This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,7.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 7.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,8.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 8.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.4151 2461199.9151 10.05 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2
120.48345 -59.08884 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas -2 -1 2 10.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,7.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 7.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,8.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 8.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.4151 2461199.9151 12.68 00:37:54.55 +04:30:37.7
116.52509 -58.19288 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.101 Helena -4 -2 4 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:37:54.55 +04:30:37.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:37:54.55 +04:30:37.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.4151 2461199.9151 13.02 00:30:41.08 +04:05:34.4
113.02559 -58.37912 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia -3 -1 3 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:41.08 +04:05:34.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:41.08 +04:05:34.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.9151,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.4151 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461199.91547123 08.06.2026 09:58:06.714 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5934
Objects passed selection criteria: 5910
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4235.75
Average stars matched: 4135.25 (97.6273 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:54:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461199.91547123 08.06.2026 09:58:06.714 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32030
Objects passed selection criteria: 31948
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23261
Average stars matched: 22574.5 (97.0487 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:56:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.91480460
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01593 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gOS2dy5Vff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9nSrdPkYhp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qPREmlrXvQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cjTogO1Kl8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec +0.7094 to +11.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec 0.7094 to 11.2737 deg
Loaded 4467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3635 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gOS2dy5Vff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6274
Got 6274 stars (including 5838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=207 n_q2=265 n_q3=258 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9nSrdPkYhp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6217
Got 6217 stars (including 5773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qPREmlrXvQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=142, passed=2247
Got 2247 stars (including 2100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2216 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=253 n_q2=233 n_q3=257 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cjTogO1Kl8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=147, passed=2304
Got 2304 stars (including 2154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=254 n_q2=232 n_q3=264 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.099
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.311
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.9: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6105 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1852 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5011 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.9: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.9: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5598 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20343.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 20326_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20328_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.58 +01:09:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20334_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.15 +00:58:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20343_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 20343_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20386_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:06.50 +00:54:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 20392_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.33 +08:55:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0089 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:31.998 +06:00:18.44
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:29.159 +05:59:39.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01593 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f1tcu84iGk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0i6VJLmxqw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wiSHk91vBy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits &> /tmp/tmp.feAOCroWaC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec +0.7037 to +11.2806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec 0.7037 to 11.2806 deg
Loaded 4474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3580 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 34111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.f1tcu84iGk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1306, passed=34109
Got 34109 stars (including 32755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=210 n_q2=257 n_q3=258 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0i6VJLmxqw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1297, passed=34085
Got 34085 stars (including 32721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=213 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wiSHk91vBy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=264, passed=12640
Got 12640 stars (including 12358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=252 n_q2=229 n_q3=261 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.feAOCroWaC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=277, passed=12760
Got 12760 stars (including 12468 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=256 n_q2=233 n_q3=267 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-57-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0415.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_054334_TTUQ1b1x1_841162_uK1IlBGW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.8: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:16:49.15 +01:18:14.9: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.68 +01:45:50.5: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3157 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.56 +01:05:01.8: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4163 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.8: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.87 +01:12:31.8: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3498 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:40.7: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.68 +01:14:04.0: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:16:49.15 +01:18:14.9: 10.61 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.07 +01:47:08.1: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0295 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:49.15 +01:18:14.9: ref_mag=10.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6879 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:10.9: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:40.7: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.68 +01:14:04.0: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:40.7: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2433 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.68 +01:14:04.0: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2788 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:46.66 +01:59:05.8: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.2: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.78 +01:19:19.7: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:10.9: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:10.9: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3311 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.9: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:24.37 +01:55:46.1: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:46.66 +01:59:05.8: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.2: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:46.66 +01:59:05.8: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3959 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.26 +00:47:13.2: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3188 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.78 +01:19:19.7: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.78 +01:19:19.7: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3670 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:53.36 +00:59:06.1: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:45.50 +01:01:46.4: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:24.37 +01:55:46.1: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:24.37 +01:55:46.1: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4252 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.9: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.9: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4303 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:53.36 +00:59:06.1: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:45.50 +01:01:46.4: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:53.36 +00:59:06.1: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5073 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:45.50 +01:01:46.4: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4775 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.0: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:54.08 +02:09:30.6: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:17.44 +01:08:50.2: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:36.17 +00:55:30.7: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:25.76 +01:55:03.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.0: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:17.44 +01:08:50.2: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:54.08 +02:09:30.6: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.0: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6162 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:17.44 +01:08:50.2: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5515 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:54.08 +02:09:30.6: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4677 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:36.17 +00:55:30.7: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:36.17 +00:55:30.7: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5787 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:15.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.43 +01:55:26.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:25.76 +01:55:03.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:25.76 +01:55:03.0: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8486 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:15.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.43 +01:55:26.0: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:15.4: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8923 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.43 +01:55:26.0: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8128 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:25.73 +01:40:37.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:36.36 +01:15:32.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:39.64 +00:58:49.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8899 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:13.81 +01:52:12.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:29.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:25.73 +01:40:37.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:36.36 +01:15:32.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:25.73 +01:40:37.3: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9464 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:36.36 +01:15:32.9: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0350 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:39.64 +00:58:49.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:39.64 +00:58:49.4: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8571 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:59.06 +02:03:08.1: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:48.43 +01:33:49.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:13.81 +01:52:12.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:13.81 +01:52:12.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9887 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:13.65 +01:43:52.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:29.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:29.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0083 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:59.06 +02:03:08.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:59.06 +02:03:08.1: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9389 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:48.43 +01:33:49.9: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:48.43 +01:33:49.9: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0370 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:13.65 +01:43:52.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:13.65 +01:43:52.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0624 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:19.85 +01:49:19.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:21.51 +01:19:23.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.8: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:19.85 +01:49:19.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:21.51 +01:19:23.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.8: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:19.85 +01:49:19.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1417 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:21.51 +01:19:23.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1941 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1450 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:27.80 +00:59:15.1: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:01.58 +01:18:01.3: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:46.75 +01:40:37.0: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:44.64 +01:38:15.9: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:01.58 +01:18:01.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:01.58 +01:18:01.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2076 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:46.75 +01:40:37.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:27.80 +00:59:15.1: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:46.75 +01:40:37.0: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3487 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:27.80 +00:59:15.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2352 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:44.64 +01:38:15.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:44.64 +01:38:15.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3490 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:32.15 +00:49:44.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:59.73 +00:56:43.0: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:42.9: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:37:54.55 +04:30:37.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.42 +01:44:55.4: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:26.31 +02:11:43.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:41.08 +04:05:34.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:32.15 +00:49:44.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:59.73 +00:56:43.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:32.15 +00:49:44.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3117 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:59.73 +00:56:43.0: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4940 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:42.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:37:54.55 +04:30:37.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:42.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4150 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:26.31 +02:11:43.2: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:26.31 +02:11:43.2: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4918 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.42 +01:44:55.4: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:41.08 +04:05:34.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.42 +01:44:55.4: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2947 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52627.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52257_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52257_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.59 +01:09:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52263_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.15 +00:58:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52269_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:46.25 +00:56:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52273_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:46:23.82 +03:45:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52286_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:30.74 +01:02:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52295_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52306_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52333_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:06.50 +00:54:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52343_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52347_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:39.93 +00:47:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:56.33 +00:57:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:24.80 +00:48:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52360_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52363_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52375_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52377_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52381_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52394_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:59.73 +00:52:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52398_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52407_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:14.77 +01:14:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52431_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52443_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:29.80 +01:56:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52452_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52456_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52457_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52457_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:09.04 +00:46:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52462_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52479_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52483_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52487_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52489_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:19.87 +00:54:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 52499_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52500_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52507_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52523_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52537_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:32:20.00 +06:58:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52542_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:36.48 +01:11:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52545_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:37.95 +01:03:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52549_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52555_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 52559_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 52615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:20.62 +01:01:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
Preparing report for the candidate 52627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.32 +08:55:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416
The candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-58-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0416 did not pass the final checks
