This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.3084 2461188.8084 11.98 19:22:48.95 -26:20:18.1
12.02804 -18.12956 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 -0 0 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:22:48.95 -26:20:18.1: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:22:48.95 -26:20:18.1: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.8084,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.3084 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.3084 2461188.8084 13.05 19:13:15.08 -28:53:12.7
8.71682 -17.11759 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.785 Zwetana 1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:13:15.08 -28:53:12.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:13:15.08 -28:53:12.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.8084,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.3084 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 28.3084 2461188.8084 13.08 19:17:31.31 -25:44:52.1
12.12961 -16.80543 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 2 -1 2 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:17:31.31 -25:44:52.1: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:17:31.31 -25:44:52.1: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.8084,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.3084 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98153534 21.03.2026 11:33:14.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
First image: 2461120.98153534 21.03.2026 11:33:14.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Last image: 2461188.80860231 28.05.2026 07:24:13.240 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8531
Objects passed selection criteria: 8514
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6044
Average stars matched: 5867.25 (97.0756 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 03:35:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98153534 21.03.2026 11:33:14.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
First image: 2461120.98153534 21.03.2026 11:33:14.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Last image: 2461188.80860231 28.05.2026 07:24:13.240 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 97756
Objects passed selection criteria: 97573
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76444.5
Average stars matched: 73301.2 (95.8882 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2001844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 26 15:05:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-83-g49118af2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-26)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 28 03:39:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.80811176
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11
Second-epoch image center 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0874 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11
Second-epoch image center 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1001 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01328 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vJpDmWpj1S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XDKWdGmog9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7fNcB0WsUo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AztfBXdScq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11043 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9160 to 297.0418 deg, Dec -31.2681 to -20.5562 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9160 to 297.0418 deg, Dec -31.2681 to -20.5562 deg
Loaded 13355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7948 out of 8277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8277 out of 11043 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.692650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.692650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11043 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9160 to 297.0418 deg, Dec -31.2681 to -20.5562 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9160 to 297.0418 deg, Dec -31.2681 to -20.5562 deg
Loaded 13355 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7948 out of 8277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8277 out of 11043 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 11117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9157 to 297.0830 deg, Dec -31.2756 to -20.5564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9157 to 297.0830 deg, Dec -31.2756 to -20.5564 deg
Loaded 13401 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7944 out of 8271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8271 out of 11117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vJpDmWpj1S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=860, passed=11043
Got 11043 stars (including 10171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.830 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=254 n_q2=199 n_q3=222 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XDKWdGmog9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=907, passed=11117
Got 11117 stars (including 10198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.752 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.645 n_q1=250 n_q2=199 n_q3=222 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7fNcB0WsUo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=347, passed=3634
Got 3634 stars (including 3284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3634 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.809 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=242 n_q2=170 n_q3=262 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AztfBXdScq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=3596
Got 3596 stars (including 3265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=243 n_q2=166 n_q3=262 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits sigma_overall=0.653 worst_q_ratio=1.272
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits sigma_overall=0.648 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits sigma_overall=0.636 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.604 worst_q_ratio=1.259
reference average sigma_overall=0.6505 worst_q_ratio=1.217
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 20660_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:11.29 -28:46:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11
Second-epoch image center 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0874 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:00.722 -26:00:22.11
Second-epoch image center 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1001 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:50.566 -25:55:38.78
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:50.136 -25:54:51.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01328 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YmL8NGTSY4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5T4ivnVWRk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3abt8Zmlnj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D4so8Ysb3N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 123095 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8787 to 297.0522 deg, Dec -31.2824 to -20.5230 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8787 to 297.0522 deg, Dec -31.2824 to -20.5230 deg
Loaded 13452 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9766 out of 11623 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11623 out of 123095 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.477750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.477750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 123095 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8787 to 297.0522 deg, Dec -31.2824 to -20.5230 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8787 to 297.0522 deg, Dec -31.2824 to -20.5230 deg
Loaded 13452 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9766 out of 11623 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11623 out of 123095 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 122760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8731 to 297.0852 deg, Dec -31.2872 to -20.5228 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8731 to 297.0852 deg, Dec -31.2872 to -20.5228 deg
Loaded 13490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9778 out of 11625 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11625 out of 122760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YmL8NGTSY4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=10487, passed=123073
Got 123073 stars (including 112418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 123073 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.849 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.666 n_q1=272 n_q2=209 n_q3=182 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.364
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5T4ivnVWRk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=10441, passed=122742
Got 122742 stars (including 112126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 122742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.798 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.679 n_q1=272 n_q2=201 n_q3=189 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3abt8Zmlnj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1995, passed=51032
Got 51032 stars (including 48957 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51032 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.857 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.627 n_q1=259 n_q2=183 n_q3=233 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D4so8Ysb3N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1945, passed=50261
Got 50261 stars (including 48233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 294 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.888 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=253 n_q2=182 n_q3=230 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.468
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-23-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_033313_TTUQ2b1x1_2023146_AVcGjfBt/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:24:17.18 -26:25:01.2: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:21:35.71 -27:35:17.6: 12.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:19:08.17 -29:48:40.9: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:10:48.24 -26:19:11.0: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:11:12.34 -26:44:23.7: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 18:53:51.49 -23:48:38.8: 12.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:11:06.98 -24:24:40.2: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:16:05.03 -23:28:22.5: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 18:48:12.81 -24:42:11.4: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 18:59:05.23 -29:17:05.2: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:24:17.18 -26:25:01.2: 12.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:17.18 -26:25:01.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7133 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:21:35.71 -27:35:17.6: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:35.71 -27:35:17.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3681 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:10:48.24 -26:19:11.0: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:19:08.17 -29:48:40.9: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:11:12.34 -26:44:23.7: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:48.24 -26:19:11.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7598 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:08.17 -29:48:40.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5797 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 18:53:51.49 -23:48:38.8: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:12.34 -26:44:23.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9339 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:51.49 -23:48:38.8: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1551 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:11:06.98 -24:24:40.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 18:48:12.81 -24:42:11.4: 12.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:06.98 -24:24:40.2: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6275 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:12.81 -24:42:11.4: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4407 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:16:05.03 -23:28:22.5: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 18:59:05.23 -29:17:05.2: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:05.03 -23:28:22.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1822 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:05.23 -29:17:05.2: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6071 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 18:45:38.79 -28:45:48.2: 10.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:04:36.47 -27:07:41.9: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:22:48.95 -26:20:18.1: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 18:45:38.79 -28:45:48.2: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:38.79 -28:45:48.2: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7416 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:04:36.47 -27:07:41.9: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:22:48.95 -26:20:18.1: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:36.47 -27:07:41.9: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7781 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:17:31.31 -25:44:52.1: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-33-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0530.fits at 19:13:15.08 -28:53:12.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:17:31.31 -25:44:52.1: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-34-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits at 19:13:15.08 -28:53:12.7: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144855_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144860_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144860_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144863_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144863_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144864_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144864_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:31.44 -28:11:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144869_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144869_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144872_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144872_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:27.72 -24:30:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144894_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144894_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:35.84 -26:28:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144897_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144897_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:11.01 -26:17:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144902_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144902_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144904_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144904_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144909_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144909_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144910_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144910_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:24.25 -27:44:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144964_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144964_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144979_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 144979_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:29.00 -27:40:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145005_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145005_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:48.13 -29:46:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145010_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145010_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.73 -26:20:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145026_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145026_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:35.16 -21:59:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145050_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145050_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.48 -22:34:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145062_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145062_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:19.09 -24:15:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145068_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145068_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:46.29 -22:40:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145078_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145078_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:59.00 -25:18:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145097_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145097_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:59.69 -22:17:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145099_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
Preparing report for the candidate 145099_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145123_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:15.21 -22:18:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145129_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145129_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.17 -26:18:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145147_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145147_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.94 -25:53:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145152_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145152_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:59.20 -27:37:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:29.40 -24:06:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145174_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145174_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:02.40 -22:34:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145197_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145197_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:57.07 -23:16:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145207_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145207_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:34.67 -21:50:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145218_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:31.49 -25:39:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145236_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145236_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.82 -23:15:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145241_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145241_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.07 -25:11:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145243_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145243_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:24.80 -23:14:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:47.83 -27:47:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:45.78 -22:18:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:13.46 -29:47:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145309_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145309_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:12.54 -21:41:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145319_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145319_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:26.49 -24:21:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145323_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145323_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:35.60 -28:50:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:55.24 -27:24:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145358_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145358_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:31.68 -23:01:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
Preparing report for the candidate 145380_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145408_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145408_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:57.56 -22:02:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
Preparing report for the candidate 145426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145439_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 145439_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:11.26 -27:05:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17963_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 17963_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:33.18 -29:04:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 56801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:07.62 -25:56:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48540_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 48540_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:59.80 -26:38:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83843_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 83843_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:04.84 -22:14:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112231_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 112231_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:32.49 -23:17:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136813_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 136813_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:38.29 -28:25:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117795_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 117795_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.69 -23:56:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61918_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 61918_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:57.26 -25:26:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22571_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 22571_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.19 -28:51:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135232_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200
The candidate 135232_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-28_02-24-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0200 did not pass the final checks