This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.4152 2461198.9152 11.79 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8
7.30772 -23.34244 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" DP Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 pg < 17.000 pg 2423704.00000 278.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8: 13.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DP Sgr,2461198.9152,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DP Sgr 20260607.4152 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.4152 2461198.9152 11.76 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8
7.61038 -21.88328 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" DG Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 V < 15.800 V 2452160.00000 212.500000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DG Sgr,2461198.9152,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DG Sgr 20260607.4152 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.4152 2461198.9152 12.11 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1
6.81409 -23.02743 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" DL Sgr
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 pg 17.000 : pg 2412640.00000 80.000000000000 : Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DL Sgr,2461198.9152,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DL Sgr 20260607.4152 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.4152 2461198.9152 11.79 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8
9.10822 -21.91176 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" DI Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.500 : pg < 17.500 pg 2422534.00000 475.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8: 13.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8: 13.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DI Sgr,2461198.9152,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DI Sgr 20260607.4152 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461198.91544589 07.06.2026 09:58:04.525 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5671
Objects passed selection criteria: 5653
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4376.5
Average stars matched: 4018.5 (91.8199 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 09:16:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461198.91544589 07.06.2026 09:58:04.525 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47730
Objects passed selection criteria: 47633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37767.8
Average stars matched: 34720 (91.9303 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 09:20:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.91492735
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9SQAdyDkjI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9f86JzhPhl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UR5rymgEwn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.warSowsUrM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.479900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.479900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Loaded 9574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4757 out of 4857 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4857 out of 5969 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9SQAdyDkjI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5975
Got 5975 stars (including 5580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.653 n_q1=226 n_q2=208 n_q3=301 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9f86JzhPhl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5969
Got 5969 stars (including 5568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.763 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.654 n_q1=227 n_q2=212 n_q3=296 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UR5rymgEwn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=5591
Got 5591 stars (including 5290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.974 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.789 n_q1=226 n_q2=308 n_q3=191 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.550
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.warSowsUrM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, passed=5419
Got 5419 stars (including 5090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.915 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.891 n_q1=221 n_q2=314 n_q3=191 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.455
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.600 worst_q_ratio=1.322
ref2=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.606 worst_q_ratio=1.259
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits sigma_overall=0.628 worst_q_ratio=1.550
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.629 worst_q_ratio=1.455
reference average sigma_overall=0.603 worst_q_ratio=1.2905
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:54.11 -31:22:05.5: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:42:11.13 -33:12:13.8: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:43:15.35 -30:57:14.9: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:37.05 -36:35:44.8: 11.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:42:11.13 -33:12:13.8: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:11.13 -33:12:13.8: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2145 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:37.05 -36:35:44.8: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:37.05 -36:35:44.8: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2066 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:53.78 -32:10:25.7: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2236 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:43:15.35 -30:57:14.9: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:54.11 -31:22:05.5: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:15.35 -30:57:14.9: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2512 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:54.11 -31:22:05.5: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0901 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21059_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 21059_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 21120_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21160_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 21160_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21171_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 21171_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21179_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 21179_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0047 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:34.586 -34:00:28.76
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:38.297 -34:00:51.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01431 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rl0QCFdBiS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F38ubjJduI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tE6HZk6cnY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lOWaOJQFuz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.285500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.285500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 50538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Loaded 9665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7408 out of 7932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7932 out of 50538 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Rl0QCFdBiS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2222, passed=50403
Got 50403 stars (including 48095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.656 n_q1=228 n_q2=208 n_q3=288 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F38ubjJduI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2320, passed=50535
Got 50535 stars (including 48153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=232 n_q2=211 n_q3=287 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tE6HZk6cnY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1620, passed=38933
Got 38933 stars (including 37260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38933 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.931 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.746 n_q1=236 n_q2=300 n_q3=206 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.498
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lOWaOJQFuz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1851, passed=41358
Got 41358 stars (including 39455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.913 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.899 n_q1=231 n_q2=310 n_q3=202 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-57-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_051724_TTUQ2b1x1_1286668_8rEfENsb/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:42:44.23 -29:54:37.7: 14.78 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:07.74 -37:18:23.4: 12.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:21.99 -32:24:37.6: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:21.45 -37:36:59.8: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:20.75 -30:47:17.9: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:10:58.33 -38:10:29.1: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:37.25 -37:57:19.0: 13.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:38.97 -37:57:18.4: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:44.68 -37:41:01.2: 12.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:07.74 -37:18:23.4: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:30:48.34 -32:29:39.4: 13.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:07.74 -37:18:23.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8053 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:21.45 -37:36:59.8: 11.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:42:44.23 -29:54:37.7: 14.53 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:21.45 -37:36:59.8: ref_mag=11.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1604 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:37.25 -37:57:19.0: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:44.23 -29:54:37.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=12.9435 delta=1.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:37.25 -37:57:19.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1327 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:21.99 -32:24:37.6: 13.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:21.99 -32:24:37.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1706 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:10:58.33 -38:10:29.1: 13.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:44.68 -37:41:01.2: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:58.33 -38:10:29.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1147 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:44.68 -37:41:01.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6581 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:38.97 -37:57:18.4: 12.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:38.97 -37:57:18.4: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8009 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:20.75 -30:47:17.9: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:20.75 -30:47:17.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7405 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:30:48.34 -32:29:39.4: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:48.34 -32:29:39.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5105 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:06:33.42 -37:53:19.2: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:11:06.84 -38:06:37.2: 13.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:39.79 -34:55:20.2: 14.35 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:10:57.02 -37:37:54.5: 13.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:04:59.61 -37:49:03.4: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:55.35 -36:50:27.1: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:50:03.14 -37:54:16.5: 14.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:39.91 -38:04:49.7: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:06:33.42 -37:53:19.2: 13.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:33.42 -37:53:19.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2672 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:39.52 -37:58:04.8: 14.08 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:39.79 -34:55:20.2: 14.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:55.35 -36:50:27.1: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:11:06.84 -38:06:37.2: 13.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:06.84 -38:06:37.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2587 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:31:39.79 -34:55:20.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.1173 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:55.35 -36:50:27.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4662 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:10:57.02 -37:37:54.5: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:57.02 -37:37:54.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:39.91 -38:04:49.7: 13.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:39.91 -38:04:49.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5159 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:04:59.61 -37:49:03.4: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:59.61 -37:49:03.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5326 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:50:03.14 -37:54:16.5: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:49:17.02 -37:38:12.9: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:03.14 -37:54:16.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4623 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:39.52 -37:58:04.8: 14.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:39.52 -37:58:04.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5526 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:55:21.25 -37:31:15.4: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:49:17.02 -37:38:12.9: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:17.02 -37:38:12.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4774 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:59:52.74 -38:07:00.0: 13.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:06:33.68 -37:46:47.0: 13.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:00:10.51 -38:06:45.1: 13.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:58:38.04 -37:41:56.6: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:55:21.25 -37:31:15.4: 13.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:21.25 -37:31:15.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5604 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:03:05.42 -36:46:23.1: 13.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:57:29.42 -38:09:43.0: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:00:10.51 -38:06:45.1: 13.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:10.51 -38:06:45.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5114 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:58:38.04 -37:41:56.6: 14.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:08.85 -36:43:44.8: 14.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:59:52.74 -38:07:00.0: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:06:33.68 -37:46:47.0: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:52.74 -38:07:00.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5700 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:38.04 -37:41:56.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5563 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:33.68 -37:46:47.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4392 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:03:05.42 -36:46:23.1: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:05.42 -36:46:23.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5745 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:59.58 -37:36:54.0: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:57:29.42 -38:09:43.0: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:29.42 -38:09:43.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5620 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:08.85 -36:43:44.8: 14.26 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:08.85 -36:43:44.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6716 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:10:03.25 -37:47:16.6: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:59.58 -37:36:54.0: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:09:08.75 -34:59:20.2: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:59.58 -37:36:54.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4986 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:10:03.25 -37:47:16.6: 13.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:03.25 -37:47:16.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6733 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:58.70 -38:02:17.0: 13.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:09:08.75 -34:59:20.2: 14.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:08.75 -34:59:20.2: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5241 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:16.94 -37:12:06.5: 13.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:55:15.81 -37:49:27.2: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:06:59.76 -37:31:02.9: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:09:48.21 -37:27:48.8: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:44:59.69 -31:14:15.6: 14.38 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:58.70 -38:02:17.0: 13.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:58.70 -38:02:17.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4929 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:06:59.76 -37:31:02.9: 14.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:59.76 -37:31:02.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5886 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:06:27.00 -35:18:22.9: 14.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:55:15.81 -37:49:27.2: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:09:48.21 -37:27:48.8: 13.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:15.81 -37:49:27.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4906 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:48.21 -37:27:48.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6486 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:44:59.69 -31:14:15.6: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:07:39.45 -36:24:19.0: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:16.94 -37:12:06.5: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:59.69 -31:14:15.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6604 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:16.94 -37:12:06.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5505 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:06:27.00 -35:18:22.9: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:07:39.45 -36:24:19.0: 14.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:27.00 -35:18:22.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6746 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:39.45 -36:24:19.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7179 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:00:04.48 -30:33:46.4: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:03:34.82 -37:51:38.0: 14.01 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:37.07 -36:42:19.7: 13.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:44:31.95 -34:08:03.5: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:00:04.48 -30:33:46.4: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:04.48 -30:33:46.4: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7604 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:37.07 -36:42:19.7: 14.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:03:34.82 -37:51:38.0: 13.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:37.07 -36:42:19.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7987 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:34.82 -37:51:38.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7668 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:03:22.87 -37:52:29.6: 13.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:59:44.39 -38:07:44.5: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:08:08.65 -35:46:06.3: 13.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:44:31.95 -34:08:03.5: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:31.95 -34:08:03.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5754 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:00:14.42 -35:37:41.8: 13.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:04:52.80 -32:48:35.7: 13.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:05:35.74 -37:23:17.9: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:08:08.65 -35:46:06.3: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:03:22.87 -37:52:29.6: 13.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:22.87 -37:52:29.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6609 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:08.65 -35:46:06.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5829 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:59:44.39 -38:07:44.5: 13.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:44.39 -38:07:44.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6256 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:04:52.80 -32:48:35.7: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:52.80 -32:48:35.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8137 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:05:35.74 -37:23:17.9: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:56:03.36 -35:42:09.3: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:00:14.42 -35:37:41.8: 13.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:35.74 -37:23:17.9: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6623 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:14.42 -35:37:41.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6453 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:52:20.38 -37:52:05.8: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:54:50.97 -33:03:45.2: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:58:05.25 -37:30:25.4: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:56:03.36 -35:42:09.3: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:03.36 -35:42:09.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7998 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:54:50.97 -33:03:45.2: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:52:20.38 -37:52:05.8: 13.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:20.38 -37:52:05.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7717 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:50.97 -33:03:45.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6554 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:58:05.25 -37:30:25.4: 14.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:05.25 -37:30:25.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5689 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8: 13.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8: 13.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:38:16.48 -32:16:48.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.7963 delta=1.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:32:11.43 -31:32:42.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.7463 delta=1.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:36:10.75 -32:36:41.1: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.1064 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8: 13.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:28.07 -30:14:37.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.8027 delta=1.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out68206.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out69184.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39916.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64501_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 64501_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64502_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 64502_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64506_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 64506_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65295_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 65295_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67352_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 67352_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67589_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 67589_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67785_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 67785_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68206_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 68206_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.23 -29:54:37.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.467 6751837955393745024 295.68394838433 -29.91019363377 13.0002 10.8950 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.467#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68588_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 68588_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68624_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 68624_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68937_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 68937_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69160_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69160_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69184_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69184_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:39.79 -34:55:20.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.686 6744190748943322240 292.91597588562 -34.92272107604 12.9836 12.0334 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.686#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69362_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69362_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69798_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69798_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69835_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69835_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69883_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69883_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69951_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 69951_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70247_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70247_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70271_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70271_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70313_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70313_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70317_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70317_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70329_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70329_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70355_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70355_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70363_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70363_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70383_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70383_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70386_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70386_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70403_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70403_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70498_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70498_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70519_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70519_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70574_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70574_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70587_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70587_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70613_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70613_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70624_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70624_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70659_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70659_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70661_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70661_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70670_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70670_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70671_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70671_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70693_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70693_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70729_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70729_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70751_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70751_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70787_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70787_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70801_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70801_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70807_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70807_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70815_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70815_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70816_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70816_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70842_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70842_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70857_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70857_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70876_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70876_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70884_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70884_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70890_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70890_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70893_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 70893_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-58-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks