This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3941 2461199.8941 13.17 20:55:50.12 +00:06:24.3
48.41446 -27.31289 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna 1 -2 2 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:55:50.12 +00:06:24.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:55:50.12 +00:06:24.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8941,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3941 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3941 2461199.8941 13.49 21:15:20.78 -00:01:57.7
51.21474 -31.54003 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:20.78 -00:01:57.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:20.78 -00:01:57.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8941,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3941 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3941 2461199.8941 13.38 20:57:23.24 +01:50:16.4
50.30045 -26.74283 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba -0 -1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:57:23.24 +01:50:16.4: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:57:23.24 +01:50:16.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8941,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3941 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3941 2461199.8941 13.97 21:15:57.68 -05:49:10.4
45.37085 -34.63143 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 -1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:57.68 -05:49:10.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:57.68 -05:49:10.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8941,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3941 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
First image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Last image: 2461199.89434075 08.06.2026 09:27:41.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9269
Objects passed selection criteria: 9261
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8681.25
Average stars matched: 8583.75 (98.8769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:51:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
First image: 2461176.90433404 16.05.2026 09:42:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Last image: 2461199.89434075 08.06.2026 09:27:41.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 35
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46325
Objects passed selection criteria: 46271
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44094.2
Average stars matched: 43034.8 (97.5972 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 147204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 05:53:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.89389106
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0778 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0858 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81
Second-epoch second image center 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01022 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e5ugV5B33K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GqKvX5Md2Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qsryvXzVhx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fd8wGq4zfL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to +3.6465 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to 3.6465 deg
Loaded 8018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6229 out of 9948 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.786000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.786000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to +3.6465 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2584 to 329.5409 deg, Dec -7.6265 to 3.6465 deg
Loaded 8018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6043 out of 6229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6229 out of 9948 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (aperture=7.5)
Read 9523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2281 to 329.4738 deg, Dec -7.6130 to +3.6510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2281 to 329.4738 deg, Dec -7.6130 to 3.6510 deg
Loaded 8017 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5972 out of 6148 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6148 out of 9523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (aperture=7.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.4 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.3 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.6 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
3.6 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
3.4 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
14.6 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e5ugV5B33K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=517, passed=9948
Got 9948 stars (including 9425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=241 n_q2=188 n_q3=291 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GqKvX5Md2Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=9523
Got 9523 stars (including 9026 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=241 n_q2=177 n_q3=291 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qsryvXzVhx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=416, passed=7740
Got 7740 stars (including 7316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=228 n_q2=196 n_q3=287 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fd8wGq4zfL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=7767
Got 7767 stars (including 7350 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=229 n_q2=194 n_q3=283 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.160
ref2=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new1=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new2=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.223
reference average sigma_overall=0.49 worst_q_ratio=1.1935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:14:06.03 +00:19:13.6: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:36:48.26 -03:22:39.8: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:14:06.03 +00:19:13.6: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:36:48.26 -03:22:39.8: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:48.26 -03:22:39.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0200 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:06.03 +00:19:13.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8793 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 20375_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 20379_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04809_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 04809_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.61 -01:31:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 07551_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:47.69 +01:10:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0778 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:46.506 -02:01:25.64
Second-epoch image center 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0858 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:26:04.894 -02:00:35.81
Second-epoch second image center 21:26:07.008 -02:00:54.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01022 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R4FWLvsDeS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ayvfclr1ng
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W7iX7ayWKI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9hbBnrTbYF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.6758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.6758 deg
Loaded 8107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6517 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6517 out of 49708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.690400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.690400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.6758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2546 to 329.5844 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.6758 deg
Loaded 8107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6517 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6517 out of 49708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 48390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.1999 to 329.5322 deg, Dec -7.6418 to +3.7110 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.1999 to 329.5322 deg, Dec -7.6418 to 3.7110 deg
Loaded 8121 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5995 out of 6531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6531 out of 48390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.2 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.1 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
3.2 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
3.1 pix wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
14.7 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R4FWLvsDeS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2459, passed=49696
Got 49696 stars (including 47184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=229 n_q2=185 n_q3=299 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ayvfclr1ng (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2429, passed=48382
Got 48382 stars (including 45883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=228 n_q2=178 n_q3=300 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W7iX7ayWKI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1710, passed=39906
Got 39906 stars (including 38147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=216 n_q2=192 n_q3=293 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9hbBnrTbYF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1760, passed=39864
Got 39864 stars (including 38052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39864 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=218 n_q2=195 n_q3=291 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0379.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_044324_TTUQ1b1x1_277709_kj4suXLo/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:55:50.12 +00:06:24.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:12:09.01 +00:14:19.9: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.6: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:54:10.61 -00:33:57.4: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:33:15.32 -00:50:00.9: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:14:55.51 +01:40:09.8: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:04:35.24 -02:27:51.3: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:38:04.99 -00:04:11.6: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:18:28.38 -05:41:34.5: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:12:17.72 +01:47:56.5: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:33:15.32 -00:50:00.9: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:12:09.01 +00:14:19.9: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:38:04.99 -00:04:11.6: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.6: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:09.01 +00:14:19.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4747 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:15.32 -00:50:00.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2233 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:54:10.61 -00:33:57.4: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:04.99 -00:04:11.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7673 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:18:28.38 -05:41:34.5: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:55:50.12 +00:06:24.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:09.81 -02:03:47.6: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4576 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:14:55.51 +01:40:09.8: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:04:35.24 -02:27:51.3: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:10.61 -00:33:57.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3950 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:28.38 -05:41:34.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4441 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:55.51 +01:40:09.8: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1342 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:35.24 -02:27:51.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4133 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:12:17.72 +01:47:56.5: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:17.72 +01:47:56.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4755 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:18:13.90 -00:56:26.4: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 20:57:23.24 +01:50:16.4: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:55:48.18 -00:44:28.4: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:44:33.30 -05:26:02.6: 13.79 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:29:45.15 +02:37:17.3: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:20.78 -00:01:57.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:29:41.63 -05:37:10.1: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:51:39.05 +00:56:32.4: 13.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:35:54.01 -04:57:32.2: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:55:48.18 -00:44:28.4: 14.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:48.18 -00:44:28.4: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0427 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:51:39.05 +00:56:32.4: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:44:33.30 -05:26:02.6: 13.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 20:57:23.24 +01:50:16.4: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:20.78 -00:01:57.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:18:13.90 -00:56:26.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:29:45.15 +02:37:17.3: 13.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:33.30 -05:26:02.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7981 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:29:41.63 -05:37:10.1: 14.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:39.05 +00:56:32.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8709 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:13.90 -00:56:26.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5402 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:45.15 +02:37:17.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9931 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:41.63 -05:37:10.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8654 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:35:54.01 -04:57:32.2: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:54.01 -04:57:32.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0484 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:15:57.68 -05:49:10.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:44:33.28 -03:38:29.0: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:17:46.86 -04:56:26.2: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:04:04.01 +00:53:52.1: 14.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-42-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0340.fits at 21:24:29.69 -02:49:45.1: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:15:57.68 -05:49:10.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:44:33.28 -03:38:29.0: 14.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:17:46.86 -04:56:26.2: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:44:33.28 -03:38:29.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1978 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:46.86 -04:56:26.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2922 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:24:29.69 -02:49:45.1: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-02-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0425.fits at 21:04:04.01 +00:53:52.1: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:29.69 -02:49:45.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2312 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:04.01 +00:53:52.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0215 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53565.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53594.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53432_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53440_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53440_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53512_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53512_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:21:09.92 -04:34:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53554_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53554_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53556_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53556_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 53565_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53572_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53572_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53575_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53576_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53579_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53579_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53581_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53581_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 53585_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 53594_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53609_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53619_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53619_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53627_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53636_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53640_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53661_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
Preparing report for the candidate 53673_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53675_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53678_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53707_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 53710_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 44599_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:47.68 +01:10:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21894_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380
The candidate 21894_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0380 did not pass the final checks