This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,6.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 6.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4291 2461200.9291 8.38 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4
120.64288 -64.17552 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4 Vesta 1 -1 1 8.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.4291* 00 47 26.95 -01 19 17.4 8.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,8.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 8.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,8.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 8.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9291,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4291 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.63968008 23.12.2025 03:20:58.359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
First image: 2461032.63968008 23.12.2025 03:20:58.359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Last image: 2461200.92927231 09.06.2026 10:17:59.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5346
Objects passed selection criteria: 5334
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3830
Average stars matched: 3762.75 (98.2441 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111616 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 08:01:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.63968008 23.12.2025 03:20:58.359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
First image: 2461032.63968008 23.12.2025 03:20:58.359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Last image: 2461200.92927231 09.06.2026 10:17:59.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28429
Objects passed selection criteria: 28346
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20765
Average stars matched: 20174 (97.1539 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 08:02:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.92884679
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:18.849 -02:02:07.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:27.762 -02:00:15.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:18.849 -02:02:07.96
Second-epoch image center 00:51:27.762 -02:00:15.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0485 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:27.986 -01:59:56.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:18.849 -02:02:07.96
Second-epoch image center 00:51:27.986 -01:59:56.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0528 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:27.762 -02:00:15.68
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:27.986 -01:59:56.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00551 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0IFEBC7Yfa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WNm78EAr4N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qh0o3WNXjK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tymrb81Vqf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits and wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5943 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9342 to 20.7407 deg, Dec -7.3328 to +3.2889 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9342 to 20.7407 deg, Dec -7.3328 to 3.2889 deg
Loaded 3951 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3257 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 5943 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5943 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9342 to 20.7407 deg, Dec -7.3328 to +3.2889 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9342 to 20.7407 deg, Dec -7.3328 to 3.2889 deg
Loaded 3951 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3257 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 5943 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9696 to 20.8081 deg, Dec -7.2934 to +3.3230 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9696 to 20.8081 deg, Dec -7.2934 to 3.3230 deg
Loaded 3972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3214 out of 3365 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3365 out of 5460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.0 pix Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0IFEBC7Yfa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=5943
Got 5943 stars (including 5538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.207 n_q1=244 n_q2=257 n_q3=224 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WNm78EAr4N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=414, passed=5460
Got 5460 stars (including 5034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=251 n_q2=249 n_q3=226 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qh0o3WNXjK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=161, passed=2009
Got 2009 stars (including 1844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=262 n_q2=202 n_q3=277 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tymrb81Vqf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=152, passed=2017
Got 2017 stars (including 1864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2017 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=260 n_q2=203 n_q3=277 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.234
ref2=Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new1=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.339
new2=fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.355
reference average sigma_overall=0.2955 worst_q_ratio=1.27
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_062010_TTUQ1b1x1_476363_3I1zrKZU/wcs_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:16:16.77 -07:08:55.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:15:59.44 -07:05:47.2: 9.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:19:28.34 -06:35:54.3: 9.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:21:09.79 -06:19:56.0: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:18:54.46 -06:17:41.2: 9.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:17:30.72 -06:50:47.8: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:20:41.37 -06:13:42.4: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:19:28.34 -06:35:54.3: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:21:09.79 -06:19:56.0: 9.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:16.77 -07:08:55.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:16.77 -07:08:55.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:54.46 -06:17:41.2: 9.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.64 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:15:59.44 -07:05:47.2: 9.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:28.34 -06:35:54.3: ref_mag=9.64 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9742 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:09.79 -06:19:56.0: ref_mag=9.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0474 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.46 -06:17:41.2: ref_mag=9.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7997 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:59.44 -07:05:47.2: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3031 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:20:41.37 -06:13:42.4: 9.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.02 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:41.37 -06:13:42.4: ref_mag=10.02 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4086 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:17:30.72 -06:50:47.8: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:30.72 -06:50:47.8: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5743 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:20:29.16 -05:39:36.9: 10.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:21:08.07 -07:06:54.9: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:16:45.89 -06:50:28.4: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:21:04.01 -06:08:26.9: 10.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:21:09.00 -06:27:45.5: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:18:31.13 -06:40:35.4: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-20-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits at 01:16:09.57 -06:45:59.9: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:20:29.16 -05:39:36.9: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:21:08.07 -07:06:54.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:08.07 -07:06:54.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:29.16 -05:39:36.9: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5950 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:45.89 -06:50:28.4: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.44 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:45.89 -06:50:28.4: ref_mag=10.44 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7156 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:21:04.01 -06:08:26.9: 10.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:21:09.00 -06:27:45.5: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:04.01 -06:08:26.9: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9065 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:09.00 -06:27:45.5: ref_mag=10.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8173 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:18:31.13 -06:40:35.4: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:31.13 -06:40:35.4: ref_mag=10.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9741 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-49-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits at 01:16:09.57 -06:45:59.9: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.09 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:09.57 -06:45:59.9: ref_mag=11.09 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3365 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 20170_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20172_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20172_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:17.51 -06:09:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20174_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 20174_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 20177_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20182_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20182_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:00.99 -06:57:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20185_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20185_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20190_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20190_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20195_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20195_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20199_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20208_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20208_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20211_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20211_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20219_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20220_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20224_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20230_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20230_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20235_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20238_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20246_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 20252_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:17.51 -06:09:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51904_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51904_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:47:26.95 -01:19:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51907_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 51907_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51913_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51913_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:21:00.98 -06:57:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51915_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51915_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51922_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51922_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51926_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51926_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51933_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51933_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51934_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51934_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51936_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51936_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51942_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51942_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51943_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51943_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51945_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51945_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51952_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51954_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51954_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51955_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51955_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51960_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51960_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51965_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51965_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51971_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51974_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51974_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51975_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51981_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51981_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51983_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 51983_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52005_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52005_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52007_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52007_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52008_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52008_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52012_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52012_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52023_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52023_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52030_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52030_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52031_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52031_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52034_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52034_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52044_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52048_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52048_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52049_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52058_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52058_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52062_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52062_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52067_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52067_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52072_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52072_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52077_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52077_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52079_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52079_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52082_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52084_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52086_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52088_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52088_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52091_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52097_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52097_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52098_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52098_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52099_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52099_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52110_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52115_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52118_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:29.90 +01:56:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52119_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52123_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52125_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52125_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52129_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52133_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52133_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52134_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52134_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52138_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52138_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52140_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52141_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52141_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52146_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52148_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52148_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 52153_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52155_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52155_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52157_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52157_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52159_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52159_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52161_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52161_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52162_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52162_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52171_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52171_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52177_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52177_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52181_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52181_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52182_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52186_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52190_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52190_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52192_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52202_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52202_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52207_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52207_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52210_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52212_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52212_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52223_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52227_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52228_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52241_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52241_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52251_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52254_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52257_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52257_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52269_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52278_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52282_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52282_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52283_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52283_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52289_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52289_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:24.21 -06:58:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52295_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52295_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52300_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52309_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52319_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52319_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52320_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52320_fd_Cet-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-17-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
