This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.47 18:11:06.69 -32:43:41.6
359.42641 -6.63072 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 4.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J181106.31-324339.3
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V 15.200 V 2457804.00000 217.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:11:06.69 -32:43:41.6: 13.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:11:06.69 -32:43:41.6: 13.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J181106.31-324339.3,2461198.8415,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J181106.31-324339.3 20260607.3415 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.48 18:11:40.99 -31:24:11.7
0.65961 -6.11286 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" Gaia DR3 4048969986105458176
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.810 G 12.100 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:11:40.99 -31:24:11.7: 13.57 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:11:40.99 -31:24:11.7: 13.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4048969986105458176,2461198.8415,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4048969986105458176 20260607.3415 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.58 18:19:48.64 -32:05:09.2
0.85791 -7.96024 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V3045 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V < 14.500 V 2452840.00000 202.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:19:48.64 -32:05:09.2: 14.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:19:48.64 -32:05:09.2: 14.19 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3045 Sgr,2461198.8415,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3045 Sgr 20260607.3415 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.61 18:16:32.67 -30:53:47.8
1.59996 -6.79507 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J181632.70-305344.4
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.630 V 14.490 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:16:32.67 -30:53:47.8: 13.64 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:16:32.67 -30:53:47.8: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J181632.70-305344.4,2461198.8415,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J181632.70-305344.4 20260607.3415 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.70 18:39:08.99 -31:03:39.2
3.62685 -11.21010 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V3709 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 V < 17.100 V 2452050.00000 240.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:39:08.99 -31:03:39.2: 13.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:39:08.99 -31:03:39.2: 13.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3709 Sgr,2461198.8415,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3709 Sgr 20260607.3415 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.92 18:10:14.91 -33:52:47.1
358.31778 -7.01388 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J181014.50-335249.1
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.202 Ic Y 2.583 Ic 318.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:10:14.91 -33:52:47.1: 13.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:10:14.91 -33:52:47.1: 13.89 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.25
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J181014.50-335249.1,2461198.8415,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J181014.50-335249.1 20260607.3415 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.96 18:27:58.11 -28:59:15.6
4.45060 -8.12871 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 3.4 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 4048158379106198400
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.740 G 19.480 G 0.392259000000
The object was found in astcheck.160 Una 3 1 3 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:27:58.11 -28:59:15.6: 14.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:27:58.11 -28:59:15.6: 14.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4048158379106198400,2461198.8415,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4048158379106198400 20260607.3415 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 12.05 18:32:37.92 -31:04:37.2
3.00291 -9.95628 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J183238.08-310437.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.740 g Y 0.550 g 2458702.77300 40.170000000000
The object was found in astcheck.800 Kressmannia 10 -1 10 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:32:37.92 -31:04:37.2: 12.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:32:37.92 -31:04:37.2: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J183238.08-310437.8,2461198.8415,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J183238.08-310437.8 20260607.3415 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3415 2461198.8415 11.87 18:41:25.00 -32:41:15.1
2.32395 -12.32844 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 3.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1924 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 pg 17.600 pg 2436745.00000 174.300000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:41:25.00 -32:41:15.1: 13.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:41:25.00 -32:41:15.1: 12.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1924 Sgr,2461198.8415,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1924 Sgr 20260607.3415 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461198.84250143 07.06.2026 08:13:02.124 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10243
Objects passed selection criteria: 10242
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9289.75
Average stars matched: 8484 (91.3265 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 03:39:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461198.84250143 07.06.2026 08:13:02.124 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 223
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 216 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116170
Objects passed selection criteria: 115991
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 105751
Average stars matched: 89199.5 (84.3484 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1942132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 03:46:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.84043058
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 940.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.710 -34:00:08.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.710 -34:00:08.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:57.173 -34:00:11.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:57.173 -34:00:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:58.710 -34:00:08.27
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:57.173 -34:00:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6d0MAD4eKc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uWKrF5TF4E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FMgcw6ayt4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZhOLKs5h0E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=7.0)
Read 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Loaded 18882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 9621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9621 out of 12244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
4.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6d0MAD4eKc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, passed=9805
Got 9805 stars (including 9075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.134 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.956 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.062 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.503 n_q1=270 n_q2=146 n_q3=284 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uWKrF5TF4E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, passed=12244
Got 12244 stars (including 11301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=249 n_q2=202 n_q3=262 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FMgcw6ayt4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, passed=7098
Got 7098 stars (including 6751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.725 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.677 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=275 n_q2=162 n_q3=343 n_q4=134 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZhOLKs5h0E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=541, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=309 n_q2=179 n_q3=309 n_q4=127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits sigma_overall=1.134 worst_q_ratio=1.325
ref2=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.158
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.505 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.8955 worst_q_ratio=1.244
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-10-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_033646_TTUQ1b1x1_4035400_EWvYKtlT/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:13:19.91 -29:21:09.2: 9.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:58:47.13 -36:48:34.2: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:23.70 -37:35:24.9: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:20:18.82 -37:56:48.3: 9.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:23:39.32 -38:16:46.8: 10.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:13:19.91 -29:21:09.2: 9.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:19.91 -29:21:09.2: ref_mag=9.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8031 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:40:23.70 -37:35:24.9: 11.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:58:47.13 -36:48:34.2: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:23:39.32 -38:16:46.8: 10.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:23.70 -37:35:24.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9370 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:47.13 -36:48:34.2: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9888 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:39.32 -38:16:46.8: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.0809 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:20:18.82 -37:56:48.3: 9.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:18.82 -37:56:48.3: ref_mag=9.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4605 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 22932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:44.53 -37:37:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22934_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 22934_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.47 -35:17:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22988_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 22988_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23012_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 23012_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 23015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:22.87 -32:54:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00706_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 00706_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00396_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 00396_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168106_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168106_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168109_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168109_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168112_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168112_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168125_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168125_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168153_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168153_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168156_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168156_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168176_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168176_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168177_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168177_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168180_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168180_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:51.80 -37:29:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168187_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168187_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168193_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168193_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:06.01 -38:12:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168206_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168206_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168212_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168212_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168225_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168225_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168238_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168238_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168242_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168242_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168248_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168248_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:07.52 -37:57:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168267_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168267_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168271_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168271_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168399_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168399_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168614_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168614_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:32.03 -36:09:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168769_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168769_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:14.73 -36:18:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168825_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168825_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168921_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 168921_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:05.14 -28:40:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169008_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169008_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:54.87 -29:55:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169047_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169047_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:51.85 -30:53:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169280_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:20.77 -36:46:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169521_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169521_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169584_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169584_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169586_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169586_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169612_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169612_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 169636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169649_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169649_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169683_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169683_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:35.98 -29:57:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169699_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169699_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:49.90 -34:49:41.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.636 6735240410760649216 281.20753195286 -34.82846586398 12.0389 10.3905 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.636#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169722_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169722_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169763_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 169763_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:01.64 -29:32:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169841_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169841_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169856_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 169856_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169892_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 169892_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169901_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 169901_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:57.79 -33:52:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 170010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170086_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170086_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170103_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170103_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170127_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170127_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170161_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170161_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170198_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170198_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:58.91 -35:32:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.961 4038385816674805888 273.99492117626 -35.54026952914 12.4158 11.1628 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170234_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170234_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:07.44 -35:50:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170241_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170241_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170268_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170268_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170296_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170296_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170309_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170309_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:18.61 -34:39:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.412 4039279754025171840 272.82607519965 -34.66333774213 13.1683 11.0838 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.412#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 170321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170324_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170324_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170345_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170345_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:55.20 -32:44:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170382_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170382_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.22 -35:44:21.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.130 6731368171324636928 286.17975785625 -35.73939156307 12.6918 11.0649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.130#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170384_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170384_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170392_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170392_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:24.50 -29:18:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170412_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170412_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170423_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170423_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170429_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170429_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:35.71 -30:43:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170440_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170440_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170441_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170441_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170444_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170444_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170445_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170445_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170446_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170446_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170454_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170454_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170465_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170465_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170474_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170474_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:22.09 -33:31:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.404 4045449109382787712 273.84200611960 -33.53216738683 13.7954 12.2065 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.404#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170476_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170476_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170477_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170477_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:19.81 -29:37:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170485_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170485_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170488_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170488_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170493_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170493_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:53.22 -34:32:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.810 4038580735094530304 274.47131367858 -34.54982367434 13.5921 11.5773 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.810#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170503_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170503_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170505_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170505_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:03.81 -33:40:45.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.722 4039445191756440320 273.51518553469 -33.67985349428 12.2796 10.7225 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.722#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170509_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170509_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170513_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170513_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170521_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170521_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:17.59 -28:54:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.521 4051285115310778624 275.07317134422 -28.91514634050 13.7954 11.5706 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.521#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170523_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170523_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170550_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170550_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 170559_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170561_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170561_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170573_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170573_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170587_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170587_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170598_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170598_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170601_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170601_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170603_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170603_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170605_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170605_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170610_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170610_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170612_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170612_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:31.93 -32:39:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170632_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170632_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170641_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:48.91 -31:35:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.745 4046653972280429312 279.20384926091 -31.59322896451 12.9979 11.6295 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.745#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170647_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:18.49 -30:55:57.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.150 4047075325747490688 279.82700315251 -30.93258101539 13.9641 12.4388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.150#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170649_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170649_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170650_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170650_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170652_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170652_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:03.42 -33:04:21.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.913 6735125168197008640 278.51439914326 -33.07280400270 12.0877 10.8262 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170658_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170658_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170664_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170664_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170668_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170668_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170679_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170679_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170691_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170691_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170696_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 170696_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03285_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 03285_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 01749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03555_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 03555_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:07.82 -29:21:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:38.45 -30:29:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.51 -29:55:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 114260_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.21 -33:50:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 114123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.47 -35:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:37.15 -31:24:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113432_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 113432_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:55.85 -29:49:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:46.43 -30:23:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113055_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 113055_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01007_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 01007_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 93381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112472_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112472_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112439_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112439_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112433_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112433_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67096_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 67096_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:43.22 -32:41:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:52.77 -37:12:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118978_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 118978_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:45.52 -29:34:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 52442_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:22.41 -29:03:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112222_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 112222_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:22.89 -32:54:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.39 -29:58:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03857_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 03857_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05372_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 05372_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:48.42 -31:47:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82311_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 82311_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:57.24 -37:37:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.54 -29:49:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.58 -29:04:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02065_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 02065_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:32.92 -38:46:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149973_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 149973_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116918_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 116918_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 02553_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 01076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02863_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 02863_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:24.31 -38:09:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123535_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 123535_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:11.68 -29:40:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 06962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136294_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 136294_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:37.57 -31:12:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007
The candidate 135749_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_03-13-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0007 did not pass the final checks
