This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 10.20 20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6
41.68676 -25.29653 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 1 -2 2 10.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461191.8654,10.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260531.3654 10.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 13.03 20:25:36.40 -05:47:50.5
38.64833 -23.56091 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina -2 -2 2 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:25:36.40 -05:47:50.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:25:36.40 -05:47:50.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461191.8654,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260531.3654 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 13.67 20:56:07.21 +00:35:46.4
48.92728 -27.12136 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.456 Abnoba 1 -3 3 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:56:07.21 +00:35:46.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:56:07.21 +00:35:46.4: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461191.8654,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260531.3654 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 13.67 20:52:53.92 -01:17:55.0
46.63167 -27.39459 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.397 Vienna 0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:52:53.92 -01:17:55.0: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:52:53.92 -01:17:55.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461191.8654,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260531.3654 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 11.34 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6
44.82656 -19.99114 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0865 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.500 V < 12.600 V 2454694.00000 369.000000000000 M6-M7(S7,5e:)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0865 Aql,2461191.8654,11.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0865 Aql 20260531.3654 11.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 11.19 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5
42.80660 -24.16067 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1661 Aql
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 13.600 V 2452402.30000 301.045227000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1661 Aql,2461191.8654,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1661 Aql 20260531.3654 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 13.10 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4
38.44813 -25.01594 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J203029-0637.2
Type: RRAB/BL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.113 V 14.298 V 2453706.64690 0.557794800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4: 14.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J203029-0637.2,2461191.8654,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J203029-0637.2 20260531.3654 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 31.3654 2461191.8654 11.99 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2
45.45388 -21.22329 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0845 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 V < 13.500 V 2453893.00000 229.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0845 Aql,2461191.8654,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0845 Aql 20260531.3654 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461191.86564469 31.05.2026 08:46:21.701 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13288
Objects passed selection criteria: 13261
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11301.5
Average stars matched: 11054.5 (97.8144 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118124 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 31 05:56:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461191.86564469 31.05.2026 08:46:21.701 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91874
Objects passed selection criteria: 91667
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 74868
Average stars matched: 71785.2 (95.8824 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1924064 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 31 05:59:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461191.86514589
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1005 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0986 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01180 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ebd5MCs9YE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bbqptaIa0h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ct5HZ10hUp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gNiCYDfuD9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8626 out of 9004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9004 out of 13571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
3.8 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
3.8 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ebd5MCs9YE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=818, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 12869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=232 n_q2=229 n_q3=238 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bbqptaIa0h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, passed=13571
Got 13571 stars (including 12699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.648 n_q1=240 n_q2=236 n_q3=228 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ct5HZ10hUp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=9094
Got 9094 stars (including 8658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=223 n_q2=222 n_q3=272 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gNiCYDfuD9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=9134
Got 9134 stars (including 8700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=220 n_q2=223 n_q3=274 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.523 worst_q_ratio=1.190
ref2=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.560 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.322
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.274
reference average sigma_overall=0.5415 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:54.75 +00:56:43.3: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:09:21.31 -00:53:21.8: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:25.89 +02:22:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:51.78 -03:39:30.4: 10.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:51.78 -03:39:30.4: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:09:21.31 -00:53:21.8: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:25.89 +02:22:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:25.89 +02:22:24.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:54.75 +00:56:43.3: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:21.31 -00:53:21.8: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6104 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.78 -03:39:30.4: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0842 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:54.75 +00:56:43.3: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1437 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out20757.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20644_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 20644_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20757_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.75 +00:56:43.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=11.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.12)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20769_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20780_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20780_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:51.98 -01:49:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20851_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20851_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20868_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20868_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20932_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 20932_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:46.30 +02:59:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.83 -00:54:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07121_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 07121_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.53 -01:31:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03686_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 03686_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.84 -04:25:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:36:55.72 -04:09:00.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1005 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0986 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:40.377 -01:59:00.33
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:39.360 -01:58:20.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01180 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bumGAhUoEQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PQdIn0O6xi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZyffnQe799
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1TjHlfPVNr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 100598 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to +3.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to 3.2767 deg
Loaded 10863 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8253 out of 9762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9762 out of 100598 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
3.5 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
3.4 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bumGAhUoEQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=7505, passed=97733
Got 97733 stars (including 90106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.606 n_q1=236 n_q2=220 n_q3=241 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PQdIn0O6xi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=7692, passed=100565
Got 100565 stars (including 92749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.667 n_q1=234 n_q2=222 n_q3=237 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZyffnQe799 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2614, passed=51715
Got 51715 stars (including 49059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=208 n_q2=219 n_q3=279 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1TjHlfPVNr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2697, passed=51976
Got 51976 stars (including 49222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51976 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=204 n_q2=222 n_q3=280 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-45-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0354.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-31_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_040143_TTUQ1b1x1_454698_H2cDMRgU/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:34.56 -02:51:03.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:57:09.57 -05:40:24.4: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:02.43 -03:17:05.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:01:54.66 -07:02:37.7: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:56.35 +01:02:30.7: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:59:36.94 -04:18:52.2: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:14:14.58 +03:02:30.4: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:10:22.21 -06:15:19.1: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:38.94 -03:21:00.1: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:05:31.00 +01:43:49.2: 13.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:59:36.94 -04:18:52.2: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:01:54.66 -07:02:37.7: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:14:14.58 +03:02:30.4: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:38.94 -03:21:00.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:10:22.21 -06:15:19.1: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:57:09.57 -05:40:24.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:02.43 -03:17:05.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:56.35 +01:02:30.7: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:05:31.00 +01:43:49.2: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:34.56 -02:51:03.8: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:36.94 -04:18:52.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2039 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:54.66 -07:02:37.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8881 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:14.58 +03:02:30.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6568 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:09.57 -05:40:24.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9481 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:38.94 -03:21:00.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0244 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:22.21 -06:15:19.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2117 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:31.00 +01:43:49.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7056 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:56.35 +01:02:30.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0024 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:02.43 -03:17:05.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2504 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:34.56 -02:51:03.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3472 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:25.88 +02:22:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:23.97 -04:04:34.7: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:36.42 -01:05:45.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:00.28 -04:25:57.7: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:19.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:16:07.30 +00:31:52.1: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:58:32.65 -05:23:58.0: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:39.34 -04:59:25.6: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:29.36 +01:50:39.3: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:41.52 -02:35:10.1: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:19.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:19.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:16:07.30 +00:31:52.1: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:36.42 -01:05:45.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:36.42 -01:05:45.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:25.88 +02:22:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:39.34 -04:59:25.6: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:25.88 +02:22:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:58:32.65 -05:23:58.0: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:23.97 -04:04:34.7: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:00.28 -04:25:57.7: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.30 +00:31:52.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3765 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:39.34 -04:59:25.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9144 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:23.97 -04:04:34.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6218 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:32.65 -05:23:58.0: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6990 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.28 -04:25:57.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9788 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:29.36 +01:50:39.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:29.36 +01:50:39.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6054 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:41.52 -02:35:10.1: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:41.52 -02:35:10.1: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5928 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:46:43.50 +02:27:15.9: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:21.8: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:11:12.43 -00:08:40.9: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:26:20.81 +02:56:38.3: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:14.4: 13.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:23.69 -00:27:19.7: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:09:27.68 -01:38:17.9: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:17:32.34 -02:03:37.6: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:17:30.53 -02:03:44.5: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:14:59.38 -04:36:07.4: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:46:43.50 +02:27:15.9: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:11:12.43 -00:08:40.9: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:21.8: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:17:32.34 -02:03:37.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:14.4: 12.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:23.69 -00:27:19.7: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:26:20.81 +02:56:38.3: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:09:27.68 -01:38:17.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.43 -00:08:40.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7034 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:43.50 +02:27:15.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0571 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:14.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9325 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:32.34 -02:03:37.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6815 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:32.09 +01:40:21.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0672 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.81 +02:56:38.3: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0070 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:27.68 -01:38:17.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8733 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:23.69 -00:27:19.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6529 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:17:30.53 -02:03:44.5: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:30.53 -02:03:44.5: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0678 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:14:59.38 -04:36:07.4: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.38 -04:36:07.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9118 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:52:07.17 -06:28:53.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:25:36.40 -05:47:50.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:12:15.78 +02:19:02.6: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:16.86 -00:59:05.5: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:06:49.95 +00:20:45.7: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:35:30.77 +01:48:53.8: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:17:26.03 -02:02:39.3: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:53:24.52 +00:25:57.9: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:19:55.67 +02:37:26.1: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:56:07.21 +00:35:46.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:12:15.78 +02:19:02.6: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:06:49.95 +00:20:45.7: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:16.86 -00:59:05.5: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:35:30.77 +01:48:53.8: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:52:07.17 -06:28:53.6: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:25:36.40 -05:47:50.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:17:26.03 -02:02:39.3: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.78 +02:19:02.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2624 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:49.95 +00:20:45.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0973 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:16.86 -00:59:05.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2426 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.77 +01:48:53.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2844 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:07.17 -06:28:53.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9683 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:26.03 -02:02:39.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0703 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:53:24.52 +00:25:57.9: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:24.52 +00:25:57.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3063 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:19:55.67 +02:37:26.1: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:56:07.21 +00:35:46.4: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:55.67 +02:37:26.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5745 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:30.34 -06:32:50.9: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:52:53.92 -01:17:55.0: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:44.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:52:53.92 -01:17:55.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:30.34 -06:32:50.9: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:30.34 -06:32:50.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3935 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:44.0: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:44.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9264 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:02:20.19 -05:20:30.7: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:54.79 +00:56:42.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3406 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:21.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:34:51.66 -02:42:55.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1847 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:02:20.19 -05:20:30.7: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:20.19 -05:20:30.7: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7634 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:11.13 -05:36:19.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:21.3: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:02:47.11 -06:29:32.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:21.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8198 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:23.80 -06:11:46.3: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:11.13 -05:36:19.8: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:11.13 -05:36:19.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9786 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:02:47.11 -06:29:32.7: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:47.11 -06:29:32.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1608 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:23.80 -06:11:46.3: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:23.80 -06:11:46.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1822 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:09.09 -05:56:30.5: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:01.88 -06:48:12.1: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:09.09 -05:56:30.5: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:09.09 -05:56:30.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1770 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:41.41 -04:27:01.9: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:00.35 -04:14:41.1: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:02:50.62 -05:12:34.6: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:01.88 -06:48:12.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:01.88 -06:48:12.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2478 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:41.41 -04:27:01.9: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:00.35 -04:14:41.1: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:41.41 -04:27:01.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2006 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.35 -04:14:41.1: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6114 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:02:50.62 -05:12:34.6: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:50.62 -05:12:34.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9787 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:01:06.05 -05:53:23.2: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4: 14.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:59:20.35 -06:27:18.1: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:01:06.05 -05:53:23.2: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:06.05 -05:53:23.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7755 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:01:06.82 -06:41:05.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:29.36 -06:37:14.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0961 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:59:20.35 -06:27:18.1: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:20.35 -06:27:18.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7330 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:01:06.82 -06:41:05.9: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:06.82 -06:41:05.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8510 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:01:05.15 -06:18:07.0: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:17.04 -05:54:38.7: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:01:05.15 -06:18:07.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:05.15 -06:18:07.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8861 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:17.04 -05:54:38.7: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:17.04 -05:54:38.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1357 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:08:49.45 -02:28:24.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:08:49.45 -02:28:24.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:49.45 -02:28:24.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3430 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:29:21.58 +00:50:54.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9926 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:17.98 -05:57:10.2: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:36.18 -05:42:03.4: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:00:21.22 -06:58:19.7: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:17.98 -05:57:10.2: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:17.98 -05:57:10.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1881 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:36.18 -05:42:03.4: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:36.18 -05:42:03.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6013 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:00:21.22 -06:58:19.7: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:21.22 -06:58:19.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6942 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:31.61 -05:50:11.5: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:59:54.61 -06:56:50.3: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:31.61 -05:50:11.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:00.62 -06:33:26.2: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:31.61 -05:50:11.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0981 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:59:54.61 -06:56:50.3: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:54.61 -06:56:50.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7723 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:00.62 -06:33:26.2: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.62 -06:33:26.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7214 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36882.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86784.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117783_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117783_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117791_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117791_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117796_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117796_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117798_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117798_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117800_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117800_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117803_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117803_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117806_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117806_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117810_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117810_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117813_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117813_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117815_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117815_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117816_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117816_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117817_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117817_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.42 +01:38:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117893_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117893_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:55.71 -04:09:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117968_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 117968_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118113_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118113_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118290_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118290_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118347_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118347_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118424_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118565_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118565_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118593_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118593_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118612_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118612_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118656_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118656_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118675_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118675_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118794_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118795_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118795_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118927_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118927_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118942_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118942_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118948_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118948_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118957_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118957_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118971_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118971_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 118981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119042_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119042_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119051_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 119051_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119057_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119057_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119124_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119124_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:20.40 +02:37:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119181_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119181_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119313_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119313_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119410_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119410_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119435_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 119435_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119483_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 119483_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119611_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 119611_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19979_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 19979_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:59.80 -04:39:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.78 +01:19:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108192_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108192_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.84 -00:54:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21744_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 21744_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.84 -04:25:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108205_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108197_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108197_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108191_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108191_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108185_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108185_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108181_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108181_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108177_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108177_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108166_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108166_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108136_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108136_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108130_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108130_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108127_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108127_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04529_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 04529_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108122_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:09.27 +01:23:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108067_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108067_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108064_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108064_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108012_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 108012_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39678_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 39678_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 62693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:45.60 +02:22:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
Preparing report for the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.68 -03:51:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:51.98 -01:49:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08530_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 08530_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10617_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 10617_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01328_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 01328_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56610_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 56610_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:46.29 +02:59:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09502_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 09502_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01543_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 01543_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48168_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 48168_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.51 -01:31:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37548_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 37548_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:12.06 -02:39:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04126_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355
The candidate 04126_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-31_03-46-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0355 did not pass the final checks
