This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 11.02 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8
315.81833 54.38922 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.13 Egeria 0 -0 0 11.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 13 21 33.52 -07 43 37.8 11.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,11.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 11.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 12.94 13:20:09.15 -07:56:29.8
315.16095 54.24693 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.374 Burgundia -0 0 0 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:20:09.15 -07:56:29.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:20:09.15 -07:56:29.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 13 20 09.15 -07 56 29.8 12.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 13.06 12:45:52.79 -08:17:31.0
300.56051 54.55421 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.55 Pandora -0 0 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:45:52.79 -08:17:31.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:45:52.79 -08:17:31.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 12 45 52.79 -08 17 31.0 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 13.29 12:31:16.51 -09:39:49.5
294.67906 52.88461 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.241 Germania -0 -0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:16.51 -09:39:49.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:16.51 -09:39:49.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 12 31 16.51 -09 39 49.5 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 13.35 13:05:50.97 -06:27:32.8
309.38214 56.23204 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.178 Belisana -0 0 0 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:05:50.97 -06:27:32.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:05:50.97 -06:27:32.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 13 05 50.97 -06 27 32.8 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 13.56 12:57:50.30 -07:27:50.9
305.72473 55.37290 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.233 Asterope 0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:57:50.30 -07:27:50.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:57:50.30 -07:27:50.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 12 57 50.30 -07 27 50.9 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 14.11 13:21:05.57 -14:58:00.2
313.52281 47.29429 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.81 Terpsichore -1 0 1 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:05.57 -14:58:00.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:05.57 -14:58:00.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 13 21 05.57 -14 58 00.2 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 14.56 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.5
291.81577 55.34177 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda -1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 12 26 04.24 -06 58 53.5 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6994,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1994 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1994 2461202.6994 14.68 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4
300.60815 56.54588 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4: 15.76 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1994* 12 46 17.02 -06 18 09.4 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6994,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1994 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
First image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Last image: 2461202.69969675 11.06.2026 04:47:23.799 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5310
Objects passed selection criteria: 5308
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5208.5
Average stars matched: 5113 (98.1665 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 00:07:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
First image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Last image: 2461202.69969675 11.06.2026 04:47:23.799 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 59
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33005
Objects passed selection criteria: 32929
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32065.2
Average stars matched: 30524.2 (95.1942 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 00:09:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.69903752
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0437 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01458 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZHBdWh9y4X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VeYF78tbUk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.92Rt80caOP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4dI8rAxEms
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Loaded 4122 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3369 out of 3460 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3460 out of 5827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.702900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.702900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Loaded 4122 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3369 out of 3460 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3460 out of 5827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.5002 to 200.9925 deg, Dec -15.6191 to -4.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.5002 to 200.9925 deg, Dec -15.6191 to -4.2997 deg
Loaded 4564 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3310 out of 3416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3416 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
14.9 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZHBdWh9y4X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=5827
Got 5827 stars (including 5438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=230 n_q2=264 n_q3=238 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VeYF78tbUk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 4817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=229 n_q2=247 n_q3=264 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.92Rt80caOP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, passed=4963
Got 4963 stars (including 4597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=220 n_q2=257 n_q3=260 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4dI8rAxEms (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, passed=5005
Got 5005 stars (including 4665 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=225 n_q2=254 n_q3=255 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.485 worst_q_ratio=1.332
ref2=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.170
new1=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.167
reference average sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.251
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20320.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 20337_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:57:04.34 -10:23:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0437 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:30.879 -10:02:10.44
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:33.930 -10:02:37.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01458 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p7Ga65odng
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dNJqVT5MHW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YRwsDS65DW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.79tCf9JfTK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Loaded 4143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3362 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 32542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Loaded 4143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3362 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 32542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.4476 to 201.0198 deg, Dec -15.6249 to -4.2566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.4476 to 201.0198 deg, Dec -15.6249 to -4.2566 deg
Loaded 4603 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3434 out of 3658 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3658 out of 33325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.0 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p7Ga65odng (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1542, passed=32528
Got 32528 stars (including 30932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=232 n_q2=258 n_q3=256 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dNJqVT5MHW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1204, passed=33305
Got 33305 stars (including 32038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=221 n_q2=257 n_q3=268 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YRwsDS65DW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1009, passed=32009
Got 32009 stars (including 30947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=220 n_q2=262 n_q3=260 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.79tCf9JfTK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1072, passed=31345
Got 31345 stars (including 30229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=223 n_q2=262 n_q3=258 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-46-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0128.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_235633_TTUQ1b1x1_3432824_MbhRzoqn/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:57:37.88 -09:12:05.6: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:42.87 -07:35:25.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:20:09.15 -07:56:29.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:30:06.41 -07:48:16.2: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:57:37.88 -09:12:05.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:57:37.88 -09:12:05.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5560 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:20:09.15 -07:56:29.8: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:30:06.41 -07:48:16.2: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:16.51 -09:39:49.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:06.41 -07:48:16.2: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8530 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:20.72 -09:50:14.2: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:45:52.79 -08:17:31.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:05:50.97 -06:27:32.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:57:50.30 -07:27:50.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:28:15.01 -04:57:29.8: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:42.87 -07:35:25.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:42.87 -07:35:25.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4965 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:16.51 -09:39:49.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:45:52.79 -08:17:31.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:20.72 -09:50:14.2: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:20.72 -09:50:14.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7567 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:57:50.30 -07:27:50.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:05:50.97 -06:27:32.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:28:15.01 -04:57:29.8: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:15.01 -04:57:29.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9237 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:05.57 -14:58:00.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:22:45.97 -14:22:40.8: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:26:52.38 -13:45:59.8: 15.12 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:22:45.97 -14:22:40.8: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:45.97 -14:22:40.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1832 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:05.57 -14:58:00.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:34.67 -05:05:51.1: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:26:52.38 -13:45:59.8: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:52.38 -13:45:59.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3487 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:34.67 -05:05:51.1: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:34.67 -05:05:51.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3491 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:04:51.00 -07:10:48.8: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:04:51.00 -07:10:48.8: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:51.00 -07:10:48.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2497 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:38.09 -09:10:23.4: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:45.58 -12:08:08.9: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:38.09 -09:10:23.4: 14.92 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:38.09 -09:10:23.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4797 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:45.58 -12:08:08.9: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:45.58 -12:08:08.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4772 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:26:22.92 -12:33:39.4: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:26:22.92 -12:33:39.4: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:22.92 -12:33:39.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4985 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:17:28.99 -12:10:31.3: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:17:28.99 -12:10:31.3: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:28.99 -12:10:31.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5005 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:32:52.41 -06:38:05.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:32:52.41 -06:38:05.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:52.41 -06:38:05.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3225 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:01:58.56 -13:14:24.1: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4: 15.76 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:01:58.56 -13:14:24.1: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:01:58.56 -13:14:24.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4354 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:46:17.02 -06:18:09.4: ref_mag=15.76 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=14.6008 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:14:02.04 -08:41:20.6: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:14:02.04 -08:41:20.6: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:14:02.04 -08:41:20.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4996 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:25:10.39 -13:47:35.6: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:17.26 -14:57:37.8: 14.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:25:10.39 -13:47:35.6: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:10.39 -13:47:35.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5239 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:17.26 -14:57:37.8: 14.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:17.26 -14:57:37.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2781 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:25:03.38 -05:02:41.8: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:33.45 -09:18:19.9: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:25:03.38 -05:02:41.8: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:07.81 -09:52:04.1: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:03.38 -05:02:41.8: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5781 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:33.45 -09:18:19.9: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:33.45 -09:18:19.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4625 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:57.07 -08:10:23.7: 15.26 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:18:01.86 -09:27:57.5: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:07.81 -09:52:04.1: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:07.81 -09:52:04.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6024 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:57.07 -08:10:23.7: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:57.07 -08:10:23.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6463 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:18:01.86 -09:27:57.5: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:01.86 -09:27:57.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4892 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:08.97 -10:03:13.4: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:24:20.78 -13:21:19.5: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:16:37.21 -12:44:43.6: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:08.97 -10:03:13.4: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:08.97 -10:03:13.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6167 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:22:50.85 -07:07:18.8: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:24:26.44 -10:07:48.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:54:54.79 -14:04:34.4: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:55.84 -13:43:33.0: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:42:32.86 -14:10:54.4: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:24:20.78 -13:21:19.5: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:16:37.21 -12:44:43.6: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:37.21 -12:44:43.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4648 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:20.78 -13:21:19.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6027 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:22:50.85 -07:07:18.8: 15.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:50.85 -07:07:18.8: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6174 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:24:26.44 -10:07:48.7: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:21:49.23 -10:31:43.5: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:26.44 -10:07:48.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6478 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:54:54.79 -14:04:34.4: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:54:54.79 -14:04:34.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6208 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:55.84 -13:43:33.0: 15.18 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:55.84 -13:43:33.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5389 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:42:32.86 -14:10:54.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:32.86 -14:10:54.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6128 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:49:18.77 -12:27:49.1: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:21:49.23 -10:31:43.5: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:49.23 -10:31:43.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5385 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:41:48.19 -14:49:45.7: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:20:31.04 -10:17:19.3: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:49:18.77 -12:27:49.1: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:49:18.77 -12:27:49.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6408 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:17:39.74 -11:34:59.9: 15.04 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:20:31.04 -10:17:19.3: 15.04 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:41:48.19 -14:49:45.7: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:41:48.19 -14:49:45.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6131 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:31.04 -10:17:19.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5964 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:17:39.74 -11:34:59.9: 14.92 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:39.74 -11:34:59.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5486 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54222.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54321.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54163_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:11:23.89 -06:58:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54165_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54165_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:22.38 -07:17:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54167_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:48.47 -05:15:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54169_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54169_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54171_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54171_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:55:53.32 -13:02:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54175_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:47:48.74 -14:02:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54176_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54176_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54181_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54181_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:21:33.52 -07:43:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54203_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54213_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54213_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54214_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54214_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54222_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54222_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54229_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54229_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54235_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54235_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54245_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54245_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54265_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54272_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54272_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54275_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54275_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54279_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54279_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:44:10.83 -13:28:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54284_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54284_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54290_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54290_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54312_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54312_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:59:09.82 -13:37:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54321_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54321_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54322_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54322_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54326_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54326_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54333_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54333_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54335_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54335_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:25:17.50 -07:49:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54338_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54338_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54339_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54339_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54344_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54344_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54351_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
Preparing report for the candidate 54351_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54356_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54356_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54357_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54357_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:57:13.70 -08:54:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54359_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54363_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54363_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54367_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54367_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:51.04 -10:48:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54373_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54373_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54377_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54377_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54384_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54389_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54389_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54394_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54394_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54397_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:14:28.06 -13:55:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54399_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54399_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54405_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54405_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54410_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54410_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54411_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54411_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54420_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54420_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54421_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54421_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54438_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54438_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54439_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54439_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54444_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54450_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54450_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54451_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54451_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54472_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54472_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54497_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129
The candidate 54497_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-47-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0129 did not pass the final checks
