This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4345 2461200.9345 10.53 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1
51.31476 -31.47128 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" SW Aqr
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.438 V 11.755 V 2425097.37710 0.459304700000 A5-G1
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -49 57 75 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SW Aqr,2461200.9345,10.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SW Aqr 20260609.4345 10.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4345 2461200.9345 13.14 20:56:05.92 +00:17:05.0
48.62429 -27.27770 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna -0 -0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:56:05.92 +00:17:05.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:56:05.92 +00:17:05.0: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9345,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4345 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4345 2461200.9345 13.70 21:15:20.99 +00:03:38.0
51.30770 -31.49088 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -1 1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:20.99 +00:03:38.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:20.99 +00:03:38.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9345,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4345 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4345 2461200.9345 13.56 20:57:25.86 +01:59:24.1
50.45158 -26.67184 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba 2 1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:57:25.86 +01:59:24.1: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:57:25.86 +01:59:24.1: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9345,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4345 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.4345 2461200.9345 13.97 21:16:05.87 -05:46:47.7
45.43302 -34.64178 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas 0 0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:16:05.87 -05:46:47.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:16:05.87 -05:46:47.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.9345,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.4345 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
First image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Last image: 2461200.93480668 09.06.2026 10:25:57.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9364
Objects passed selection criteria: 9360
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9018.75
Average stars matched: 8915.5 (98.8552 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 07:43:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
First image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Last image: 2461200.93480668 09.06.2026 10:25:57.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 66
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47241
Objects passed selection criteria: 47174
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45263
Average stars matched: 44077.8 (97.3814 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 147208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 07:46:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.93426005
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01509 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jWfqxuQpko
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aYLK0Pnyfk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C8yqr2Ghb5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J0XHKq2aBq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to +3.6465 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to 3.6465 deg
Loaded 8018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6229 out of 9948 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.786000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.786000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to +3.6465 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to 3.6465 deg
Loaded 8018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6229 out of 9948 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (aperture=7.5)
Read 9523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2281 to 329.4738 deg, Dec -7.6130 to +3.6510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2281 to 329.4738 deg, Dec -7.6130 to 3.6510 deg
Loaded 8017 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5972 out of 6148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6148 out of 9523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (aperture=7.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.4 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.3 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.7 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
3.7 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
3.4 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
14.6 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jWfqxuQpko (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=517, passed=9948
Got 9948 stars (including 9425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=241 n_q2=188 n_q3=291 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aYLK0Pnyfk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=9523
Got 9523 stars (including 9026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=241 n_q2=177 n_q3=291 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C8yqr2Ghb5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=448, passed=8445
Got 8445 stars (including 7990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=226 n_q2=195 n_q3=290 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J0XHKq2aBq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=439, passed=8420
Got 8420 stars (including 7972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=229 n_q2=196 n_q3=286 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.160
ref2=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new1=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.208
new2=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.222
reference average sigma_overall=0.49 worst_q_ratio=1.1935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:21:34.32 -01:18:11.6: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:19:35.53 -00:43:55.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:14:06.04 +00:19:13.8: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:21:34.32 -01:18:11.6: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:34.32 -01:18:11.6: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0115 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5236 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:14:06.04 +00:19:13.8: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:19:35.53 -00:43:55.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:06.04 +00:19:13.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8681 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:35.53 -00:43:55.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9840 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 20340_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20341_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 20341_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 20342_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06538_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 06538_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 07551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:47.68 +01:10:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04809_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 04809_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.62 -01:31:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:15:17.79 +00:04:34.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0387 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:47.575 -01:59:07.16
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:50.579 -01:58:36.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01509 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mf5ysQ46hh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NrN9RjYZE8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oYqK5rMhTd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EAIR3VdOau
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.6758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.6758 deg
Loaded 8107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6517 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6517 out of 49708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.690400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.690400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.6758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.6758 deg
Loaded 8107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6517 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6517 out of 49708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 48390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.1999 to 329.5322 deg, Dec -7.6418 to +3.7110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.1999 to 329.5322 deg, Dec -7.6418 to 3.7110 deg
Loaded 8121 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5995 out of 6531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6531 out of 48390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.2 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.1 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
3.2 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.1 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
14.7 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mf5ysQ46hh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2459, passed=49696
Got 49696 stars (including 47184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=229 n_q2=185 n_q3=299 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NrN9RjYZE8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2429, passed=48382
Got 48382 stars (including 45883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=228 n_q2=178 n_q3=300 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oYqK5rMhTd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2035, passed=42412
Got 42412 stars (including 40316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=215 n_q2=194 n_q3=296 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EAIR3VdOau (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1934, passed=42124
Got 42124 stars (including 40136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=221 n_q2=191 n_q3=296 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0338.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_073910_TTUQ1b1x1_2147258_j15nzNKT/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.1: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:17:08.49 -05:41:52.2: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:28:01.53 +02:44:46.9: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:56:53.80 -06:27:08.1: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:28:22.14 -02:43:13.6: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:50:25.08 -06:55:45.0: 13.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:56:05.92 +00:17:05.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:52:10.55 +00:16:49.8: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:30:02.96 -01:42:37.5: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:14:55.49 +01:40:09.0: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:28:01.53 +02:44:46.9: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.1: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4675 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:01.53 +02:44:46.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9532 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:17:08.49 -05:41:52.2: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:28:22.14 -02:43:13.6: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:50:25.08 -06:55:45.0: 14.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:08.49 -05:41:52.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5141 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:25.08 -06:55:45.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9232 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:22.14 -02:43:13.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6092 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:56:05.92 +00:17:05.0: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:56:53.80 -06:27:08.1: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:52:10.55 +00:16:49.8: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:30:02.96 -01:42:37.5: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:53.80 -06:27:08.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2612 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:10.55 +00:16:49.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5573 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:14:55.49 +01:40:09.0: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:02.96 -01:42:37.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1266 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:55.49 +01:40:09.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0748 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:36:07.23 -00:28:55.6: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:33:15.52 -00:50:00.3: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:18:13.98 -00:56:25.0: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:20.99 +00:03:38.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:45:45.06 -00:26:09.4: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:51:12.13 -02:37:44.4: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:57:25.64 +03:20:53.7: 13.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:55:41.39 -06:04:44.0: 14.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:30:31.84 -00:52:49.9: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:33:15.52 -00:50:00.3: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:15.52 -00:50:00.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2394 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:36:07.23 -00:28:55.6: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:07.23 -00:28:55.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7011 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:20.99 +00:03:38.0: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:18:13.98 -00:56:25.0: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:13.98 -00:56:25.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4363 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:45:45.06 -00:26:09.4: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:45.06 -00:26:09.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7685 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:51:12.13 -02:37:44.4: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:57:25.64 +03:20:53.7: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:12.13 -02:37:44.4: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6737 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:25.64 +03:20:53.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4220 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:55:41.39 -06:04:44.0: 14.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:41.39 -06:04:44.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5921 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:30:31.84 -00:52:49.9: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:30:31.84 -00:52:49.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6509 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:57:25.86 +01:59:24.1: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:51:13.00 -02:38:03.9: 13.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:38:12.54 -00:33:07.2: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:52:28.03 -03:30:28.4: 14.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:29:45.00 +02:37:16.2: 13.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:53:30.00 -07:03:36.2: 13.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:43:15.27 -00:25:04.8: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:49:54.28 -03:25:22.0: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:57:25.86 +01:59:24.1: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:51:13.00 -02:38:03.9: 14.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:13.00 -02:38:03.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9912 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:38:12.54 -00:33:07.2: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:29:45.00 +02:37:16.2: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:52:28.03 -03:30:28.4: 14.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:12.54 -00:33:07.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9797 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:53:30.00 -07:03:36.2: 14.45 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:28.03 -03:30:28.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9160 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:45.00 +02:37:16.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9385 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:30.00 -07:03:36.2: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8439 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:43:15.27 -00:25:04.8: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:15.27 -00:25:04.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9945 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:49:54.28 -03:25:22.0: 14.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:54.28 -03:25:22.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1398 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:45:10.98 -02:43:39.7: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:47:26.96 -04:40:59.1: 14.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:54:37.68 -03:02:28.3: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:52:08.10 -03:53:43.5: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:45:54.26 -05:09:22.8: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:54:58.13 -01:13:05.8: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:42:29.62 -01:37:22.0: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:45:10.98 -02:43:39.7: 14.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:10.98 -02:43:39.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1212 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:54:37.68 -03:02:28.3: 14.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:37.68 -03:02:28.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9692 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:47:26.96 -04:40:59.1: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:52:08.10 -03:53:43.5: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:45:54.26 -05:09:22.8: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:26.96 -04:40:59.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1269 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:08.10 -03:53:43.5: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1859 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:54:58.13 -01:13:05.8: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:54.26 -05:09:22.8: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0464 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:58.13 -01:13:05.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1736 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:42:29.62 -01:37:22.0: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:29.62 -01:37:22.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1586 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:45:20.37 +00:19:10.9: 14.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:41:59.66 -06:58:29.4: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:54:20.02 -00:38:07.0: 14.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:38:40.36 -06:53:09.5: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:53:43.65 +01:07:32.3: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:46:30.51 +00:00:50.5: 14.58 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:19:20.41 -07:00:00.6: 14.19 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:45:20.37 +00:19:10.9: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:45:20.37 +00:19:10.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1607 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:38:40.36 -06:53:09.5: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:40.36 -06:53:09.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0542 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:41:59.66 -06:58:29.4: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:54:20.02 -00:38:07.0: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:59.66 -06:58:29.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1095 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:46:30.51 +00:00:50.5: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:20.02 -00:38:07.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1562 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:53:43.65 +01:07:32.3: 14.64 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:30.51 +00:00:50.5: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1159 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:43.65 +01:07:32.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1806 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:19:20.41 -07:00:00.6: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:20.41 -07:00:00.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9859 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:50:20.86 -02:13:51.4: 14.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:29:41.70 -05:37:10.0: 14.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:52:42.02 +01:53:10.0: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:49:18.48 +01:27:25.4: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:16:05.87 -05:46:47.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:41:54.62 -05:47:19.0: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:43:50.66 -01:48:42.5: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:50:20.86 -02:13:51.4: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:20.86 -02:13:51.4: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2975 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:29:41.70 -05:37:10.0: 14.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:52:42.02 +01:53:10.0: 14.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:42.02 +01:53:10.0: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1438 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:41.70 -05:37:10.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9421 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:49:18.48 +01:27:25.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:18.48 +01:27:25.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1400 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:41:54.62 -05:47:19.0: 14.46 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:43:50.66 -01:48:42.5: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:54.62 -05:47:19.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1575 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:16:05.87 -05:46:47.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:50.66 -01:48:42.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2002 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:58:12.13 +01:37:52.2: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:41:57.34 -03:55:20.0: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:37:02.95 -04:19:14.7: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:58:12.13 +01:37:52.2: 14.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:12.13 +01:37:52.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0369 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:41:57.34 -03:55:20.0: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:37:02.95 -04:19:14.7: 14.98 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:41:57.34 -03:55:20.0: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1813 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:02.95 -04:19:14.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3276 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53521.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 48s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53430_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53435_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53445_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53450_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53451_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53486_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53486_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53488_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53488_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 53491_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53492_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53492_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53493_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53493_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53494_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53494_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53498_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53504_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53504_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53505_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53507_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53507_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53510_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53510_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 53515_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53517_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53519_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53520_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53520_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53521_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 53521_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53530_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53530_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53531_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53540_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53540_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53548_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53553_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53553_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53555_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53555_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53558_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53558_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53566_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53567_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53567_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53568_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53570_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53574_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53574_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53577_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53577_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53580_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53582_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53584_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53586_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53586_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53590_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53606_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53609_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53610_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53611_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53612_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
Preparing report for the candidate 53625_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53626_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53633_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53638_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53640_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53659_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 53659_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21894_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 21894_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.62 -01:31:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 44599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:47.69 +01:10:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48070_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339
The candidate 48070_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_05-25-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0339 did not pass the final checks