This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 11.28 15:05:55.59 -22:29:36.3
339.43464 30.68183 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 4 -1 4 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:05:55.59 -22:29:36.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:05:55.59 -22:29:36.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.01 14:56:06.92 -13:22:26.5
343.63063 39.44868 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard 4 -1 5 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:56:06.92 -13:22:26.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:56:06.92 -13:22:26.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.29 15:35:49.31 -13:20:12.4
352.77563 33.19098 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 3 1 3 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:35:49.31 -13:20:12.4: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:35:49.31 -13:20:12.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.40 14:38:09.91 -21:33:50.7
333.53600 34.88731 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 4 -0 4 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:38:09.91 -21:33:50.7: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:38:09.91 -21:33:50.7: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.86 14:46:22.06 -14:06:14.6
340.56614 40.22315 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina 4 -1 4 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:46:22.06 -14:06:14.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:46:22.06 -14:06:14.6: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.91 15:09:41.34 -16:42:06.2
344.37356 34.81624 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 6 -0 6 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:09:41.34 -16:42:06.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:09:41.34 -16:42:06.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 14.04 15:13:31.05 -22:14:14.1
341.25660 29.86344 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.541 Deborah 4 -0 4 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:13:31.05 -22:14:14.1: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:13:31.05 -22:14:14.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 13.96 15:31:32.03 -20:44:49.7
346.07036 28.41184 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.229 Adelinda 2 1 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:31:32.03 -20:44:49.7: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:31:32.03 -20:44:49.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3075 2461199.8075 14.31 15:04:40.88 -21:02:44.7
340.13200 32.03265 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1343 Nicole 4 -1 4 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:04:40.88 -21:02:44.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:04:40.88 -21:02:44.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8075,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3075 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461199.80775468 08.06.2026 07:23:00.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7958
Objects passed selection criteria: 7950
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7163.25
Average stars matched: 6967.25 (97.2638 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:05:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461199.80775468 08.06.2026 07:23:00.004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 157
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53251
Objects passed selection criteria: 53135
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 50396.5
Average stars matched: 47732 (94.7129 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:08:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.80725044
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:27.837 -18:00:01.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:27.837 -18:00:01.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Image size: 927.7'x626.3' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:25.468 -18:00:15.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:25.468 -18:00:15.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0737 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:27.837 -18:00:01.12
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:25.468 -18:00:15.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01023 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nVGjxG1zyP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TQsi6Lw27l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iTcxASQa5v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fBKPqmFXcw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Loaded 6114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4966 out of 5104 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5104 out of 8227 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nVGjxG1zyP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=8201
Got 8201 stars (including 7705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.711 n_q1=244 n_q2=224 n_q3=262 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.555
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TQsi6Lw27l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=8227
Got 8227 stars (including 7762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=216 n_q2=289 n_q3=194 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.471
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iTcxASQa5v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=6207
Got 6207 stars (including 5794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=284 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.364
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fBKPqmFXcw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, passed=6193
Got 6193 stars (including 5801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012885 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010308 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 672 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.87"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.97"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 700 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.06"
Excluding outliers - 700 stars left (next iteration limit 729)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits N_match=700 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.933 sigma_q2_arcsec=9.208 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.095 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.599 n_q1=252 n_q2=63 n_q3=282 n_q4=103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.524
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.555
ref2=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.471
new1=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.364
new2=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits sigma_overall=2.613 worst_q_ratio=3.524
reference average sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.513
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits) flagged: sigma=2.613 (ref avg 0.484), ratio=3.524 (ref avg 1.513), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6072 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3334859.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3334859.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 29.5823 (7.03799e+12), 34 match, 0 conflict, 117 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (226.646,-17.9897), pixel scale 5.9382 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---++--------+---------++---++--------+----+++--+-+-------++---+---------+-----+-----+---+--------
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3334859.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3334859.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.608361, -18.003873) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:26.007, -18:00:13.942).
Field size: 15.7948 x 10.5801 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.321 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 8 05:06 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 8 05:06 out3334859.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3334859.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3334859.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7283 degrees of RA,Dec (226.607,-18.0047)
log-odds ratio 23.9241 (2.45542e+10), 5 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.622,-18.0228), pixel scale 5.94233 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-------+---+-+---+(best)-----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3334859.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3334859.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.632822, -18.022774) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:31.877, -18:01:21.985).
Field size: 15.6999 x 10.6184 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.569 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 8 05:06 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 8 05:06 out3334859.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 35956 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5626, 952.842] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 94.0651 (7.11155e+40), 32 match, 0 conflict, 209 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--------------+----------------+--------------+-------+-----------+----+-----+-+-----+-+-+-------
--> log-odds 94.0651
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 357.572 (1.95756e+155), 71 match, 0 conflict, 238 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-------------+-------+--------+------+------+++-----++--+-----+--++-+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+---
--> log-odds 357.572
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 674.287 (6.90343e+292), 124 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----++------+++------++-----+++-----++------+++------+--+---+-+--++-+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+---
--> log-odds 674.287
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1003.85 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 450 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++------+--+---+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1003.85
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1706.08 (inf), 426 match, 0 conflict, 1187 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++------+--+---+-+--+--+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1706.08
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5626, 952.842] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 94.0651 (7.11155e+40), 32 match, 0 conflict, 209 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+--------------+----------------+--------------+-------+-----------+----+-----+-+-----+-+-+-------
--> log-odds 94.0651
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 357.572 (1.95756e+155), 71 match, 0 conflict, 238 distractors, 195 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++-------------+-------+--------+------+------+++-----++--+-----+--++-+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+---
--> log-odds 357.572
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 674.287 (6.90343e+292), 124 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 380 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----++------+++------++-----+++-----++------+++------+--+---+-+--++-+-+-+---+-+-----+-+-+---+---
--> log-odds 674.287
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1003.85 (inf), 201 match, 0 conflict, 450 distractors, 736 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++------+--+---+-+--+--+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1003.85
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1706.08 (inf), 426 match, 0 conflict, 1187 distractors, 1455 index.
RA,Dec = (226.634,-18.022), pixel scale 5.97019 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++-----+++------+--+---+-+--+--+-+-----+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1706.08
Got 10 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.607732, -18.003822) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:25.856, -18:00:13.759).
Field size: 15.7942 x 10.5805 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.322 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
Image size: 943.8'x628.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:25.633 -18:00:16.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6193 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3356737.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, passed=6193
Got 6193 stars (including 5801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.11"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.229 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.167 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.432 n_q1=251 n_q2=199 n_q3=283 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.998
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits): sigma 2.613->1.436, ratio 3.524->0.998; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits with order-2 result
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.436 -- 2.97x the reference average (0.484); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-22-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0243.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_045529_TTUQ1b1x1_1269965_7sVGPSw0/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:37:32.12 -13:45:53.3: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:05:55.59 -22:29:36.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:37:32.12 -13:45:53.3: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:32.12 -13:45:53.3: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9912 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:05:55.59 -22:29:36.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 20634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20721_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 20721_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.74 -21:10:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20746_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 20746_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.32 -17:39:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69420_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69420_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69424_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69424_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69431_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69431_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69432_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69432_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69436_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69436_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69438_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69438_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:53.33 -14:27:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69443_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69443_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:15:20.99 -14:05:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69446_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69446_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69448_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69448_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69454_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69454_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69455_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69455_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69460_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69460_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:50.08 -19:50:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:49:45.47 -15:07:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69464_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69464_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69465_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69465_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:18.81 -19:52:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69469_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69469_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:01.45 -14:25:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69471_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69471_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:35.72 -14:10:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69588_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69588_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:55.58 -22:29:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69647_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69647_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:57.88 -13:30:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69773_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69773_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:41.27 -13:58:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69829_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69829_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69833_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 69833_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69989_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 69989_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70083_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70083_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:26.10 -15:09:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70176_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70176_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70177_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70177_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70200_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70200_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:14.37 -20:08:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70222_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70222_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70229_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70229_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70250_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70250_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:10:23.96 -13:43:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70366_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70366_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70412_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70412_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:54.65 -15:20:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70415_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70415_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:20:24.03 -15:41:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70484_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70484_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70503_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70503_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.62 -14:30:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70505_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70505_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:45.71 -15:29:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70543_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70543_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:10.57 -22:58:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70544_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70544_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:59.00 -15:21:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70564_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70564_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:09.63 -13:20:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70625_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70625_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70647_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70647_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:06.96 -13:55:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70674_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70674_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:40.17 -14:56:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70681_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70681_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70691_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70691_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70698_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70698_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70722_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70722_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:27.23 -15:15:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70770_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70770_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:20.25 -23:04:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70771_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70771_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70802_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70802_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:23.78 -22:21:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70840_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70840_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70843_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70843_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70850_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70850_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70852_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70852_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70855_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70855_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70859_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70859_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70861_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70861_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70862_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 70862_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70876_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70876_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70878_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70878_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70882_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70882_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70888_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70888_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70894_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70894_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70903_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70903_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70904_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70904_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70932_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70932_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:02.08 -20:49:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70936_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70936_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70937_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70937_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70946_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70946_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:00.64 -14:36:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70947_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70947_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:29.61 -19:46:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70958_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70958_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70960_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70960_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70969_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70969_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70988_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70988_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70997_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 70997_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71005_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71005_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71007_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71007_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71024_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71024_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71027_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71027_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71029_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71029_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71050_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71050_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71055_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71055_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71058_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71058_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71060_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71060_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71065_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71065_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71068_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71068_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71070_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71070_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71102_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71102_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71104_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71104_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71107_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71107_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71113_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71113_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71139_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71139_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71142_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71142_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71151_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71151_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71153_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71153_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71154_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71154_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71166_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71166_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71188_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71188_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71195_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71195_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71196_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71196_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71204_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
Preparing report for the candidate 71204_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71208_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71208_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71213_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71213_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71222_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71222_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71251_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71251_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71255_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71255_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71287_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71287_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71292_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71292_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71298_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71298_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71307_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 71307_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40130_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 40130_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 34169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:44:37.01 -19:32:28.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.681 6281614215586496256 221.15401583288 -19.54116513755 11.7057 10.0011 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.681#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.39 -20:19:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.34 -17:39:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 40563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34784_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 34784_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40038_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 40038_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 39515_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 35341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50199_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 50199_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 35150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:58.09 -22:15:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.73 -21:10:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22016_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 22016_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 39562_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:27.75 -22:06:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43817_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 43817_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40548_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 40548_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44155_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 44155_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34687_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 34687_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244
The candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_02-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0244 did not pass the final checks
