Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 08.2204  2461199.7204  14.46  09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6
133.44744  35.14254 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6:  15.74 +/- 0.34  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.74 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -crosshair 8839.04688 2030.01074 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -crosshair 8839.04883 2030.37830 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22042 09 48 40.58 +77 57 44.6          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22019 09 48 39.22 +77 57 45.0          14.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22066 09 48 41.94 +77 57 44.1          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 08.2204*  09 48 40.58 +77 57 44.6  14.5 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.7204,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.2204 14.46CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 08.2204  2461199.7204  14.53  09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8
132.51901  32.98388 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 1.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8:  15.68 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8:  15.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits  wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -crosshair 8906.95996 632.96362 image    wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -crosshair 8907.87012 633.98822 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22042 09 21 36.56 +79 51 06.8          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22019 09 21 35.59 +79 51 10.2          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 08.22066 09 21 37.54 +79 51 03.3          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 08.2204*  09 21 36.56 +79 51 06.8  14.5 U             Cam       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.7204,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.2204 14.53CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
First image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Last  image: 2461199.72065669 08.06.2026 05:17:34.738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  9190
Objects passed selection criteria:  9185
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 8653.25
Average stars matched: 8495.25 (98.1741 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   114608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun Jun  7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  8 01:08:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
First image: 2461120.77735586 21.03.2026 06:39:13.546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Last  image: 2461199.72065669 08.06.2026 05:17:34.738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 153
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  45444
Objects passed selection criteria:  45351
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 39932.5
Average stars matched: 38854.2 (97.2998 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   146728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun Jun  7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  8 01:10:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 254964 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 254964 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 526.5434
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8510
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1069.2832
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 483.6403
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1063.1982
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 488.7807
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.03076
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.011
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T00:16:54.2038266' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T05:16:54.2038266' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61199.220071794 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T05:17:04.1048639' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.2201863891 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.996376520238 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.4999317186525 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.5441666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     346.592777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.53635611021415 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits :)

Spent 0.687102 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T00:17:34.7382193' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T05:17:34.7382193' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61199.2205409491 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T05:17:44.6438325' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.2206555903 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.996376685997 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.4999317092301 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.5116666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               346.57 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.53737134571895 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 31.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits :)

Spent 0.665597 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits



fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.72018753
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.20g3hSOsTM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IxJ9SNTKOg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Q5v0FGSra
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fivc8JJ1gv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.25

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.25

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.5565 to +82.7610 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7297 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.5565 to 82.7610 deg
Loaded 10549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5474 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec +70.6526 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7029 to 226.3096 deg, Dec 70.6526 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5483 out of 5706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5706 out of 9473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 4.2 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
 4.2 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  12.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.20g3hSOsTM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=208 n_q2=238 n_q3=265 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IxJ9SNTKOg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=586, passed=9473
Got 9473 stars (including 8874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=198 n_q2=243 n_q3=270 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1Q5v0FGSra (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, passed=7873
Got 7873 stars (including 7560 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=229 n_q2=254 n_q3=254 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Fivc8JJ1gv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, passed=8076
Got 8076 stars (including 7754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=228 n_q2=255 n_q3=251 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.104
ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.411
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.317
reference average sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.1045
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:23:40.53 +78:21:06.2:  11.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:23:40.53 +78:21:06.2:  11.56 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:40.53 +78:21:06.2: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6831 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20501_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 20501_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.04    09:47:03.95 +76:17:13.5   9384 2895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  09:47:04.02 +76:17:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 20532_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    11.68    10:23:40.54 +78:21:05.8   7741 2269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.69    10:23:40.52 +78:21:06.6   7743 2268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0644 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.041 +77:30:09.24
Second-epoch image center 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:01:07.344 +77:30:50.11
Second-epoch second image center 12:01:10.036 +77:30:51.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bZ7AoKY8dw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6h2br2w1dC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kuexIvQk0q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XoaamVPgq4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec +70.4550 to +82.7776 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4077 to 226.7739 deg, Dec 70.4550 to 82.7776 deg
Loaded 10786 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5129 out of 5748 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5748 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 48409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec +70.5310 to +82.7825 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.4064 to 226.7706 deg, Dec 70.5310 to 82.7825 deg
Loaded 10696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5749 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5749 out of 48409 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 3.8 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
 3.8 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bZ7AoKY8dw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=215 n_q2=234 n_q3=257 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6h2br2w1dC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2526, passed=48390
Got 48390 stars (including 45783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=209 n_q2=239 n_q3=259 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kuexIvQk0q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=1382, passed=31900
Got 31900 stars (including 30479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31900 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=231 n_q2=246 n_q3=257 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XoaamVPgq4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1447, passed=32390
Got 32390 stars (including 30919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=231 n_q2=252 n_q3=253 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:17:54.05 +80:18:06.4:  13.81 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:24:26.25 +78:28:46.9:  13.49 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:12:01.58 +80:16:43.0:  13.49 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:35:09.40 +75:45:17.1:  11.96 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:51:35.65 +78:14:31.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:17:54.05 +80:18:06.4:  13.87 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:24:26.25 +78:28:46.9:  13.48 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:54.05 +80:18:06.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7847 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:24:26.25 +78:28:46.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5964 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:01:23.25 +74:26:01.6:  12.90 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:12:01.58 +80:16:43.0:  13.46 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:12:01.58 +80:16:43.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7012 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 10:35:09.40 +75:45:17.1:  12.02 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 14:51:35.65 +78:14:31.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:35.65 +78:14:31.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:09.40 +75:45:17.1: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9095 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.38 +74:50:11.4:  13.26 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:01:23.25 +74:26:01.6:  12.86 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:23.25 +74:26:01.6: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9310 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:13:43.24 +77:37:26.9:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 12:32:00.38 +74:50:11.4:  13.31 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.38 +74:50:11.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2147 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:13:43.24 +77:37:26.9:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:43.24 +77:37:26.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3297 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:15:29.87 +75:07:35.5:  14.07 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:39:53.86 +71:56:04.9:  14.41 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 11:15:29.87 +75:07:35.5:  14.01 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:29.87 +75:07:35.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9979 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 13:39:53.86 +71:56:04.9:  14.55 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:39:53.86 +71:56:04.9: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2248 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6:  15.74 +/- 0.34  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.74 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.3658 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8:  15.68 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-40-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits at 09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8:  15.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53382_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53382_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.00    12:08:52.44 +75:07:24.5   4399 4608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53392_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.83    09:17:54.03 +80:18:09.7   8826 0353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.76    09:17:54.08 +80:18:03.2   8827 0354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53402_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53402_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.71    09:12:01.62 +80:16:41.4   8957 0273   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.70    09:12:01.54 +80:16:44.6   8958 0272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53404_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.66    09:24:26.14 +78:28:46.3   9322 1365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.56    09:24:26.36 +78:28:47.4   9323 1364   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53407_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.32    09:15:24.76 +79:34:50.4   9144 0666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  09:15:25.14 +79:34:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53410_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53410_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.74    09:08:43.56 +79:17:34.0   9403 0688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  09:08:44.41 +79:17:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53413_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.02    08:55:00.36 +79:58:39.9   9424 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  08:55:00.72 +79:58:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53450_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    10.58    09:21:06.88 +79:17:29.5   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53451_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    10.61    13:07:34.43 +71:21:10.3   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53468_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.11    09:47:04.08 +76:17:12.9   9384 2895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  09:47:04.18 +76:17:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53492_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53492_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.57    11:29:00.17 +79:58:51.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53507_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53507_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    11.66    14:51:35.71 +78:14:31.7   0116 0602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.65    14:51:35.60 +78:14:31.1   0116 0603   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53514_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    11.93    10:35:09.32 +75:45:17.4   7877 3881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    11.89    10:35:09.47 +75:45:16.8   7878 3881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53522_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53522_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.05    12:42:12.30 +74:48:33.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53524_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.03    11:44:35.32 +73:50:55.6   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53532_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.13    13:52:12.41 +79:40:25.9   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53544_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.47    10:10:24.21 +74:14:17.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.22    12:23:52.30 +79:39:15.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53559_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53559_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.41    09:59:19.04 +79:15:57.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53566_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.47    11:58:50.46 +80:19:55.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53596_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53596_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.66    13:41:01.91 +80:11:23.0   2439 0880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  13:41:02.05 +80:11:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53609_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    12.89    11:01:23.11 +74:26:01.9   7079 4901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    12.99    11:01:23.40 +74:26:01.4   7081 4901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53618_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.22    11:46:02.10 +80:39:50.8   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53622_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53622_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.02    11:36:33.61 +75:06:55.8   5648 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  11:36:33.56 +75:06:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53629_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.02    12:25:44.63 +80:36:03.5   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53636_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.22    09:44:23.81 +79:10:16.6   8593 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53664_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.24    12:32:00.30 +74:50:11.5   3479 4648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.19    12:32:00.46 +74:50:11.4   3480 4648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53670_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53670_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.30    10:57:15.65 +74:22:20.3   7253 4905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:15.50 +74:22:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53680_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.33    11:13:43.45 +77:37:26.7   6319 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.33    11:13:43.03 +77:37:27.0   6321 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53694_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53694_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.62    12:01:01.13 +78:13:26.2   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.63    13:33:28.29 +71:37:45.0   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.54    14:54:48.59 +79:12:54.8   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53713_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53713_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.46    10:23:47.35 +78:20:04.1   7743 2279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  10:23:47.42 +78:20:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53718_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53718_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.41    10:59:45.39 +79:39:37.8   6526 1793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:45.32 +79:39:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.56    13:12:28.35 +72:36:25.1   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53745_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.84    08:57:56.75 +79:58:19.5   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53746_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.72    12:34:35.86 +76:02:05.3   3529 3920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  12:34:35.71 +76:02:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.01    13:26:16.82 +72:14:02.8   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53750_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.73    09:51:17.86 +78:36:07.9   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53751_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.91    13:56:41.73 +76:37:34.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53774_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53774_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.65    14:17:49.65 +76:49:27.1   0394 1989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  14:17:49.54 +76:49:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.72    09:56:51.36 +75:18:41.8   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53789_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.97    10:00:29.09 +75:35:55.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53795_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53795_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.27    13:50:13.72 +73:30:19.5   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53811_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53811_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.11    14:01:02.37 +79:22:40.1   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53815_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.88    14:24:46.43 +78:36:16.5   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.19    10:40:20.97 +72:30:16.5   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53824_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53824_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.84    14:17:22.58 +76:29:29.1   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53829_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    13.96    11:15:29.69 +75:07:35.1   6459 4575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.05    11:15:30.06 +75:07:36.0   6460 4575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53832_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.32    13:23:39.10 +76:49:12.7   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53835_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.73    12:01:04.59 +80:48:31.8   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.94    14:02:00.34 +74:52:19.6   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53840_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.47    10:28:02.45 +71:45:58.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53844_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53844_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.14    13:44:25.75 +73:20:05.5   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.90    13:35:40.22 +76:08:13.3   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53846_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.19    14:21:47.38 +77:57:23.4   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53853_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53853_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.42    10:24:35.88 +79:38:12.2   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.29    14:38:51.67 +79:45:02.0   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53865_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.40    10:28:26.25 +79:17:27.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53878_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53878_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.16    12:23:47.74 +75:51:22.0   3898 4098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  12:23:48.12 +75:51:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.22019    2461199.72019    14.20    13:39:53.74 +71:56:04.4   0111 5329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-16-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.25    13:39:53.97 +71:56:05.4   0113 5330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.30    12:34:48.29 +73:08:12.6   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53899_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53899_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.52    09:44:23.44 +77:18:11.1   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.46    13:52:45.25 +74:22:03.2   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.57    14:15:22.73 +78:47:00.5   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53910_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
Preparing report for the candidate 53910_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.39    09:59:15.03 +75:50:42.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53914_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53914_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.29    10:08:13.12 +74:43:46.7   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53921_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53921_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.47    10:05:38.19 +80:23:52.1   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53923_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53923_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.54    11:26:24.76 +82:20:50.7   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.67    12:54:05.62 +72:32:36.3   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.65    13:02:44.77 +72:37:01.2   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53936_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.20    13:08:20.30 +72:16:39.5   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53937_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.42    12:49:35.56 +80:34:15.4   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53946_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.54    12:31:45.88 +78:14:26.7   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53948_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.46    12:10:54.03 +82:36:06.9   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.50    10:19:50.64 +71:33:21.3   9353 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53954_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53954_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.31    09:21:59.94 +80:39:13.7   8616 0241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53955_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53955_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.70    11:24:45.51 +72:32:05.7   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53962_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.67    14:16:34.90 +76:33:25.6   0331 2145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53964_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53964_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.74    13:14:20.13 +75:45:15.3   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53965_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53965_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.83    10:34:21.31 +73:55:24.1   8244 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53966_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.54    14:32:22.55 +77:34:10.0   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
Preparing report for the candidate 53972_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53976_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.55    13:20:26.82 +74:06:47.2   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53983_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.62    12:59:14.46 +78:56:37.8   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.48    14:19:21.49 +78:58:39.5   1152 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53989_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.05    14:32:11.21 +77:17:56.4   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53994_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53994_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.51    13:05:45.49 +81:58:07.1   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53997_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.33    11:30:56.30 +74:45:46.2   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53998_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 53998_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.50    13:21:40.54 +79:12:55.4   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54003_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54003_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.97    12:30:32.12 +72:46:57.5   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54011_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54011_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.53    10:31:56.09 +75:23:12.5   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54013_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.81    12:40:22.36 +76:22:36.5   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54021_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54021_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.99    13:28:17.52 +75:16:16.1   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54022_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.91    12:18:59.31 +73:03:46.6   3836 5797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.58    10:53:58.87 +80:30:17.4   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54027_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.68    12:21:51.65 +73:58:24.5   3795 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54031_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.60    11:35:45.59 +79:57:13.5   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54032_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.54    11:46:46.28 +73:36:22.4   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54043_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    15.05    11:22:41.96 +78:05:13.9   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54048_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54048_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.71    13:02:18.87 +74:01:36.8   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54059_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.71    12:47:17.04 +73:58:23.5   2757 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 54066_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    14.81    11:57:43.92 +76:29:50.1   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22873_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100
The candidate 22873_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 08.22066    2461199.72066    13.29    12:46:19.45 +77:06:30.2   3278 3196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001818_TTUQ1b1x1_325411_RARU3l3u/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-17-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits

**** FOUND  12:46:19.42 +77:06:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8
########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8
###################################################################################
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8  -- not a known variable star
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6  -- not a known variable star
Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:21:36.56 +79:51:06.8
09:48:40.58 +77:57:44.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.72018753 -observatory V36
06:43:54.40 +24:59:46.2 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:42:59.77 +23:22:25.7 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:49:41.54 +15:43:13.5 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:27.66 +21:31:23.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:22.95 +02:48:43.5 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:12.82 +20:25:28.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:08.64 +00:16:48.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:21.31 -23:04:33.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:04:58.23 -05:30:12.7 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun  8 01:08 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.72018753:
07:48:29.42 +21:31:20.5 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:28.54 +21:31:23.0 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:11.70 +21:32:11.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:45.98 +21:30:24.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:44.92 +21:07:41.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:32.28 +21:31:08.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:44.31 +21:23:07.0 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:38.44 +21:43:04.4 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:55:02.67 +21:33:06.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:13.58 +02:48:41.9 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:19.71 +02:48:56.4 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:55.20 +02:50:53.1 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:19.03 +02:48:20.3 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:05.17 +02:50:39.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun  8 01:08 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.72018753:
17:26:32.95 -35:16:14.5 JWST
14:47:14.93 +56:40:45.5 Chandra
19:01:07.99 -11:04:07.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  8 01:08 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.72018753 -observatory V36
18:43:29.58 -32:39:21.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:29.79 -68:03:49.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:04.13 +31:58:06.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:43.31 +15:21:11.7 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:12:31.13 -49:28:38.4 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:37.70 +31:35:35.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:04.44 +26:58:32.3 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:44.77 +31:04:54.2 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:33.58 +03:55:59.5 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:12.33 +21:36:10.4 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:21.82 -11:00:31.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:25.47 +66:31:49.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:46:19.42 -06:41:30.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:18:04.76 +82:59:15.1 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:27.01 +64:18:35.5 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:18.63 +27:50:11.7 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:16.11 +13:31:43.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:13:01.76 +31:08:35.2 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:18:03.12 -15:56:55.5 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:05:56.13 +34:29:13.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:53.52 +52:44:51.2 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:44:58.50 -10:52:15.3 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:10.94 +23:20:22.7 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:42.02 +04:41:27.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:50.73 +75:08:17.2 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:00:42.65 +43:25:01.8 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:19.01 -03:43:27.2 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:41.82 -08:34:17.1 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:00.66 -00:58:06.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:11:45.65 +25:38:56.9 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:00:02.06 +23:45:42.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:26:56.98 -06:21:57.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:43:31.40 +33:25:57.2 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:14.61 +17:13:11.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:20:48.93 +04:51:17.8 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:54:43.40 +30:18:17.9 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:43:01.40 +27:37:48.7 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:50:36.52 +33:02:14.1 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:13.38 +14:37:35.3 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:59:04.68 +19:15:07.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:36.88 +19:05:08.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:58:25.31 +18:39:44.7 14.7mag 141P/Machholz
06:01:03.61 +17:40:35.9 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:54:13.19 +16:10:38.0 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:41.81 -24:41:45.6 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:41:37.90 +23:49:11.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:37.99 +01:44:12.5 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:24.35 +02:28:13.5 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:09.75 -08:28:28.4 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:34:42.89 +35:29:26.9 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:25.11 -02:27:29.8 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:17.65 +32:29:08.4 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:52:25.45 -09:40:39.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:13.58 +08:05:56.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:09.42 +20:44:48.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:00:00.86 +41:41:40.8 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun  8 01:08 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  8 01:08 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  8 01:08 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28  AT 2026nsc  2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30  AT 2026nsb  2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73  AT 2026nsa  2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72  AT 2026nrz  2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63  AT 2026nry  2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12  AT 2026nrx  2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64  AT 2026nrw  2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25  AT 2026nrv  2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81  AT 2026nru  2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66  AT 2026nrt  2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76  AT 2026nrs  2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91  SN 2026nrr  2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51  SN 2026nrq  2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45  AT 2026nrp  2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84  AT 2026nro  2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32  AT 2026nrn  2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28  AT 2026nrm  2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35  AT 2026nrl  2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88  AT 2026nrk  2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51  AT 2026nrj  2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  8 01:08 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Jun  8 01:07:44 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 32s (0.53 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 48s (0.80 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 90s (1.50 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 31s (0.52 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 75s (1.25 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 19s (0.32 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 130s (2.17 min)
FIELD_Cam-05-Q1b1x1: 236s (3.93 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 239s (3.98 min)
Finished: Mon Jun  8 01:11:43 CDT 2026