This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 10.39 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2
114.67763 -8.23539 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 55 49.97 +53 44 34.2 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 10.86 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9
116.43295 -7.09871 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 3.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" FK Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 pg < 18.000 pg 2432820.00000 333.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9: 15.60 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 06 02.33 +55 11 56.9 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FK Cas,2461198.8793,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FK Cas 20260607.3793 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 11.67 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5
113.89950 -8.22396 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 50 45.05 +53 34 48.5 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 11.70 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9
115.70328 -8.04689 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 420317392359633792 | 00:02:21.60 +54:07:41.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 02 19.61 +54 08 02.9 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 420317392359633792,2461198.8793,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 420317392359633792 20260607.3793 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 11.68 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0
117.90076 -12.37044 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 20 40.52 +50 12 02.0 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 12.04 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8
117.88510 -11.81804 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 20 09.20 +50 44 48.8 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 12.14 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1
113.32433 -11.61240 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 52 18.51 +50 09 11.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 8.01 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8
114.57133 -10.56756 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 58 24.64 +51 26 28.8 8.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,8.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 8.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 13.32 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0
112.88493 -4.44505 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 37 00.60 +56 58 04.0 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 13.06 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8
115.12001 -8.15939 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J359.6649+53.9052 | 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8: 15.68 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8: 15.64 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 58 37.50 +53 54 33.8 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J359.6649+53.9052,2461198.8793,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J359.6649+53.9052 20260607.3793 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 11.98 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3
113.28309 -4.40210 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J354.9153+57.1171 | 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 39 43.44 +57 07 12.3 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J354.9153+57.1171,2461198.8793,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J354.9153+57.1171 20260607.3793 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 13.37 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4
113.38643 -3.69530 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 39 00.60 +57 49 40.4 13.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 13.74 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1
113.34390 -3.41233 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 38 06.47 +58 05 16.1 13.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 14.11 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6
117.87340 -6.19189 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.2" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6: 15.43 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 15 03.37 +56 19 19.6 14.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 14.34 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5
112.94415 -4.56085 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 37 39.94 +56 52 24.5 14.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 8.29 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9
114.56980 -10.56665 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 58 24.00 +51 26 30.9 8.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,8.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 8.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 10.51 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5
114.67914 -8.23791 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.6" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 55 50.78 +53 44 26.5 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,10.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 10.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 10.66 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7
112.79354 -5.39420 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 23 38 19.26 +56 01 53.7 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,10.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 10.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3793 2461198.8793 8.02 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9
118.93033 -6.85995 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.3792* 00 23 07.32 +55 47 29.9 8.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461198.8793,8.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260607.3793 8.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461198.87948387 07.06.2026 09:06:17.406 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24794
Objects passed selection criteria: 24709
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19228.8
Average stars matched: 17548 (91.2592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 05:28:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461198.87948387 07.06.2026 09:06:17.406 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 375
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 207 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 196938
Objects passed selection criteria: 196345
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 153640
Average stars matched: 138899 (90.4052 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1952228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 05:57:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.87902317
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00552 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Spkb0zq1S2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cepVqMEcJV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gY73xqSqNo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YNeLuzJHRn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6373 to +59.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6373 to 59.3623 deg
Loaded 163448 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14807 out of 16429 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16429 out of 29065 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Spkb0zq1S2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=218 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cepVqMEcJV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3195, passed=29065
Got 29065 stars (including 25829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4479 through 0 to 15.3165, gap 15.3165 to 345.4479
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4484 through 0 to 15.3183, gap 15.3183 to 345.4484
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=196 n_q2=274 n_q3=213 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gY73xqSqNo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1700, passed=21822
Got 21822 stars (including 20104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0752 through 0 to 14.8811, gap 14.8811 to 345.0752
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 345 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 252 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0797 through 0 to 14.8920, gap 14.8920 to 345.0797
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 396 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.54"
Excluding outliers - 321 stars left (next iteration limit 264)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=321 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.129 sigma_q2_arcsec=30.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.209 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.954 n_q1=32 n_q2=31 n_q3=86 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.927
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YNeLuzJHRn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1769, passed=21710
Got 21710 stars (including 19923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9597 through 0 to 14.8807, gap 14.8807 to 344.9597
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 238 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9688 through 0 to 14.8898, gap 14.8898 to 344.9688
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 388 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.32"
Excluding outliers - 308 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits N_match=308 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.188 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.773 sigma_q2_arcsec=24.015 sigma_q3_arcsec=4.937 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.196 n_q1=29 n_q2=31 n_q3=77 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.751
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.147
ref2=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits sigma_overall=10.449 worst_q_ratio=2.927
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits sigma_overall=11.188 worst_q_ratio=2.751
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.2195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits) flagged: sigma=10.449 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.927 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 20915 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1964918.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1964918.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 25.9224 (1.81115e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (360,54.0189), pixel scale 5.93269 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-------++--+-+---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1964918.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1964918.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.001178, 54.019719) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.283, +54:01:10.989).
Field size: 15.6091 x 10.4356 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.4012 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 05:36 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 05:36 out1964918.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1964918.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1964918.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.45 degrees of RA,Dec (0.00255,54.0206)
log-odds ratio 25.9224 (1.81115e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (360,54.0189), pixel scale 5.93269 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-------++--+-+---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1964918.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1964918.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.001178, 54.019719) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.283, +54:01:10.989).
Field size: 15.6091 x 10.4356 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.4012 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 05:36 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 05:36 out1964918.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 99292 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1634, 946.857] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.22286
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.928367
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.766
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1634, 946.857] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.22286
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.928367
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 6.766
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21822 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2151102.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1700, passed=21822
Got 21822 stars (including 20104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0752 through 0 to 14.8811, gap 14.8811 to 345.0752
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 345 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 252 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0797 through 0 to 14.8920, gap 14.8920 to 345.0797
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 396 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 323 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 321 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.54"
Excluding outliers - 321 stars left (next iteration limit 264)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=321 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.129 sigma_q2_arcsec=30.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.209 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.954 n_q1=32 n_q2=31 n_q3=86 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.927
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits): sigma 10.449->10.449, ratio 2.927->2.927; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits) flagged: sigma=11.188 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.751 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 20805 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2151496.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2151496.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 26.1444 (2.26138e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.999,54.0244), pixel scale 5.9328 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-----+--+--+-+---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2151496.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2151496.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.000450, 54.025225) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.108, +54:01:30.808).
Field size: 15.6095 x 10.436 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.40698 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 05:43 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 05:43 out2151496.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2151496.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2151496.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.45 degrees of RA,Dec (0.001825,54.0261)
log-odds ratio 26.1444 (2.26138e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.999,54.0244), pixel scale 5.9328 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-----+--+--+-+---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2151496.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2151496.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.000450, 54.025225) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.108, +54:01:30.808).
Field size: 15.6095 x 10.436 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.40698 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 7 05:43 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 7 05:43 out2151496.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1645, 946.874] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.23336
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1645, 946.874] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.23336
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 21710 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2457383.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1769, passed=21710
Got 21710 stars (including 19923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9597 through 0 to 14.8807, gap 14.8807 to 344.9597
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 238 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9688 through 0 to 14.8898, gap 14.8898 to 344.9688
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 388 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 311 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.32"
Excluding outliers - 308 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits N_match=308 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.188 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.773 sigma_q2_arcsec=24.015 sigma_q3_arcsec=4.937 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.196 n_q1=29 n_q2=31 n_q3=77 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.751
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits): sigma 11.188->11.188, ratio 2.751->2.751; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=10.449 -- 20.06x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=11.188 -- 21.47x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.927 -- 2.40x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.751 -- 2.26x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (321 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (308 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:43:44.55 +57:38:10.6: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:49.93 +54:00:33.4: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9: 15.60 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:49.93 +54:00:33.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:49.93 +54:00:33.4: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8849 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.7016 delta=2.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.60 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9: ref_mag=15.60 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=10.8557 delta=4.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:43:44.55 +57:38:10.6: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:44.55 +57:38:10.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0447 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:43.70 +55:00:51.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:43.70 +55:00:51.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:43.70 +55:00:51.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1030 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=8.0030 delta=7.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34639.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31470_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31470_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 32298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 32809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33936_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 33936_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:41.16 +55:32:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34351_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34351_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:52:38.52 +56:44:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 34639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34688_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 34688_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 34703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35615_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35615_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35691_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35691_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 35884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35887_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35887_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36173_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 36173_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 32s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:58:24.64 +51:26:28.8
23:55:49.97 +53:44:34.2
00:06:02.33 +55:11:56.9
23:50:45.05 +53:34:48.5
00:02:19.61 +54:08:02.9
00:20:40.52 +50:12:02.0
00:20:09.20 +50:44:48.8
23:52:18.51 +50:09:11.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.612 +54:01:13.98
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.438 +54:01:33.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00552 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SmjW9uPVpl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.np7k5NtwcA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iveM70516d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NDaLEanEw6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.676500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.676500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 217552 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6349 to +59.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6349 to 59.3691 deg
Loaded 163556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11613 out of 17712 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17712 out of 217552 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 327 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SmjW9uPVpl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=32857, passed=217571
Got 217571 stars (including 184418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=213 n_q2=264 n_q3=237 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.np7k5NtwcA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=32499, passed=217519
Got 217519 stars (including 184678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4097, gap 15.4097 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4450 through 0 to 15.4115, gap 15.4115 to 345.4450
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=220 n_q2=266 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iveM70516d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=17626, passed=151150
Got 151150 stars (including 133345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9629 through 0 to 14.9831, gap 14.9831 to 344.9629
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 319 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 216 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9723 through 0 to 15.0025, gap 15.0025 to 344.9723
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 366 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 300 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 298 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.98"
Excluding outliers - 298 stars left (next iteration limit 237)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=298 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.978 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=27.778 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.917 n_q1=35 n_q2=25 n_q3=81 n_q4=157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.455
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NDaLEanEw6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=18380, passed=155733
Got 155733 stars (including 137181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9596 through 0 to 14.9846, gap 14.9846 to 344.9596
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 313 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 209 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9637 through 0 to 14.9940, gap 14.9940 to 344.9637
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 359 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 292 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.49"
Excluding outliers - 289 stars left (next iteration limit 229)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits N_match=289 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.080 sigma_q1_arcsec=27.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.640 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.771 n_q1=33 n_q2=22 n_q3=76 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.482
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-05-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_043117_TTUQ2b1x1_2274353_xq12s77Y/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:57:26.69 +56:32:08.1: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:57:26.69 +56:32:08.1: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:26.69 +56:32:08.1: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3260 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8: 15.68 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:37:00.60 +56:58:04.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8: 15.64 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:58:37.50 +53:54:33.8: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.0665 delta=2.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:46:42.90 +54:28:31.3: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:46:42.90 +54:28:31.3: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:39:43.44 +57:07:12.3: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:42.90 +54:28:31.3: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8557 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:39:00.60 +57:49:40.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:06.47 +58:05:16.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:24.47 +56:01:49.7: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:24.47 +56:01:49.7: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:24.47 +56:01:49.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.9335 delta=-1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6: 15.43 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:15:03.37 +56:19:19.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.1029 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:37:39.94 +56:52:24.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:24.00 +51:26:30.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:50.78 +53:44:26.5: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9: 11.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:38:19.26 +56:01:53.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:23:07.32 +55:47:29.9: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=8.0176 delta=3.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125040.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out174810.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out247996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out259257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out263221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out272429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out277083.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 43s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243675_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243675_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243686_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243686_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243690_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243690_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243714_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243714_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243715_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243715_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243726_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243726_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243745_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243745_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243755_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243755_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243768_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243768_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243777_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243777_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243779_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243779_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243789_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243789_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243801_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243801_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243815_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243815_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243816_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243831_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243831_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243855_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243857_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243857_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243860_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243860_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243866_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243866_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243869_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243869_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243871_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243871_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243872_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243872_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243894_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243895_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243895_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243897_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243897_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243904_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243909_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243909_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243917_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 243917_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 243930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243932_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243932_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243943_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243943_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243950_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243950_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243953_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243953_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243959_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 243959_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 244886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 245376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247650_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 247650_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247721_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 247721_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247996_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 247996_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 248185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249431_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 249431_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 251205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 251429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 251468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 251724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 251856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 252212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 252848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 253042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 253349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 254501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 255103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 255390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 255804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256499_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256499_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 256878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257149_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257149_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257241_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257241_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257727_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257727_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257899_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 257899_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258296_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258296_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258416_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258416_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258581_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258581_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258677_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258677_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 258925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259010_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259010_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259257_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 259257_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259301_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259301_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259546_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259546_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259628_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259628_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 259814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260437_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260616_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260616_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260672_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260672_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260777_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260777_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 260926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261540_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 261540_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 261874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262148_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262148_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262419_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262419_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262694_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262930_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 262967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263173_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263173_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 263221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263306_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263306_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263353_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263353_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263795_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263795_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 263905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264149_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264149_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264268_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264268_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264432_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264493_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264493_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264602_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264602_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264780_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264932_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 264932_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265449_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265951_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 265951_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266184_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266184_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266306_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266306_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266413_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266413_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266494_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266494_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266569_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266569_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266736_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 266999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267338_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267338_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267668_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267983_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 267983_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268420_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268420_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268597_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268597_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268633_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268633_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268634_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268634_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268858_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268858_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 268882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269397_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269397_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269629_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 269629_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270055_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270055_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270209_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270209_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270642_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270642_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 270826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271139_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271251_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271251_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271383_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271383_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271554_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271554_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271632_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271632_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 271671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 272213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272226_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 272226_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 272429_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272438_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 272438_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 272662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273138_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273138_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273260_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273260_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273656_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273656_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273661_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 273937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 274048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274157_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 274157_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 275144_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 275271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 275624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275976_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 275976_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 276134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 276455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 276748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277046_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277046_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 277083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277368_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277368_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277941_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 277941_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278450_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278450_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278627_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278709_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278709_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 278935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279146_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279146_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279208_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279488_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279488_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279740_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279740_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279907_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279907_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 279928_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280122_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280122_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280143_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280143_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280254_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280254_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280355_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280355_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280731_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280731_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280772_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280772_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280794_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280794_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280828_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 280862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 166100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 132530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 229994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-06-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
