This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3128 2461200.8128 13.01 15:07:22.18 +17:29:16.5
23.01738 57.23504 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.148 Gallia 0 0 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:07:22.18 +17:29:16.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:07:22.18 +17:29:16.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8128,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3128 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3128 2461200.8128 14.93 14:44:50.49 +16:52:11.0
17.46411 61.86744 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.667 Denise -1 0 1 15.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:44:50.49 +16:52:11.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:44:50.49 +16:52:11.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8128,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3128 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
First image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Last image: 2461200.81314819 09.06.2026 07:30:46.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7320
Objects passed selection criteria: 7319
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7057
Average stars matched: 6842.25 (96.9569 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 05:56:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
First image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Last image: 2461200.81314819 09.06.2026 07:30:46.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 39
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38507
Objects passed selection criteria: 38423
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37311.2
Average stars matched: 36625.2 (98.1614 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 05:59:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.81243347
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0743 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01575 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sy3mj2ZGoQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YGWgDJvsrq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NUCuMIkkt0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ImKPkLRWLP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6792 to +19.2477 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6792 to 19.2477 deg
Loaded 4308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3555 out of 3660 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3660 out of 6628 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
3.3 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
3.3 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
15.2 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Sy3mj2ZGoQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=7234
Got 7234 stars (including 6692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=243 n_q2=205 n_q3=263 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YGWgDJvsrq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=6628
Got 6628 stars (including 6229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=235 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NUCuMIkkt0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=7305
Got 7305 stars (including 6937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=245 n_q2=210 n_q3=250 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ImKPkLRWLP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, passed=7236
Got 7236 stars (including 6871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=244 n_q2=206 n_q3=249 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.084
ref2=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new1=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new2=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.194
reference average sigma_overall=0.3975 worst_q_ratio=1.172
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:01:45.61 +14:04:33.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:59:48.28 +14:48:18.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:09:47.91 +14:38:56.7: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:38:47.15 +15:02:46.6: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:13:07.21 +14:06:18.5: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:45:26.32 +09:15:14.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:03:48.00 +15:40:03.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:06:38.46 +13:58:34.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:13:31.36 +14:46:28.4: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:01:32.96 +14:42:06.0: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:45:26.32 +09:15:14.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:13:07.21 +14:06:18.5: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:38:47.15 +15:02:46.6: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:03:48.00 +15:40:03.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:07.21 +14:06:18.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3737 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:26.32 +09:15:14.9: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4164 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:47.15 +15:02:46.6: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6828 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:59:48.28 +14:48:18.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:13:31.36 +14:46:28.4: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:09:47.91 +14:38:56.7: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:48.00 +15:40:03.6: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2186 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:01:32.96 +14:42:06.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:48.28 +14:48:18.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3833 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:06:38.46 +13:58:34.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:01:45.61 +14:04:33.6: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:31.36 +14:46:28.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4280 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:47.91 +14:38:56.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3054 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:32.96 +14:42:06.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3439 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:06:38.46 +13:58:34.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3869 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:45.61 +14:04:33.6: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4270 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:08:14.17 +14:50:06.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:06:07.09 +13:00:47.0: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:08:14.17 +14:50:06.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:06:07.09 +13:00:47.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:06:07.09 +13:00:47.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4226 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:14.17 +14:50:06.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4290 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20418_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20418_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20421_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20421_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20423_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20424_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20427_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20428_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20428_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20430_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20432_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20433_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20433_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20434_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20435_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20436_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20436_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01157_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 01157_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:19.97 +17:41:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0743 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:48.385 +14:02:19.75
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:45.826 +14:01:36.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01575 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aBbbWDz1nZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M41jtboWeV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MeMm8f23mQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3NYneb1rtl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.706700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.706700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 37570 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6742 to +19.2568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6742 to 19.2568 deg
Loaded 4313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3706 out of 37570 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.1 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
3.0 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
3.0 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aBbbWDz1nZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=1964, passed=44396
Got 44396 stars (including 42351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=245 n_q2=205 n_q3=260 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M41jtboWeV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1496, passed=37551
Got 37551 stars (including 36005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=233 n_q2=226 n_q3=236 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MeMm8f23mQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1267, passed=34234
Got 34234 stars (including 32924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=249 n_q2=209 n_q3=248 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3NYneb1rtl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1275, passed=34114
Got 34114 stars (including 32798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=243 n_q2=212 n_q3=251 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-29-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_054424_TTUQ1b1x1_1217047_n3hohggv/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:26:09.73 +11:17:18.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:30:04.62 +10:29:19.2: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:03:25.91 +16:11:20.4: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:37:49.99 +14:48:27.8: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:44:29.70 +10:33:32.2: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:07:22.18 +17:29:16.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:15:07.28 +14:07:11.9: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:12:02.46 +14:21:38.9: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:44:20.90 +19:01:45.0: 14.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:30:04.62 +10:29:19.2: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:44:29.70 +10:33:32.2: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:04.62 +10:29:19.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5825 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:37:49.99 +14:48:27.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:29.70 +10:33:32.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4801 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:26:09.73 +11:17:18.5: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:38:47.14 +15:02:46.3: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:09.73 +11:17:18.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1712 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:49.99 +14:48:27.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3313 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:15:07.28 +14:07:11.9: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:03:25.91 +16:11:20.4: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:07:22.18 +17:29:16.5: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:25.91 +16:11:20.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8727 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:07.28 +14:07:11.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4944 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:12:02.46 +14:21:38.9: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:02.46 +14:21:38.9: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3798 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:44:20.90 +19:01:45.0: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:20.90 +19:01:45.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5862 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:38:47.14 +15:02:46.3: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:47.14 +15:02:46.3: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7430 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:35:11.53 +08:52:18.5: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:40:56.90 +19:04:56.1: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:33:03.04 +14:10:51.2: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:25:53.34 +08:55:46.6: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:36:02.68 +13:34:47.1: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:32:52.76 +10:30:20.7: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:33:02.14 +14:53:24.8: 15.57 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:34:43.62 +16:11:03.1: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:04:20.05 +13:55:40.2: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:35:11.53 +08:52:18.5: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:11.53 +08:52:18.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5046 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:33:03.04 +14:10:51.2: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:03.04 +14:10:51.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6415 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:34:43.62 +16:11:03.1: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:40:56.90 +19:04:56.1: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:25:53.34 +08:55:46.6: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:56.90 +19:04:56.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7891 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:04:20.05 +13:55:40.2: 15.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:36:02.68 +13:34:47.1: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:43.62 +16:11:03.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6393 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:53.34 +08:55:46.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8262 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:33:02.14 +14:53:24.8: 15.27 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:20.05 +13:55:40.2: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8092 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:32:52.76 +10:30:20.7: 15.50 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:02.68 +13:34:47.1: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8457 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:02.14 +14:53:24.8: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8465 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:52.76 +10:30:20.7: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6429 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:29:20.34 +09:54:41.1: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:34:31.38 +08:47:34.7: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:29:20.34 +09:54:41.1: 15.42 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:20.34 +09:54:41.1: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7971 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:42:54.04 +17:08:19.7: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:35:45.95 +09:54:40.6: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:26:14.43 +15:28:03.1: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:52:32.78 +09:34:21.8: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:39:27.68 +17:00:33.1: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:39:27.68 +17:00:33.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:27.68 +17:00:33.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:36:16.03 +15:36:29.5: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:16:38.44 +12:06:37.5: 15.53 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:35:45.95 +09:54:40.6: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:34:31.38 +08:47:34.7: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:45.95 +09:54:40.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7406 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:31.38 +08:47:34.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6027 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:42:54.04 +17:08:19.7: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:52:32.78 +09:34:21.8: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:54.04 +17:08:19.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8737 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:32.78 +09:34:21.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7960 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:26:14.43 +15:28:03.1: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:14.43 +15:28:03.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8380 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:36:16.03 +15:36:29.5: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:16.03 +15:36:29.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7672 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:16:38.44 +12:06:37.5: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:38.44 +12:06:37.5: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8888 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:36:43.03 +14:58:10.0: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:44:50.49 +16:52:11.0: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:36:43.03 +14:58:10.0: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:43.03 +14:58:10.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9722 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:36:17.37 +11:56:46.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:44:50.49 +16:52:11.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:36:17.37 +11:56:46.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:17.37 +11:56:46.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7584 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52069.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52009_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52009_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52015_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52015_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52039_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 52069_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52078_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52152_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52152_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52181_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52181_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52221_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52221_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52226_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52241_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52241_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52242_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52242_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52248_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52254_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52259_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52266_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52289_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52289_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52297_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52300_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52301_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52301_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52304_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52308_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52313_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52328_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52338_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52341_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52349_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52349_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 52353_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 52369_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 50019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-30-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks