Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461192.8937,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260601.3937 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Ser-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Ser-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Ser-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 670849 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 670849 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits_preview.png'
Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits

renamed 'Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits_preview.png'
Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 634.1552
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 478.8377
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5777.0830
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1181.9590
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5783.2337
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1184.8630
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 9.10989
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 16.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T04:26:24.1069188' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T09:26:24.1069188' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3933345601 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T09:26:34.0099213' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3934491784 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 231.42557310271 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -1.99960708728846 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.9655555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 248.928333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.35869057544237 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Ser-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20439 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20439 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 74.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/d_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits :)
Spent 0.726122 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/d_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T04:27:02.2850398' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T09:27:02.2850398' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.3937764466 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T09:27:12.1896045' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.3938910766 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 231.425573084237 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -1.99960709586448 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.8425 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 249.038333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.36950367422282 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Ser-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20439 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20439 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.92 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 74.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/d_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits :)
Spent 0.762679 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/d_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits

fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.89345030
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.43c48a6rgM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6TMhKOUVZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7V9xdaJw6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jH8rFadamr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2636 deg
Loaded 4371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3740 out of 3886 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3886 out of 7902 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.43c48a6rgM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7872
Got 7872 stars (including 7376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.686 n_q1=256 n_q2=255 n_q3=227 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p6TMhKOUVZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=7902
Got 7902 stars (including 7404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.660 n_q1=254 n_q2=258 n_q3=223 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.519
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7V9xdaJw6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, passed=2514
Got 2514 stars (including 2264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=238 n_q2=267 n_q3=235 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jH8rFadamr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=247, passed=2487
Got 2487 stars (including 2238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=248 n_q2=260 n_q3=232 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.480
ref2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.519
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.293
reference average sigma_overall=0.4485 worst_q_ratio=1.4995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:43.72 -05:28:31.3: 9.43 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:43.72 -05:28:31.3: 9.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:43.72 -05:28:31.3: ref_mag=9.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6128 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 20350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.39345 | 2461192.89345 | 9.69 | 15:11:43.71 -05:28:30.9 | 6916 5287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 9.55 | 15:11:43.73 -05:28:31.6 | 6914 5285 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.780 -01:59:53.58
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:42.898 -02:00:05.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8h5HX5X7UR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cWTpYoi515
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B80q22YES7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UWbugFqYmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 44929 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to +3.2684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to 3.2684 deg
Loaded 4375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3912 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3912 out of 44929 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8h5HX5X7UR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2413, passed=44762
Got 44762 stars (including 42284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=265 n_q2=244 n_q3=236 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.570
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cWTpYoi515 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2430, passed=44919
Got 44919 stars (including 42424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.685 n_q1=267 n_q2=248 n_q3=232 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.689
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B80q22YES7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=569, passed=18446
Got 18446 stars (including 17855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=251 n_q2=249 n_q3=241 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UWbugFqYmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=571, passed=18360
Got 18360 stars (including 17767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.512 n_q1=258 n_q2=248 n_q3=235 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:43.70 -05:28:31.1: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:16:22.89 +01:15:10.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:35.45 +02:07:36.9: 12.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:22:05.06 -00:23:20.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:29:50.42 +02:03:58.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:43.70 -05:28:31.1: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:43.70 -05:28:31.1: ref_mag=9.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8051 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:16:22.89 +01:15:10.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:35.45 +02:07:36.9: 12.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:22.89 +01:15:10.0: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2511 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:22:05.06 -00:23:20.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:29:50.42 +02:03:58.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:35.45 +02:07:36.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0155 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:05.06 -00:23:20.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4989 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53156_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.39345 | 2461192.89345 | 13.51 | 15:22:05.00 -00:23:20.7 | 5333 2218 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 13.49 | 15:22:05.12 -00:23:21.1 | 5330 2216 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53159_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.39345 | 2461192.89345 | 9.90 | 15:11:43.68 -05:28:31.0 | 6916 5287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 9.73 | 15:11:43.72 -05:28:31.2 | 6914 5285 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53169_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 11.97 | 15:18:41.70 +02:04:00.6 | 5834 0722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:18:41.71 +02:03:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53172_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 12.24 | 15:18:42.92 +02:07:31.4 | 5831 0686 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:18:42.96 +02:07:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53176_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 12.45 | 15:18:39.72 +02:07:13.3 | 5839 0689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:18:39.83 +02:07:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 53178_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53180_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 12.53 | 15:18:32.64 -00:26:46.6 | 5865 2246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:18:32.65 -00:26:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53187_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 12.98 | 15:18:45.85 +02:07:21.2 | 5823 0688 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:18:45.68 +02:07:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53194_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.39345 | 2461192.89345 | 13.02 | 15:18:35.51 +02:07:36.1 | 5852 0687 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 13.02 | 15:18:35.40 +02:07:37.7 | 5850 0685 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53198_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.39345 | 2461192.89345 | 13.14 | 15:16:22.97 +01:15:10.1 | 6189 1216 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-26-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 13.45 | 15:16:22.82 +01:15:10.0 | 6188 1214 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 53199_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 12.98 | 15:49:00.08 -03:47:56.3 | 1270 4324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 15:49:00.20 -03:47:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22588_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 22588_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.39389 | 2461192.89389 | 11.67 | 15:25:48.55 -01:50:15.1 | 4774 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_045005_TTUQ2b1x1_1191091_GOARZdWi/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_04-27-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:29:50.42 +02:03:58.6
########### Completed Ser-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:29:50.42 +02:03:58.6
###################################################################################
15:29:50.42 +02:03:58.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.89345030 -observatory V36
05:57:34.74 +25:35:37.1 Mercury (-0.5mag)
07:08:11.99 +24:27:14.1 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:29:55.76 +14:07:12.2 Mars (1.3mag)
07:42:52.73 +21:45:02.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:20.12 +02:37:24.0 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:34.58 +20:20:44.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:42.13 +00:14:18.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:41.75 -23:02:06.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:21:20.68 -28:39:17.5 Moon (-12.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 04:53 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.89345030:
07:42:59.59 +21:44:44.6 Io (6.0mag)
07:42:58.88 +21:44:47.1 Europa (6.1mag)
07:42:36.89 +21:45:49.5 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:42:54.35 +21:45:05.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:43:34.95 +21:21:07.9 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:42:56.94 +21:44:50.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:43:45.11 +21:39:37.4 Elara (17.5mag)
07:44:41.62 +22:00:26.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:49:45.11 +21:46:16.3 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:27.32 +02:37:43.9 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:24.37 +02:37:17.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:47:51.23 +02:38:37.5 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:14.04 +02:37:53.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:10.53 +02:40:18.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 04:54 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.89345030:
17:21:40.76 -34:28:05.0 JWST
17:49:47.57 +35:10:39.2 Chandra
09:31:28.60 -54:17:51.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 04:53 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.89345030 -observatory V36
18:47:48.04 -32:08:33.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:46:50.09 -68:09:14.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:34.58 +31:52:55.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:26.67 +14:58:08.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:15:41.52 -51:25:35.5 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:51.93 +31:19:05.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:25:40.71 +26:55:26.7 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:59.88 +31:18:29.1 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:01.33 +03:34:52.1 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:34.14 +21:25:49.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:56.11 -11:00:44.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:57.73 +66:05:27.4 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:02:51.14 -06:03:21.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:24:50.95 +84:30:08.3 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:01:16.40 +64:05:45.4 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:36:46.53 +27:10:30.1 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:44.62 +12:52:51.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:17:01.28 +29:04:53.4 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:12.27 -16:34:44.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:59:31.90 +35:41:24.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:39:21.41 +53:06:06.8 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:35:40.90 -10:33:02.4 13.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:18:53.86 +23:24:13.8 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:07.74 +04:40:51.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:48:21.34 +42:54:09.3 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:23.94 -06:18:44.5 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:11:10.53 -08:13:44.8 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:37.29 -00:53:38.9 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:55:40.61 -02:37:56.1 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:01:09.41 +24:42:58.7 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:45:28.40 +25:40:43.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:20:50.22 -06:50:19.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:21:28.93 +32:37:27.2 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:52:48.38 +16:18:05.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:05:36.53 +03:18:47.4 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:32:43.67 +29:41:08.0 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:24:04.18 +26:28:52.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:34:27.40 +33:13:56.3 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:38:27.71 +17:33:59.4 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:47:49.29 +18:46:12.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:20:00.08 +18:44:01.4 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:28:03.76 +19:18:54.9 13.8mag 141P/Machholz
05:30:32.62 +17:09:15.4 13.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:19:12.63 +15:03:10.3 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:52:47.46 -25:41:06.5 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:19:30.71 +20:58:41.7 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:17.80 -00:09:32.2 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
23:59:53.97 +01:05:40.1 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:57:29.45 -08:52:44.1 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:19:13.09 +35:43:42.9 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:14:36.48 -05:17:49.5 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:46:03.85 +31:11:20.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:02:19.62 -19:00:24.0 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:29.49 +08:16:54.6 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:01:50.49 +20:54:37.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:48:52.68 +42:10:12.1 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 1 04:54 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 04:53 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Jun 1 04:53 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:08:26.968 +28:11:01.32 AT 2026nfx 2026-05-20.30 21.04
20:41:11.858 +07:30:47.01 AT 2026nfw 2026-05-20.41 19.6773
21:59:44.032 +01:09:25.15 AT 2026nfv 2026-05-20.41 20.2169
19:55:15.987 -12:13:04.06 SN 2026nfu 2026-05-20.40 19.764
19:11:59.188 -05:59:29.48 AT 2026nft 2026-05-20.40 20.1465
20:49:19.514 -11:14:29.34 AT 2026nfs 2026-05-15.43 20.3991
17:50:32.577 +03:03:50.91 AT 2026nfr 2026-05-14.42 20.7439
09:56:58.256 +03:14:00.41 AT 2026nfq 2026-05-18.98 23.2429
09:58:28.172 +03:37:48.70 AT 2026nfp 2026-05-18.00 23.6388
01:41:52.654 +49:02:23.74 AT 2026nfo 2026-05-15.49 16.6376
19:48:38.478 -15:49:21.40 SN 2026nfn 2026-05-14.45 20.6205
23:29:50.523 +24:19:16.46 AT 2026nfm 2026-05-16.48 19.4861
00:22:50.994 +32:13:55.02 AT 2026nfl 2026-05-20.48 19.4447
00:19:09.783 +22:55:29.39 AT 2026nfk 2026-05-15.49 18.5774
18:50:22.104 +74:56:01.68 AT 2026nfj 2026-05-20.01 17.95
14:44:27.710 +29:51:15.82 AT 2026nfi 2026-05-05.85 20.76
15:03:26.220 +29:01:29.01 AT 2026nfh 2026-05-05.85 20.56
13:18:06.250 +03:51:41.98 AT 2026nfg 2026-05-17.67 21.83
14:20:14.220 +03:14:46.94 AT 2026nff 2026-05-17.66 22.59
13:59:52.100 +00:18:30.03 AT 2026nfe 2026-05-17.65 22.32
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 04:53 tns_transients_list.txt