This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3589 2461198.8589 9.70 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2
29.61639 -12.08043 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.18 Melpomene 1 -1 1 9.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.8589,9.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.3589 9.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3589 2461198.8589 11.15 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9
27.99647 -14.43167 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.409 Aspasia -1 -0 1 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.8589,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.3589 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3589 2461198.8589 11.30 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0
25.52190 -12.46813 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J192308-1209.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.010 V Y 0.690 V 2452148.70000 61.532150000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192308-1209.2,2461198.8589,11.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192308-1209.2 20260607.3589 11.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461198.85914369 07.06.2026 08:37:00.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9907
Objects passed selection criteria: 9874
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7544
Average stars matched: 7359.5 (97.5543 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 07:52:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461198.85914369 07.06.2026 08:37:00.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 76 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 94512
Objects passed selection criteria: 94346
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81992.8
Average stars matched: 79502.5 (96.9628 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1932200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 07:57:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.85866183
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01093 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0GyjGEUSF4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JVI0gWjoRW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lKMO0OgyUZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yvtWRsQgqN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8436 out of 8760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8760 out of 13026 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0GyjGEUSF4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=13037
Got 13037 stars (including 12267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=269 n_q2=220 n_q3=230 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JVI0gWjoRW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=765, passed=13026
Got 13026 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=273 n_q2=214 n_q3=232 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lKMO0OgyUZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, passed=5986
Got 5986 stars (including 5638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.791 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=228 n_q2=243 n_q3=239 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yvtWRsQgqN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=5847
Got 5847 stars (including 5488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5847 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.778 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=222 n_q2=235 n_q3=240 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.570 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.580 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits sigma_overall=0.594 worst_q_ratio=1.331
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.243
reference average sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.213
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:52:04.31 -06:20:32.3: 10.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=9.7020 delta=3.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:52:04.31 -06:20:32.3: 10.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:04.31 -06:20:32.3: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4796 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20731.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20729_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 20729_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.99 -08:14:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20731_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 20731_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20737_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 20737_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03442_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 03442_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:59.57 -12:35:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 05110_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.79 -11:14:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:28:46.66 -08:22:53.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:54.852 -10:00:11.06
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:52.327 -10:00:23.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01093 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IMKzui9dnb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F6Umr8Tcg7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tly1fkWQXQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SU7ogcEcpi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.456700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.456700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 117743 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Loaded 11444 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8582 out of 10248 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10248 out of 117743 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IMKzui9dnb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=9917, passed=120318
Got 120318 stars (including 110246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=282 n_q2=219 n_q3=215 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F6Umr8Tcg7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=9576, passed=117729
Got 117729 stars (including 108009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 117729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=276 n_q2=225 n_q3=212 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tly1fkWQXQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3316, passed=72301
Got 72301 stars (including 68868 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72301 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=241 n_q2=239 n_q3=213 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SU7ogcEcpi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3275, passed=71940
Got 71940 stars (including 68564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=235 n_q2=239 n_q3=222 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-36-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_041722_TTUQ2b1x1_1836692_DIq0DJN9/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:29:50.79 -10:24:49.5: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:00.00 -10:49:50.2: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:32:08.60 -11:19:55.8: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:29:44.82 -10:04:42.3: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:45.18 -10:30:00.0: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:24.40 -07:10:56.3: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:55:16.00 -09:13:44.0: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:29:44.82 -10:04:42.3: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:45.18 -10:30:00.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:44.82 -10:04:42.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6296 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:45.18 -10:30:00.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5308 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:00.00 -10:49:50.2: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:32:08.60 -11:19:55.8: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:08.60 -11:19:55.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7254 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:00.00 -10:49:50.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4467 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:29:50.79 -10:24:49.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:50.79 -10:24:49.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6587 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:55:16.00 -09:13:44.0: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:24.40 -07:10:56.3: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:16.00 -09:13:44.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5699 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:24.40 -07:10:56.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8079 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:42:03.74 -09:45:14.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:55:23.82 -08:17:10.6: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:42:03.74 -09:45:14.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:03.74 -09:45:14.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4154 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:55:23.82 -08:17:10.6: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:23.82 -08:17:10.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3337 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:56:06.11 -07:57:24.2: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:57.94 -09:38:49.8: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:26:31.51 -13:34:00.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:14:48.63 -12:46:59.1: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:25:01.25 -07:18:56.4: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:56:06.11 -07:57:24.2: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:06.58 -08:37:25.0: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:26:31.51 -13:34:00.5: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:06.11 -07:57:24.2: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1515 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:57.94 -09:38:49.8: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:31.51 -13:34:00.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9636 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:57.94 -09:38:49.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1491 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:48.5: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:37:13.73 -07:56:48.8: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:25:01.25 -07:18:56.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:01.25 -07:18:56.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9359 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:14:48.63 -12:46:59.1: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:14:48.63 -12:46:59.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5752 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:37:13.73 -07:56:48.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:06.58 -08:37:25.0: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:06.58 -08:37:25.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6867 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:13.73 -07:56:48.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1171 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:48.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:17.20 -08:58:48.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2488 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:58:16.95 -12:00:48.2: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:17:17.22 -10:46:07.5: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:38:58.78 -11:45:34.0: 12.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:58:16.95 -12:00:48.2: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:16.95 -12:00:48.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3408 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:07.19 -10:33:02.2: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:56.88 -12:20:50.5: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:17:17.22 -10:46:07.5: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:28:37.89 -06:31:15.8: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:17.22 -10:46:07.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5341 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:38:58.78 -11:45:34.0: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:15:28.88 -13:55:14.5: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:58.78 -11:45:34.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7062 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:07.19 -10:33:02.2: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:07.19 -10:33:02.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7983 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:56.88 -12:20:50.5: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:56.88 -12:20:50.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9130 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:04.02 -06:03:22.0: 13.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:28:37.89 -06:31:15.8: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:15:28.88 -13:55:14.5: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:37.89 -06:31:15.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9824 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:28.88 -13:55:14.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7839 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:15:43.84 -08:59:15.8: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:04.02 -06:03:22.0: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:04.02 -06:03:22.0: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1488 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:15:43.84 -08:59:15.8: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:43.84 -08:59:15.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1438 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:48:14.79 -10:31:19.5: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:47.16 -09:44:56.1: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:33:04.92 -06:49:03.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:33:03.68 -10:16:48.8: 15.10 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:59:39.86 -12:26:52.8: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:10.51 -10:24:45.2: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:48:14.79 -10:31:19.5: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:14.79 -10:31:19.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6822 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:33:04.92 -06:49:03.8: 15.17 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:33:03.68 -10:16:48.8: 14.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:33:04.92 -06:49:03.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.8682 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:33:03.68 -10:16:48.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6264 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:59:39.86 -12:26:52.8: 14.23 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:47.16 -09:44:56.1: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:53:44.14 -10:07:57.6: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:39.86 -12:26:52.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7233 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:47.16 -09:44:56.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6279 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:27:30.06 -09:12:52.9: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:10.51 -10:24:45.2: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:10.51 -10:24:45.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8332 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:27:30.06 -09:12:52.9: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:53:44.14 -10:07:57.6: 14.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:30.06 -09:12:52.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1519 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:44.14 -10:07:57.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0553 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:20:34.59 -07:40:01.0: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:20:34.59 -07:40:01.0: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:34.59 -07:40:01.0: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1386 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:34.97 -10:49:26.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=11.1434 delta=3.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:23:07.39 -12:09:10.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2830 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out139852.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out139866.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31521.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139582_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139582_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139584_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139584_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139600_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139600_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:50.47 -10:19:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139601_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139601_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:22.37 -09:34:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139605_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139605_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139606_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139606_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139607_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139607_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139608_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139608_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:20.32 -09:21:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139612_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139612_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139615_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139615_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139633_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139633_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:46.62 -12:31:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139636_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139636_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139641_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139641_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139646_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139646_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:12.49 -10:43:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139649_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139649_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:11.32 -12:18:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139654_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139654_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:22.18 -08:16:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139655_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139655_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139656_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139656_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139663_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139663_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139667_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139667_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139668_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139668_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139672_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:43.64 -09:03:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139673_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139673_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139677_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139677_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139682_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139682_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.98 -08:14:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139687_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139687_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:44.12 -08:13:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139693_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139693_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:10.30 -13:28:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139701_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139701_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:31.18 -06:43:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139704_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139704_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139705_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139705_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:15.30 -10:00:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139710_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139710_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:26.55 -09:21:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139714_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139714_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139716_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:01.93 -07:14:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139722_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139722_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139725_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139725_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:58.75 -10:22:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139731_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139731_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139734_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139734_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:32.34 -08:30:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139735_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139735_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139736_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139736_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139737_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139737_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139740_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139740_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139741_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139741_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:02.39 -06:31:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139749_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139749_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.38 -06:29:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139750_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139750_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139754_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139754_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139768_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139768_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:19.51 -05:57:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139771_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139771_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:34.12 -07:40:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139777_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139777_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:32.20 -08:25:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139790_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139790_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:01.45 -09:33:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139798_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139798_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:04.42 -12:08:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139804_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139804_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:01.94 -09:25:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139810_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139810_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:16.78 -06:46:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139850_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139850_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139852_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:04.92 -06:49:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.413 4207339109788512256 293.27047026254 -06.81839179965 13.2443 11.5848 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139861_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139866_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139866_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:03.68 -10:16:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.299 4188064666649364096 293.26531332787 -10.28058241210 13.8230 11.9904 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.299#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139872_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139872_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139876_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139876_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:46.33 -10:53:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139932_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139932_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139950_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 139950_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42076_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 42076_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.78 -11:14:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 118727_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:46.64 -08:22:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49102_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 49102_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:28.77 -10:41:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48316_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 48316_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105287_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 105287_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:52.13 -06:58:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26567_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 26567_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:59.60 -12:35:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130901_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 130901_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_03-37-00_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks