This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 11.71 16:41:13.71 -13:20:16.3
4.50026 21.14730 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -2 3 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:13.71 -13:20:16.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:13.71 -13:20:16.3: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.6387,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.1387 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 12.15 16:58:11.96 -05:35:14.3
13.92238 22.06535 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 3 -1 3 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:11.96 -05:35:14.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:11.96 -05:35:14.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.6387,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.1387 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 12.76 17:01:37.58 -11:19:22.3
9.29221 18.22739 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 -1 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:01:37.58 -11:19:22.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:01:37.58 -11:19:22.3: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.6387,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.1387 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 13.03 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5
8.15929 17.34202 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J170210.39-124239.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.840 V 14.420 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170210.39-124239.8,2461198.6387,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170210.39-124239.8 20260607.1387 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 13.09 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6
10.59085 21.12078 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J165436.18-084202.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 V 14.060 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165436.18-084202.8,2461198.6387,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165436.18-084202.8 20260607.1387 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 13.04 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8
10.24449 19.11037 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J170040.06-100457.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.870 V 14.260 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170040.06-100457.5,2461198.6387,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170040.06-100457.5 20260607.1387 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 13.40 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9
13.50254 22.32744 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 13614396
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.400 V 2451332.00000 55.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 13614396,2461198.6387,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 13614396 20260607.1387 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 11.95 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1
9.85890 20.84333 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J165400-0925.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.071 Ic Y 0.256 Ic 2452542.50000 58.480000000000
The object was found in astcheck.11415 1999 JG81 428 313 530 16.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J165400-0925.4,2461198.6387,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J165400-0925.4 20260607.1387 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 12.59 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9
12.97152 12.89376 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J1727445-111236
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 R1 Y 1.001 R1 178.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.1387* 17 27 44.30 -11 12 35.9 12.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1727445-111236,2461198.6387,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1727445-111236 20260607.1387 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 12.29 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2
7.03038 20.85668 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J164751.31-113534.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.520 V 13.990 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J164751.31-113534.0,2461198.6387,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J164751.31-113534.0 20260607.1387 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.1387 2461198.6387 11.32 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6
11.08772 10.47677 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J173214-1402.8
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.930 V Y 1.030 V 2452190.70000 123.882408000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 07.1387* 17 32 13.38 -14 02 48.6 11.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J173214-1402.8,2461198.6387,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J173214-1402.8 20260607.1387 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461198.63900797 07.06.2026 03:20:00.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 30
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6483
Objects passed selection criteria: 6463
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5511.25
Average stars matched: 5421 (98.3624 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 6 22:21:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461198.63900797 07.06.2026 03:20:00.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 223
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59525
Objects passed selection criteria: 59432
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47453.5
Average stars matched: 46232.5 (97.427 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 162600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 6 22:24:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.63847108
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01444 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KUbstmS51P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QQu04xNfHZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wE9N0BewoK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MhLJedSN6p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
3.8 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.8 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KUbstmS51P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QQu04xNfHZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wE9N0BewoK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=165, passed=4102
Got 4102 stars (including 3937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4102 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=180 n_q2=309 n_q3=250 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MhLJedSN6p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=153, passed=4122
Got 4122 stars (including 3966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=182 n_q2=305 n_q3=251 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.403
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.379
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.403
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20099_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20099_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:31.80 -14:42:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20103_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20103_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:50.35 -14:47:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20117_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20117_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:30.26 -14:35:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20131_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20131_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:25.25 -15:00:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20143_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20143_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:17.41 -15:02:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20151_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20151_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.96 -14:37:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:27.51 -15:04:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:31.74 -14:45:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20170_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.11 -06:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.64 -14:40:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20179_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:34.50 -14:49:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:10.33 -14:55:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:13.85 -14:38:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20248_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20248_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:22.22 -15:04:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.91 -04:55:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20273_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.02 -15:02:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20277_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20277_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:56.53 -15:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.58 -13:46:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20309_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20309_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:44.49 -14:39:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20327_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:10.67 -14:20:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:41.22 -09:25:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05972_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05972_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.48 -07:22:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:45.82 -10:24:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.16 -09:57:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0235 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:35.236 -10:00:05.62
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:38.193 -10:00:33.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01444 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dM2z33yiOI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.smCHRNTYdP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mDt1O6imoI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8laj8YDTD9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 197 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
3.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dM2z33yiOI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420
Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.smCHRNTYdP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998
Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mDt1O6imoI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1079, passed=28758
Got 28758 stars (including 27639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=179 n_q2=288 n_q3=265 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.380
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8laj8YDTD9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1086, passed=28630
Got 28630 stars (including 27522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=181 n_q2=284 n_q3=262 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-19-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-06_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222034_TTUQ1b1x1_2843383_MrcgYy6P/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:36.41 -07:33:02.7: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:54.69 -10:00:54.2: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:27:58.01 -13:53:15.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:36.41 -07:33:02.7: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:27:58.01 -13:53:15.4: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:36.41 -07:33:02.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2608 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:58.01 -13:53:15.4: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2198 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:54.69 -10:00:54.2: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:54.69 -10:00:54.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4879 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:13.71 -13:20:16.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:11.96 -05:35:14.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:13.71 -13:20:16.3: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:11.96 -05:35:14.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:34:50.07 -12:14:52.0: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:34:50.07 -12:14:52.0: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:50.07 -12:14:52.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4300 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:39:23.42 -13:29:02.5: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:01:37.58 -11:19:22.3: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:39:23.42 -13:29:02.5: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:23.42 -13:29:02.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4483 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:01:37.58 -11:19:22.3: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:39:17.26 -14:37:45.3: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:39:14.74 -14:30:19.2: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:09.60 -08:21:01.7: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:39:17.26 -14:37:45.3: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:39:14.74 -14:30:19.2: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:17.26 -14:37:45.3: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5268 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:14.74 -14:30:19.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6128 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:09.60 -08:21:01.7: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:09.60 -08:21:01.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0176 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:01.70 -14:36:23.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:01.70 -14:36:23.8: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:01.70 -14:36:23.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4970 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:36:12.93 -14:39:02.0: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:54.52 -09:41:46.3: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:36:12.93 -14:39:02.0: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:12.93 -14:39:02.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7077 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:19.66 -07:39:21.7: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:41.19 -10:40:04.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:54.52 -09:41:46.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:08:54.52 -09:41:46.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=13.6126 delta=1.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:19.66 -07:39:21.7: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:56:19.66 -07:39:21.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8818 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:41.19 -10:40:04.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:41.19 -10:40:04.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9406 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:02:10.21 -12:42:43.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0273 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:54:36.16 -08:42:01.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0857 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:00:39.99 -10:04:57.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0375 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:56:28.37 -05:46:30.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4044 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:53:59.92 -09:25:22.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9456 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:27:44.30 -11:12:35.9: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5882 delta=1.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:47:51.39 -11:35:33.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2928 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:30:54.01 -14:47:32.9: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:32:13.38 -14:02:48.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3103 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:30:54.01 -14:47:32.9: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:54.01 -14:47:32.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4779 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out86927.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out86995.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33097.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69978.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86049.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86489.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:19.34 -15:01:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:04.85 -12:43:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:15.12 -05:27:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85795_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85795_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:31.77 -14:42:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85800_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85800_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:50.36 -14:47:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85807_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85807_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:10.39 -14:17:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85810_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85810_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:45.41 -14:30:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85821_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85821_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85825_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85825_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:30.29 -14:35:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85827_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85827_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:00.16 -14:52:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:25.24 -15:00:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85848_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85848_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:17.40 -15:02:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85850_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85850_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:00.55 -14:50:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:47.17 -14:07:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85862_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85862_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:27.52 -15:04:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85863_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85863_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.95 -14:37:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85868_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85868_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:31.73 -14:45:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85873_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85873_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.09 -06:23:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85881_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85881_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.60 -14:40:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85887_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85887_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:34.48 -14:49:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85893_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85893_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:04.91 -14:59:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85904_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85904_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:56.26 -14:04:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85921_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85921_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:10.33 -14:55:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85932_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85932_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:50.36 -15:07:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:41.97 -14:19:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85955_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85955_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:13.80 -14:38:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:58.85 -15:03:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85960_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85960_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:22.21 -15:04:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85964_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85964_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:23.93 -14:28:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85967_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85967_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:55.71 -14:30:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85968_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85968_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:09.13 -14:59:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:04.01 -14:42:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85985_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 85985_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.01 -15:02:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86003_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86003_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:56.56 -15:02:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:33.50 -14:33:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:13.05 -15:01:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:13.74 -15:05:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86035_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86035_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:44.45 -14:39:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86048_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86048_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:44.69 -14:44:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86049_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 86049_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86050_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86050_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:44.36 -14:57:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86055_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86055_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:10.64 -14:20:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86057_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86057_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:00.25 -14:51:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86067_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86067_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:44.94 -14:21:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86070_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86070_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:08.83 -15:04:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86081_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86081_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:36.28 -14:57:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86085_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86085_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:42.08 -14:55:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86092_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 86092_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86120_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86120_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:05.73 -14:30:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86124_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86124_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:55.45 -15:00:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86130_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86130_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:12.96 -14:51:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.97 -14:52:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86196_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86196_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:05.26 -14:59:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86207_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:23.31 -14:17:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:58.76 -15:01:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86218_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86218_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:32.72 -14:55:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:07.63 -14:53:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:43.87 -15:01:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86241_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86241_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:17.52 -15:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86243_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86243_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:49.33 -14:28:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86244_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86244_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:35.99 -14:28:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86246_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86246_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:59.80 -14:48:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86247_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86247_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:16.71 -14:35:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86261_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86261_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:16.98 -14:08:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:50.34 -14:48:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86272_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86272_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:57.18 -14:14:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86309_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86309_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:36.78 -14:54:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86317_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86317_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:22.54 -15:06:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:05.03 -14:46:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86325_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86325_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:08.38 -14:49:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:03.00 -14:59:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86343_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86343_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.36 -14:53:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86349_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86349_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:02.99 -14:30:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86361_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86361_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:46.97 -14:41:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:35.69 -14:50:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86368_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86368_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:00.11 -14:33:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86370_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86370_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86389_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86389_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.44 -15:06:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86390_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86390_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:53.42 -14:52:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86391_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86391_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:53.61 -14:22:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86396_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86396_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.98 -14:06:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86398_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86398_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:00.21 -14:36:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86401_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86401_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:12.74 -14:36:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:32.82 -14:52:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:25.68 -14:40:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86429_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86429_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.59 -06:07:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:50.10 -14:45:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86460_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:51.07 -14:51:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:53.95 -15:02:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.26 -12:21:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:51.45 -14:40:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86489_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 86489_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.12 -08:49:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86498_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86498_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:08.67 -14:24:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86507_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86507_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:04.39 -15:00:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86512_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86512_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:49.34 -14:52:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86513_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86513_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:17.70 -15:03:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86522_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86522_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:51.18 -14:17:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86523_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.25 -06:07:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:15.52 -15:03:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86536_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86536_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86540_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86540_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:59.85 -14:46:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86546_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86546_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86556_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86556_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:33.94 -14:49:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86565_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86565_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:28.54 -15:02:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86566_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86566_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:20.47 -14:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86567_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86567_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:36.82 -14:51:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86568_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86568_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86569_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86569_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.17 -14:45:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86573_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86573_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:49.17 -15:01:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86582_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86582_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:31.05 -14:46:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:16.47 -14:40:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86597_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86597_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86599_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86599_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:41.84 -14:57:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86616_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86616_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:08.26 -14:58:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86626_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86626_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:27.83 -14:55:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86628_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86628_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.56 -08:58:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86640_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86640_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:08.61 -14:01:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.52 -08:52:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86643_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86643_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.71 -07:07:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86645_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86645_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86663_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86663_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.73 -07:33:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86692_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86692_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.14 -14:30:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86734_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86734_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.77 -05:04:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86808_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86808_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:58.91 -13:43:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86834_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86834_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:11.47 -12:41:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86889_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86889_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.86 -06:46:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86900_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86900_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:46.43 -08:27:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86925_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86925_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.39 -11:05:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.52 -09:41:46.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.090 4335415957966688128 257.22744258912 -09.69606114397 13.5081 11.4416 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.090#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:39.53 -15:09:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 86995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:19.66 -07:39:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.880 4339882827033270272 254.08186631916 -07.65626698149 12.5028 11.0482 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.880#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32504_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 32504_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:32.54 -11:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20115_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20115_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:39.61 -12:45:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82564_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82564_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.09 -14:09:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:52.69 -13:40:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.58 -14:16:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.91 -12:09:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.55 -06:11:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03149_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 03149_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:52.31 -14:43:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 63181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.47 -07:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11937_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11937_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:50.14 -13:41:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20699_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 20699_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.76 -11:28:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 26741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.31 -11:59:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 55427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07719_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07719_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.36 -14:14:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 41427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41855_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 41855_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:47.63 -10:00:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67768_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 67768_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.29 -07:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.91 -04:55:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:31.13 -07:33:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.68 -14:35:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 06604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:18.23 -14:17:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:03.19 -10:42:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12067_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 12067_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:57.52 -13:42:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.13 -12:40:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04020_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 04020_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.99 -14:41:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69978_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 69978_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.69 -10:00:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.89 -08:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.57 -05:49:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 68212_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:51.83 -08:51:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45088_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 45088_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:41.24 -09:25:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.18 -14:20:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.57 -10:38:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09755_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 09755_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.01 -14:00:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:45.82 -10:24:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.18 -09:20:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.74 -12:34:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 41342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.16 -09:57:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 01431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:09.88 -14:59:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40659_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 40659_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:35.78 -10:06:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39933_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 39933_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:43.32 -10:14:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 19792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:11.69 -12:48:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10499_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 10499_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.37 -13:55:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29919_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 29919_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 38851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:29.72 -10:26:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 61166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:18.82 -07:06:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 41505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:48.85 -10:01:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.58 -13:46:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.73 -14:14:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 08771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02896_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 02896_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 37365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:53.36 -10:37:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.81 -06:14:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-06_22-20-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
