Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Y LMi,2461190.6621,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Y LMi 20260530.1621 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 988045 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 988045 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits

renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 457.7779
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.8111
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4284.9171
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 800.0875
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4166.9302
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 856.4336
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 9.36025
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.066
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-29T22:52:51.2800258' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-30T03:52:51.2800258' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61190.1617046297 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-30T03:53:01.1830887' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61190.1618192475 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.996884413221 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9995272271905 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.7597222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 280.433888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.41876578135982 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 13.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits :)
Spent 0.527568 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-29T22:53:34.3305619' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-30T03:53:34.3305619' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61190.1622028933 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-30T03:53:44.2314989' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61190.1623174883 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.996884437312 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9995272283953 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.6163888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 280.505 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.42234525521361 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29487 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 895.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 13.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)
Spent 0.520330 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits

fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461190.66182037
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0372 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01026 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dKeA44VzDC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rZPSdc7yNW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ru1TcKFSCf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WIXdl5sqNy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2124 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2124 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4039 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dKeA44VzDC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, passed=7484
Got 7484 stars (including 6942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=240 n_q2=204 n_q3=230 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rZPSdc7yNW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=7488
Got 7488 stars (including 6948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=240 n_q2=209 n_q3=228 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ru1TcKFSCf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, passed=1992
Got 1992 stars (including 1789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=237 n_q2=236 n_q3=158 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WIXdl5sqNy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=204, passed=2130
Got 2130 stars (including 1924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 902 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=231 n_q2=222 n_q3=147 n_q4=302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new1=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.109
new2=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.103
reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.2965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083_astrometric_residuals.png (902 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0372 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:06.942 +29:58:42.94
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:09.769 +29:58:38.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01026 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yep8y3NcBq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lXULq7U3Ps
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KKiyfLeSK6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RGk4Eyp5VR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 38277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3559 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3559 deg
Loaded 5585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 4316 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4316 out of 38277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
1.9 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
1.9 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Yep8y3NcBq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1709, passed=38233
Got 38233 stars (including 36466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.222 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lXULq7U3Ps (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1697, passed=38258
Got 38258 stars (including 36498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=236 n_q2=209 n_q3=227 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KKiyfLeSK6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=384, passed=14249
Got 14249 stars (including 13837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14249 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits N_match=901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=245 n_q2=238 n_q3=155 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RGk4Eyp5VR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=463, passed=14772
Got 14772 stars (including 14289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 562 to 629 (Dec 22.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 562 to 629 (Dec 22.5 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits N_match=901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=235 n_q2=223 n_q3=148 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:16:05.17 +32:00:15.8: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:22.48 +28:45:56.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:24.16 +28:48:04.0: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:29.81 +28:33:20.6: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:06:51.90 +28:55:05.1: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:24.16 +28:48:04.0: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:24.16 +28:48:04.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8361 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4355 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:16:05.17 +32:00:15.8: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:22.48 +28:45:56.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.17 +32:00:15.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0921 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:22.48 +28:45:56.9: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7462 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:29.81 +28:33:20.6: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:06:51.90 +28:55:05.1: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:29.81 +28:33:20.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5196 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:51.90 +28:55:05.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7729 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9939 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52433_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.70 | 09:56:30.13 +33:35:53.2 | 5380 1042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:56:30.14 +33:35:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52686_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 12.63 | 10:15:00.13 +31:29:06.2 | 2943 2141 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 10:15:00.15 +31:29:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52770_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 12.84 | 10:01:22.52 +28:45:56.1 | 4579 3913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 12.69 | 10:01:22.43 +28:45:57.8 | 4585 3913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52776_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 12.87 | 10:01:24.17 +28:48:04.0 | 4577 3892 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 12.81 | 10:01:24.14 +28:48:04.1 | 4583 3891 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52815_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.18 | 09:41:27.83 +31:16:37.7 | 7244 2508 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:41:27.88 +31:16:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52832_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 12.87 | 09:52:39.28 +25:58:54.6 | 5660 5655 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:52:39.24 +25:58:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52843_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 13.09 | 10:16:05.09 +32:00:15.6 | 2828 1816 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.09 | 10:16:05.25 +32:00:16.1 | 2833 1815 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52850_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.13 | 09:47:35.62 +26:13:11.1 | 6352 5540 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:47:35.80 +26:13:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52927_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.56 | 09:38:40.73 +30:45:30.4 | 7601 2827 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:38:40.73 +30:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 52964_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 13.45 | 10:20:44.89 +30:39:21.6 | 2146 2564 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.42 | 10:20:44.75 +30:39:21.5 | 2152 2564 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 13.64 | 10:01:29.82 +28:33:20.1 | 4555 4039 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.44 | 10:01:29.80 +28:33:21.2 | 4561 4038 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 53072_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 30.16182 | 2461190.66182 | 13.82 | 10:06:52.00 +28:55:04.6 | 3863 3772 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-52-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0082.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.74 | 10:06:51.80 +28:55:05.7 | 3870 3772 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 53099_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 13.99 | 10:05:00.42 +29:44:36.4 | 4149 3294 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 10:05:00.35 +29:44:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33804_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
Preparing report for the candidate 33804_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 06509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 11.39 | 10:02:41.00 +26:41:37.5 | 4330 5149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 10:02:41.03 +26:41:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 8.33 | 09:45:34.44 +34:30:39.3 | 6771 0540 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:45:34.43 +34:30:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 12.17 | 09:39:25.64 +34:14:51.8 | 7538 0712 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:39:25.62 +34:14:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083
The candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 30.16232 | 2461190.66232 | 8.18 | 09:53:43.21 +34:55:33.5 | 5768 0254 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-29_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_230221_TTUQ1b1x1_2642377_tgOZ1uUk/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-29_22-53-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0083.fits |
**** FOUND 09:53:43.21 +34:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7
########### Completed Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7
###################################################################################
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:15:51.45 +32:51:32.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461190.66182037 -observatory V36
05:40:15.37 +25:27:31.3 Mercury (-0.7mag)
06:56:38.79 +24:41:44.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:23:29.44 +13:34:17.1 Mars (1.3mag)
07:41:05.88 +21:49:15.4 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:37.28 +02:33:23.4 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:02.13 +20:19:09.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:32.35 +00:13:22.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:47.41 -23:01:20.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
15:28:01.33 -24:34:07.0 Moon (-12.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 29 23:04 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461190.66182037:
07:41:02.80 +21:49:25.9 Io (6.0mag)
07:41:10.24 +21:49:01.3 Europa (6.1mag)
07:41:09.41 +21:49:00.1 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:40:44.55 +21:50:19.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:41:56.31 +21:25:23.2 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:41:04.09 +21:49:22.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:42:09.63 +21:44:53.0 Elara (17.5mag)
07:42:47.29 +22:05:51.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:48:03.66 +21:50:20.1 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:49.31 +02:33:22.5 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:34.32 +02:33:37.1 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:47:06.12 +02:34:13.7 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:40.42 +02:33:52.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:47:30.34 +02:36:37.0 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 29 23:04 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461190.66182037:
17:21:00.37 -34:04:30.7 JWST
18:42:36.83 +24:13:11.2 Chandra
08:14:35.90 -43:43:16.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 29 23:04 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461190.66182037 -observatory V36
13:17:45.15 -26:38:55.6 14.3mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:44:24.73 +30:33:33.2 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:22:40.07 +01:29:08.3 14.5mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:34:35.09 +24:46:56.2 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:58:36.69 +10:52:17.6 18.0mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:49:02.56 -31:58:09.5 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:44:40.91 -68:11:28.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:46.29 +31:51:18.7 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:18:19.47 +14:49:32.4 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:59:47.69 -51:34:52.0 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:09.47 +31:13:20.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:22:55.41 +26:54:08.9 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:23:30.92 +31:22:38.1 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:45:55.05 +03:27:20.0 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:33:57.31 +21:21:23.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:22:49.44 -11:01:09.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:10.47 +65:56:21.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:08:04.78 -05:51:43.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:28:56.62 +84:58:45.7 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:58:23.78 +64:01:58.6 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:33:15.28 +26:56:13.0 13.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:44:34.72 +12:38:54.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:06.78 +28:23:53.6 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:08:57.92 -16:47:52.8 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:57:25.42 +36:05:26.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:41:21.90 +53:11:57.5 17.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:32:07.89 -10:26:01.9 13.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:22.75 +04:39:50.0 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:44:06.87 +42:43:17.3 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:18.75 -07:14:14.3 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:07:03.57 -08:10:14.6 9.2mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:15.11 -03:14:44.7 18.0mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:00:15.43 -00:52:46.4 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:54:03.50 -02:36:11.8 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:57:40.52 +24:24:12.3 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:40:42.91 +26:17:32.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:18:44.31 -07:00:24.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:14:19.34 +32:18:33.8 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:47:27.45 +15:58:54.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:00:28.81 +02:47:10.6 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:25:32.59 +29:26:19.2 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:18:01.13 +26:05:02.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:29:13.77 +33:16:29.3 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:34:39.85 +18:32:05.2 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:44:08.67 +18:36:06.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:15:32.22 +18:36:08.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:17:41.76 +19:27:56.3 13.5mag 141P/Machholz
05:20:11.97 +16:54:38.7 13.4mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:07:31.95 +14:36:24.0 10.9mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:51:08.98 -26:01:31.9 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:12:24.38 +20:00:28.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:52.22 -00:44:03.1 17.4mag 169P/NEAT
23:53:48.35 +00:37:51.3 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
16:59:15.49 -09:02:22.7 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:14:07.60 +35:47:12.5 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:08:49.31 -06:11:53.1 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:40:13.93 +30:44:34.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:43:03.33 -22:08:55.6 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:19:38.18 +08:19:11.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:00:09.32 +20:57:31.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:45:14.25 +42:19:18.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 29 23:04 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 29 23:04 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 29 23:04 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
19:34:37.106 -06:17:48.77 AT 2026ncq 2026-04-28.37 18.94
18:45:36.050 -47:02:22.90 AT 2026ncp 2026-05-16.36 16.3
16:44:58.190 -12:01:14.40 AT 2026nco 2026-05-17.78 16.12
23:45:12.005 +19:33:29.70 AT 2026ncn 2026-05-16.48 18.8237
12:10:09.900 +33:30:34.08 AT 2026ncm 2026-05-09.81 20.47
15:58:04.997 +19:43:47.30 AT 2026ncl 2026-05-09.79 20.37
16:15:45.870 +24:41:26.60 AT 2026nck 2026-05-09.79 20.42
14:54:16.520 +41:08:00.06 AT 2026ncj 2026-05-07.81 21.47
12:39:40.670 +30:20:35.75 AT 2026nci 2026-05-07.79 20.97
13:13:25.460 +25:11:14.24 AT 2026nch 2026-05-07.75 21.52
12:37:45.750 +26:31:30.09 AT 2026ncg 2026-05-07.75 21.31
15:22:43.110 +43:36:13.56 AT 2026ncf 2026-05-02.85 21.33
16:17:17.640 +15:12:51.58 AT 2026nce 2026-04-20.82 21.27
16:10:36.980 +27:29:40.18 AT 2026ncd 2026-04-20.81 20.52
16:21:10.940 +21:07:51.13 AT 2026ncc 2026-04-08.88 21.67
16:04:25.190 +17:44:39.62 AT 2026ncb 2026-04-06.88 21.38
16:17:05.280 +22:11:59.04 AT 2026nca 2026-04-06.84 21.63
16:03:27.180 +26:47:45.36 AT 2026nbz 2026-04-06.79 20.91
12:58:38.740 +25:18:29.00 AT 2026nby 2026-04-03.87 20.73
14:26:24.830 +37:28:28.38 AT 2026nbx 2026-03-29.93 21.17
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 29 23:04 tns_transients_list.txt