This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 10.88 11:54:12.61 +00:34:39.6
273.21070 60.10488 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -0 1 1 11.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:12.61 +00:34:39.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:12.61 +00:34:39.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 11 54 12.61 +00 34 39.6 10.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,10.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 10.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 13.16 12:16:35.13 -00:58:11.4
284.91596 60.67702 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:16:35.13 -00:58:11.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:16:35.13 -00:58:11.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 12 16 35.13 +00 58 11.4 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 13.27 11:59:38.20 +00:43:15.6
275.57740 60.81153 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:38.20 +00:43:15.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:38.20 +00:43:15.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 11 59 38.20 +00 43 15.6 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 13.66 12:20:12.50 -03:22:02.4
287.85091 58.58700 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja -0 -0 0 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:20:12.50 -03:22:02.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:20:12.50 -03:22:02.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 12 20 12.50 -03 22 02.4 13.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 13.74 12:23:59.14 +02:30:07.4
286.82529 64.51189 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.238 Hypatia -1 1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:59.14 +02:30:07.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:59.14 +02:30:07.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 12 23 59.14 +02 30 07.4 13.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 14.06 11:39:49.64 +00:17:24.8
267.33346 58.12410 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -0 1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:39:49.64 +00:17:24.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:39:49.64 +00:17:24.8: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 11 39 49.64 +00 17 24.8 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 14.37 11:58:26.78 -02:33:05.7
277.57279 57.68744 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.109 Felicitas -0 1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:58:26.78 -02:33:05.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:58:26.78 -02:33:05.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 11 58 26.78 -02 33 05.7 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 14.36 11:52:13.13 +01:13:34.5
271.72419 60.45905 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda 0 0 0 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:52:13.13 +01:13:34.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:52:13.13 +01:13:34.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 11 52 13.13 +01 13 34.5 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1947 2461202.6947 14.47 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.3
291.81575 55.34182 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda 0 1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:26:04.24 -06:58:53.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1947* 12 26 04.24 -06 58 53.3 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6947,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1947 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461202.69490131 11.06.2026 04:40:29.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5504
Objects passed selection criteria: 5499
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5045
Average stars matched: 4958.25 (98.2805 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111440 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:46:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461202.69490131 11.06.2026 04:40:29.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30423
Objects passed selection criteria: 30332
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28884
Average stars matched: 27937 (96.7214 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:47:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.69445518
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:10.348 -02:03:57.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:10.348 -02:03:57.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0826 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:12.373 -02:04:17.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:12.373 -02:04:17.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0921 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:10.348 -02:03:57.19
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:12.373 -02:04:17.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01009 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FgEvDYWFAx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UB02O2DA3a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PLpog6YV71
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.otq75ALyuw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3118 out of 3206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3206 out of 5500 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FgEvDYWFAx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5769
Got 5769 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=240 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UB02O2DA3a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5500
Got 5500 stars (including 5152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=242 n_q2=228 n_q3=245 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PLpog6YV71 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, passed=4512
Got 4512 stars (including 4235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=251 n_q2=212 n_q3=266 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.otq75ALyuw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, passed=4560
Got 4560 stars (including 4269 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=248 n_q2=210 n_q3=266 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new1=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.113
reference average sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-39-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234235_TTUQ1b1x1_2519160_COwLu6Pu/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:12.61 +00:34:39.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:15.94 -00:03:52.7: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:12.61 +00:34:39.6: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:15.94 -00:03:52.7: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:15.94 -00:03:52.7: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7272 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20203.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20203_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 20203_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20246_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.13 -05:38:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20255_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:22:52.18 +00:05:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51736_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51736_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:56.68 +01:45:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51738_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51738_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51739_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51739_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51740_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51740_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51742_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51742_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:49.64 -05:51:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51744_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51744_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51745_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51745_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.87 +02:04:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51749_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51749_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:21.09 +01:09:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51750_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51802_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51802_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:54:12.60 +00:34:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51849_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 51849_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.12 -05:38:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52076_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52076_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52096_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52096_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52111_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52114_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.71 -05:22:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52210_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52223_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.01 +02:07:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52243_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52243_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52277_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52277_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:22.78 -05:40:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52286_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:50.17 -04:54:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52291_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52307_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:08.04 +00:06:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52328_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:44.05 +02:19:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52356_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52356_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52375_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52420_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52429_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52462_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:57.97 -05:02:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52486_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52510_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52524_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52526_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52551_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52552_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52553_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52554_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52560_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52561_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52566_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52571_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52573_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52574_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52582_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52584_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52596_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52601_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52606_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52618_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52622_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52626_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52627_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52630_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52634_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52639_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52644_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52663_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:07.79 +00:56:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52671_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52676_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52676_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52678_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 52679_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52682_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52685_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:11.28 -00:54:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52692_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52693_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52695_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52702_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52704_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52705_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52721_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52722_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52729_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52731_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52736_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52779_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52785_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52786_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52793_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52799_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52799_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52803_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52804_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52829_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52832_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52841_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52848_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52858_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52859_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52879_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52880_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52886_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52888_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52891_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52895_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:04.88 +02:49:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52901_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:55.64 -02:10:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52905_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52907_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52925_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 52942_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50039_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 50039_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:13.18 -05:08:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50027_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 50027_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-40-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
