This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 11.32 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8
211.91885 50.66178 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 0.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V Leo
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.400 V 14.700 V 2442706.00000 273.350000000000 M5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 00 02.07 +21 15 44.8 11.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V Leo,2461193.6267,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V Leo 20260602.1267 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.49 10:07:05.92 +20:40:58.7
213.60285 52.05810 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.567 Eleutheria -5 0 5 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:07:05.92 +20:40:58.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:07:05.92 +20:40:58.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 07 05.92 +20 40 58.7 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6267,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1267 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.87 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1
211.21212 53.34095 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 10 34.27 +22 26 29.1 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6267,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1267 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.84 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9
220.50563 55.77225 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.7" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 27 45.12 +18 07 16.9 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6267,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1267 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.77 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5
215.62778 55.27962 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 21 46.61 +20 32 43.5 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6267,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1267 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.82 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5
215.38697 50.31895 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 01 38.47 +19 03 42.5 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6267,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1267 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1267 2461193.6267 14.89 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1
206.21769 56.44389 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1267* 10 20 56.27 +25 56 42.1 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6267,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1267 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
First image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Last image: 2461193.62688744 02.06.2026 03:02:33.075 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4462
Objects passed selection criteria: 4451
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4010
Average stars matched: 3944.25 (98.3603 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:15:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
First image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Last image: 2461193.62688744 02.06.2026 03:02:33.075 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24778
Objects passed selection criteria: 24721
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 22789
Average stars matched: 22131.5 (97.1148 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:17:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.62647365
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00074 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00074 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1BgAfkRyIq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a7BpdBPNGQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xlA3p6go4V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6qgv0MGODm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.753000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.753000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec +16.5183 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec 16.5183 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3596 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 6417 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1BgAfkRyIq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6437
Got 6437 stars (including 6029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=203 n_q2=247 n_q3=183 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a7BpdBPNGQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=6417
Got 6417 stars (including 6016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=202 n_q2=249 n_q3=184 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xlA3p6go4V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=302, passed=4449
Got 4449 stars (including 4145 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.814 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=213 n_q2=237 n_q3=185 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.666
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6qgv0MGODm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, passed=4488
Got 4488 stars (including 4189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=210 n_q2=237 n_q3=184 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.212
ref2=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.666
new2=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.462
reference average sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (904 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025_astrometric_residuals.png (904 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (903 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3213 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03676.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 20257_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:52.06 +23:59:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:00:02.07 +21:15:44.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0039 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:13.037 +22:00:10.31
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:12.897 +22:00:12.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00074 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00074 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1b5tUILzte
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W9Z1Tku6q7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLZ6zEfsol
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1WTN3FgeuU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.627800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.627800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec +16.4866 to +27.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec 16.4866 to 27.2736 deg
Loaded 4585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3776 out of 33297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1b5tUILzte (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1503, passed=33005
Got 33005 stars (including 31454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=199 n_q2=244 n_q3=181 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W9Z1Tku6q7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1479, passed=33286
Got 33286 stars (including 31760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33286 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=198 n_q2=251 n_q3=179 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gLZ6zEfsol (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1098, passed=23416
Got 23416 stars (including 22288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.691 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=207 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.469
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1WTN3FgeuU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1219, passed=23573
Got 23573 stars (including 22327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23573 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 896 stars left (next iteration limit 985)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=210 n_q2=218 n_q3=206 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.320
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_221129_TTUQ2b1x1_3180606_wRgNeRsr/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:35:57.62 +25:05:33.1: 14.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:37.34 +21:03:22.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:26:11.54 +20:15:31.1: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:37.34 +21:03:22.9: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:35:57.62 +25:05:33.1: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:37.34 +21:03:22.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0700 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:57.62 +25:05:33.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2882 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:46.35 +23:01:15.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:26:11.54 +20:15:31.1: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:11.54 +20:15:31.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3781 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:46.35 +23:01:15.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:46.35 +23:01:15.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6567 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:21:22.73 +24:30:58.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:35:27.35 +21:32:13.2: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:07:05.92 +20:40:58.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:38:03.70 +19:36:56.4: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:21:22.73 +24:30:58.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:35:27.35 +21:32:13.2: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:27.35 +21:32:13.2: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6926 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:15:56.30 +19:06:00.7: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:07:05.92 +20:40:58.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:38:03.70 +19:36:56.4: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:03.70 +19:36:56.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8037 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:25:23.77 +18:32:55.2: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:15:56.30 +19:06:00.7: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:56.30 +19:06:00.7: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8166 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:10:34.27 +22:26:29.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:45.12 +18:07:16.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:25:23.77 +18:32:55.2: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:36:42.38 +19:08:39.3: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:25:23.77 +18:32:55.2: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8471 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:21:46.61 +20:32:43.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:36:22.15 +20:27:21.4: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:36:42.38 +19:08:39.3: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:42.38 +19:08:39.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8463 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:35:11.58 +22:06:14.8: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:36:22.15 +20:27:21.4: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:22.15 +20:27:21.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6098 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:19:01.98 +18:08:31.8: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:35:11.58 +22:06:14.8: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:11.58 +22:06:14.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8891 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:19:01.98 +18:08:31.8: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:25:03.28 +21:20:42.8: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:01.98 +18:08:31.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7702 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:25:03.28 +21:20:42.8: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:25:03.28 +21:20:42.8: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8061 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:01:38.47 +19:03:42.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:20:56.27 +25:56:42.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52197.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52291.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52006_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52006_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52009_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52009_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52011_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52011_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:44.39 +18:22:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52019_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52030_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52030_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:48.85 +24:27:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52031_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52031_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52042_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52042_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52050_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52050_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:52.04 +19:34:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52051_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:52.48 +19:22:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52052_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52052_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52054_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52054_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52055_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52055_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52057_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52061_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52061_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52062_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52062_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52070_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52070_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52072_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52072_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52073_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:44.20 +20:10:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52074_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52074_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52076_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52076_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52078_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:25.24 +25:41:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52079_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52079_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52083_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52084_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:55.81 +20:47:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52087_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52096_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52096_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52100_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52108_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52108_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52111_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52115_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:30.71 +21:17:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52124_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52124_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52131_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52131_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52137_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52137_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52141_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52141_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52153_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52158_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52158_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52164_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52164_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52166_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52168_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52170_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52170_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52171_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52171_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52174_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52174_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52176_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52176_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52180_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52180_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52181_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52181_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52182_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52190_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52190_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52197_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52197_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:21:22.73 +24:30:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.834 725958054092901632 155.34491003092 +24.51571920018 15.2638 14.9010 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.834#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52199_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52199_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52200_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52207_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52207_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52208_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52208_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52211_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52211_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52217_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52217_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52225_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52225_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52226_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52227_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52228_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52229_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52229_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52241_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52241_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52245_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52245_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52246_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52246_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52249_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52250_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52251_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52254_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52254_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52256_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52256_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52260_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52265_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52271_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52271_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52277_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52277_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52279_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52290_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52291_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52298_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52300_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52304_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52308_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52309_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52311_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52313_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52315_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52316_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52316_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52317_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52321_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52321_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52326_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52326_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52328_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52338_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52340_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52344_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52344_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52346_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 52360_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
Preparing report for the candidate 52362_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:02.08 +21:15:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25812_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026
The candidate 25812_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-02-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0026 did not pass the final checks
