This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 10.94 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8
273.69959 47.13402 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.15 Eunomia 0 -0 0 11.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6826,10.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1826 10.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 13.28 12:31:16.29 -09:39:50.0
294.67761 52.88435 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.241 Germania -0 0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:31:16.29 -09:39:50.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:31:16.29 -09:39:50.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1826* 12 31 16.29 -09 39 50.0 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6826,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1826 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 13.94 11:37:42.32 -07:48:30.2
273.24440 50.76396 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.639 Latona -0 1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:37:42.32 -07:48:30.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:37:42.32 -07:48:30.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6826,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1826 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 14.27 11:47:59.78 -08:43:36.4
277.51961 50.98784 galactic Crt Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX12" CSS_J114759.1-084328
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.120 CV Y 0.290 CV 0.287008000000
The object was found in astcheck.227 Philosophia -1 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:47:59.78 -08:43:36.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:47:59.78 -08:43:36.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS_J114759.1-084328,2461202.6826,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS_J114759.1-084328 20260611.1826 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 14.51 12:12:55.08 -11:40:13.3
288.13726 50.09161 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.36 Atalante 1 1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:12:55.08 -11:40:13.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:12:55.08 -11:40:13.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1826* 12 12 55.08 -11 40 13.3 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6826,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1826 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1826 2461202.6826 14.59 12:26:04.07 -06:58:55.1
291.81469 55.34121 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda 1 0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:26:04.07 -06:58:55.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:26:04.07 -06:58:55.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1826* 12 26 04.07 -06 58 55.1 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6826,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1826 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.69990902 08.05.2026 04:47:42.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
First image: 2461168.69990902 08.05.2026 04:47:42.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Last image: 2461202.68284657 11.06.2026 04:23:07.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5780
Objects passed selection criteria: 5774
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5158.75
Average stars matched: 5038 (97.6593 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:30:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.69990902 08.05.2026 04:47:42.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
First image: 2461168.69990902 08.05.2026 04:47:42.139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Last image: 2461202.68284657 11.06.2026 04:23:07.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32799
Objects passed selection criteria: 32708
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30983
Average stars matched: 29810 (96.2141 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134140 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:31:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.68237282
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30
Second-epoch image center 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0547 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01151 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KlztB1c5tY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ktxTEji681
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OFf6ypq3F9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.edAHNB5cqI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9446 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9446 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6856 deg
Loaded 4262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3614 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3614 out of 5940 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.740500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.740500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9446 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9446 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6856 deg
Loaded 4262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3528 out of 3614 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3614 out of 5940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9819 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2480 to -4.6848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9819 to 188.0896 deg, Dec -15.2480 to -4.6848 deg
Loaded 4252 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3494 out of 3590 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3590 out of 5891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.3 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KlztB1c5tY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=5940
Got 5940 stars (including 5598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=226 n_q2=253 n_q3=218 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ktxTEji681 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, passed=5891
Got 5891 stars (including 5542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=224 n_q2=256 n_q3=216 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OFf6ypq3F9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=274, passed=4468
Got 4468 stars (including 4190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=236 n_q2=244 n_q3=239 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.edAHNB5cqI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=4510
Got 4510 stars (including 4185 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=238 n_q2=240 n_q3=239 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new1=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.164
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20323.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 20323_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 20378_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:10.24 -07:17:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04752_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 04752_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:46.66 -13:14:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30
Second-epoch image center 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0547 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:00.562 -09:59:51.30
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0620 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:05.675 -10:02:52.99
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:08.414 -10:03:01.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01151 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ot329UABDy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gYDTaapquY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C730ycLWTB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4SUdoAA4Wm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33319 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9446 to 188.0928 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9446 to 188.0928 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 4264 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3508 out of 3727 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3727 out of 33319 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.623850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.623850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33319 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9446 to 188.0928 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9446 to 188.0928 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 4264 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3508 out of 3727 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3727 out of 33319 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9656 to 188.1174 deg, Dec -15.2621 to -4.6829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9656 to 188.1174 deg, Dec -15.2621 to -4.6829 deg
Loaded 4265 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3499 out of 3725 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3725 out of 33275 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.1 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ot329UABDy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1421, passed=33301
Got 33301 stars (including 31829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33301 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=221 n_q2=258 n_q3=222 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gYDTaapquY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1345, passed=33262
Got 33262 stars (including 31866 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33262 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=224 n_q2=260 n_q3=217 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C730ycLWTB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=837, passed=29061
Got 29061 stars (including 28166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=245 n_q2=244 n_q3=237 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4SUdoAA4Wm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=835, passed=29320
Got 29320 stars (including 28429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29320 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=241 n_q2=242 n_q3=240 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-22-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_670449_gdGQxF6v/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:02.64 -11:56:26.6: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:52.25 -12:59:51.2: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:47.12 -11:35:07.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:31:16.29 -09:39:50.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:59:15.15 -11:23:58.6: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:02:56.99 -13:42:08.8: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:26.38 -12:03:48.7: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:37:42.32 -07:48:30.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:59:15.15 -11:23:58.6: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:02:56.99 -13:42:08.8: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:47.12 -11:35:07.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:02.64 -11:56:26.6: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:52.25 -12:59:51.2: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:31:16.29 -09:39:50.0: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:26.38 -12:03:48.7: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:56.99 -13:42:08.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2422 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:15.15 -11:23:58.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5191 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:52.25 -12:59:51.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4398 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:02.64 -11:56:26.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4122 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:47.12 -11:35:07.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7792 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:26.38 -12:03:48.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9840 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:33:27.00 -10:36:13.2: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:41:28.82 -06:48:22.8: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:37:42.32 -07:48:30.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:33:27.00 -10:36:13.2: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:41:28.82 -06:48:22.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:27.00 -10:36:13.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8874 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:41:28.82 -06:48:22.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0506 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:20:11.55 -08:42:15.3: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:07.80 -14:00:09.5: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:32:02.85 -14:24:31.9: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:05.81 -14:10:39.2: 14.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:03.37 -05:03:53.6: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:09.28 -05:39:25.0: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:03.37 -05:03:53.6: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:07.80 -14:00:09.5: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:20:11.55 -08:42:15.3: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:32:02.85 -14:24:31.9: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:05.81 -14:10:39.2: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:03.37 -05:03:53.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2709 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:11.55 -08:42:15.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0696 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:07.80 -14:00:09.5: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0532 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:02.85 -14:24:31.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9683 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:05.81 -14:10:39.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0222 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:10.29 -13:46:47.2: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:44.31 -13:34:34.0: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:09.28 -05:39:25.0: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:09.28 -05:39:25.0: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2752 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:10.29 -13:46:47.2: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:44.31 -13:34:34.0: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:10.29 -13:46:47.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0991 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:44.31 -13:34:34.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9857 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:47:59.78 -08:43:36.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:24.02 -12:21:37.7: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:41.68 -12:08:39.0: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:50.51 -11:47:09.4: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:08.03 -05:38:19.5: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:05.07 -13:26:20.3: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:47:59.78 -08:43:36.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:41.68 -12:08:39.0: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:50.51 -11:47:09.4: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:24.02 -12:21:37.7: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:41.68 -12:08:39.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0235 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:50.51 -11:47:09.4: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3122 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:24.02 -12:21:37.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2705 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:25.92 -09:46:42.8: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:56.29 -13:13:13.3: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:08.03 -05:38:19.5: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:08.03 -05:38:19.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3236 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:05.07 -13:26:20.3: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:05.07 -13:26:20.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3840 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:25.92 -09:46:42.8: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:56.29 -13:13:13.3: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:25.92 -09:46:42.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3340 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:56.29 -13:13:13.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2136 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:18.57 -11:55:49.6: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:17.76 -12:08:16.4: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:33.20 -14:14:11.7: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:29:30.54 -15:02:46.4: 14.67 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:24.33 -07:55:51.9: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:17.76 -12:08:16.4: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:33.20 -14:14:11.7: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:18.57 -11:55:49.6: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:17.76 -12:08:16.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1419 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:33.20 -14:14:11.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2852 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:18.57 -11:55:49.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2521 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:19.36 -07:37:45.3: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:32:43.88 -14:05:57.0: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:29:30.54 -15:02:46.4: 14.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:24.33 -07:55:51.9: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:30.54 -15:02:46.4: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3774 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:24.33 -07:55:51.9: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4439 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:19.36 -07:37:45.3: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:32:43.88 -14:05:57.0: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:19.36 -07:37:45.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3181 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:43.88 -14:05:57.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1969 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:48.68 -13:35:49.6: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:45.59 -10:13:26.2: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:21.29 -13:16:26.4: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:29:46.55 -12:09:10.9: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:19.25 -11:50:43.8: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:48.68 -13:35:49.6: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:45.59 -10:13:26.2: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:48.68 -13:35:49.6: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3097 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:45.59 -10:13:26.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3284 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:31:25.89 -10:33:01.7: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:21.29 -13:16:26.4: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:21.29 -13:16:26.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1975 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:29:46.55 -12:09:10.9: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:19.25 -11:50:43.8: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:19.25 -11:50:43.8: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3888 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:46.55 -12:09:10.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1652 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:49.91 -06:10:58.5: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:31:25.89 -10:33:01.7: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:25.89 -10:33:01.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4758 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:31:09.09 -07:46:05.0: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:34:54.54 -09:47:37.8: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:49.91 -06:10:58.5: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:49.91 -06:10:58.5: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4278 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:17.65 -09:46:00.1: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:42:35.40 -05:49:02.7: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:34:04.51 -06:23:29.2: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:31:09.09 -07:46:05.0: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:34:54.54 -09:47:37.8: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:09.09 -07:46:05.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5906 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:54.54 -09:47:37.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5494 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:24:45.56 -10:06:53.5: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:17.65 -09:46:00.1: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:17.65 -09:46:00.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4775 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:42:35.40 -05:49:02.7: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:34:04.51 -06:23:29.2: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:35.40 -05:49:02.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5350 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:04.51 -06:23:29.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5257 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:24:45.56 -10:06:53.5: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:10.68 -13:20:57.8: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:45.56 -10:06:53.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6073 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:28:41.23 -11:26:55.7: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:30.93 -08:54:33.0: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:10.68 -13:20:57.8: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:10.68 -13:20:57.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4597 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:52.15 -12:21:40.1: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:36:03.48 -07:22:20.2: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:30:21.90 -07:37:54.4: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:28:41.23 -11:26:55.7: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:41.23 -11:26:55.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3270 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:30.93 -08:54:33.0: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:30.93 -08:54:33.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3919 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:12:55.08 -11:40:13.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:52.15 -12:21:40.1: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:30:21.90 -07:37:54.4: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:52.15 -12:21:40.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3280 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:36:03.48 -07:22:20.2: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:21.90 -07:37:54.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5775 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:03.48 -07:22:20.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5709 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:26:51.23 -05:43:57.0: 15.40 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:12:55.08 -11:40:13.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:31:18.45 -05:54:46.6: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:26:04.07 -06:58:55.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:26:51.23 -05:43:57.0: 15.22 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:51.23 -05:43:57.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.7136 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:23:19.78 -10:28:16.2: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:31:18.45 -05:54:46.6: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:18.45 -05:54:46.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4802 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:26:04.07 -06:58:55.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 11:36:22.55 -14:25:10.3: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-47-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0136.fits at 12:15:06.01 -10:02:13.8: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:23:19.78 -10:28:16.2: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:19.78 -10:28:16.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7667 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 11:36:22.55 -14:25:10.3: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-07_23-48-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 12:15:06.01 -10:02:13.8: 15.50 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:22.55 -14:25:10.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5140 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:06.01 -10:02:13.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8063 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53002.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53395.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52578_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52580_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52580_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52586_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52589_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:15.98 -13:38:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52655_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:15.39 -11:11:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52842_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52894_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52994_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.72 -05:22:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53002_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53002_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53078_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53115_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53115_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:21.73 -07:23:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53204_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:20:25.41 -06:32:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53250_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53296_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53301_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53301_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53331_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53336_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53336_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53356_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:04.27 -11:28:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53361_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53364_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53364_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53368_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53368_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53370_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53373_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53393_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53393_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53395_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53395_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53411_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53411_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53417_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53418_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53418_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53433_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:51.51 -04:52:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53458_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53459_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53459_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53466_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53468_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53471_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53481_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53484_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53495_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53495_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53512_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53512_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53513_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53515_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53528_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53529_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:36.24 -08:17:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53535_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53535_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53537_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53538_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53548_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53552_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:26.16 -13:59:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53557_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53557_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53576_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53591_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53595_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53595_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53602_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53605_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53607_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53614_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53617_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53626_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53644_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53646_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53646_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53668_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53669_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53669_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53671_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53671_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53676_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53681_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53697_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:01.15 -05:33:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53720_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53726_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:39.82 -04:53:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53755_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 53766_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27770_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 27770_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
