This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 9.98 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2
344.93475 16.91330 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 1 -0 1 9.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,9.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 9.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 11.69 16:20:02.93 -22:04:21.6
353.87850 19.55354 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 0 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:02.93 -22:04:21.6: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:02.93 -22:04:21.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 12.86 16:48:29.90 -22:53:07.1
357.62634 13.98771 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 1 -1 1 12.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:29.90 -22:53:07.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:29.90 -22:53:07.1: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 12.95 16:51:23.65 -26:33:17.9
355.08314 11.20564 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache -0 -1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:51:23.65 -26:33:17.9: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:51:23.65 -26:33:17.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 13.27 16:36:40.43 -23:54:27.2
355.04293 15.45834 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 0 1 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:40.43 -23:54:27.2: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:40.43 -23:54:27.2: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 13.32 15:59:37.97 -27:06:25.8
346.61913 19.39224 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.254 Augusta 0 -0 0 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:37.97 -27:06:25.8: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:37.97 -27:06:25.8: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1379 2461202.6379 13.14 16:00:19.54 -25:39:58.8
347.80051 20.32257 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis -0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:19.54 -25:39:58.8: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:19.54 -25:39:58.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6379,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1379 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461202.63810113 11.06.2026 03:18:41.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5318
Objects passed selection criteria: 5315
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5151.5
Average stars matched: 4858 (94.3026 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 22:22:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461202.63810113 11.06.2026 03:18:41.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55172
Objects passed selection criteria: 55105
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49673.8
Average stars matched: 45773.8 (92.1488 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 22:24:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.63763209
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0505 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01056 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YD4wZl1Fdn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E4Rui2kOgO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rCw0WPk8aQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ixd5J8OgQi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.386900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.386900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Loaded 8547 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4618 out of 4781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4781 out of 6303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YD4wZl1Fdn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5279
Got 5279 stars (including 4876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=289 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E4Rui2kOgO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=6303
Got 6303 stars (including 5717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=299 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rCw0WPk8aQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=223, passed=4542
Got 4542 stars (including 4314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=292 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.561
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ixd5J8OgQi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, passed=4620
Got 4620 stars (including 4375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=291 n_q2=245 n_q3=270 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.561
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.289
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.3655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:15:17.35 -26:08:31.5: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:42.63 -26:45:08.2: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:42.63 -26:45:08.2: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:15:17.35 -26:08:31.5: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:42.63 -26:45:08.2: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1599 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:17.35 -26:08:31.5: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2419 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21139.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21143_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21143_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.49 -27:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21144_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21144_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.86 -23:28:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21146_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21146_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.98 -21:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21148_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21148_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:22.44 -26:30:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21153_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21153_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21158_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 21158_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.31 -27:26:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.74 -23:46:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.11 -27:23:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.23 -22:56:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0505 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:24.862 -25:59:21.51
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:23.434 -25:59:54.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01056 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hoZC081MfX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0AdkHPCTXu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HhlHa15q5K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RB5zzfJwKk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.178000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.178000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 69536 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Loaded 8557 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6303 out of 6992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6992 out of 69536 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hoZC081MfX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2322, passed=57332
Got 57332 stars (including 54899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=300 n_q2=253 n_q3=262 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0AdkHPCTXu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3494, passed=69528
Got 69528 stars (including 65904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=307 n_q2=265 n_q3=249 n_q4=145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.418
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HhlHa15q5K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1247, passed=36217
Got 36217 stars (including 34930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=287 n_q2=236 n_q3=279 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.490
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RB5zzfJwKk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1242, passed=37091
Got 37091 stars (including 35797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=281 n_q2=238 n_q3=284 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.329
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0034.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222014_TTUQ1b1x1_1593182_sPgHXi1T/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:02.93 -22:04:21.6: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:53:46.31 -28:18:04.7: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:58.74 -20:46:57.7: 12.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:13:01.05 -25:16:46.9: 12.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:29.90 -22:53:07.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:12.83 -24:32:56.4: 12.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:58.74 -20:46:57.7: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:53:46.31 -28:18:04.7: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:02.93 -22:04:21.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:58.74 -20:46:57.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1567 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:46.31 -28:18:04.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3705 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:13:01.05 -25:16:46.9: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:01.05 -25:16:46.9: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1132 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:05.30 -23:00:18.6: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:32.96 -27:09:33.5: 12.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:42.81 -21:49:28.1: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:29.90 -22:53:07.1: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:12.83 -24:32:56.4: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:12.83 -24:32:56.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6473 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:05.30 -23:00:18.6: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:05.30 -23:00:18.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7992 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:32.96 -27:09:33.5: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:42.81 -21:49:28.1: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:32.96 -27:09:33.5: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7143 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.81 -21:49:28.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8486 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:29.40 -23:46:18.1: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:51:23.65 -26:33:17.9: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:29.40 -23:46:18.1: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:29.40 -23:46:18.1: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7320 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:40.43 -23:54:27.2: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:54.23 -21:08:16.5: 13.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:37.97 -27:06:25.8: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:42:07.54 -21:55:07.4: 14.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:19.54 -25:39:58.8: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:51:23.65 -26:33:17.9: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:11:09.53 -22:29:39.7: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:54.23 -21:08:16.5: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:42:07.54 -21:55:07.4: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:54.23 -21:08:16.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1846 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:37.97 -27:06:25.8: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:07.54 -21:55:07.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2895 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:40.43 -23:54:27.2: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:19.54 -25:39:58.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:11:09.53 -22:29:39.7: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:09.53 -22:29:39.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2206 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:57:36.30 -20:49:47.2: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:45:26.80 -22:42:51.5: 14.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:15.03 -24:38:19.3: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:57:36.30 -20:49:47.2: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:36.30 -20:49:47.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4066 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:45:26.80 -22:42:51.5: 13.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:26.80 -22:42:51.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5545 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:15.03 -24:38:19.3: 14.40 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:08:00.23 -20:54:45.1: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:15.03 -24:38:19.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4375 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:08:00.23 -20:54:45.1: 14.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:00.23 -20:54:45.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7655 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.6: 14.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.6: 14.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7021 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82438.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82554.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82556.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82405_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82405_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:33.87 -30:07:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82408_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82408_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82416_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82416_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:07.80 -30:00:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82446_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82446_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.83 -27:54:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82455_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82455_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.67 -25:17:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82459_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82459_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82462_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82462_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:26.99 -26:31:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82471_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82471_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:49.29 -30:19:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:22.31 -23:17:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:50.20 -29:42:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82498_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82498_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82500_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82500_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:39.62 -29:23:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82504_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82504_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82505_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82505_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:35.48 -21:20:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82510_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82510_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82511_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82511_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82512_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82512_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.28 -23:11:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82513_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82516_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82516_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:03.66 -31:17:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82517_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82517_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82518_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82518_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.89 -25:16:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82528_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82528_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:50.23 -28:56:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:18.47 -25:52:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82531_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82531_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:41.23 -28:39:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82534_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.50 -26:44:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82538_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82538_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:28.75 -27:58:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82546_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82546_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:48.88 -23:07:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82547_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82547_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82550_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82550_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82552_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82552_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82556_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 82556_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82561_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82561_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82566_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82566_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:43.28 -26:02:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82570_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82583_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82583_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82591_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82591_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82610_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82610_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82619_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 82619_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.36 -29:15:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.35 -25:11:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31558_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 31558_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:33.33 -26:20:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.36 -24:14:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.36 -25:39:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:48.33 -29:18:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:25.03 -28:43:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.54 -24:24:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.99 -21:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.88 -23:28:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.31 -27:26:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.11 -27:23:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:00.12 -30:24:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.51 -27:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:14.16 -29:21:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:56.79 -30:22:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035
The candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-18-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0035 did not pass the final checks
