Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8858,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3858 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Equ-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Equ-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Equ-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 167207 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 167207 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.png' -> 'transient_report/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits_preview.png'
Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits

renamed 'Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.png' -> 'transient_report/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits_preview.png'
Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 901.1893
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 556.6370
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2019.0045
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 683.1943
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2018.2569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 683.6264
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.24038
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T04:15:02.7959377' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T09:15:02.7959377' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.385449016 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T09:15:12.6979607' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.3855636227 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 321.42530699373 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 5.99979384223591 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.045 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 130.414166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26743929463808 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Equ-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/d_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits :)
Spent 0.590351 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/d_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T04:15:48.7237392' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T09:15:48.7237392' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.3859805902 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T09:15:58.6267200' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.3860952081 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 321.425306941005 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 5.99979381788283 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.1663888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 130.654166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26535698445161 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Equ-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '21 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29462 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/d_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits :)
Spent 0.639812 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/d_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits

fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.88556476
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits'
wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05
Second-epoch image center 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0806 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05
Second-epoch image center 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0940 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64
Second-epoch second image center 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01388 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rFnq0ad6t5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pg0zZVR5HR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m5vStO2vDg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rR5pZ9y367
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits) and catalog (wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10219 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.4443 to 329.3377 deg, Dec +0.6861 to +11.2828 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.4443 to 329.3377 deg, Dec 0.6861 to 11.2828 deg
Loaded 8501 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6651 out of 6891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6891 out of 10219 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.676100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.676100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10219 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.4443 to 329.3377 deg, Dec +0.6861 to +11.2828 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.4443 to 329.3377 deg, Dec 0.6861 to 11.2828 deg
Loaded 8501 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6651 out of 6891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6891 out of 10219 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 12516 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.3125 to 329.6598 deg, Dec +0.2771 to +11.6045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.3125 to 329.6598 deg, Dec 0.2771 to 11.6045 deg
Loaded 9387 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7102 out of 7298 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7298 out of 12516 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits (aperture=7.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
3.4 pix Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
3.5 pix fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
3.5 pix fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
3.4 pix wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
14.8 mag. Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rFnq0ad6t5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=662, passed=10219
Got 10219 stars (including 9544 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10219 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=238 n_q2=226 n_q3=230 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits -region wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pg0zZVR5HR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=572, passed=12516
Got 12516 stars (including 11929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12516 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=253 n_q2=208 n_q3=257 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -region wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m5vStO2vDg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, passed=9581
Got 9581 stars (including 9123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=253 n_q2=219 n_q3=245 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rR5pZ9y367 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=454, passed=9646
Got 9646 stars (including 9183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=250 n_q2=222 n_q3=244 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.202
ref2=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.273
new2=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.308
reference average sigma_overall=0.4365 worst_q_ratio=1.1855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Equ-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22769_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 22769_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 11.95 | 21:17:52.96 +09:50:08.9 | 3430 5441 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:17:52.96 +09:50:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00475_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 00475_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 9.52 | 21:08:47.77 +01:10:16.7 | 2350 0131 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:08:47.77 +01:10:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Equ-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05
Second-epoch image center 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0806 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.948 +06:00:22.05
Second-epoch image center 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0940 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:26:02.244 +05:59:44.64
Second-epoch second image center 21:26:05.301 +05:59:24.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01388 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kpN5HZVyWp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GkRCB3oySW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rziTPGnEyr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SDcgZp1D6m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits and wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits) and catalog (wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.4158 to 329.3417 deg, Dec +0.6796 to +11.2843 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.4158 to 329.3417 deg, Dec 0.6796 to 11.2843 deg
Loaded 8534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6648 out of 7491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7491 out of 70334 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.510800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.510800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70334 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.4158 to 329.3417 deg, Dec +0.6796 to +11.2843 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.4158 to 329.3417 deg, Dec 0.6796 to 11.2843 deg
Loaded 8534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6648 out of 7491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7491 out of 70334 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 64486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.2957 to 329.7195 deg, Dec +0.2519 to +11.6160 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.2957 to 329.7195 deg, Dec 0.2519 to 11.6160 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6852 out of 7548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7548 out of 64486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
3.2 pix Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
3.2 pix fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
3.2 pix fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
3.2 pix wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
14.9 mag. Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kpN5HZVyWp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits' -> 'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=4247, passed=70309
Got 70309 stars (including 65964 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=234 n_q2=231 n_q3=221 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits -region wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GkRCB3oySW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3625, passed=64469
Got 64469 stars (including 60774 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=246 n_q2=207 n_q3=270 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits -region wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rziTPGnEyr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2354, passed=50976
Got 50976 stars (including 48564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50976 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=241 n_q2=221 n_q3=255 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits -region wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SDcgZp1D6m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2352, passed=51055
Got 51055 stars (including 48657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=240 n_q2=222 n_q3=253 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/wcs_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Equ-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:14:55.71 +01:40:03.3: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:14:46.17 +07:48:29.6: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:07:56.72 +05:08:07.5: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:00:37.01 +08:11:41.6: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:17:24.61 +08:15:38.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:20:59.03 +07:19:22.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:18:18.41 +07:43:31.1: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:20:58.59 +07:19:44.0: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:52:45.97 +01:18:16.0: 13.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:14:55.71 +01:40:03.3: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:55.71 +01:40:03.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9811 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:14:46.17 +07:48:29.6: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:46.17 +07:48:29.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1917 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:00:37.01 +08:11:41.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:20:58.59 +07:19:44.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:58.59 +07:19:44.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7580 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:07:56.72 +05:08:07.5: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:37.01 +08:11:41.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0290 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:17:24.61 +08:15:38.2: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:20:59.03 +07:19:22.2: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:56.72 +05:08:07.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8679 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:18:18.41 +07:43:31.1: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:59.03 +07:19:22.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3813 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:24.61 +08:15:38.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5605 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:18:18.41 +07:43:31.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5519 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:52:45.97 +01:18:16.0: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:00:57.44 +08:04:47.1: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:45.97 +01:18:16.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6655 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:00:57.44 +08:04:47.1: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:57.44 +08:04:47.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2707 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:59:09.88 +11:05:45.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:28:59.71 +11:01:34.5: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:59:04.91 +05:42:41.0: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:13:30.83 +07:08:43.9: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:57:23.29 +01:50:10.8: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:06:46.02 +03:48:20.3: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:55:29.20 +08:10:46.6: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:53:35.01 +04:28:04.2: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 20:59:09.88 +11:05:45.9: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:09.88 +11:05:45.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 20:57:23.29 +01:50:10.8: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:06:46.02 +03:48:20.3: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:13:30.83 +07:08:43.9: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:30.83 +07:08:43.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3364 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:46.02 +03:48:20.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3379 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 20:59:04.91 +05:42:41.0: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:28:59.71 +11:01:34.5: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 20:55:29.20 +08:10:46.6: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:04.91 +05:42:41.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6160 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:29.20 +08:10:46.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4601 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:28:59.71 +11:01:34.5: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4679 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:17:55.57 +06:50:27.2: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:53:35.01 +04:28:04.2: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:35.01 +04:28:04.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7239 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:56:57.80 +05:28:45.3: 14.84 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:17:55.57 +06:50:27.2: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:55.57 +06:50:27.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9059 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:48:29.74 +08:24:50.7: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:56:57.80 +05:28:45.3: 14.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:56:57.80 +05:28:45.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0194 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:36:37.09 +05:14:23.3: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:56:23.95 +07:17:06.4: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:00:22.09 +10:02:14.1: 14.57 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 20:57:16.97 +07:38:26.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:09:22.79 +09:49:44.0: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:48:29.74 +08:24:50.7: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:29.74 +08:24:50.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9854 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:56:23.95 +07:17:06.4: 14.88 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:15:14.02 +09:43:34.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:56:23.95 +07:17:06.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2738 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:36:37.09 +05:14:23.3: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:36:37.09 +05:14:23.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0791 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:00:22.09 +10:02:14.1: 14.64 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 20:57:16.97 +07:38:26.3: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:22.09 +10:02:14.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3801 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:16.97 +07:38:26.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.2516 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:09:22.79 +09:49:44.0: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:09:22.79 +09:49:44.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3433 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:15:14.02 +09:43:34.6: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:14.02 +09:43:34.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4806 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-31-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0408.fits at 21:36:35.78 +09:41:09.1: 15.43 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-35-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0330.fits at 21:36:35.78 +09:41:09.1: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:35.78 +09:41:09.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4654 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out86971.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 45s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86705_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86705_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.19 | 21:14:46.14 +07:48:30.7 | 3043 4189 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.19 | 21:14:46.20 +07:48:28.5 | 3035 4191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86711_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86711_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.75 | 21:52:45.88 +01:18:13.8 | 9016 0614 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.62 | 21:52:46.06 +01:18:18.1 | 9009 0618 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86760_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86760_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.04 | 21:23:01.18 +06:49:19.2 | 4301 3668 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:23:01.19 +06:49:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86767_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86767_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.37 | 21:20:59.04 +07:19:22.3 | 3987 3948 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.40 | 21:20:59.02 +07:19:22.1 | 3980 3951 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86775_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86775_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.55 | 21:18:18.40 +07:43:31.1 | 3574 4167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.55 | 21:18:18.41 +07:43:31.1 | 3566 4170 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86776_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86776_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.56 | 21:17:24.61 +08:15:38.3 | 3422 4482 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.56 | 21:17:24.61 +08:15:38.0 | 3414 4485 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86785_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86785_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.74 | 21:20:58.62 +07:19:44.0 | 3986 3952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.79 | 21:20:58.57 +07:19:44.0 | 3978 3954 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86795_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86795_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.84 | 21:07:56.72 +05:08:07.5 | 2105 2523 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.90 | 21:07:56.73 +05:08:07.4 | 2097 2526 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86798_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86798_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.98 | 21:00:37.02 +08:11:41.6 | 0903 4319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.11 | 21:00:37.01 +08:11:41.5 | 0895 4322 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86809_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86809_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 12.97 | 21:14:55.67 +01:40:04.0 | 3271 0487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 12.99 | 21:14:55.74 +01:40:02.5 | 3263 0490 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86822_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86822_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.24 | 21:00:57.42 +08:04:46.8 | 0958 4251 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.30 | 21:00:57.47 +08:04:47.3 | 0950 4254 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86823_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86823_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.35 | 20:59:09.89 +11:05:46.2 | 0593 6079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.38 | 20:59:09.88 +11:05:45.5 | 0586 6082 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86842_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86842_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.38 | 21:13:30.83 +07:08:43.2 | 2877 3779 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.30 | 21:13:30.84 +07:08:44.5 | 2870 3782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86846_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86846_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.45 | 20:55:29.30 +08:10:47.0 | 0123 4277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.47 | 20:55:29.10 +08:10:46.3 | 0114 4280 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86849_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86849_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.49 | 21:28:59.71 +11:01:34.9 | 5043 6255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.45 | 21:28:59.71 +11:01:34.2 | 5036 6258 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86853_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86853_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.37 | 21:06:46.03 +03:48:21.1 | 1968 1710 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.31 | 21:06:46.01 +03:48:19.5 | 1960 1712 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86861_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86861_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.47 | 21:14:33.88 +09:58:40.8 | 2931 5501 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:14:33.80 +09:58:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86884_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86884_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.62 | 20:59:04.94 +05:42:41.1 | 0743 2802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.61 | 20:59:04.87 +05:42:41.0 | 0735 2805 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86888_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
Preparing report for the candidate 86888_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86905_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86905_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.71 | 21:53:35.08 +04:28:03.4 | 8998 2547 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.74 | 21:53:34.93 +04:28:05.0 | 8989 2550 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86926_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86926_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.90 | 21:17:55.52 +06:50:26.8 | 3548 3632 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.91 | 21:17:55.63 +06:50:27.6 | 3540 3635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86932_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86932_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 13.96 | 21:56:57.87 +05:28:49.0 | 9469 3198 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.09 | 21:56:57.73 +05:28:41.6 | 9461 3199 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86944_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86944_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.02 | 21:48:29.61 +08:24:52.0 | 8054 4879 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 13.96 | 21:48:29.86 +08:24:49.4 | 8047 4881 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86971_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86971_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.04 | 21:36:37.03 +05:14:23.7 | 6392 2844 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:36:37.09 +05:14:23.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.06)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86986_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86986_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.26 | 21:56:23.98 +07:17:05.8 | 9301 4287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.29 | 21:56:23.91 +07:17:07.0 | 9293 4290 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86996_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 86996_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.37 | 21:00:22.02 +10:02:14.1 | 0808 5438 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.39 | 21:00:22.17 +10:02:14.1 | 0801 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87000_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 87000_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.30 | 20:57:16.94 +07:38:26.9 | 0412 3960 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.22 | 20:57:17.00 +07:38:25.7 | 0405 3963 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 87022_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.40 | 21:09:22.87 +09:49:44.3 | 2170 5370 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.30 | 21:09:22.71 +09:49:43.8 | 2162 5373 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87026_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 87026_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.45 | 21:15:13.88 +09:43:32.7 | 3047 5350 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.52 | 21:15:14.17 +09:43:36.5 | 3040 5354 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87030_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 87030_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.38556 | 2461199.88556 | 14.46 | 21:36:35.78 +09:41:08.7 | 6223 5518 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0365.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 14.47 | 21:36:35.77 +09:41:09.5 | 6215 5521 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02172_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 02172_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 9.53 | 21:08:47.77 +01:10:16.7 | 2350 0131 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:08:47.77 +01:10:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56983_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366
The candidate 56983_fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 08.38610 | 2461199.88610 | 11.96 | 21:17:52.96 +09:50:09.2 | 3430 5441 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_043129_TTUQ1b1x1_3218732_e9pQjo12/fd_Equ-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_04-15-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits |
**** FOUND 21:17:52.96 +09:50:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 46s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Equ-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:57:23.29 +01:50:10.8
########### Completed Equ-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:57:23.29 +01:50:10.8
###################################################################################
20:57:23.29 +01:50:10.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_apass.txt
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
21:36:37.09 +05:14:23.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.88556476 -observatory V36
06:44:54.24 +24:57:56.8 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:43:50.04 +23:20:27.7 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:50:10.56 +15:45:28.2 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:35.98 +21:31:02.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:25.80 +02:48:58.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:15.21 +20:25:35.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:09.24 +00:16:52.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:20.77 -23:04:37.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:12:23.13 -04:34:28.2 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 8 04:38 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.88556476:
07:48:41.38 +21:30:48.2 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:39.94 +21:30:52.6 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:20.04 +21:31:51.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:52.74 +21:30:07.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:52.65 +21:07:21.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:36.62 +21:31:00.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:51.77 +21:22:42.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:47.29 +21:42:38.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:55:10.57 +21:32:45.8 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:16.79 +02:48:55.6 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:21.94 +02:49:10.2 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:57.96 +02:51:09.5 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:22.47 +02:48:34.8 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:07.81 +02:50:53.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 8 04:38 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.88556476:
17:25:45.31 -35:17:07.1 JWST
15:30:08.39 +52:28:03.8 Chandra
23:22:30.38 +61:10:40.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 8 04:38 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.88556476 -observatory V36
18:43:22.57 -32:40:05.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:39.65 -68:03:43.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:07.83 +31:58:13.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:39.25 +15:21:41.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:14:00.81 -49:23:55.7 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:35.51 +31:35:58.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:16.71 +26:58:35.8 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:51.94 +31:04:32.9 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:38.94 +03:56:28.0 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:05.80 +21:36:21.9 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:18.18 -11:00:32.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:22.15 +66:32:26.7 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:45:54.74 -06:42:28.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:59.27 +82:56:58.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:40.96 +64:18:55.0 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:33.85 +27:51:04.9 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:08.25 +13:32:35.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:12:55.09 +31:11:33.3 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:18:13.16 -15:56:03.4 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:06:05.53 +34:27:29.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:48.73 +52:44:14.9 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:45:10.93 -10:52:42.1 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:19.12 +23:20:14.4 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:41.74 +04:41:25.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:34.44 +75:10:26.9 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:01:00.07 +43:25:45.6 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:21.04 -03:39:56.8 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:59.34 -08:35:00.5 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:02.98 -00:58:14.4 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:12:01.14 +25:40:17.1 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:00:23.36 +23:42:51.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:27:05.55 -06:21:18.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:44:03.79 +33:26:56.6 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:38.74 +17:14:28.3 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:21:10.63 +04:53:27.7 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:55:15.58 +30:19:02.9 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
02:43:29.64 +27:39:25.0 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:51:00.35 +33:01:52.1 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:30.74 +14:33:19.3 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:59:21.18 +19:15:47.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:56.77 +19:05:35.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:59:08.18 +18:38:35.9 14.7mag 141P/Machholz
06:01:46.95 +17:41:06.9 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:55:03.44 +16:11:59.9 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:48.96 -24:40:23.6 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:42:10.73 +23:53:10.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:36.76 +01:47:07.9 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:51.17 +02:30:10.5 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:01.81 -08:27:59.2 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:35:05.48 +35:29:01.4 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:51.24 -02:23:17.1 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:44.79 +32:30:57.1 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:53:29.27 -09:28:02.3 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:09.00 +08:05:35.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:17.39 +20:44:32.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:00:17.18 +41:40:58.1 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 8 04:38 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 8 04:38 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 8 04:38 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28 AT 2026nsc 2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30 AT 2026nsb 2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73 AT 2026nsa 2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72 AT 2026nrz 2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63 AT 2026nry 2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12 AT 2026nrx 2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64 AT 2026nrw 2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25 AT 2026nrv 2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81 AT 2026nru 2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66 AT 2026nrt 2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76 AT 2026nrs 2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91 SN 2026nrr 2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51 SN 2026nrq 2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45 AT 2026nrp 2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84 AT 2026nro 2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32 AT 2026nrn 2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28 AT 2026nrm 2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35 AT 2026nrl 2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88 AT 2026nrk 2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51 AT 2026nrj 2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 8 04:38 tns_transients_list.txt