This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4411 2461202.9411 12.97 20:27:39.17 -12:59:40.0
31.70714 -27.12894 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix -1 0 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:39.17 -12:59:40.0: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:39.17 -12:59:40.0: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.4411* 20 27 39.17 -12 59 40.0 13.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9411,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4411 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.4411* 20 29 30.94 -08 49 57.7 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9411,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4411 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461202.94134628 11.06.2026 10:35:22.319 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7073
Objects passed selection criteria: 7068
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6559
Average stars matched: 4856 (74.0357 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:46:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461202.94134628 11.06.2026 10:35:22.319 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 51623
Objects passed selection criteria: 51548
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43870.2
Average stars matched: 37314.5 (85.0565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:49:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.94084287
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LGkQ7Omhlk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zQF6r3LjTq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PkWOkRfNtZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eVaz8beqdq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.449100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.449100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Loaded 10202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7581 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 12515 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=7.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LGkQ7Omhlk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=6247
Got 6247 stars (including 5872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=237 n_q2=192 n_q3=266 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zQF6r3LjTq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, passed=12515
Got 12515 stars (including 11948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=236 n_q2=183 n_q3=287 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PkWOkRfNtZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7200
Got 7200 stars (including 6738 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.794 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.684 n_q1=235 n_q2=284 n_q3=189 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eVaz8beqdq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, passed=7115
Got 7115 stars (including 6685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.820 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=244 n_q2=283 n_q3=182 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.219
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.231
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.562 worst_q_ratio=1.411
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.451
reference average sigma_overall=0.3775 worst_q_ratio=1.225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.409 -09:59:58.94
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.320 -10:00:10.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ErkStftufO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QH2Bkk5wLT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BQwYJrbu2R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SN6e2bkCya
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.238900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.238900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 67486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Loaded 10232 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7501 out of 8355 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8355 out of 67486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ErkStftufO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2235, passed=49692
Got 49692 stars (including 47388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=245 n_q2=197 n_q3=238 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QH2Bkk5wLT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4245, passed=67479
Got 67479 stars (including 63157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=233 n_q2=184 n_q3=287 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BQwYJrbu2R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3002, passed=46009
Got 46009 stars (including 42962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.830 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.752 n_q1=252 n_q2=263 n_q3=210 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SN6e2bkCya (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3001, passed=45782
Got 45782 stars (including 42734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45782 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.750 n_q1=257 n_q2=266 n_q3=198 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-34-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_054356_TTUQ2b1x1_2339544_JUoKKhjd/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:17:58.96 -10:36:15.4: 13.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:11.78 -14:06:50.7: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:43:35.92 -07:30:03.0: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:39:46.98 -05:48:20.4: 13.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:17:13.63 -07:51:39.2: 13.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:18:06.83 -11:17:04.1: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:27:39.17 -12:59:40.0: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:46.49 -12:38:48.8: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:41.76 -13:52:27.0: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:39.42 -10:06:34.8: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:18:06.83 -11:17:04.1: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:39:46.98 -05:48:20.4: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:43:35.92 -07:30:03.0: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:27:39.17 -12:59:40.0: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:06.83 -11:17:04.1: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2421 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:46.98 -05:48:20.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5978 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:17:58.96 -10:36:15.4: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.92 -07:30:03.0: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3996 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:11.78 -14:06:50.7: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:58.96 -10:36:15.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1250 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:41.76 -13:52:27.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:11.78 -14:06:50.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3168 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.76 -13:52:27.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.2262 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:46.49 -12:38:48.8: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:17:13.63 -07:51:39.2: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:46.49 -12:38:48.8: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6344 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:39.42 -10:06:34.8: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:13.63 -07:51:39.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4302 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:39.42 -10:06:34.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8978 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:48.74 -08:38:14.3: 13.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:06.60 -13:53:06.3: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.1: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:05.97 -12:04:19.0: 14.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:33.53 -10:56:06.1: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:45.52 -12:29:35.1: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:34:45.00 -06:15:57.3: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:04.49 -13:29:08.4: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:05.97 -12:04:19.0: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:48.74 -08:38:14.3: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:05.97 -12:04:19.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5321 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:48.74 -08:38:14.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4434 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:06.60 -13:53:06.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:06.60 -13:53:06.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3752 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.1: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:33.53 -10:56:06.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.04 -10:08:24.1: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3211 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:04.49 -13:29:08.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:34:45.00 -06:15:57.3: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:45.52 -12:29:35.1: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:33.53 -10:56:06.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5887 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:04.49 -13:29:08.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.5422 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:45.00 -06:15:57.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3574 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:45.52 -12:29:35.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5243 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:06.47 -14:08:58.8: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:48:00.21 -14:03:11.5: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:21.68 -12:11:37.8: 14.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:44:10.48 -11:03:17.7: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:06.63 -14:04:51.2: 14.26 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:38.68 -13:18:16.9: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:05.25 -13:14:44.2: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:54.44 -13:59:21.4: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:21.68 -12:11:37.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:06.47 -14:08:58.8: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:44:10.48 -11:03:17.7: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:21.68 -12:11:37.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.5368 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:48:00.21 -14:03:11.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:38.68 -13:18:16.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:05.25 -13:14:44.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:06.47 -14:08:58.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5694 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:10.48 -11:03:17.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5120 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:06.63 -14:04:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:00.21 -14:03:11.5: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.6413 delta=-2.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:38.68 -13:18:16.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.6369 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:05.25 -13:14:44.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6485 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:06.63 -14:04:51.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.6342 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:54.44 -13:59:21.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:54.44 -13:59:21.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5682 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:26.67 -11:15:15.7: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:16.08 -13:12:45.9: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:47.72 -14:13:41.3: 14.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:41:52.26 -11:34:47.2: 13.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:09.49 -12:42:55.3: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:44.65 -14:03:01.5: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:38.83 -12:20:27.4: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:26.67 -11:15:15.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:26.67 -11:15:15.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7507 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:47.72 -14:13:41.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:16.08 -13:12:45.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:30.00 -11:11:23.7: 13.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:44.65 -14:03:01.5: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:09.49 -12:42:55.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:41:52.26 -11:34:47.2: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:47.72 -14:13:41.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.6928 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:16.08 -13:12:45.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.7372 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:38.83 -12:20:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:09.49 -12:42:55.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.7282 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:44.65 -14:03:01.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6771 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.26 -11:34:47.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8106 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:38.83 -12:20:27.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.7594 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:30.00 -11:11:23.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:30.00 -11:11:23.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6878 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:26.91 -08:25:26.8: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:46:09.19 -13:36:53.8: 14.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:40.65 -13:58:08.3: 14.29 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:37.89 -12:37:29.7: 14.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:26.84 -13:20:44.0: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:36.79 -11:20:27.1: 14.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:53.17 -13:41:36.5: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:26.91 -08:25:26.8: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:37.89 -12:37:29.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:26.84 -13:20:44.0: 14.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:26.91 -08:25:26.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7738 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:46:09.19 -13:36:53.8: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:36.79 -11:20:27.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:37.89 -12:37:29.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.8243 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:26.84 -13:20:44.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7337 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:53.17 -13:41:36.5: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:09.19 -13:36:53.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8241 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:36.79 -11:20:27.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.8136 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:40.65 -13:58:08.3: 14.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:35:46.98 -11:53:14.3: 13.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:53.17 -13:41:36.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8571 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:40.65 -13:58:08.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8720 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:35:46.98 -11:53:14.3: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:46.98 -11:53:14.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8800 delta=-0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:44:59.35 -14:11:00.6: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:26.21 -11:00:25.2: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:44:59.35 -14:11:00.6: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:59.35 -14:11:00.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8153 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:26.21 -11:00:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:26.21 -11:00:25.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.6394 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66488_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66488_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66495_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66496_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66496_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66497_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66498_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66498_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66503_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 66503_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 70630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71039_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 71039_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71267_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 71267_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71415_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 71415_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71728_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 71728_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71782_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 71782_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72024_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72024_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72050_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 72050_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72192_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72192_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72267_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72267_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72383_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72383_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72435_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72435_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72570_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72570_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72685_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72685_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72741_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72741_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72756_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72756_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72757_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72757_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72760_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72760_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72766_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72766_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.16 -12:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72796_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72796_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72864_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72864_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72912_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72912_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72956_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 72956_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73013_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73013_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73048_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73048_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73152_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73152_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73219_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73219_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73342_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73342_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73530_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73530_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73608_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73671_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73671_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73688_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73688_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73690_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73690_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73695_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73708_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73708_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73751_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73751_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73770_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73770_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73798_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73798_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73832_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 73832_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17874_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380
The candidate 17874_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-35-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0380 did not pass the final checks