######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
And-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting And-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing And-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1163248 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1163248 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.png' -> 'transient_report/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits_preview.png'
And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits

renamed 'And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.png' -> 'transient_report/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits_preview.png'
And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 574.0494
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 776.5502
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2554.4550
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 709.2817
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2526.0736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 706.9936
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.44989
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T03:55:17.6247034' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T08:55:17.6247034' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.371731759 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T08:55:27.5267641' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.3718463657 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 0.002427820283315 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999709595683 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.4291666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 51.3591666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.09364940957053 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 271.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/d_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits :)
Spent 0.625679 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/d_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-28T03:56:09.4414690' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T08:56:09.4414690' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.3723314931 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T08:56:19.3423935' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.3724460881 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 0.002427719915879 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999709524955 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.5702777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 51.4186111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.08425564771948 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 271.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/d_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits :)
Spent 0.536525 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/d_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits

fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.87184750
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 926.2'x626.7' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.80"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Image size: 929.6'x629.2' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.82"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PBotI5NpKV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.naO1cAbkEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NVb4VALXkj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IAle0oesz6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 25830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0017 to 359.9990 deg, Dec +39.9647 to +51.3431 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0017 to 359.9990 deg, Dec 39.9647 to 51.3431 deg
Loaded 171328 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11512 out of 12759 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12759 out of 25830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.963100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.963100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 25830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0017 to 359.9990 deg, Dec +39.9647 to +51.3431 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0017 to 359.9990 deg, Dec 39.9647 to 51.3431 deg
Loaded 171328 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11512 out of 12759 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12759 out of 25830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 21508 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0016 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +39.9637 to +51.3506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0016 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 39.9637 to 51.3506 deg
Loaded 171450 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11594 out of 12535 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12535 out of 21508 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.1 pix And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
2.1 pix wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.1 pix wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.1 mag. And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
13.9 mag. fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
13.9 mag. fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PBotI5NpKV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 149: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2560, passed=25830
Got 25830 stars (including 23238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9690 through 0 to 12.6773, gap 12.6773 to 347.9690
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9684 through 0 to 12.6775, gap 12.6775 to 347.9684
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=174 n_q2=310 n_q3=208 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.naO1cAbkEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1927, passed=21505
Got 21505 stars (including 19550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9687 through 0 to 12.6783, gap 12.6783 to 347.9687
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9685 through 0 to 12.6783, gap 12.6783 to 347.9685
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=185 n_q2=326 n_q3=210 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.358
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -region wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NVb4VALXkj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=481, passed=8567
Got 8567 stars (including 8078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012864 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010291 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0583 through 0 to 12.3549, gap 12.3549 to 348.0583
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.05"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 653 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0566 through 0 to 12.3639, gap 12.3639 to 348.0566
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 711 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 696 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 694 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.20"
Excluding outliers - 694 stars left (next iteration limit 718)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=694 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.166 sigma_q2_arcsec=12.867 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.933 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.323 n_q1=224 n_q2=63 n_q3=320 n_q4=87 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.622
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IAle0oesz6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=8641
Got 8641 stars (including 8162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012911 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010329 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0251 through 0 to 12.2447, gap 12.2447 to 348.0251
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 335 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 258 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 250 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0234 through 0 to 12.2362, gap 12.2362 to 348.0234
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 339 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.83"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 334 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.94"
Excluding outliers - 334 stars left (next iteration limit 275)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=334 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=7.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=33.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.080 sigma_q4_arcsec=30.234 n_q1=156 n_q2=22 n_q3=134 n_q4=22 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.896
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.281
ref2=And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.358
new1=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=3.553 worst_q_ratio=3.622
new2=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits sigma_overall=11.532 worst_q_ratio=2.896
reference average sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.3195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) flagged: sigma=3.553 (ref avg 0.398), ratio=3.622 (ref avg 1.3195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 8170 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out373935.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out373935.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 16.4498 (1.39332e+07), 8 match, 0 conflict, 35 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (359.977,45.9974), pixel scale 5.96052 arcsec/pix.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 238.149 (2.67123e+103), 68 match, 0 conflict, 149 distractors, 191 index.
RA,Dec = (359.986,46.0063), pixel scale 5.97155 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++---++---++---++---++---++--+++---++----+---++---++--+++---+++--+----++---++---++--+++---++--+++--
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out373935.solved to indicate this.
Field: out373935.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.002911, 46.001238) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:00.699, +46:00:04.458).
Field size: 15.8038 x 10.5744 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.39376 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 28 04:20 fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 28 04:20 out373935.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out373935.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out373935.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.75 degrees of RA,Dec (0.004175,46.002)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 16.4498 (1.39332e+07), 8 match, 0 conflict, 35 distractors, 52 index.
RA,Dec = (359.977,45.9974), pixel scale 5.96052 arcsec/pix.
log-odds ratio 22.5493 (6.20917e+09), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (359.946,45.9873), pixel scale 5.93212 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+--+(best)--------------------------+--+--+--------------------++--------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out373935.solved to indicate this.
Field: out373935.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.946861, 45.988042) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:47.247, +45:59:16.951).
Field size: 15.54 x 10.4471 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -2.21519 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 28 04:20 fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K May 28 04:21 out373935.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 46338 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1573, 946.767] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 221.497 (1.56659e+96), 87 match, 0 conflict, 275 distractors, 363 index.
RA,Dec = (359.946,45.9873), pixel scale 5.9264 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 14.844
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.33591
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1573, 946.767] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 221.497 (1.56659e+96), 87 match, 0 conflict, 275 distractors, 363 index.
RA,Dec = (359.946,45.9873), pixel scale 5.9264 arcsec/pix.
--> log-odds 14.844
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.33591
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Got 2 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.917019, 45.995523) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:40.085, +45:59:43.884).
Field size: 15.5204 x 10.6061 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -2.29356 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.new' -> 'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Generating wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 929.3'x626.9' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.82"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:40.382 +45:59:46.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8567 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky397296.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=481, passed=8567
Got 8567 stars (including 8078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012907 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010326 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0405 through 0 to 12.2532, gap 12.2532 to 348.0405
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 434 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 388 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.99"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 386 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0440 through 0 to 12.2571, gap 12.2571 to 348.0440
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 471 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 423 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 420 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.72"
Excluding outliers - 420 stars left (next iteration limit 424)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=420 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.040 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=23.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=27.265 n_q1=167 n_q2=7 n_q3=228 n_q4=18 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=6.748
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits): sigma 3.553->4.040, ratio 3.622->6.748; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits) flagged: sigma=11.532 (ref avg 0.398), ratio=2.896 (ref avg 1.3195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 8230 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out398125.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out398125.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 16.1479 (1.0303e+07), 8 match, 0 conflict, 35 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (359.989,45.9864), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 246.944 (1.76421e+107), 69 match, 0 conflict, 148 distractors, 190 index.
RA,Dec = (359.998,45.9954), pixel scale 5.97145 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++---++---++---++---++---++--+++---++----+---++---++--+++---+++--++---++---++---++--++----++--+++--
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out398125.solved to indicate this.
Field: out398125.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.999090, 45.996150) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:59.782, +45:59:46.139).
Field size: 15.715 x 10.5378 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.476052 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> 'fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 28 04:21 fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K May 28 04:21 out398125.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out398125.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out398125.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6833 degrees of RA,Dec (0.000345833,45.9969)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 16.1479 (1.0303e+07), 8 match, 0 conflict, 35 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (359.989,45.9864), pixel scale 5.96053 arcsec/pix.
log-odds ratio 22.5494 (6.21001e+09), 3 match, 0 conflict, 4 distractors, 51 index.
RA,Dec = (359.957,45.9764), pixel scale 5.93189 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +--+--+(best)--------------------------+--+--+--------------------++--------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out398125.solved to indicate this.
Field: out398125.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.958113, 45.977125) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:49.947, +45:58:37.650).
Field size: 15.539 x 10.4466 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -2.22296 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 28 04:21 fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K May 28 04:21 out398125.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 46568 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1548, 946.729] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.59239
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 4.36629
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.63788
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1548, 946.729] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 5.59239
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 4.36629
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.63788
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Generating wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Image size: 929.6'x629.2' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.82"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8641 stars ###
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky896622.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=8641
Got 8641 stars (including 8162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8641 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012911 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010329 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0251 through 0 to 12.2447, gap 12.2447 to 348.0251
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 335 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 258 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 250 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 348.0234 through 0 to 12.2362, gap 12.2362 to 348.0234
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 339 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.83"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 334 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.94"
Excluding outliers - 334 stars left (next iteration limit 275)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=334 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=7.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=33.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.080 sigma_q4_arcsec=30.234 n_q1=156 n_q2=22 n_q3=134 n_q4=22 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.896
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits): sigma 11.532->11.532, ratio 2.896->2.896; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=4.040 -- 10.15x the reference average (0.398); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=11.532 -- 28.97x the reference average (0.398); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=6.748 -- 5.11x the reference average (1.3195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.896 -- 2.19x the reference average (1.3195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (694 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (334 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30346_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 30346_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 10.20 | 23:18:19.35 +48:57:29.0 | 0528 5023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:18:19.22 +48:57:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30348_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 30348_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 10.35 | 23:14:51.20 +50:46:32.8 | 0270 6160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30367_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 30367_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.13 | 23:26:42.95 +45:14:59.2 | 1269 2722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:26:42.78 +45:14:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30376_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 30376_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.53 | 23:17:59.80 +46:45:13.6 | 0398 3687 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:17:59.81 +46:45:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 926.2'x626.7' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.80"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Image size: 929.6'x629.2' 15.5(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.82"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.659 +45:59:51.92
Second-epoch image center 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.941 +46:00:02.58
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:50.245 +45:58:40.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UsH1b8Ac22
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dy95ihIFaL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hU9DcypxPf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yLBBcyihN1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits and wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 173168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +39.9237 to +51.3453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 39.9237 to 51.3453 deg
Loaded 172077 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9314 out of 12944 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12944 out of 173168 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 173168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +39.9237 to +51.3453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 39.9237 to 51.3453 deg
Loaded 172077 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9314 out of 12944 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12944 out of 173168 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 147848 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +39.9158 to +51.3538 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 39.9158 to 51.3538 deg
Loaded 172317 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9979 out of 12972 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12972 out of 147848 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
1.9 pix And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.4 pix fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.3 mag. And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
14.0 mag. fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
14.0 mag. fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UsH1b8Ac22 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=58, blended=21088, passed=173110
Got 173110 stars (including 151724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9343 through 0 to 12.6975, gap 12.6975 to 347.9343
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9336 through 0 to 12.6990, gap 12.6990 to 347.9336
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=171 n_q2=284 n_q3=216 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dy95ihIFaL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=15202, passed=147814
Got 147814 stars (including 132362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 147814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9609 through 0 to 12.6984, gap 12.6984 to 347.9609
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9602 through 0 to 12.6989, gap 12.6989 to 347.9602
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=183 n_q2=294 n_q3=225 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -region wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hU9DcypxPf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3132, passed=63187
Got 63187 stars (including 59964 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012864 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010291 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9788 through 0 to 12.3896, gap 12.3896 to 347.9788
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 672 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 656 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.11"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 654 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9790 through 0 to 12.3993, gap 12.3993 to 347.9790
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 705 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 689 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.14"
Excluding outliers - 687 stars left (next iteration limit 719)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=687 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.889 sigma_q2_arcsec=12.208 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.677 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.687 n_q1=228 n_q2=58 n_q3=325 n_q4=76 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.745
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yLBBcyihN1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3068, passed=63794
Got 63794 stars (including 60625 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63794 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012911 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010329 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9953 through 0 to 12.2849, gap 12.2849 to 347.9953
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 254 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 249 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 347.9904 through 0 to 12.2766, gap 12.2766 to 347.9904
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 396 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 347 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 343 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.74"
Excluding outliers - 343 stars left (next iteration limit 273)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits N_match=343 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.959 sigma_q1_arcsec=6.854 sigma_q2_arcsec=30.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=11.918 sigma_q4_arcsec=34.480 n_q1=158 n_q2=23 n_q3=138 n_q4=24 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits -region wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/wcs_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:31:04.02 +45:30:31.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:19:11.05 +46:32:11.7: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:32:24.70 +41:06:13.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:27:51.06 +48:14:03.0: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:20:33.82 +43:04:16.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:28:19.39 +47:47:17.0: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:19:34.27 +44:58:36.3: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:31:04.02 +45:30:31.7: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:32:24.70 +41:06:13.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:04.02 +45:30:31.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1944 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:19:11.05 +46:32:11.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:27:51.06 +48:14:03.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:24.70 +41:06:13.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7316 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:20:33.82 +43:04:16.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:11.05 +46:32:11.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9049 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:51.06 +48:14:03.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0185 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:33.82 +43:04:16.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2371 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:37:08.84 +44:23:11.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:19:34.27 +44:58:36.3: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:28:19.39 +47:47:17.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:19.39 +47:47:17.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5666 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:19:34.27 +44:58:36.3: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8871 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:37:08.84 +44:23:11.4: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:08.84 +44:23:11.4: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.1829 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:22:43.97 +50:23:03.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:39:26.02 +45:44:16.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:45:21.06 +44:17:44.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:22:43.97 +50:23:03.3: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:43.97 +50:23:03.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6719 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:25:13.45 +49:39:16.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:39:26.02 +45:44:16.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:26.02 +45:44:16.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8687 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:45:21.06 +44:17:44.0: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:21.06 +44:17:44.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6986 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:25:57.90 +42:32:27.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:25:13.45 +49:39:16.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:13.45 +49:39:16.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0645 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:25:57.90 +42:32:27.4: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:57.90 +42:32:27.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0407 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:27:51.10 +49:05:16.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:38:11.38 +45:07:27.3: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 23:38:11.01 +46:47:20.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:27:51.10 +49:05:16.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:51.10 +49:05:16.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2465 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:38:11.38 +45:07:27.3: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:11.38 +45:07:27.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3654 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 23:38:11.01 +46:47:20.3: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:11.01 +46:47:20.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5480 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-48-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-33-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188419_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188419_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.87 | 00:01:56.11 +47:19:55.1 | 4957 4037 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (209.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188425_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188425_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.81 | 00:35:37.10 +41:05:27.4 | 9147 0649 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (576.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188436_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188436_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.20 | 23:31:04.01 +45:30:30.8 | 1746 2855 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.19 | 23:31:04.04 +45:30:32.7 | 1741 2862 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188439_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188439_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.18 | 23:20:33.58 +43:04:14.9 | 0525 1427 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.34 | 23:20:34.06 +43:04:17.8 | 0520 1434 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188443_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188443_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.00 | 23:32:24.49 +41:06:09.8 | 1812 0177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.62 | 23:32:24.92 +41:06:16.7 | 1806 0184 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188445_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188445_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.05 | 23:18:01.11 +50:12:42.9 | 0552 5789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:18:00.88 +50:12:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188447_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188447_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.03 | 23:27:50.92 +48:14:03.8 | 1472 4516 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.01 | 23:27:51.19 +48:14:02.2 | 1467 4523 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188449_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188449_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.44 | 19:09:34.65 +41:53:42.7 | 4670 0690 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (186950.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188450_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188450_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.30 | 23:18:52.61 +49:01:54.6 | 0587 5064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:18:52.49 +49:01:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188452_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188452_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.91 | 23:19:11.04 +46:32:09.6 | 0519 3539 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.90 | 23:19:11.07 +46:32:13.7 | 0514 3547 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188453_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188453_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.95 | 23:17:50.70 +50:50:18.6 | 0561 6175 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188454_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188454_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.82 | 23:28:19.09 +47:47:18.2 | 1509 4244 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.45 | 23:28:19.69 +47:47:15.8 | 1505 4251 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188455_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188455_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.86 | 23:19:34.41 +44:58:35.4 | 0495 2591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.92 | 23:19:34.14 +44:58:37.2 | 0489 2598 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188457_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188457_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.65 | 00:01:31.01 +50:11:20.4 | 4806 5773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (286.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188458_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188458_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.22 | 23:48:42.58 +46:14:25.1 | 3601 3298 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188459_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188459_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.12 | 23:37:08.81 +44:23:09.6 | 2384 2164 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.26 | 23:37:08.87 +44:23:13.2 | 2378 2170 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188515_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188515_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.82 | 23:34:07.78 +46:20:01.9 | 2078 3352 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:34:07.71 +46:20:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188525_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188525_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.00 | 23:40:14.97 +44:20:44.7 | 2714 2144 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:40:15.00 +44:20:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188543_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188543_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.36 | 23:42:08.59 +45:00:37.2 | 2918 2545 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:42:08.61 +45:00:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188548_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188548_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.23 | 23:59:10.91 +50:27:50.3 | 4564 5925 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (262.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188560_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188560_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.19 | 00:42:36.94 +49:00:32.6 | 9021 5633 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (339.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188564_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188564_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.64 | 23:22:43.96 +50:23:02.4 | 1026 5852 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.71 | 23:22:43.98 +50:23:04.3 | 1021 5859 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188570_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188570_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.23 | 00:37:43.56 +49:18:19.6 | 8487 5715 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (398.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188577_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188577_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.49 | 23:30:03.65 +49:05:51.9 | 1706 5042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188584_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188584_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.70 | 23:17:33.18 +49:02:11.5 | 0454 5077 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:17:33.06 +49:02:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188585_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188585_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.31 | 00:42:10.05 +46:59:29.4 | 9217 4391 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (238.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188588_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188588_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.87 | 23:22:54.37 +51:03:24.9 | 1062 6267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188595_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188595_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.80 | 23:43:16.61 +47:02:00.7 | 3030 3771 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188597_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188597_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.67 | 23:24:19.09 +41:37:22.3 | 0891 0530 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:24:19.17 +41:37:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188605_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188605_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.72 | 23:45:21.04 +44:17:42.4 | 3271 2111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.68 | 23:45:21.07 +44:17:45.7 | 3265 2118 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188606_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188606_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.70 | 23:38:12.60 +43:18:05.2 | 2487 1512 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:38:12.82 +43:18:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188608_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188608_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 12.82 | 23:39:26.02 +45:44:14.5 | 2636 2977 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.93 | 23:39:26.01 +45:44:17.9 | 2631 2984 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188609_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188609_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.81 | 00:23:13.72 +44:16:02.9 | 7427 2393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (299.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188611_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188611_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.74 | 23:52:54.62 +48:26:29.9 | 3990 4652 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188616_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188616_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.72 | 23:55:52.87 +48:10:36.9 | 4303 4506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188617_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188617_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.79 | 23:38:16.64 +43:17:13.3 | 2494 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:38:16.84 +43:17:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188626_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188626_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.06 | 23:25:13.43 +49:39:13.1 | 1248 5392 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.07 | 23:25:13.47 +49:39:20.4 | 1243 5399 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188628_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188628_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.98 | 23:25:30.37 +44:57:44.0 | 1131 2553 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:25:30.28 +44:57:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188631_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188631_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.04 | 23:25:58.00 +42:32:27.6 | 1114 1075 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.04 | 23:25:57.81 +42:32:27.1 | 1108 1082 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188633_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188633_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.15 | 23:44:42.56 +50:52:32.0 | 3152 6120 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188635_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188635_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.78 | 00:25:13.65 +49:19:15.5 | 7218 5507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (415.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188636_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188636_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.98 | 23:37:41.56 +44:25:29.2 | 2438 2192 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:37:41.58 +44:25:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188639_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188639_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.98 | 00:02:01.77 +50:24:34.8 | 4847 5911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (296.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188648_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188648_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.84 | 00:11:30.28 +48:04:32.5 | 5909 4570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188650_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188650_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.16 | 23:29:47.68 +47:28:42.5 | 1648 4057 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:29:47.56 +47:28:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188652_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188652_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.89 | 00:17:52.15 +44:01:05.6 | 6851 2170 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (282.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188655_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188655_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.75 | 00:26:22.73 +49:54:01.2 | 7283 5879 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (466.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188660_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188660_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.55 | 23:20:33.07 +48:18:40.5 | 0728 4613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:20:33.13 +48:18:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188661_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188661_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.12 | 00:03:10.72 +49:50:20.1 | 4986 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (295.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188665_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188665_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.24 | 00:16:53.97 +50:11:03.8 | 6319 5920 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (430.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188670_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188670_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.29 | 23:42:33.66 +48:01:32.4 | 2952 4377 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188671_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188671_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.09 | 00:10:47.09 +50:46:27.4 | 5683 6208 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (389.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188675_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188675_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.10 | 23:36:48.83 +48:34:45.0 | 2372 4717 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188681_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188681_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.06 | 23:19:50.55 +42:26:37.6 | 0418 1059 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188683_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188683_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.28 | 23:43:18.25 +50:52:21.0 | 3017 6116 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (154.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188684_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188684_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.17 | 23:58:46.07 +44:35:21.3 | 4721 2342 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188691_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188691_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.20 | 23:43:18.75 +43:21:02.9 | 3048 1544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:43:18.49 +43:21:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188697_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188697_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.34 | 23:55:31.95 +48:35:43.7 | 4256 4760 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188707_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188707_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.10 | 23:43:05.53 +49:06:02.9 | 3000 5030 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188710_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188710_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.16 | 00:03:00.13 +49:51:03.0 | 4968 5576 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (295.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188717_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188717_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.43 | 23:43:32.34 +47:18:35.6 | 3056 3940 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188720_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188720_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.34 | 23:27:50.92 +49:05:16.3 | 1494 5034 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.18 | 23:27:51.28 +49:05:17.4 | 1489 5041 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188748_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188748_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.20 | 23:20:16.26 +49:43:37.3 | 0754 5476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:20:16.05 +49:43:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188752_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188752_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.28 | 23:46:59.36 +48:47:30.5 | 3392 4852 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188754_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188754_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.52 | 23:55:07.48 +50:10:58.5 | 4176 5730 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (214.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188778_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188778_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.55 | 23:29:40.49 +45:47:42.8 | 1599 3039 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:29:40.55 +45:47:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188786_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188786_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.17 | 00:05:36.63 +44:43:50.5 | 5461 2477 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (218.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188789_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188789_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.37 | 23:38:11.28 +45:07:27.6 | 2501 2609 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.36 | 23:38:11.48 +45:07:27.0 | 2496 2615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188798_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188798_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.55 | 00:05:26.55 +49:33:28.8 | 5222 5415 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (308.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188819_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188819_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.21 | 00:12:30.22 +49:52:54.6 | 5905 5681 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (394.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188828_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188828_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.45 | 23:57:10.55 +48:04:15.4 | 4442 4452 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (164.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188830_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188830_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.36 | 23:55:16.90 +47:19:43.3 | 4265 3991 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188880_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188880_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.37185 | 2461188.87185 | 13.55 | 23:38:10.71 +46:47:20.4 | 2510 3613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-55-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0332.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.55 | 23:38:11.32 +46:47:20.2 | 2504 3619 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188893_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 188893_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.47 | 00:01:10.59 +46:43:06.9 | 4898 3657 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189037_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 189037_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.98 | 23:48:43.32 +46:50:56.2 | 3597 3670 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189040_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 189040_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.93 | 23:57:22.68 +47:21:07.9 | 4485 4015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (141.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189050_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 189050_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 13.86 | 00:07:18.13 +47:33:50.7 | 5504 4217 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (269.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47407_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 47407_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.56 | 23:29:49.85 +48:56:50.4 | 1680 4952 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31971_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 31971_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.94 | 00:40:05.42 +48:50:22.5 | 8782 5477 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (351.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65440_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 65440_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.80 | 00:19:07.71 +47:40:14.4 | 6724 4413 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (324.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85597_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 85597_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.59 | 23:17:59.83 +46:45:14.1 | 0398 3687 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:17:59.88 +46:45:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128556_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 128556_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.74 | 23:54:27.80 +43:12:28.9 | 4288 1479 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06387_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 06387_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 10.50 | 23:14:51.29 +50:46:31.3 | 0270 6160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44230_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 44230_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 10.35 | 23:18:19.12 +48:57:31.0 | 0528 5023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:18:19.11 +48:57:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113172_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 113172_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.31 | 23:26:42.81 +45:14:59.7 | 1269 2722 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:26:42.71 +45:14:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138187_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 138187_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.07 | 23:45:03.02 +43:55:27.2 | 3234 1893 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:45:02.78 +43:55:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95726_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 95726_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.82 | 23:42:08.51 +46:24:34.7 | 2916 3389 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
**** FOUND 23:42:08.77 +46:24:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185525_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 185525_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.63 | 23:50:48.81 +43:05:32.6 | 3882 1398 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 52279_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 11.93 | 00:44:49.18 +47:39:27.7 | 9417 4856 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (228.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114182_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
The candidate 114182_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.37245 | 2461188.87245 | 12.44 | 00:21:04.36 +44:52:57.0 | 7141 2739 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_And-01-Q1b1x1_035701_TTUQ1b1x1_3086321_t2wZD3pv/fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (284.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112226_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
Preparing report for the candidate 112226_fd_And-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-28_03-56-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0333
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9
########### Completed And-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9
###################################################################################
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
00:35:41.85 +44:28:59.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.87184750 -observatory V36
05:25:42.59 +25:12:31.0 Mercury (-0.9mag)
06:47:20.54 +24:50:50.2 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:18:20.63 +13:07:22.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:39:41.31 +21:52:31.6 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:46:02.15 +02:30:04.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:36.10 +20:17:52.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:24.20 +00:12:34.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:51.62 -23:00:45.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:56:47.43 -17:22:03.6 Moon (-11.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 28 04:08 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.87184750:
07:39:37.84 +21:52:43.0 Io (6.0mag)
07:39:38.81 +21:52:40.9 Europa (6.1mag)
07:39:59.74 +21:51:41.5 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:39:11.66 +21:53:52.9 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:40:38.36 +21:28:43.9 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:39:45.85 +21:52:18.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:40:54.05 +21:49:01.6 Elara (17.5mag)
07:41:16.66 +22:10:06.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:46:43.35 +21:53:29.4 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:12.33 +02:29:48.7 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:07.71 +02:30:03.3 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:46:28.51 +02:30:35.1 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:12.05 +02:30:23.4 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:57.26 +02:33:32.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 28 04:08 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.87184750:
17:18:30.15 -33:48:06.2 JWST
10:54:24.40 +46:49:50.9 Chandra
09:18:07.36 -53:03:47.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 28 04:08 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.87184750 -observatory V36
13:19:01.92 -26:49:59.2 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:41:13.91 +30:36:43.1 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:24:17.07 +01:25:51.1 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:31:42.20 +24:43:26.4 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:46:32.12 +12:32:00.0 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:49:57.91 -31:49:46.8 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:42:58.13 -68:13:26.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:07.95 +31:50:01.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:01.15 +14:42:16.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:47:54.72 -51:35:54.5 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:21.27 +31:08:40.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:20:42.93 +26:52:59.7 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:22:21.18 +31:25:49.4 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:45:03.16 +03:21:03.6 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:35:02.84 +21:17:29.5 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:23:32.84 -11:01:35.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:14.62 +65:48:58.1 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:12:11.03 -05:42:44.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:33:08.95 +85:21:12.7 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:56:08.47 +63:59:03.7 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:30:24.51 +26:44:12.8 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:46:03.50 +12:27:17.0 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:18:54.62 +27:50:55.3 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:07:10.47 -16:58:41.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:55:44.06 +36:24:52.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:43:11.09 +53:15:59.5 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:29:03.19 -10:19:50.0 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:36.94 +04:38:42.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:40:38.96 +42:34:18.9 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:19.38 -08:00:29.7 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:03:44.08 -08:08:29.3 9.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:51.42 -02:57:01.8 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:59.81 -00:52:16.5 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:52:48.10 -02:35:11.9 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:54:53.05 +24:08:59.4 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:36:54.34 +26:46:42.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:17:01.47 -07:08:46.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:08:36.61 +32:02:17.8 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:43:11.10 +15:43:09.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:56:19.10 +02:21:20.9 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:19:47.81 +29:13:29.5 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:13:13.52 +25:45:32.4 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:25:03.93 +33:18:03.0 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:31:38.25 +19:18:47.3 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:41:12.17 +18:27:48.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:11:57.51 +18:29:28.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:09:14.34 +19:33:39.0 13.3mag 141P/Machholz
05:11:47.40 +16:41:16.8 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:58:06.86 +14:13:17.6 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:49:49.79 -26:18:17.2 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:06:45.69 +19:12:59.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:24.85 -01:10:52.2 17.4mag 169P/NEAT
23:48:54.63 +00:15:17.9 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
17:00:39.18 -09:10:41.7 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:10:02.52 +35:49:31.7 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:04:11.99 -06:54:39.5 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:35:36.56 +30:22:40.4 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:26:34.72 -24:37:27.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:20:34.39 +08:20:32.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:58:49.44 +20:59:44.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:42:19.39 +42:26:30.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 28 04:08 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 28 04:08 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 28 04:08 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:20:11.486 +09:24:13.02 AT 2026nbc 2026-04-24.43 21.0629
10:03:54.706 +03:13:12.09 AT 2026nbb 2026-05-18.00 23.44
15:12:52.836 +15:19:04.18 SN 2026nba 2026-05-10.29 21.0132
13:32:20.126 +01:34:12.61 SN 2026naz 2026-05-13.26 20.8156
14:56:58.087 +36:57:10.58 AT 2026nay 2026-05-19.27 19.6866
11:46:04.206 +13:54:30.53 AT 2026nax 2026-05-07.19 20.6018
12:09:12.149 +41:27:00.14 AT 2026naw 2026-05-11.29 20.6337
06:25:45.633 -48:14:58.83 AT 2026nav 2026-05-04.02 18.255
06:58:22.644 -55:50:37.36 AT 2026nau 2026-05-18.96 18.984
08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28 AT 2026nat 2026-05-17.28 19.023
10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29 AT 2026nas 2026-05-16.99 23.35
08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80 AT 2026nar 2026-05-18.88 19.333
12:51:56.463 +16:16:53.32 SN 2026naq 2026-05-19.19 19.6515
08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39 AT 2026nap 2026-05-15.16 19.132
12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40 AT 2026nao 2026-05-16.27 20.0531
11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57 AT 2026nan 2026-05-08.18 20.1914
11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49 AT 2026nam 2026-05-16.20 20.4814
02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67 AT 2026nal 2026-05-18.43 15.4
12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23 SN 2026nak 2026-05-18.88 19.67
13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14 AT 2026naj 2026-05-17.91 19.77
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 28 04:08 tns_transients_list.txt