839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92056_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 92056_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    13.46    16:00:32.24 -30:00:09.9   1975 0826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.57    16:00:32.21 -30:00:10.0   1977 0823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92418_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 92418_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    13.23    15:58:44.12 -35:44:54.4   2378 4298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.27    15:58:44.11 -35:44:53.8   2381 4296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 92450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    12.92    15:25:36.67 -34:30:46.6   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92639_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 92639_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 12.24742    2461203.74742    13.33    15:59:24.74 -35:21:48.0   2284 4070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    13.25    15:59:24.61 -35:21:50.9   2286 4067   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68717_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 68717_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.47    15:45:11.00 -32:22:30.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    11.51    15:26:26.78 -38:06:06.8   6303 5688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 15:26:26.81 -38:06:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 12.24790    2461203.74790    10.94    15:25:47.81 -36:13:51.9   6418 4557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_010844_TTUQ2b1x1_1130417_K7MoR595/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 15:25:47.79 -36:13:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-56-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 ########### Completed Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 ################################################################################### 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 15:36:35.38 -33:50:22.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74741824 -observatory V36 07:06:03.51 +24:06:30.8 Mercury (0.3mag) 08:03:05.29 +22:30:20.2 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:01:24.84 +16:36:23.5 Mars (1.3mag) 07:51:50.59 +21:22:46.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:50:29.46 +02:54:42.6 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:01:09.92 +20:28:12.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:21.90 +00:18:01.5 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:07.21 -23:06:05.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 02:26:43.33 +18:33:35.3 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 12 01:11 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74741824: 07:51:58.26 +21:22:22.3 Io (6.0mag) 07:51:59.38 +21:22:20.2 Europa (6.2mag) 07:52:07.99 +21:21:51.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:51:28.32 +21:23:49.5 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:51:53.35 +20:59:25.8 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:51:55.30 +21:22:30.9 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:51:46.04 +21:13:06.9 Elara (17.6mag) 07:54:13.63 +21:32:14.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:58:14.82 +21:24:47.4 Carme (18.9mag) 00:50:35.95 +02:54:19.2 Titan (8.6mag) 00:50:28.97 +02:54:56.5 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:50:58.20 +02:57:10.4 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:50:39.90 +02:54:14.7 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:51:06.71 +02:56:04.0 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 12 01:11 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74741824: 17:27:34.11 -35:32:31.9 JWST 18:22:49.13 +28:50:52.8 Chandra 19:24:42.24 +02:12:59.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 12 01:11 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74741824 -observatory V36 18:40:37.40 -32:56:34.2 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:57:28.58 -68:01:39.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:50:33.36 +32:01:18.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:13:06.52 +15:32:26.4 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 21:51:05.09 -46:47:21.1 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:11:39.03 +31:44:27.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:39:00.29 +26:59:44.0 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:32:41.32 +30:56:16.3 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:52:45.19 +04:07:07.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:25:33.73 +21:39:57.5 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:17:57.83 -11:01:09.5 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:12:52.49 +66:46:05.8 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:36:19.36 -07:05:32.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:16:44.81 +82:03:39.0 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:16:07.86 +64:26:59.9 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:53:22.64 +28:11:03.7 13.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:34:09.52 +13:51:55.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:10:11.91 +32:19:49.6 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:22:05.38 -15:36:18.6 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:09:40.95 +33:47:25.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:33:18.11 +52:30:37.2 17.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:49:40.77 -11:03:26.5 14.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:27:34.07 +23:16:45.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:41.25 +04:40:02.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:05:54.59 +75:58:22.2 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:07:34.39 +43:41:47.7 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:16.60 -02:21:27.7 16.5mag A/2026 E1 20:30:59.28 -08:54:34.5 8.5mag 10P/Tempel 11:03:01.07 -01:01:58.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:17:59.13 +26:10:56.9 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:08:37.57 +22:36:06.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:30:19.80 -06:07:03.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:56:36.16 +33:47:57.7 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:18:59.78 +17:43:06.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:29:26.98 +05:42:47.3 15.6mag 88P/Howell 05:07:41.36 +30:34:25.4 15.3mag 93P/Lovas 02:54:31.92 +28:15:20.5 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:00:14.88 +32:52:26.3 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:57:15.64 +12:54:20.9 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:05:43.63 +19:30:46.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:41:37.07 +19:15:27.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 06:15:22.94 +18:09:35.6 15.2mag 141P/Machholz 06:18:15.33 +17:50:16.8 15.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:14:16.26 +16:40:09.8 12.0mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:00:30.28 -24:08:59.8 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:54:58.22 +25:23:53.5 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:01.01 +02:57:47.4 16.6mag 169P/NEAT 00:29:13.05 +03:14:47.1 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:49:09.14 -08:18:03.1 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR 07:43:48.11 +35:18:31.8 17.6mag 240P/NEAT 00:43:01.23 -00:43:46.5 16.3mag 260P/McNaught 04:15:19.97 +33:11:54.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:16:25.96 -04:47:17.5 17.7mag 320P/McNaught 15:13:29.23 +07:56:42.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:10:23.91 +20:38:20.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:06:35.00 +41:24:19.6 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 12 01:11 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 12 01:11 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 12 01:11 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:07:51.250 +24:10:15.37 AT 2026ohe 2026-05-16.81 21.59 13:38:05.560 +19:24:23.06 AT 2026ohd 2026-05-16.80 21.01 14:00:47.770 +18:13:38.00 AT 2026ohc 2026-05-16.80 20.77 14:42:20.560 +46:34:25.14 AT 2026ohb 2026-05-12.86 21.63 15:37:36.080 +28:23:57.03 AT 2026oha 2026-05-12.85 21.38 13:11:47.430 +24:23:17.11 AT 2026ogz 2026-04-23.88 21.65 13:28:46.440 +04:10:17.43 AT 2026ogy 2026-05-22.72 21.45 13:19:13.090 +00:02:42.02 AT 2026ogx 2026-05-22.71 22.28 14:22:32.600 -00:42:16.67 AT 2026ogw 2026-05-22.70 21.87 13:41:54.970 +01:03:14.50 AT 2026ogv 2026-05-22.68 22.32 13:39:12.070 +02:04:49.22 AT 2026ogu 2026-05-21.69 22.02 14:31:27.720 +03:25:02.91 AT 2026ogt 2026-05-17.66 22.05 11:12:25.300 +01:12:09.84 AT 2026ogs 2026-05-17.60 22.13 10:57:06.470 -01:19:33.41 AT 2026ogr 2026-05-17.60 22.09 13:46:33.190 +02:44:41.49 AT 2026ogq 2026-05-11.62 22.84 11:13:33.080 +02:44:16.90 AT 2026ogp 2026-05-11.60 22.76 16:42:30.573 -13:46:07.58 AT 2026ogo 2026-05-24.19 21.5377 00:03:44.957 +08:28:44.28 AT 2026ogn 2026-06-05.44 19.2492 22:46:13.996 +03:59:51.65 AT 2026ogm 2026-06-04.43 18.9981 23:07:50.760 -12:36:34.14 AT 2026ogl 2026-06-05.45 19.2023 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 12 01:11 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C