NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-08-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    12.76    10:42:24.43 +02:13:58.4   8937 0900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    12.76    10:42:24.47 +02:13:58.4   8943 0905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1242  2461193.6242  12.76  10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4
246.25526  50.33763 galactic  Sex  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
88 Thisbe                  -3      2       3  12.9     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4:  15.79 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4:  15.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.23    11:15:43.33 +00:41:36.2   3839 1533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.23    11:15:43.35 +00:41:36.6   3844 1538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1242  2461193.6242  13.23  11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4
257.96137  54.98004 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
120 Lachesis                -2      1       3  13.3    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.89    11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.9   1662 0811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.65    11:30:20.09 +01:39:03.1   1668 0817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1242  2461193.6242  13.77  11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0
262.17456  57.95504 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
453 Tea                     -2      1       2  14.2    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0:  15.72 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0:  15.60 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 597348 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 597348 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits

renamed 'Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 625.4784 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.1793 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1947.3892 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 586.0501 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1864.1689 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 575.3881 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.11344 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.019 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T21:58:10.0367221' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T02:58:10.0367221' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61193.1237272685 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T02:58:19.9452232' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61193.1238419558 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 167.139779436368 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99952100618442 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.665 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 219.315 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.37363314102154 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits :) Spent 0.508566 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T21:59:04.7511508' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T02:59:04.7511508' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61193.1243605441 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T02:59:14.6522474' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61193.1244751387 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 167.139779448237 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99952100977431 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 46.5455555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 219.591944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.37633406037228 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits :) Spent 0.552711 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits


fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.62384301 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0533 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 Second-epoch second image center 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Drv1QhwtAQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mORq30jitu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PvrQBm1hgG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s2AodkBRcZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.798800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.798800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2717 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2717 deg Loaded 3803 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3190 out of 3294 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3294 out of 5632 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 2.3 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 15.0 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Drv1QhwtAQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113 Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=219 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mORq30jitu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, passed=5632 Got 5632 stars (including 5252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5581 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5581 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=219 n_q2=234 n_q3=238 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PvrQBm1hgG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, passed=4514 Got 4514 stars (including 4170 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4514 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=226 n_q2=219 n_q3=245 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.s2AodkBRcZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=4602 Got 4602 stars (including 4262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4602 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4553 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4553 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=227 n_q2=221 n_q3=243 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.301 ref2=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.294 new1=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.270 new2=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.186 reference average sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.2975 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (946 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0533 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 Second-epoch image center 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.854 -01:57:49.56 Second-epoch second image center 11:08:47.348 -01:57:19.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ll6hw7Bjea Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8pkYZzifox Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dIcwEbq3YC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1V0utfOPOX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 31205 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2727 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2727 deg Loaded 3807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3109 out of 3359 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3359 out of 31205 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Ll6hw7Bjea (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1524, passed=33848 Got 33848 stars (including 32278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33848 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=216 n_q2=238 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8pkYZzifox (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1336, passed=31185 Got 31185 stars (including 29805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30861 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=223 n_q2=227 n_q3=236 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dIcwEbq3YC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=770, passed=26455 Got 26455 stars (including 25641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26455 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26187 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26188 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26188 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=228 n_q2=220 n_q3=246 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.1V0utfOPOX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=757, passed=26949 Got 26949 stars (including 26142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26949 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26656 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=230 n_q2=219 n_q3=240 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:39.82 +00:06:53.8: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:05.91 +02:58:57.2: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:49:25.33 -02:37:54.3: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:44:16.68 -01:33:19.6: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:49:25.33 -02:37:54.3: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:49:25.33 -02:37:54.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2533 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:39.82 +00:06:53.8: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:05:05.91 +02:58:57.2: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:39.82 +00:06:53.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8153 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:05.91 +02:58:57.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6868 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:28.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:29.71 -00:07:39.2: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:44:16.68 -01:33:19.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:16.68 -01:33:19.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6284 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:28.5: 13.78 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:06:29.71 -00:07:39.2: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.37 +03:01:28.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6672 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:29.71 -00:07:39.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7941 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:04.45 -01:44:52.9: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:05.65 -05:44:02.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:29:34.88 +00:45:46.1: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:39.48 +02:45:55.9: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:27.71 -03:59:42.8: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:04.45 -01:44:52.9: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:04.45 -01:44:52.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8535 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:38:05.65 -05:44:02.2: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:05.65 -05:44:02.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1073 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:14.89 +02:16:38.1: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:33.32 -04:59:03.9: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:29:34.88 +00:45:46.1: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:27.71 -03:59:42.8: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:34.88 +00:45:46.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1518 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:27.71 -03:59:42.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2032 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:39.48 +02:45:55.9: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:39.48 +02:45:55.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2622 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:14.89 +02:16:38.1: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:33.32 -04:59:03.9: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:14.89 +02:16:38.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4605 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:33.32 -04:59:03.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2298 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:24.00 +02:15:60.0: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:41.37 -00:09:24.3: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:37.87 +02:12:40.4: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:30.89 +02:09:07.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:57.81 -03:21:50.2: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:24.00 +02:15:60.0: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:24.00 +02:15:60.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5359 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:38:41.37 -00:09:24.3: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:41.37 -00:09:24.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5258 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:23:34.90 -00:51:52.6: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:35.02 -06:04:54.2: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:37:57.81 -03:21:50.2: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:37.87 +02:12:40.4: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:42:30.89 +02:09:07.9: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:57.81 -03:21:50.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5923 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:37.87 +02:12:40.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4504 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:30.89 +02:09:07.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5118 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:23:34.90 -00:51:52.6: 15.44 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:34.90 -00:51:52.6: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7166 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:40:35.02 -06:04:54.2: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:35.02 -06:04:54.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5335 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52036.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51758_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51758_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.65    11:05:05.85 +02:58:56.9   5523 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.73    11:05:05.97 +02:58:57.5   5529 0253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51761_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51761_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.24    10:49:25.35 -02:37:54.3   7673 3781   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.27    10:49:25.32 -02:37:54.4   7679 3787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51762_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51762_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.99    11:25:49.46 +01:41:17.2   2354 0839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:25:49.45 +01:41:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51763_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51763_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.13    11:32:55.93 +02:01:56.4   1284 0558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:32:55.93 +02:01:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51764_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.11    11:35:30.26 +02:10:06.0   0895 0449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:35:30.18 +02:10:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51766_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51766_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.52    11:38:24.90 +02:04:56.0   0445 0471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:38:24.91 +02:04:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51767_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51767_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.12    11:35:21.09 +01:09:17.7   0884 1068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:35:21.12 +01:09:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51768_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 51768_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    12.83    10:40:39.84 +00:06:54.1   9118 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    12.80    10:40:39.80 +00:06:53.5   9124 2209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52036_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 Preparing report for the candidate 52036_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52092_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52092_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.05    10:51:21.65 +02:00:15.2   7567 0968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 10:51:21.68 +02:00:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52129_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.21    11:28:08.34 -00:54:16.1   1912 2385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:28:08.32 -00:54:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52150_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52150_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.31    11:29:07.37 -02:53:46.3   1692 3579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:29:07.36 -02:53:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 Preparing report for the candidate 52154_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52211_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52211_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.67    10:38:10.94 -04:11:17.4   9332 4848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 10:38:10.94 -04:11:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52260_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52260_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.62    10:44:16.66 -01:33:19.3   8497 3182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.64    10:44:16.69 -01:33:19.9   8503 3187   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52267_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52267_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.72    11:34:22.60 +01:44:33.9   1053 0720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:34:22.58 +01:44:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.71    10:40:05.38 +03:01:28.9   9327 0435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.64    10:40:05.35 +03:01:28.1   9333 0440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52311_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.86    10:46:55.87 -05:02:26.7   7963 5269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 10:46:55.76 -05:02:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52322_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52322_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.71    11:14:03.17 +02:50:14.1   4174 0258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:14:03.17 +02:50:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52324_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.82    11:06:29.69 -00:07:39.5   5195 2113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.77    11:06:29.74 -00:07:38.8   5201 2118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52330_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.63    10:41:13.27 -00:17:31.0   9021 2451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 10:41:13.23 -00:17:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52336_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 Preparing report for the candidate 52336_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52342_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52342_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.92    10:48:16.91 +02:47:39.9   8067 0514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 10:48:16.91 +02:47:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52372_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.86    10:40:04.46 -01:44:52.6   9133 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.85    10:40:04.44 -01:44:53.2   9139 3346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52376_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52376_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.88    11:31:37.74 -00:49:14.5   1385 2302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits **** FOUND 11:31:37.69 -00:49:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52447_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.02    10:38:05.60 -05:44:03.5   9279 5786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.24    10:38:05.71 -05:44:00.9   9285 5791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52513_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.24    11:29:34.84 +00:45:46.8   1746 1358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.09    11:29:34.91 +00:45:45.4   1751 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52552_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.19    10:37:27.74 -03:59:44.6   9445 4733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.21    10:37:27.69 -03:59:41.1   9451 4738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52625_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.31    10:40:39.44 +02:45:56.1   9228 0589   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.24    10:40:39.52 +02:45:55.7   9234 0594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52636_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.26    10:37:33.25 -04:59:03.8   9391 5335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.21    10:37:33.39 -04:59:04.0   9397 5340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52710_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.51    10:40:14.83 +02:16:38.5   9271 0891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.42    10:40:14.95 +02:16:37.6   9277 0896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52711_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.54    10:40:24.03 +02:16:00.8   9247 0896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.53    10:40:23.96 +02:15:59.2   9253 0902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.53    10:38:41.39 -00:09:23.3   9410 2387   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.53    10:38:41.34 -00:09:25.3   9416 2393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52725_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.51    10:40:37.90 +02:12:39.7   9209 0928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.41    10:40:37.85 +02:12:41.1   9215 0933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.53    10:42:30.85 +02:09:06.1   8917 0949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.50    10:42:30.93 +02:09:09.7   8923 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52759_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.57    10:37:57.77 -03:21:49.1   9393 4343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.61    10:37:57.85 -03:21:51.3   9398 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 52775_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    14.69    11:23:34.98 -00:51:52.7   2597 2398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    14.75    11:23:34.82 -00:51:52.6   2604 2403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50010_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 The candidate 50010_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.12384    2461193.62384    13.49    10:40:35.01 -06:04:54.9   8884 5969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-58-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.12448    2461193.62448    13.58    10:40:35.02 -06:04:53.5   8890 5975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_220114_TTUQ1b1x1_2910918_PJDyf0Uh/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0 ########### Completed Leo-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0 ################################################################################### 10:42:24.45 +02:13:58.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:15:43.34 +00:41:36.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:30:20.08 +01:39:04.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62384301 -observatory V36 06:03:01.08 +25:35:56.9 Mercury (-0.4mag) 07:11:57.35 +24:21:48.9 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:32:01.95 +14:17:48.7 Mars (1.3mag) 07:43:27.94 +21:43:39.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:47:33.77 +02:38:40.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:58:45.12 +20:21:15.2 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:45.17 +00:14:36.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:39.76 -23:02:21.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:05:23.61 -28:21:41.6 Moon (-12.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 22:04 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62384301: 07:43:25.97 +21:43:43.1 Io (6.0mag) 07:43:39.64 +21:43:05.0 Europa (6.1mag) 07:43:17.92 +21:44:12.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:43:37.72 +21:43:18.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:44:07.45 +21:19:44.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:43:32.60 +21:43:25.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:44:16.52 +21:37:53.9 Elara (17.5mag) 07:45:19.21 +21:58:39.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:50:18.49 +21:44:55.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:47:38.18 +02:39:05.7 Titan (8.7mag) 00:47:39.14 +02:38:42.9 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:05.46 +02:40:01.4 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:47:25.28 +02:39:06.7 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:48:23.34 +02:41:29.3 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 22:04 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62384301: 17:23:24.47 -34:31:09.3 JWST 19:24:44.58 +10:35:45.4 Chandra 18:04:14.31 -36:09:49.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 22:04 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62384301 -observatory V36 18:47:22.81 -32:11:54.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:47:32.39 -68:08:33.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:46:50.41 +31:53:28.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:17:09.47 +15:00:50.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:21:12.67 -51:19:35.1 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:45.44 +31:20:54.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:26:34.59 +26:55:50.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:25:29.43 +31:17:06.7 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:47:23.32 +03:37:15.9 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:32:06.75 +21:27:09.5 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:21:39.09 -11:00:38.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:51.67 +66:08:21.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:01:07.50 -06:07:14.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:23:46.50 +84:20:39.8 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:02:13.46 +64:07:03.9 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:37:54.93 +27:15:02.9 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:42:09.00 +12:57:17.4 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:16:38.61 +29:18:14.1 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:11:56.08 -16:30:31.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:00:13.02 +35:33:36.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:38:45.96 +53:04:07.4 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:36:46.35 -10:35:13.8 13.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:19:26.07 +23:23:58.4 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:03.63 +04:41:06.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:21:06.21 +73:43:29.4 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:49:43.00 +42:57:35.9 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:27.18 -06:01:06.3 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:12:31.76 -08:15:10.4 9.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:00:45.05 -00:53:59.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:56:13.22 -02:38:37.6 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:02:17.47 +24:49:04.0 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:47:01.74 +25:28:37.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:21:30.64 -06:47:06.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:23:49.53 +32:43:20.3 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:54:33.27 +16:24:13.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:07:15.91 +03:28:59.3 15.4mag 88P/Howell 04:35:04.47 +29:45:42.3 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:26:03.60 +26:36:31.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:36:10.14 +33:12:59.7 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:39:42.57 +17:15:03.3 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:49:01.29 +18:49:26.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:21:27.41 +18:46:30.0 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:31:24.12 +19:15:32.6 13.9mag 141P/Machholz 05:33:53.01 +17:13:34.2 13.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:23:00.13 +15:11:26.2 11.1mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:53:19.15 -25:34:31.8 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:21:50.63 +21:17:29.4 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:24.78 +00:02:01.8 17.2mag 169P/NEAT 00:01:53.09 +01:14:41.3 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:56:55.38 -08:49:45.0 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:20:52.72 +35:42:28.4 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:16:30.02 -04:59:56.7 16.6mag 260P/McNaught 03:47:58.86 +31:19:58.0 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:08:17.86 -17:58:13.8 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:18:07.70 +08:16:01.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:02:23.89 +20:53:38.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:50:04.00 +42:07:13.4 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 1 22:04 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 22:04 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 1 22:04 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:43:04.770 +44:26:44.68 AT 2026nhj 2026-05-12.86 21.31 14:48:12.840 +26:16:16.61 AT 2026nhi 2026-05-07.83 20.09 14:39:54.860 +26:23:14.77 AT 2026nhh 2026-05-07.83 21.13 14:29:41.070 +26:50:04.61 AT 2026nhg 2026-05-07.83 20.77 14:03:03.560 -00:52:45.67 AT 2026nhf 2026-05-19.65 21.75 13:27:33.220 -01:52:49.95 AT 2026nhe 2026-05-17.64 20.72 13:18:46.250 +02:28:16.38 AT 2026nhd 2026-05-09.67 22.71 20:47:45.529 -19:53:26.35 AT 2026nhc 2026-05-20.40 19.7848 19:13:38.097 -14:31:38.10 AT 2026nhb 2026-05-14.44 20.7774 15:35:51.801 +19:40:09.90 AT 2026nha 2026-05-07.31 20.0995 15:57:39.574 -25:29:17.95 AT 2026ngz 2026-04-18.41 19.9742 10:51:38.905 -10:28:42.76 AT 2026ngy 2026-05-15.38 20.12 11:36:55.330 -31:38:36.50 AT 2026ngx 2026-05-11.39 20.37 10:39:09.434 -12:00:29.70 AT 2026ngw 2026-05-15.36 19.47 23:31:07.680 +49:32:03.66 AT 2026ngv 2026-05-21.20 19.21 11:15:47.222 -26:40:41.12 AT 2026ngu 2026-05-21.37 19.08 11:22:13.240 -18:01:38.68 AT 2026ngt 2026-05-21.37 19.38 13:49:04.574 +60:57:59.76 AT 2026ngs 2026-05-13.26 20.7824 13:58:24.302 -03:02:49.29 SN 2026ngr 2026-05-15.19 19.8766 16:18:20.038 +32:35:19.31 AT 2026ngq 2026-05-20.15 20.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 22:04 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 82 C