This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 11.12 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3
111.02619 -8.11226 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 32 14.33 +52 55 08.3 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 10.39 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1
114.67598 -8.23619 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 55 49.39 +53 44 30.1 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 10.82 00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6
116.43119 -7.09905 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX14" FK Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 pg < 18.000 pg 2432820.00000 333.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 06 01.63 +55 11 54.6 10.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FK Cas,2461198.8800,10.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FK Cas 20260607.3800 10.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 11.66 23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8
113.89678 -8.22436 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX22" ZTF J235042.32+533501.1
Type: BY
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.969 r Y 0.057 r 2458319.88750 7.361242100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 50 44.03 +53 34 44.8 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J235042.32+533501.1,2461198.8800,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J235042.32+533501.1 20260607.3800 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 10.63 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9
112.79333 -5.39234 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 38 18.95 +56 01 59.9 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,10.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 10.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.88 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8
115.37746 -8.37604 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 00 36.74 +53 44 54.8 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.87 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4
115.24884 -8.67233 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4: 15.65 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 00 10.15 +53 25 58.4 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 12.04 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9
112.78035 -8.26766 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 43 37.39 +53 15 43.9 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 11.81 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7
117.68450 -6.06706 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J003.4066+56.4246 | 00:13:37.59 +56:25:28.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 13 35.02 +56 25 06.7 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J003.4066+56.4246,2461198.8800,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J003.4066+56.4246 20260607.3800 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 12.67 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9
117.73229 -8.54581 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 16 22.89 +53 58 17.9 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.10 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3
113.75683 -8.30453 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 49 57.38 +53 28 06.3 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.53 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4
117.66744 -5.27017 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 422385225835251328 | 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 12 35.62 +57 12 14.4 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 422385225835251328,2461198.8800,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 422385225835251328 20260607.3800 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.61 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8
115.14828 -8.48417 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J359.8124+53.5851 | 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 59 15.54 +53 35 49.8 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J359.8124+53.5851,2461198.8800,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J359.8124+53.5851 20260607.3800 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.85 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0
115.73648 -8.63654 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0: 15.67 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 03 18.17 +53 33 41.0 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 13.98 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0
114.79794 -8.29400 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" Gaia DR3 1945524428801896192
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.640 G 15.650 G 0.018007400000 F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0: 15.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 56 42.24 +53 42 40.0 14.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1945524428801896192,2461198.8800,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1945524428801896192 20260607.3800 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 11.86 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0
113.90188 -8.23410 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 23 50 46.94 +53 34 15.0 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 11.59 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6
116.30350 -6.73435 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX11" DI Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 V 16.500 V 2437170.00000 363.900000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 04 41.39 +55 32 04.6 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DI Cas,2461198.8800,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DI Cas 20260607.3800 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3800 2461198.8800 8.01 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6
118.93364 -6.85900 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6: 10.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6: 10.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3800* 00 23 08.67 +55 47 34.6 8.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8800,8.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3800 8.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461198.88023792 07.06.2026 09:07:22.556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24842
Objects passed selection criteria: 24754
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19273.8
Average stars matched: 17584.2 (91.2342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126736 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 06:58:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461198.88023792 07.06.2026 09:07:22.556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 386
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 193 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 197047
Objects passed selection criteria: 196458
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 153698
Average stars matched: 139002 (90.4383 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1997156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 07:32:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.87977122
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0406 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f5SPaTyPRX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L9sMOjAfh5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.44gyxbedjZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UIPJ9q4iP4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6373 to +59.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6373 to 59.3623 deg
Loaded 163448 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14807 out of 16429 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16429 out of 29065 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.f5SPaTyPRX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=218 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L9sMOjAfh5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3195, passed=29065
Got 29065 stars (including 25829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4479 through 0 to 15.3165, gap 15.3165 to 345.4479
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4484 through 0 to 15.3183, gap 15.3183 to 345.4484
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=196 n_q2=274 n_q3=213 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.44gyxbedjZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1700, passed=21880
Got 21880 stars (including 20163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9598 through 0 to 14.8808, gap 14.8808 to 344.9598
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 345 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9632 through 0 to 14.8897, gap 14.8897 to 344.9632
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 391 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.02"
Excluding outliers - 310 stars left (next iteration limit 257)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits N_match=310 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.136 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=32.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.104 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.679 n_q1=31 n_q2=27 n_q3=83 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UIPJ9q4iP4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1707, passed=21838
Got 21838 stars (including 20117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9601 through 0 to 14.8808, gap 14.8808 to 344.9601
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 241 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 228 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9659 through 0 to 14.8925, gap 14.8925 to 344.9659
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.24"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 250)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.682 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.808 sigma_q3_arcsec=6.658 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.650 n_q1=27 n_q2=32 n_q3=81 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.147
ref2=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits sigma_overall=10.136 worst_q_ratio=3.214
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=9.576 worst_q_ratio=3.204
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.2195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits) flagged: sigma=10.136 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=3.214 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 20956 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out134044.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out134044.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 25.8274 (1.64706e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (0.00150342,54.0249), pixel scale 5.93272 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++------++--+-+---+(best)-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out134044.solved to indicate this.
Field: out134044.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.002876, 54.025686) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.690, +54:01:32.469).
Field size: 15.6094 x 10.4358 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.40787 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 07:08 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 07:08 out134044.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out134044.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out134044.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.45 degrees of RA,Dec (0.00425,54.0265)
log-odds ratio 25.8274 (1.64706e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (0.00150342,54.0249), pixel scale 5.93272 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++------++--+-+---+(best)-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out134044.solved to indicate this.
Field: out134044.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.002876, 54.025686) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.690, +54:01:32.469).
Field size: 15.6094 x 10.4358 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.40787 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 07:08 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 07:08 out134044.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1636, 946.861] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.649271
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.0039145
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1636, 946.861] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.649271
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.0039145
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21880 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky930806.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1700, passed=21880
Got 21880 stars (including 20163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9598 through 0 to 14.8808, gap 14.8808 to 344.9598
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 345 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9632 through 0 to 14.8897, gap 14.8897 to 344.9632
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 391 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.02"
Excluding outliers - 310 stars left (next iteration limit 257)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits N_match=310 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.136 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=32.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.104 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.679 n_q1=31 n_q2=27 n_q3=83 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits): sigma 10.136->10.136, ratio 3.214->3.214; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits) flagged: sigma=9.576 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=3.204 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 20949 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out935304.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out935304.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 26.4206 (2.98059e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.996,54.0247), pixel scale 5.93267 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+----++--+-+---+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out935304.solved to indicate this.
Field: out935304.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.997841, 54.025558) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:59.482, +54:01:32.007).
Field size: 15.6092 x 10.4357 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.41701 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 07:20 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 07:20 out935304.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out935304.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out935304.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.45 degrees of RA,Dec (359.999,54.0264)
log-odds ratio 26.4206 (2.98059e+11), 8 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.996,54.0247), pixel scale 5.93267 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+----++--+-+---+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out935304.solved to indicate this.
Field: out935304.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.997841, 54.025558) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:59.482, +54:01:32.007).
Field size: 15.6092 x 10.4357 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.41701 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 07:20 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 07:20 out935304.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1632, 946.854] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 9.15634
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 7.67128
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.38829
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.69584
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1632, 946.854] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 9.15634
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 7.67128
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.38829
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.69584
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21838 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1141826.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1707, passed=21838
Got 21838 stars (including 20117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9601 through 0 to 14.8808, gap 14.8808 to 344.9601
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 241 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 228 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9659 through 0 to 14.8925, gap 14.8925 to 344.9659
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 314 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.24"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 250)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.682 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.808 sigma_q3_arcsec=6.658 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.650 n_q1=27 n_q2=32 n_q3=81 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits): sigma 9.576->9.576, ratio 3.204->3.204; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=10.136 -- 19.45x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=9.576 -- 18.38x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.214 -- 2.64x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.204 -- 2.63x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080_astrometric_residuals.png (310 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (312 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09534.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 31473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 31474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32311_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 32311_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 32816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 33893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.02 +55:32:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 34259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 34575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 34704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 34826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35190_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35190_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35505_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35505_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35591_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35591_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35985_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 35985_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 36182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:25.19 +51:26:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:23:07.65 +55:47:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:38:18.95 +56:01:59.9
23:32:14.33 +52:55:08.3
23:55:49.39 +53:44:30.1
00:06:01.63 +55:11:54.6
23:50:44.03 +53:34:44.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0406 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.020 +54:01:35.46
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:59.811 +54:01:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5wuXcyycdS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9JnWcPRfAT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f2aaYninEM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o9VKXuLLIG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.676500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.676500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 217552 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6349 to +59.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6349 to 59.3691 deg
Loaded 163556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11613 out of 17712 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17712 out of 217552 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 337 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5wuXcyycdS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=32857, passed=217571
Got 217571 stars (including 184418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=213 n_q2=264 n_q3=237 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9JnWcPRfAT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=32499, passed=217519
Got 217519 stars (including 184678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4097, gap 15.4097 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4450 through 0 to 15.4115, gap 15.4115 to 345.4450
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=220 n_q2=266 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f2aaYninEM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=17821, passed=153075
Got 153075 stars (including 135078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153075 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9596 through 0 to 14.9840, gap 14.9840 to 344.9596
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.18"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 216 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9674 through 0 to 15.0012, gap 15.0012 to 344.9674
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 362 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 295 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
Excluding outliers - 295 stars left (next iteration limit 237)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits N_match=295 sigma_overall_arcsec=12.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=26.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=24.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.981 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.765 n_q1=35 n_q2=25 n_q3=79 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o9VKXuLLIG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=18200, passed=153831
Got 153831 stars (including 135470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153831 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9601 through 0 to 14.9847, gap 14.9847 to 344.9601
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 319 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 223 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9709 through 0 to 15.0033, gap 15.0033 to 344.9709
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 365 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 292 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.12"
Excluding outliers - 292 stars left (next iteration limit 232)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=292 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.055 sigma_q2_arcsec=26.973 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.020 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.155 n_q1=35 n_q2=24 n_q3=77 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.599
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0080.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_060128_TTUQ2b1x1_2818764_gc8EfYVL/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4: 15.65 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:07.36 +53:24:33.4: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:00:36.74 +53:44:54.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:07.36 +53:24:33.4: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:07.36 +53:24:33.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8627 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:00:10.15 +53:25:58.4: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.8669 delta=1.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:43:37.39 +53:15:43.9: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:13:35.02 +56:25:06.7: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.8115 delta=2.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:16:22.89 +53:58:17.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:49:57.38 +53:28:06.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:35.62 +57:12:14.4: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:15.54 +53:35:49.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0: 15.67 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:03:18.17 +53:33:41.0: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.8381 delta=1.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:25.40 +56:01:53.1: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:25.40 +56:01:53.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:25.40 +56:01:53.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0117 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0: 15.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:56:42.24 +53:42:40.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9769 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:16.53 +54:07:49.0: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:16.53 +54:07:49.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:16.53 +54:07:49.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0855 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:46.94 +53:34:15.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:04:41.39 +55:32:04.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.5846 delta=3.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6: 10.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6: 10.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:23:08.67 +55:47:34.6: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=8.0126 delta=2.67 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130430.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out247550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out252274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out256027.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out263600.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out266003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out270367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 50s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243708_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243708_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243734_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243734_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243771_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243771_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243781_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243781_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243791_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243791_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243795_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243795_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243797_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243797_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243800_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243800_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243803_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243803_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243805_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243805_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243827_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243827_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243829_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243829_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243839_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243839_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243840_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243840_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243843_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243843_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 243848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243850_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243850_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243853_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 243853_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243869_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243869_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243870_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243870_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243891_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243891_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243902_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243902_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243912_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243912_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243913_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243913_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243914_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243914_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243918_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243918_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243936_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243936_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 243940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244853_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 244853_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245345_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 245345_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247056_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 247056_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247550_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 247550_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248067_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 248067_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 248176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249461_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 249461_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251020_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251020_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251313_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251313_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251333_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251333_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251334_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251334_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 251965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252274_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 252274_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 252469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 253105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 253312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254304_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 254304_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 254377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255068_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 255068_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 255109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 255744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 255838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 255911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 256027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256558_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 256558_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 256627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256833_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 256833_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256981_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 256981_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257397_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 257397_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 257809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258452_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258452_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258496_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258496_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258631_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258631_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 258990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259285_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259285_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259562_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259562_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259868_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259868_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259995_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 259995_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 260202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260339_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 260339_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260778_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 260778_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261266_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261266_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261352_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261352_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261649_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261649_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 261948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261996_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 261996_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262190_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262190_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 262927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263079_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263079_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263452_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263452_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263531_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263531_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263600_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 263600_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 263900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264492_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264492_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264615_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264615_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264953_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264953_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264972_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 264972_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265199_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265199_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265471_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265471_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265550_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265550_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265713_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 265955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266003_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 266003_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266128_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266128_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266656_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266656_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266913_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 266913_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267629_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267629_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267824_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267824_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 267851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268459_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268459_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268542_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268542_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268681_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268681_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268917_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268917_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 268935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269155_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269155_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269632_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269632_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 269804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270076_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270076_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270317_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270317_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 270367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 270874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271101_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271101_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271197_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271197_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271329_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271329_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271500_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271500_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 271948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272002_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272002_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272038_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272038_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272071_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272071_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272156_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272156_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272616_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272616_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 272940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273169_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 273169_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273507_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 273507_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 274748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275418_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275418_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 275956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 276150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276602_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 276602_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 276624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 276802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277684_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 277684_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 277719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 277747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 277767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278019_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278019_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278248_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278248_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278950_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278950_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278979_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278979_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278989_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 278989_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279123_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279123_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279252_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279252_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279451_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279451_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279574_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279574_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 279988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280111_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280111_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280545_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280545_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280793_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280793_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280872_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280872_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 280974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 281093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 281144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 281200_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:23.75 +51:26:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 229994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 132530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 166100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
Preparing report for the candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:19.61 +56:01:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081
The candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-07-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0081 did not pass the final checks
