This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4339 2461188.9339 12.38 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1
135.98886 -7.14490 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0219559+532808
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.989 g Y 3.817 g 2458334.11800 490.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4339* 02 19 55.58 +53 28 07.1 12.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0219559+532808,2461188.9339,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0219559+532808 20260528.4339 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4339 2461188.9339 11.88 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9
138.75848 -7.36979 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" EF Per
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.600 pg 17.800 pg 2428016.00000 184.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4339* 02 36 18.63 +52 14 58.9 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EF Per,2461188.9339,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EF Per 20260528.4339 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.4339 2461188.9339 11.86 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1
137.28586 -8.31687 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" DL Per
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.900 pg 18.000 pg 2429269.00000 226.800000000000 M2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 28.4339* 02 25 11.36 +51 55 22.1 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DL Per,2461188.9339,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DL Per 20260528.4339 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.75818454 23.12.2025 06:11:37.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461032.75818454 23.12.2025 06:11:37.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last image: 2461188.93410128 28.05.2026 10:24:56.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19803
Objects passed selection criteria: 19689
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12801.8
Average stars matched: 11811.2 (92.2628 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 07:29:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.75818454 23.12.2025 06:11:37.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461032.75818454 23.12.2025 06:11:37.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last image: 2461188.93410128 28.05.2026 10:24:56.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 212 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 147407
Objects passed selection criteria: 146975
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102992
Average stars matched: 93356.5 (90.644 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1969976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 07:36:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.93362774
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71
Second-epoch image center 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0299 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71
Second-epoch image center 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00995 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jfBH8iDqVZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mJCfNjbHZh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3iCG5j2eZF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0FX9rqplVM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7919 to 57.7165 deg, Dec +47.6824 to +59.3633 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7919 to 57.7165 deg, Dec 47.6824 to 59.3633 deg
Loaded 17800 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11289 out of 12704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12704 out of 28578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.970500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.970500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7919 to 57.7165 deg, Dec +47.6824 to +59.3633 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7919 to 57.7165 deg, Dec 47.6824 to 59.3633 deg
Loaded 17800 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11289 out of 12704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12704 out of 28578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 27390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.8138 to 57.7163 deg, Dec +47.6659 to +59.3479 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.8138 to 57.7163 deg, Dec 47.6659 to 59.3479 deg
Loaded 17780 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11114 out of 12629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12629 out of 27390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.3 pix Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.3 pix fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
2.3 pix fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.3 mag. Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jfBH8iDqVZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3275, passed=28578
Got 28578 stars (including 25264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=131 n_q2=348 n_q3=202 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mJCfNjbHZh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3329, passed=27390
Got 27390 stars (including 24043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=128 n_q2=352 n_q3=195 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.055
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3iCG5j2eZF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=610, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.693 n_q1=276 n_q2=163 n_q3=346 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0FX9rqplVM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=608, passed=8228
Got 8228 stars (including 7615 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.912 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.828 n_q1=273 n_q2=164 n_q3=353 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.191
ref2=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.055
new1=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits sigma_overall=0.658 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new2=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.687 worst_q_ratio=1.328
reference average sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.123
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30898_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 30898_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:00.91 +57:08:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31476_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 31476_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:06.82 +57:08:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 32245_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:16.50 +57:10:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33004_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 33004_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:52.43 +57:06:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 33081_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:09.70 +57:06:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71
Second-epoch image center 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0299 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:49:25.719 +53:59:48.71
Second-epoch image center 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 02:49:33.020 +53:58:22.38
Second-epoch second image center 02:49:34.567 +53:58:55.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00995 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lBNfZmBJLV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wMiRs0PWe3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6Qw42j1o12
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kTb5EGLXfk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 187490 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7703 to 57.8229 deg, Dec +47.6824 to +59.3668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7703 to 57.8229 deg, Dec 47.6824 to 59.3668 deg
Loaded 17879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8700 out of 12888 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12888 out of 187490 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 187490 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7703 to 57.8229 deg, Dec +47.6824 to +59.3668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7703 to 57.8229 deg, Dec 47.6824 to 59.3668 deg
Loaded 17879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8700 out of 12888 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12888 out of 187490 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 187222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 27.7751 to 57.7698 deg, Dec +47.6443 to +59.3511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 27.7751 to 57.7698 deg, Dec 47.6443 to 59.3511 deg
Loaded 17874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8530 out of 12899 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12899 out of 187222 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.1 pix fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
2.2 pix fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.5 mag. Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lBNfZmBJLV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=58, blended=26738, passed=187432
Got 187432 stars (including 160397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 187432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=158 n_q2=325 n_q3=219 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wMiRs0PWe3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=26988, passed=187189
Got 187189 stars (including 159917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 187189 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=156 n_q2=327 n_q3=208 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6Qw42j1o12 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=5274, passed=73958
Got 73958 stars (including 68573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.725 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.726 n_q1=285 n_q2=162 n_q3=332 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kTb5EGLXfk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=15, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5008, passed=72180
Got 72180 stars (including 67060 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72180 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.853 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.710 n_q1=283 n_q2=164 n_q3=337 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Per-01-Q2b1x1_072708_TTUQ2b1x1_235143_wYgcr8nu/wcs_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:21:00.33 +57:02:11.3: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:46:02.68 +57:38:50.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:25:25.10 +57:30:14.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:19:30.31 +52:17:06.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:21:00.33 +57:02:11.3: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:46:02.68 +57:38:50.3: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:25:25.10 +57:30:14.7: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:21:00.33 +57:02:11.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5393 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:02.68 +57:38:50.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6396 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:25.10 +57:30:14.7: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6855 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:26:53.59 +53:20:44.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:18:58.18 +57:05:59.3: 12.93 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:37:25.87 +55:40:51.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:22:12.84 +57:09:29.8: 12.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:30.31 +52:17:06.3: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:30.31 +52:17:06.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3437 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:28:30.47 +52:39:18.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:19:32.04 +57:09:34.6: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:18:58.18 +57:05:59.3: 12.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:26:53.59 +53:20:44.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:58.18 +57:05:59.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9933 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:53.59 +53:20:44.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9997 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:22:12.84 +57:09:29.8: 12.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:37:25.87 +55:40:51.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:12.84 +57:09:29.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9381 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:37:25.87 +55:40:51.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0805 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:28:27.12 +51:04:44.5: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:32.04 +57:09:34.6: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:28:30.47 +52:39:18.1: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:19:32.04 +57:09:34.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5513 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:30.47 +52:39:18.1: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1367 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:28:27.12 +51:04:44.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:28:27.12 +51:04:44.5: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9296 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:24:12.53 +56:34:19.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:24:12.53 +56:34:19.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:24:12.53 +56:34:19.2: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8373 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 03:09:00.86 +52:06:52.5: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:18:56.08 +57:13:18.8: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:25:23.66 +56:12:32.0: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 03:09:00.86 +52:06:52.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:00.86 +52:06:52.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7756 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:18:56.08 +57:13:18.8: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:56.08 +57:13:18.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2600 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:25:23.66 +56:12:32.0: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:23.66 +56:12:32.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2201 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:57:11.29 +54:37:44.3: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:29:01.30 +57:32:27.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:42:22.35 +51:49:13.3: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:57:11.29 +54:37:44.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:29:01.30 +57:32:27.3: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:57:11.29 +54:37:44.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2876 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:29:01.30 +57:32:27.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5200 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:42:22.35 +51:49:13.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:42:22.35 +51:49:13.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4611 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:30:12.30 +49:53:55.7: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:35:19.80 +56:39:37.6: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:45:50.77 +51:28:18.0: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:30:12.30 +49:53:55.7: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:30:12.30 +49:53:55.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4840 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:35:19.80 +56:39:37.6: 15.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:35:19.80 +56:39:37.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8540 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:45:50.77 +51:28:18.0: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:50.77 +51:28:18.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4548 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:59:44.74 +51:58:06.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_00-11-37_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:19:55.58 +53:28:07.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3808 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:59:44.74 +51:58:06.9: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-35-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits at 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:59:44.74 +51:58:06.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9643 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:36:18.63 +52:14:58.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8821 delta=1.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:25:11.36 +51:55:22.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8567 delta=1.62 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127571.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out231800.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out126705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133035.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209931_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209931_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:05.91 +54:01:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209939_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209939_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209940_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209940_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:31.55 +56:40:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209941_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209941_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:07.69 +54:10:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209944_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209944_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:05.35 +55:11:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209957_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209957_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209958_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209958_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209965_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209965_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:47.28 +51:51:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209971_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209971_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:52:04.51 +51:52:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209973_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209973_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:25.70 +53:45:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209976_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209976_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209977_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209977_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209986_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209986_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.74 +55:16:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209987_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209987_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:46.43 +50:17:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209989_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209989_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:40.85 +52:11:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209990_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209990_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:40:19.62 +52:06:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209992_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209992_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:35:37.12 +52:27:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209994_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209994_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209999_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 209999_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210003_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210003_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:41:03.99 +52:21:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210004_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210004_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210005_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210005_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210011_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210011_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:06.00 +55:17:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210017_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210017_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210023_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210023_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210026_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210026_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210027_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210027_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:20.61 +51:42:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210028_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 210028_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:51.22 +49:45:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214576_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 214576_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:52.32 +50:15:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217351_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 217351_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:15.31 +58:01:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217486_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 217486_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:49.67 +50:55:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217836_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 217836_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:13.62 +50:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218175_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 218175_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:55.79 +55:20:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218573_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 218573_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:58.52 +55:37:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219946_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 219946_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:12.20 +54:42:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219991_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 219991_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:13:24.28 +49:47:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220097_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 220097_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220124_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 220124_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:59.40 +56:40:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220166_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 220166_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:28.61 +57:34:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220564_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 220564_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:30.74 +57:52:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220604_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 220604_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:37.92 +49:41:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221138_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221138_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:47.29 +50:35:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221352_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221352_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:59.03 +55:55:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221679_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221679_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:40.11 +52:41:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221723_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221723_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:34:50.54 +52:45:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221770_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221770_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:56.65 +58:00:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221778_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 221778_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222421_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 222421_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:13.93 +54:24:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222436_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 222436_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:32.66 +56:18:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222549_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 222549_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:50.89 +58:01:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222937_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 222937_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:13.14 +52:21:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223115_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 223115_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:08.67 +57:48:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223195_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 223195_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:54.13 +55:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223240_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 223240_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:42:48.10 +53:31:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223556_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 223556_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223942_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 223942_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:29:50.82 +51:15:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224510_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 224510_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:34.10 +57:11:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224810_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 224810_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:47.23 +52:18:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224848_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 224848_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:50:57.68 +57:50:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224933_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 224933_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224969_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 224969_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:29.94 +57:55:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225076_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225076_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:27.52 +55:41:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225132_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225132_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:26.32 +51:15:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225194_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225194_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:30.36 +57:34:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225497_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225497_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:16.07 +57:48:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225540_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225540_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:14.85 +57:42:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225960_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225960_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:56.71 +53:54:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225972_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 225972_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:13.09 +51:12:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226253_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 226253_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:12.94 +51:43:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226283_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 226283_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:45.92 +57:05:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226996_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 226996_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:04.42 +53:40:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227085_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 227085_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227943_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 227943_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228613_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 228613_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:52:03.52 +53:00:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228637_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 228637_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:18.87 +56:40:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228704_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 228704_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229520_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 229520_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:44:38.89 +57:34:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229951_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 229951_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:56.00 +56:39:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230082_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 230082_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:52.49 +50:58:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230368_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 230368_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:48.83 +54:48:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230818_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 230818_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:41:01.70 +52:22:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231288_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 231288_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:02.87 +55:56:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231350_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 231350_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231767_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 231767_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:37.50 +57:34:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231800_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 231800_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:35:19.80 +56:39:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.383 457761222183353856 038.83261391250 +56.66006545522 12.6612 11.0984 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232453_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 232453_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:39.02 +53:33:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232740_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 232740_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232970_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 232970_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:46.89 +55:53:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233422_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 233422_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:48:40.08 +57:48:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47709_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 47709_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:32:46.40 +56:29:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101918_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
Preparing report for the candidate 101918_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126705_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
Preparing report for the candidate 126705_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133035_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
Preparing report for the candidate 133035_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127571_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394
The candidate 127571_fd_Per-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_05-24-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394 did not pass the final checks