This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4329 2461202.9329 10.01 20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6
42.07940 -24.95733 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 1 10.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9329,10.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4329 10.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4329 2461202.9329 12.85 20:24:33.78 -04:47:25.1
39.49251 -22.86827 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina -0 -1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:24:33.78 -04:47:25.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:24:33.78 -04:47:25.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9329,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4329 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4329 2461202.9329 13.73 20:33:31.98 -03:54:53.1
41.47587 -24.43868 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea 0 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:33:31.98 -03:54:53.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:33:31.98 -03:54:53.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9329,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4329 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4329 2461202.9329 9.90 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5
37.41171 -22.08264 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" PY Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 pg < 12.500 pg 2427640.00000 120.000000000000 : Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PY Aql,2461202.9329,9.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PY Aql 20260611.4329 9.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4329 2461202.9329 10.49 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1
44.38079 -18.81767 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V2020 Aql
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 V 12.200 V 2452489.90000 93.813095000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2020 Aql,2461202.9329,10.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2020 Aql 20260611.4329 10.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461202.93316514 11.06.2026 10:23:35.468 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12970
Objects passed selection criteria: 12941
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10195
Average stars matched: 9421.5 (92.4129 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:36:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461202.93316514 11.06.2026 10:23:35.468 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 59 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93228
Objects passed selection criteria: 93011
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74090.8
Average stars matched: 68011.2 (91.7945 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2005416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:40:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.93268854
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01105 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M53WR6iyEm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qZHoMXFM9F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BYE5pLsAq6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DdnFSnb1j4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8626 out of 9004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9004 out of 13571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M53WR6iyEm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=818, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 12869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=233 n_q2=229 n_q3=238 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qZHoMXFM9F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, passed=13571
Got 13571 stars (including 12699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.647 n_q1=241 n_q2=233 n_q3=230 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BYE5pLsAq6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=748, passed=12349
Got 12349 stars (including 11598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.932 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.849 n_q1=209 n_q2=288 n_q3=212 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.512
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DdnFSnb1j4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=787, passed=12850
Got 12850 stars (including 12055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12850 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.879 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.850 n_q1=226 n_q2=284 n_q3=196 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.404
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.524 worst_q_ratio=1.188
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.559 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.616 worst_q_ratio=1.512
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.404
reference average sigma_overall=0.5415 worst_q_ratio=1.2125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:46:37.66 -02:18:36.2: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:38.28 +02:16:14.4: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:31:58.04 +02:08:54.1: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:41:00.41 -00:11:26.1: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:44.81 +00:41:48.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:46:37.66 -02:18:36.2: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:38.28 +02:16:14.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.5: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:31:58.04 +02:08:54.1: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:37.66 -02:18:36.2: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8925 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:38.28 +02:16:14.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5707 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:58.04 +02:08:54.1: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8440 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.5: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8932 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:41:00.41 -00:11:26.1: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.41 -00:11:26.1: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9328 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:44.81 +00:41:48.3: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:44.81 +00:41:48.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9720 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20742.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 20446_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 20742_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 21194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.98 +00:56:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21237_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 21237_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.06 -01:49:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21625_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 21625_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.61 +00:50:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21716_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 21716_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21833_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 21833_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.71 -03:51:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 22136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22215_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 22215_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.93 +01:19:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22303_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 22303_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22382_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 22382_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22386_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 22386_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05730_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 05730_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:51.69 -02:42:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.77 -00:54:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:36:24.24 -03:40:35.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.642 -01:59:42.84
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:17.956 -01:59:03.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01105 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ug3n8z2abx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.er3lVlDEHl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GvhNjHD9My
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EkwAPcitKc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.541200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.541200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 100598 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to +3.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to 3.2767 deg
Loaded 10863 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8253 out of 9762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9762 out of 100598 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ug3n8z2abx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7505, passed=97740
Got 97740 stars (including 90113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.588 n_q1=237 n_q2=216 n_q3=242 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.er3lVlDEHl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=7692, passed=100579
Got 100579 stars (including 92763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100579 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=234 n_q2=221 n_q3=240 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GvhNjHD9My (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6653, passed=75350
Got 75350 stars (including 68626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75350 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.806 n_q1=229 n_q2=263 n_q3=228 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EkwAPcitKc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=7148, passed=78349
Got 78349 stars (including 71125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.819 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.746 n_q1=239 n_q2=265 n_q3=217 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-22-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0365.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_053147_TTUQ2b1x1_775371_8qXxkx4s/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:08.42 -01:45:38.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:22:04.25 +00:35:23.7: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:49:07.89 -01:47:29.8: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:49:05.09 -05:26:09.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:32:53.47 +01:13:27.9: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:33:41.84 -05:02:40.8: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:28:10.10 +00:24:31.9: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:50:34.65 -05:45:46.2: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:44:43.24 +00:09:54.7: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:08.42 -01:45:38.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:08.42 -01:45:38.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6261 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:33:41.84 -05:02:40.8: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:41.84 -05:02:40.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6421 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:28:10.10 +00:24:31.9: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:49:05.09 -05:26:09.6: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:32:53.47 +01:13:27.9: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:49:07.89 -01:47:29.8: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:10.10 +00:24:31.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2872 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:22:04.25 +00:35:23.7: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:05.09 -05:26:09.6: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2162 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:50:34.65 -05:45:46.2: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:44:43.24 +00:09:54.7: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:53.47 +01:13:27.9: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3660 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:07.89 -01:47:29.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9760 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:04.25 +00:35:23.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7324 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:34.65 -05:45:46.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0633 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:43.24 +00:09:54.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9917 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:39.29 -04:59:23.6: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:39.29 -04:59:23.6: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:39.29 -04:59:23.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8784 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:24:33.78 -04:47:25.1: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:41:16.04 -05:33:13.1: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:33:31.98 -03:54:53.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:49:10.94 -06:10:15.6: 14.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:15.01 -00:48:33.5: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:52:11.90 -05:45:42.4: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:17.01 +01:42:27.4: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:59.8: 14.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:41:16.04 -05:33:13.1: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:24:33.78 -04:47:25.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:16.04 -05:33:13.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5137 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:48:11.08 -01:29:28.2: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:33:31.98 -03:54:53.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:40:49.76 -02:12:39.0: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:49:10.94 -06:10:15.6: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:52:11.90 -05:45:42.4: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:10.94 -06:10:15.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7665 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:11.90 -05:45:42.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9899 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:59.8: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:15.01 -00:48:33.5: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:17.01 +01:42:27.4: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:38.45 -05:05:59.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8067 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:15.01 -00:48:33.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8134 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:17.01 +01:42:27.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1386 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:48:11.08 -01:29:28.2: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:11.08 -01:29:28.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9602 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:40:49.76 -02:12:39.0: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:49.76 -02:12:39.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9460 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:50:39.25 -06:02:47.1: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:49:17.50 -05:40:01.5: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:45:12.66 -05:16:19.5: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:28:41.68 -05:31:38.5: 15.32 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:45:56.19 -03:36:07.0: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:50:39.25 -06:02:47.1: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:39.25 -06:02:47.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1467 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:45:19.67 -04:25:57.9: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:51:41.69 +00:58:36.6: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:42:41.02 -06:14:37.5: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:49:17.50 -05:40:01.5: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:45:12.66 -05:16:19.5: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:28:41.68 -05:31:38.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:17.50 -05:40:01.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3218 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:45:56.19 -03:36:07.0: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:12.66 -05:16:19.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4000 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:28:41.68 -05:31:38.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.3232 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:56.19 -03:36:07.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3693 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:45:19.67 -04:25:57.9: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:19.67 -04:25:57.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3679 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:51:41.69 +00:58:36.6: 15.06 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:41.69 +00:58:36.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4004 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:42:41.02 -06:14:37.5: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:41.02 -06:14:37.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4074 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:48:22.12 -05:01:29.1: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:42.54 -02:32:57.6: 15.25 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:46:45.15 +01:57:28.2: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:52:08.58 -03:40:04.5: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:48:22.12 -05:01:29.1: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:22.12 -05:01:29.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4670 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:19:37.81 -02:55:06.5: 14.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:51:59.41 -03:27:26.5: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:32:15.83 +01:54:09.9: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:42.54 -02:32:57.6: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:42.54 -02:32:57.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4358 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:52:08.58 -03:40:04.5: 15.11 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:46:45.15 +01:57:28.2: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:08.58 -03:40:04.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5597 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:45.15 +01:57:28.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5611 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:19:37.81 -02:55:06.5: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:37.81 -02:55:06.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2053 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:51:59.41 -03:27:26.5: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:59.41 -03:27:26.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4902 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:32:15.83 +01:54:09.9: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:15.83 +01:54:09.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4701 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:41:52.34 -06:02:47.7: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:15.38 -01:49:20.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:50:43.94 -05:47:25.7: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:41:52.34 -06:02:47.7: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.34 -06:02:47.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5588 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:15.38 -01:49:20.7: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:50:43.94 -05:47:25.7: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:15.38 -01:49:20.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4097 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:43.94 -05:47:25.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4607 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:18:13.75 -06:08:34.5: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8973 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:18:59.79 +01:09:13.1: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4977 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out128662.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116576_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116576_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116585_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116585_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116590_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116590_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116592_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116592_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116594_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116594_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116600_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116600_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:42.89 +00:46:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116601_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116601_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116608_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116608_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116611_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116611_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116613_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116613_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 116915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:24.23 -03:40:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118409_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 118409_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 120163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:23.21 -03:37:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120244_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 120244_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:32.37 -02:03:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120455_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 120455_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:41.49 -02:35:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120572_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 120572_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:42.10 -00:39:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120909_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 120909_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122207_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 122207_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:30.45 -02:03:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122486_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 122486_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.68 +01:48:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122554_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 122554_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:57.62 +01:21:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123225_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 123225_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124506_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 124506_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124581_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 124581_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124836_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 124836_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125538_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 125538_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125734_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 125734_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:06.71 -03:58:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125782_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 125782_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126737_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 126737_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126742_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 126742_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126858_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 126858_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127062_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 127062_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127255_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 127255_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:17.39 -04:18:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128447_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128447_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128540_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128540_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128647_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128647_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128662_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128662_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:41.68 -05:31:38.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.208 4217899403570358144 307.17368629750 -05.52702600977 14.7800 14.3420 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.208#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128835_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128835_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128950_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128950_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128978_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 128978_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129052_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129052_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129054_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129054_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129204_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129204_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129287_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129287_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129317_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129317_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129347_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129347_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129518_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129518_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129529_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129529_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129588_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 129588_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:51.69 -02:42:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.93 +01:19:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.75 -00:54:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.05 -01:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 12921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:17.33 -05:30:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.61 +00:50:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.98 +00:56:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.69 -03:51:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 82295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:35.78 +01:30:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84983_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 84983_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366
The candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_05-23-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0366 did not pass the final checks