Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1256  2461193.6256  14.56  09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6
174.55760  50.56334 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6:  16.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -crosshair 2903.00000 3966.96948 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -crosshair 2902.59058 3966.70654 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12562 09 53 36.85 +44 40 43.6          14.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12541 09 53 37.03 +44 40 39.8          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12583 09 53 36.67 +44 40 47.4          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1256*  09 53 36.85 +44 40 43.6  14.6 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6256,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1256 14.56CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1256  2461193.6256  14.54  09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1
177.23278  47.82184 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1:  16.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -crosshair 4682.01318 4806.80713 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -crosshair 4681.63867 4807.02002 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12562 09 37 04.53 +43 21 45.1          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12541 09 37 04.73 +43 21 42.9          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12583 09 37 04.33 +43 21 47.3          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1256*  09 37 04.53 +43 21 45.1  14.5 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6256,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1256 14.54CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1256  2461193.6256  14.52  09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1
179.80792  46.41323 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -crosshair 5630.36670 5787.94678 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -crosshair 5629.99951 5787.89990 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12562 09 28 41.82 +41 43 39.1          14.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12541 09 28 42.03 +41 43 36.0          14.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12583 09 28 41.62 +41 43 42.2          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1256*  09 28 41.82 +41 43 39.1  14.5 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6256,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1256 14.52CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1256  2461193.6256  14.43  09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1
179.41547  45.57951 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -crosshair 6121.00293 5582.65430 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -crosshair 6121.00928 5583.03125 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12562 09 24 17.47 +42 02 20.1          14.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12541 09 24 17.77 +42 02 18.3          14.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12583 09 24 17.16 +42 02 21.8          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1256*  09 24 17.47 +42 02 20.1  14.4 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6256,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1256 14.43CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1256  2461193.6256  13.71  09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2
179.10786  43.38402 galactic  Lyn  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.5 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 0"  Mis V1406                     
Type: SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    13.900   CV      Y     0.680   CV                              86.742588000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2:  14.71 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2:  14.74 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.72 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits


UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs   wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -crosshair 2017.45898 1256.72180 image    wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -crosshair 2020.09875 1252.01990 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -crosshair 7441.11914 5339.68506 image    wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -crosshair 7439.90430 5340.55859 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12562 09 12 28.62 +42 19 07.2          13.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12541 09 12 28.59 +42 19 06.7          13.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12583 09 12 28.64 +42 19 07.7          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1256*  09 12 28.62 +42 19 07.2  13.7 U             Lyn       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Mis V1406,2461193.6256,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Mis V1406 20260602.1256 13.71CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62582690 02.06.2026 03:01:01.444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6913
Objects passed selection criteria:  6888
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4846.75
Average stars matched: 4528.5 (93.4337 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:07:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62582690 02.06.2026 03:01:01.444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38549
Objects passed selection criteria:  38433
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28385.2
Average stars matched: 26376 (92.9215 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   138820 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:09:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 594177 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 594177 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits_preview.png'

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits


renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits_preview.png'

UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1861.1387
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 565.9835
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1804.4397
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 556.5926
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.14494
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.017
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:00:25.4054736' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:00:25.4054736' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1252940395 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:00:35.3089062' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61193.1254086574 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      144.00040720198 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9995230723051 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.8469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     303.156111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.28867678776921 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits :)

Spent 0.722439 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.0400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:01:01.4444404' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:01:01.4444404' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1257111575 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:01:11.3495470' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61193.1258257986 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     144.000407217717 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9995230797032 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.7422222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     303.155833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.29059389387171 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.0400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.0400009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits :)

Spent 0.749433 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits



fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.62540978
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0265 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00252 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Xk5cbHI0W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BP7vVu3t3w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gBw0KKgcLU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LyG8RAnMXH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2Xk5cbHI0W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BP7vVu3t3w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=262 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gBw0KKgcLU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, passed=4453
Got 4453 stars (including 4143 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4453 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.614 n_q1=222 n_q2=281 n_q3=232 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LyG8RAnMXH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=4486
Got 4486 stars (including 4167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=228 n_q2=276 n_q3=229 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.265
ref2=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.254
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.246
reference average sigma_overall=0.3645 worst_q_ratio=1.2595
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0253 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0265 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:02.979 +46:01:36.08
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:02.324 +46:01:42.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00252 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J84s5Nos8V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kWWlpmizf0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kbEzKVwPzW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cRtC329m9U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.65

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.65

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.0 pix  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
 1.9 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.J84s5Nos8V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2151, passed=43815
Got 43815 stars (including 41587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43815 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kWWlpmizf0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2132, passed=43635
Got 43635 stars (including 41420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kbEzKVwPzW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=952, passed=24865
Got 24865 stars (including 23886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=232 n_q2=266 n_q3=241 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cRtC329m9U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=948, passed=25126
Got 25126 stars (including 24151 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=240 n_q2=264 n_q3=235 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:48:31.63 +46:45:06.9:  11.50 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:41:28.73 +44:12:14.0:  13.84 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:48:31.63 +46:45:06.9:  11.45 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:48:31.63 +46:45:06.9: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8794 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:40:08.94 +45:09:05.9:  14.16 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:41:28.73 +44:12:14.0:  13.85 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:28.73 +44:12:14.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9426 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6:  16.28 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1:  16.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:40:08.94 +45:09:05.9:  14.12 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:08.94 +45:09:05.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2125 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1:  16.23 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1:  16.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2:  14.71 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2:  14.74 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6582 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08114.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 52413_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.31    10:00:06.97 +42:15:41.8   2094 5393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  10:00:07.00 +42:15:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 52414_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12541    2461193.62541    11.88    09:48:31.64 +46:45:06.8   3495 2736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    11.88    09:48:31.62 +46:45:07.0   3494 2737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 52686_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    10.51    09:12:42.95 +48:35:24.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 53067_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    11.60    09:50:02.22 +46:26:03.1   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 53726_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    12.59    09:29:07.16 +50:00:37.8   5454 0772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:07.16 +50:00:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 53762_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    12.51    09:34:26.36 +43:22:14.9   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54009_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54009_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    12.78    09:24:01.94 +42:06:06.4   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54043_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    12.94    09:16:50.13 +42:18:59.4   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54224_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    12.98    09:29:52.19 +43:36:02.2   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54342_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54342_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.46    09:36:10.65 +46:11:31.2   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54653_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54653_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.28    09:30:54.12 +43:01:43.0   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54968_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54968_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.55    09:44:12.73 +42:30:55.3   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 54974_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.60    09:41:54.81 +48:47:17.0   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55403_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55403_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.63    09:14:05.86 +49:32:21.9   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55614_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55614_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.76    09:44:57.55 +43:14:51.2   3812 4868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:44:57.57 +43:14:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55666_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55666_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.08    09:24:20.29 +49:27:08.4   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55818_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55818_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.95    09:17:55.45 +49:48:56.5   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55884_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55884_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12541    2461193.62541    13.95    09:41:28.76 +44:12:13.8   4205 4294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.94    09:41:28.69 +44:12:14.2   4204 4295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55911_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55911_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.92    09:50:21.22 +43:59:07.2   3236 4403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:50:21.23 +43:59:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55972_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55972_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.98    09:15:25.34 +46:19:01.6   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55982_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55982_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.97    09:58:00.37 +44:47:26.7   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55984_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 55984_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.06    09:57:45.09 +46:26:36.9   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56064_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56064_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.87    09:29:54.33 +46:11:09.2   5430 3091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:54.33 +46:11:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56073_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56073_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.19    09:59:02.58 +42:52:37.1   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56100_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56100_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.27    09:33:42.91 +47:30:48.7   5023 2295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:33:42.95 +47:30:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56166_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56166_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    13.92    09:50:22.53 +43:58:48.6   3233 4406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

**** FOUND  09:50:22.52 +43:58:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56339_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56339_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.13    09:46:11.95 +41:52:21.1   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56397_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56397_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12541    2461193.62541    14.16    09:40:08.93 +45:09:06.2   4354 3723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.28    09:40:08.95 +45:09:05.6   4353 3724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56430_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56430_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.38    10:00:03.80 +45:24:03.8   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56447_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56447_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.49    09:39:00.71 +42:04:03.8   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56474_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56474_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.56    10:01:11.98 +43:57:58.7   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56555_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56555_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.58    10:00:19.83 +47:50:02.6   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56763_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56763_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.59    09:52:28.85 +49:55:12.4   3175 0799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56799_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56799_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.15    09:34:57.04 +43:07:09.0   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56805_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56805_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.38    09:53:58.53 +42:00:16.3   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56885_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 56885_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56931_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 56931_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56975_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 56975_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.30    09:13:32.81 +49:13:27.9   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57047_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57047_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.82    09:50:50.75 +49:44:39.0   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57074_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57074_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.52    09:48:57.83 +47:09:45.5   3458 2487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57092_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 57092_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57115_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57115_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.52    10:01:43.41 +47:57:46.3   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57118_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57118_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.51    09:42:30.51 +42:24:36.2   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57134_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57134_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.25    09:52:47.06 +50:05:06.9   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57148_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57148_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.43    09:18:16.53 +43:40:54.7   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57163_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57163_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.71    09:10:22.65 +49:56:10.6   7286 0709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57221_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 57221_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57254_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57254_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.83    09:39:04.87 +49:16:52.0   4481 1226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57274_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57274_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.57    09:19:15.62 +47:49:44.9   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57283_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57283_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.83    10:01:00.83 +49:20:48.3   2314 1092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57316_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57316_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.67    09:46:01.98 +45:29:35.1   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57354_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57354_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.44    09:59:43.65 +42:02:14.0   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57441_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57441_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.70    09:52:49.28 +49:51:53.2   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57454_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57454_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.49    09:37:07.35 +47:55:08.4   4675 2052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57482_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57482_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.91    09:56:09.88 +46:57:05.5   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57574_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
The candidate 57574_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12583    2461193.62583    14.70    09:49:24.86 +46:54:53.9   3406 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_220532_TTUQ2b1x1_3013292_HkCTgoZ0/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08114_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
Preparing report for the candidate 08114_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-01-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0024
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1
########### Completed UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2
###################################################################################
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2  -- a known variable star
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1  -- not a known variable star
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1  -- not a known variable star
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1  -- not a known variable star
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
5 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:12:28.62 +42:19:07.2
09:24:17.47 +42:02:20.1
09:28:41.82 +41:43:39.1
09:37:04.53 +43:21:45.1
09:53:36.85 +44:40:43.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62540978 -observatory V36
06:03:01.77 +25:35:56.8 Mercury (-0.4mag)
07:11:57.83 +24:21:48.1 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:32:02.22 +14:17:50.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:43:28.01 +21:43:38.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:33.80 +02:38:40.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:45.15 +20:21:15.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:45.18 +00:14:36.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:39.76 -23:02:21.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:05:28.32 -28:21:50.8 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun  1 22:07 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62540978:
07:43:26.02 +21:43:43.0 Io (6.0mag)
07:43:39.71 +21:43:04.8 Europa (6.1mag)
07:43:18.02 +21:44:12.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:43:37.82 +21:43:18.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:44:07.52 +21:19:43.9 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:43:32.68 +21:43:24.8 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:44:16.59 +21:37:53.7 Elara (17.5mag)
07:45:19.29 +21:58:38.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:50:18.56 +21:44:55.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:38.20 +02:39:05.9 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:39.17 +02:38:43.1 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:48:05.49 +02:40:01.6 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:25.30 +02:39:06.9 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:23.37 +02:41:29.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun  1 22:07 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62540978:
17:23:24.37 -34:31:13.4 JWST
19:25:03.06 +10:30:22.4 Chandra
18:05:00.86 -35:54:42.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  1 22:07 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62540978 -observatory V36
18:47:22.75 -32:11:55.0 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:47:32.48 -68:08:33.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:50.44 +31:53:28.3 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:09.43 +15:00:50.8 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:21:13.40 -51:19:34.5 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:45.42 +31:20:55.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:26:34.70 +26:55:50.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:25:29.50 +31:17:06.5 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:23.37 +03:37:16.2 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:06.69 +21:27:09.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:39.05 -11:00:38.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:51.66 +66:08:21.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:01:07.28 -06:07:15.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:23:46.36 +84:20:38.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:02:13.58 +64:07:04.0 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:37:55.08 +27:15:03.5 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:08.92 +12:57:17.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:16:38.56 +29:18:15.8 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:56.17 -16:30:31.0 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:00:13.11 +35:33:35.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:38:45.89 +53:04:07.1 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:36:46.49 -10:35:14.0 13.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:19:26.14 +23:23:58.3 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:03.62 +04:41:06.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:21:06.10 +73:43:30.8 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
01:49:43.18 +42:57:36.4 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:27.19 -06:01:04.0 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:12:31.93 -08:15:10.7 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:45.07 -00:53:59.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:56:13.29 -02:38:37.7 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:02:17.61 +24:49:04.8 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:47:01.94 +25:28:36.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:21:30.73 -06:47:05.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:23:49.83 +32:43:21.0 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:54:33.50 +16:24:14.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:07:16.12 +03:29:00.6 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:35:04.77 +29:45:42.8 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:26:03.86 +26:36:32.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:36:10.36 +33:12:59.5 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:39:42.73 +17:15:00.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:49:01.45 +18:49:27.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:21:27.59 +18:46:30.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:31:24.55 +19:15:32.1 13.9mag 141P/Machholz
05:33:53.44 +17:13:34.7 13.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:23:00.62 +15:11:27.3 11.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:53:19.22 -25:34:30.9 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:21:50.93 +21:17:31.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:24.79 +00:02:03.2 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:01:53.35 +01:14:42.5 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:56:55.31 -08:49:44.6 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:20:52.93 +35:42:28.2 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:16:30.26 -04:59:54.4 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:47:59.11 +31:19:59.1 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:08:18.64 -17:58:05.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:07.66 +08:16:01.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:02:23.96 +20:53:38.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:50:04.15 +42:07:13.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun  1 22:07 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  1 22:07 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  1 22:07 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:43:04.770 +44:26:44.68  AT 2026nhj  2026-05-12.86 21.31
14:48:12.840 +26:16:16.61  AT 2026nhi  2026-05-07.83 20.09
14:39:54.860 +26:23:14.77  AT 2026nhh  2026-05-07.83 21.13
14:29:41.070 +26:50:04.61  AT 2026nhg  2026-05-07.83 20.77
14:03:03.560 -00:52:45.67  AT 2026nhf  2026-05-19.65 21.75
13:27:33.220 -01:52:49.95  AT 2026nhe  2026-05-17.64 20.72
13:18:46.250 +02:28:16.38  AT 2026nhd  2026-05-09.67 22.71
20:47:45.529 -19:53:26.35  AT 2026nhc  2026-05-20.40 19.7848
19:13:38.097 -14:31:38.10  AT 2026nhb  2026-05-14.44 20.7774
15:35:51.801 +19:40:09.90  AT 2026nha  2026-05-07.31 20.0995
15:57:39.574 -25:29:17.95  AT 2026ngz  2026-04-18.41 19.9742
10:51:38.905 -10:28:42.76  AT 2026ngy  2026-05-15.38 20.12
11:36:55.330 -31:38:36.50  AT 2026ngx  2026-05-11.39 20.37
10:39:09.434 -12:00:29.70  AT 2026ngw  2026-05-15.36 19.47
23:31:07.680 +49:32:03.66  AT 2026ngv  2026-05-21.20 19.21
11:15:47.222 -26:40:41.12  AT 2026ngu  2026-05-21.37 19.08
11:22:13.240 -18:01:38.68  AT 2026ngt  2026-05-21.37 19.38
13:49:04.574 +60:57:59.76  AT 2026ngs  2026-05-13.26 20.7824
13:58:24.302 -03:02:49.29  SN 2026ngr  2026-05-15.19 19.8766
16:18:20.038 +32:35:19.31  AT 2026ngq  2026-05-20.15 20.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  1 22:07 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Jun  1 22:07:28 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 27s (0.45 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 39s (0.65 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 72s (1.20 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 8 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 18s (0.30 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 59s (0.98 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 1s (0.02 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 21s (0.35 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 101s (1.68 min)
FIELD_UMa-09-Q2b1x1: 188s (3.13 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 190s (3.17 min)
Finished: Mon Jun  1 22:10:38 CDT 2026