This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 12.82 10:48:50.85 +01:48:43.3
248.47136 51.23394 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe -1 1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:48:50.85 +01:48:43.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:48:50.85 +01:48:43.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 48 50.85 +01 48 43.3 12.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6734,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1734 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 13.42 11:21:09.49 +00:04:34.0
260.50149 55.32883 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:21:09.49 +00:04:34.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:21:09.49 +00:04:34.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 11 21 09.49 +00 04 34.0 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6734,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1734 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 13.52 11:09:53.61 +02:55:02.2
253.46603 55.71188 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -0 1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:53.61 +02:55:02.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:09:53.61 +02:55:02.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 11 09 53.61 +02 55 02.2 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6734,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1734 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.34 10:51:21.43 +02:45:17.5
248.06012 52.33723 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera -1 -1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:51:21.43 +02:45:17.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:51:21.43 +02:45:17.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 51 21.43 +02 45 17.5 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6734,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1734 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.75 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1
266.69312 58.26512 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 11 38 58.23 +00 35 12.1 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.46 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4
250.14096 47.12888 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 40 07.33 -01 49 57.4 14.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.31 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4
251.38694 46.21279 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 39 58.45 -03 05 06.4 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.76 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8
259.68701 53.35454 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 11 14 52.01 -01 12 29.8 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.57 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1
255.09725 45.52442 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 45 41.31 -05 20 50.1 14.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.79 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3
252.83092 47.34605 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 45 58.42 -02 56 56.3 14.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.85 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5
254.49525 52.93143 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 11 04 12.07 +00 27 14.5 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1734 2461202.6734 14.77 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7
248.60587 51.58793 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1735* 10 50 06.29 +01 59 43.7 14.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6734,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1734 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461202.67364064 11.06.2026 04:09:52.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5671
Objects passed selection criteria: 5663
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5178.25
Average stars matched: 5090 (98.2958 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:17:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461202.67364064 11.06.2026 04:09:52.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31676
Objects passed selection criteria: 31588
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29947.5
Average stars matched: 29041 (96.973 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:18:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.67325190
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00065 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00065 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A1gDnS6KUh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udPPPFp5Oo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0jv5OimruC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PAMgDDnJY2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.798800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.798800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2717 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2717 deg
Loaded 3803 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3190 out of 3294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3294 out of 5632 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.0 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.A1gDnS6KUh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=219 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.udPPPFp5Oo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, passed=5632
Got 5632 stars (including 5252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=219 n_q2=234 n_q3=238 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0jv5OimruC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, passed=4583
Got 4583 stars (including 4284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=220 n_q2=216 n_q3=253 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PAMgDDnJY2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, passed=4557
Got 4557 stars (including 4266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4557 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=221 n_q2=217 n_q3=251 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.301
ref2=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.294
new1=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new2=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.220
reference average sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.2975
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:39.277 -02:02:35.90
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.401 -02:02:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00065 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00065 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3OhfOTyVTH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oJOku4xQLc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yMzzsuxlYx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KjLJJgMt0d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 31205 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2727 deg
Loaded 3807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3109 out of 3359 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3359 out of 31205 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3OhfOTyVTH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1524, passed=33848
Got 33848 stars (including 32278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=216 n_q2=238 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oJOku4xQLc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1336, passed=31185
Got 31185 stars (including 29805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=223 n_q2=227 n_q3=236 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yMzzsuxlYx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=920, passed=27879
Got 27879 stars (including 26892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=226 n_q2=215 n_q3=253 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KjLJJgMt0d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=795, passed=27801
Got 27801 stars (including 26948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=228 n_q2=216 n_q3=249 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231435_TTUQ1b1x1_2765254_8kDlBOQu/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:21.09 -03:31:57.1: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:48:50.85 +01:48:43.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:53.61 +02:55:02.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:21:09.49 +00:04:34.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:29.5: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:41:21.09 -03:31:57.1: 14.12 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:21.09 -03:31:57.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9448 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:48:50.85 +01:48:43.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:09:53.61 +02:55:02.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:29.5: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:21:09.49 +00:04:34.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:29.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6062 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:59.04 +01:27:53.5: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:39:59.04 +01:27:53.5: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.04 +01:27:53.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8846 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:51:21.43 +02:45:17.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:45:32.40 +03:01:42.4: 15.41 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:46.13 -05:31:03.9: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:09.16 -06:09:37.6: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:51:21.43 +02:45:17.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:45:32.40 +03:01:42.4: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:46.13 -05:31:03.9: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:19.27 -02:32:34.9: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:45:32.40 +03:01:42.4: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3299 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:46.13 -05:31:03.9: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1733 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:38:09.16 -06:09:37.6: 14.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:09.16 -06:09:37.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1974 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:15.24 +01:37:20.1: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:38:19.27 -02:32:34.9: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:19.27 -02:32:34.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2827 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:42:15.24 +01:37:20.1: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:15.24 +01:37:20.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3595 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:11:36.57 +01:54:56.3: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:14.91 +02:16:38.9: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:38:58.23 +00:35:12.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:01:11.96 -03:18:30.9: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:11:36.57 +01:54:56.3: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:36.57 +01:54:56.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5050 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:14.91 +02:16:38.9: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:01:11.96 -03:18:30.9: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:14.91 +02:16:38.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2100 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:11.96 -03:18:30.9: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3289 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:07.33 -01:49:57.4: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:23.04 -04:10:16.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:21.08 +02:11:07.4: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:23.04 -04:10:16.3: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:23.04 -04:10:16.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:37:21.08 +02:11:07.4: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:21.08 +02:11:07.4: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5958 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:39:58.45 -03:05:06.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:27.68 -03:59:42.4: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:27.68 -03:59:42.4: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:27.68 -03:59:42.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3396 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.6: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.6: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6097 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:31:28.51 -01:50:32.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:14:52.01 -01:12:29.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:57.71 -03:21:49.2: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:31:28.51 -01:50:32.9: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:28.51 -01:50:32.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7480 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:57.71 -03:21:49.2: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:57.71 -03:21:49.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3595 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:35:23.22 +02:00:20.8: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:35:23.22 +02:00:20.8: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:23.22 +02:00:20.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7911 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:45:41.31 -05:20:50.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:45:58.42 -02:56:56.3: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:04:12.07 +00:27:14.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:50:06.29 +01:59:43.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52742.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52039.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52817.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52841.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52979.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53000.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53016.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51761_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51761_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51763_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51763_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51806_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51806_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51872_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51872_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51884_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51884_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51891_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51891_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51909_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51909_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51967_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 51967_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52005_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52005_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52039_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52047_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52090_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52100_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:21.72 +02:00:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52103_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52117_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52117_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52135_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52135_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:08.34 -00:54:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52160_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52186_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52263_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52328_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52370_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52373_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:10.96 -04:11:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52374_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52375_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52384_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52385_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:13.25 -00:17:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52406_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:14:03.16 +02:50:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52455_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52477_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52489_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52497_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52501_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52506_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52508_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52514_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52515_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52560_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52564_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:56.04 +02:01:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52593_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52626_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52628_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52651_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52659_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52691_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52694_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52701_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52742_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:32.40 +03:01:42.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.940 3809438599150598144 161.38538802107 +03.02807009973 14.6053 14.0015 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.940#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52752_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52771_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52783_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52784_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52803_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52806_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52815_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52817_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52820_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52821_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52833_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52835_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52838_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52841_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52845_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52847_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52849_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52849_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52851_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52853_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52855_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52868_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52869_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52870_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52877_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52879_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52893_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52902_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52911_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52911_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52915_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52917_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52927_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52929_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52940_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52944_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52946_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52951_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52956_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52963_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52969_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52975_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 52979_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52980_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52986_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52987_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 52998_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 53000_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53002_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53002_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 53016_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53054_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 53062_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50223_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 50223_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-09-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
