Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461188.6543,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260528.1543 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Gem-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1219231 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1219231 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits_preview.png'
Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits

renamed 'Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits_preview.png'
Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 516.5709
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 634.3629
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3287.5757
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 756.0353
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3313.6928
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 759.7048
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 6.36423
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.7199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T22:41:40.8766734' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T03:41:40.8766734' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.153945324 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T03:41:50.7928753' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.1540600928 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 119.998139264894 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996008784734 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.6208333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 290.723055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.38926015832844 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.7199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.7199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits :)
Spent 0.612728 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-27T22:42:17.6156708' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-28T03:42:17.6156708' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61188.154370544 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-28T03:42:27.5181134' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61188.1544851619 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 119.998139285912 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996008853369 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.5038888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 290.786388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.39982991173137 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits :)
Spent 0.604015 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/d_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits

fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461188.65406106
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uGvi0fDRkV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SmmHNdJSnX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qvvXkDJFrZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n2d3WtHwrj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uGvi0fDRkV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=222 n_q2=286 n_q3=200 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SmmHNdJSnX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=225 n_q2=287 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qvvXkDJFrZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=272, passed=4296
Got 4296 stars (including 4023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=235 n_q2=287 n_q3=215 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n2d3WtHwrj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=4267
Got 4267 stars (including 3999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.677 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=234 n_q2=283 n_q3=212 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.393
ref2=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.324
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.541 worst_q_ratio=1.251
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.3585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:23.168 +30:02:17.20
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:22.269 +30:02:22.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00359 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T546XYipLV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HhC6j3dD73
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HchpKf2Zn8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.esOGLf79Ny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.T546XYipLV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6475, passed=84020
Got 84020 stars (including 77437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=232 n_q2=288 n_q3=192 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HhC6j3dD73 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6514, passed=84110
Got 84110 stars (including 77507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=231 n_q2=290 n_q3=190 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HchpKf2Zn8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1178, passed=28340
Got 28340 stars (including 27125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.609 n_q1=247 n_q2=263 n_q3=231 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.esOGLf79Ny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1223, passed=28567
Got 28567 stars (including 27306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=254 n_q2=259 n_q3=229 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:15:44.87 +31:46:25.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:24:04.34 +31:19:16.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:16:02.05 +30:26:36.1: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:56:08.69 +29:50:56.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:15:44.87 +31:46:25.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:24:04.34 +31:19:16.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:16:02.05 +30:26:36.1: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:15:44.87 +31:46:25.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2779 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:04.34 +31:19:16.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4229 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:02.05 +30:26:36.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9766 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:54:48.82 +32:17:11.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:56:08.69 +29:50:56.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:08.69 +29:50:56.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5785 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:54:48.82 +32:17:11.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:48.82 +32:17:11.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7572 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:55.43 +26:51:52.9: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:11:46.24 +25:57:31.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:51:49.34 +27:30:35.1: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:49:18.99 +29:02:25.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:08:30.28 +28:59:12.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:55.43 +26:51:52.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:55.43 +26:51:52.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4234 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:11:46.24 +25:57:31.5: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:46.24 +25:57:31.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2561 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:51:49.34 +27:30:35.1: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:49.34 +27:30:35.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1645 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:08:30.28 +28:59:12.9: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:49:18.99 +29:02:25.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:08:30.28 +28:59:12.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6311 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99204.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98823_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.60 | 08:05:38.52 +28:09:57.7 | 4104 4335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:05:38.61 +28:09:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98827_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98827_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 12.98 | 08:16:02.02 +30:26:36.2 | 2746 2947 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.98 | 08:16:02.08 +30:26:36.0 | 2744 2948 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98828_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 11.98 | 08:29:47.75 +27:35:48.0 | 0848 4620 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:29:47.77 +27:35:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98829_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 11.92 | 07:59:11.63 +27:22:44.5 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98849_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98849_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 10.43 | 08:27:05.43 +27:03:22.2 | 1201 4964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98906_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98906_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 11.42 | 08:00:28.44 +30:12:14.4 | 4774 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98930_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98930_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 11.91 | 08:14:29.68 +27:17:27.6 | 2914 4861 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:14:29.70 +27:17:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98964_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98964_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 12.28 | 08:15:44.82 +31:46:25.6 | 2798 2142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.28 | 08:15:44.92 +31:46:25.2 | 2796 2143 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98969_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98969_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.28 | 07:43:57.67 +25:46:40.3 | 7068 5706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:43:57.69 +25:46:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98972_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98972_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 12.41 | 08:24:04.35 +31:19:16.4 | 1711 2385 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.43 | 08:24:04.33 +31:19:16.8 | 1709 2386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98976_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98976_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.27 | 07:53:37.09 +26:45:21.8 | 5730 5161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:53:37.07 +26:45:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98978_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98978_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.39 | 08:06:15.60 +26:14:19.4 | 4024 5504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:06:15.59 +26:14:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98991_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98991_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.57 | 08:14:34.91 +26:43:05.7 | 2897 5209 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:14:34.91 +26:43:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98995_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 98995_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.94 | 08:20:04.96 +27:11:32.3 | 2157 4909 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:20:04.95 +27:11:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99007_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99007_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 12.53 | 07:56:08.69 +29:50:56.6 | 5346 3298 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.64 | 07:56:08.70 +29:50:55.9 | 5344 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99013_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99013_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.62 | 07:53:25.46 +26:44:40.7 | 5757 5167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:53:25.46 +26:44:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99021_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99021_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.65 | 07:42:27.93 +27:13:56.0 | 7224 4812 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99029_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99029_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.64 | 07:56:56.09 +31:10:01.6 | 5223 2505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:56:56.05 +31:10:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99036_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99036_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.76 | 07:56:12.67 +29:49:10.8 | 5335 3317 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:56:12.70 +29:49:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99037_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99037_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.32 | 08:29:10.50 +29:28:10.5 | 0988 3483 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:29:10.53 +29:28:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99041_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.65 | 07:43:37.29 +32:27:29.3 | 6905 1656 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:43:37.32 +32:27:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99047_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99047_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 12.74 | 07:54:48.86 +32:17:10.7 | 5480 1820 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.78 | 07:54:48.79 +32:17:11.8 | 5478 1821 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99058_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99058_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.06 | 08:20:25.94 +26:46:27.2 | 2103 5162 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:20:25.96 +26:46:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99059_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99059_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.23 | 08:24:58.58 +28:34:18.7 | 1526 4051 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:24:58.58 +28:34:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99069_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99069_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.37 | 08:13:42.01 +30:25:07.7 | 3049 2968 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:13:41.97 +30:25:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99076_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.06 | 08:16:55.79 +30:20:13.8 | 2625 3010 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:16:55.82 +30:20:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99077_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99077_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.15 | 08:20:02.32 +28:27:16.6 | 2185 4142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:20:02.29 +28:27:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99079_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99079_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.03 | 08:10:16.86 +28:49:14.0 | 3488 3939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:10:16.88 +28:49:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99082_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.21 | 08:20:11.90 +31:29:35.2 | 2216 2299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:20:11.98 +31:29:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99104_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99104_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.02 | 08:07:06.06 +27:04:17.1 | 3910 4999 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:07:05.95 +27:04:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99121_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99121_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.18 | 08:19:59.46 +27:14:38.7 | 2171 4877 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:19:59.47 +27:14:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99123_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99123_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 13.40 | 08:19:55.64 +26:51:52.7 | 2175 5108 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.47 | 08:19:55.22 +26:51:53.0 | 2174 5108 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99139_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99139_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 13.33 | 08:11:46.18 +25:57:32.9 | 3275 5673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.21 | 08:11:46.30 +25:57:30.1 | 3273 5675 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99149_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99149_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.49 | 07:53:11.91 +27:54:07.7 | 5766 4465 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:53:12.02 +27:54:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99159_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99159_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 13.25 | 07:51:49.26 +27:30:35.7 | 5960 4695 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.11 | 07:51:49.43 +27:30:34.5 | 5957 4697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99178_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.16 | 07:56:18.14 +27:01:56.4 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99189_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99189_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.16 | 08:13:12.70 +30:30:28.1 | 3113 2915 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99204_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 99204_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99215_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99215_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.67 | 08:03:47.98 +27:46:23.0 | 4351 4571 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 08:03:47.96 +27:46:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99228_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 99228_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 28.15406 | 2461188.65406 | 13.78 | 08:08:30.24 +28:59:12.4 | 3726 3838 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-41-40_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 13.55 | 08:08:30.32 +28:59:13.3 | 3724 3839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 28.15449 | 2461188.65449 | 12.37 | 07:45:27.76 +30:46:40.6 | 6717 2686 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-28_CI_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_012713_TTUQ2b1x1_2611012_lH9o5h4e/fd_Gem-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-27_22-42-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0015.fits |
**** FOUND 07:45:27.76 +30:46:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:49:18.99 +29:02:25.5
########### Completed Gem-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
07:49:18.99 +29:02:25.5
###################################################################################
07:49:18.99 +29:02:25.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.65406106 -observatory V36
05:23:53.59 +25:10:10.7 Mercury (-0.9mag)
06:46:12.06 +24:51:50.0 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:17:42.77 +13:04:04.1 Mars (1.3mag)
07:39:31.04 +21:52:55.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:57.75 +02:29:39.5 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:57:32.89 +20:17:43.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:23.15 +00:12:28.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:52.09 -23:00:41.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:50:13.79 -16:27:25.2 Moon (-11.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 28 01:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.65406106:
07:39:25.11 +21:53:12.4 Io (6.0mag)
07:39:24.87 +21:53:14.9 Europa (6.1mag)
07:39:48.68 +21:52:08.9 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:39:01.26 +21:54:16.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:40:28.87 +21:29:08.6 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:39:29.60 +21:53:01.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:40:44.85 +21:49:32.2 Elara (17.5mag)
07:41:05.63 +22:10:37.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:46:33.58 +21:53:52.7 Carme (18.8mag)
00:46:07.38 +02:29:22.8 Titan (8.7mag)
00:46:03.05 +02:29:36.0 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:46:23.79 +02:30:08.0 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:46:08.34 +02:29:57.2 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:46:53.14 +02:33:10.0 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 28 01:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461188.65406106:
17:19:17.81 -33:42:38.8 JWST
22:27:47.63 -38:12:12.4 Chandra
08:12:06.42 -43:03:44.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 28 01:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461188.65406106 -observatory V36
13:19:12.34 -26:51:22.6 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:40:50.63 +30:37:06.4 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:24:29.34 +01:25:24.5 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:31:21.01 +24:43:00.6 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:45:02.75 +12:44:09.2 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:50:04.61 -31:48:44.0 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:42:45.55 -68:13:41.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:45:03.24 +31:49:52.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:19:06.30 +14:41:21.8 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
19:46:32.67 -51:35:20.9 17.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:14:22.52 +31:08:04.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:20:26.68 +26:52:51.3 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:22:12.78 +31:26:13.1 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:44:56.89 +03:20:17.1 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:35:10.82 +21:16:59.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:23:38.29 -11:01:39.6 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:14.72 +65:48:02.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:12:40.88 -05:41:39.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:33:45.06 +85:23:55.7 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:55:51.98 +63:58:44.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:30:03.45 +26:42:44.2 13.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:46:14.46 +12:25:50.6 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:19:00.24 +27:46:53.0 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:06:57.27 -17:00:01.4 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:55:31.56 +36:27:16.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:43:25.44 +53:16:29.8 17.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:28:39.34 -10:19:03.0 12.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:40:38.91 +04:38:33.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:40:13.13 +42:33:11.1 15.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:19.87 -08:06:14.4 16.3mag A/2026 E1
20:03:20.17 -08:08:18.2 9.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:17:56.83 -02:54:52.7 17.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:58.06 -00:52:13.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:52:39.16 -02:35:06.3 17.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:54:32.48 +24:07:07.4 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:36:26.44 +26:50:16.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:16:48.72 -07:09:48.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:07:54.72 +32:00:16.4 16.6mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:42:39.71 +15:41:12.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:55:48.25 +02:18:10.5 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:19:05.61 +29:11:52.8 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:12:38.45 +25:43:08.0 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:24:33.41 +33:18:14.0 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:31:16.21 +19:24:30.7 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:40:50.53 +18:26:46.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:11:31.17 +18:28:38.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:08:11.70 +19:34:15.5 13.2mag 141P/Machholz
05:10:45.23 +16:39:33.8 13.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:56:57.51 +14:10:23.1 10.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:49:39.88 -26:20:20.5 17.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:06:04.31 +19:07:09.6 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:21.51 -01:14:04.8 17.5mag 169P/NEAT
23:48:18.63 +00:12:32.4 18.0mag 220P/McNaught
17:00:49.82 -09:11:44.1 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:09:32.51 +35:49:48.6 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:03:38.05 -06:59:49.0 16.7mag 260P/McNaught
03:35:02.72 +30:19:58.9 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
22:24:30.20 -24:54:53.4 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:20:41.48 +08:20:40.2 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:58:39.75 +21:00:00.5 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:41:57.99 +42:27:23.6 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 3.0K May 28 01:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 28 01:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 28 01:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:46:46.014 +33:52:05.28 AT 2026nat 2026-05-17.28 19.023
10:01:59.220 +03:28:24.29 AT 2026nas 2026-05-16.99 23.35
08:33:18.216 +19:20:44.80 AT 2026nar 2026-05-18.88 19.333
12:51:56.470 +16:16:53.47 SN 2026naq 2026-05-19.19 19.6515
08:02:36.297 +15:58:21.39 AT 2026nap 2026-05-15.16 19.132
12:35:48.509 -01:02:49.40 AT 2026nao 2026-05-16.27 20.0531
11:46:27.658 +23:07:49.57 AT 2026nan 2026-05-08.18 20.1914
11:15:28.304 -01:08:27.49 AT 2026nam 2026-05-16.20 20.4814
02:05:49.697 -30:29:09.67 AT 2026nal 2026-05-18.43 15.4
12:23:18.242 +28:09:07.23 SN 2026nak 2026-05-18.88 19.67
13:47:06.036 +18:15:15.14 AT 2026naj 2026-05-17.91 19.77
15:46:38.025 -55:50:28.50 AT 2026nai 2026-05-17.00 19.04
11:40:58.130 +28:13:30.16 AT 2026nah 2026-05-17.94 19.877
23:21:04.257 +34:14:10.38 SN 2026nag 2026-05-13.19 18.36
14:12:48.859 +54:00:36.42 AT 2026naf 2026-05-18.36 18.96
09:57:42.622 +27:44:09.60 AT 2026nae 2026-05-17.90 20.056
00:31:01.441 -13:38:51.90 SN 2026nad 2026-05-18.40 15.715
19:56:03.307 -21:50:03.06 AT 2026nac 2026-05-17.54 19.217
16:20:28.851 +36:44:11.28 AT 2026nab 2026-05-18.05 19.657
13:52:38.978 -42:27:39.20 AT 2026naa 2026-05-16.89 19.587
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 28 01:29 tns_transients_list.txt