Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 608443,2461185.8095,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 608443 20260525.3095 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-03-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-03-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 948161 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 948161 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits_preview.png'
Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits

renamed 'Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits_preview.png'
Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 554.0501
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 675.2684
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2070.4676
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 679.6392
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2069.4969
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 696.3930
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.73697
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.024
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T02:24:00.2523939' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T07:24:00.2523939' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.30833625 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T07:24:10.1541364' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.3084508567 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 59.9970642626128 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997870568877 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.5294444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.56138888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.70785977479469 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 345.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/d_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits :)
Spent 0.516328 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/d_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 18.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T02:27:01.7378976' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T07:27:01.7378976' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.3104367708 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T07:27:11.6387668' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.3105513658 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 59.9970641302987 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.4997872255008 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.5586111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 2.73444444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.70442271707466 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29475 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 345.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/d_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits :)
Spent 0.528475 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/d_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits

fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.80845199
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00139 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00139 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mxcqtyHWe5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nd9bJAdGQQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.28UY89an50
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ocHjtOfxzr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1399 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1399 deg
Loaded 18140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8370 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 16361 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.901900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.901900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1399 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1399 deg
Loaded 18140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8370 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 16361 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 16218 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9568 to 103.5000 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9568 to 103.5000 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1564 deg
Loaded 18163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8337 out of 8977 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8977 out of 16218 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.0 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
4.3 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mxcqtyHWe5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1344, passed=16361
Got 16361 stars (including 14997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=221 n_q2=262 n_q3=230 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nd9bJAdGQQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1323, passed=16218
Got 16218 stars (including 14876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=219 n_q2=268 n_q3=229 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.28UY89an50 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=233, passed=4990
Got 4990 stars (including 4755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4990 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 804 to 865 (Dec 70.8 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=283 n_q2=136 n_q3=308 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ocHjtOfxzr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=5218
Got 5218 stars (including 4900 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=288 n_q2=138 n_q3=282 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.148
ref2=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.056
new1=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.243
new2=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.3755 worst_q_ratio=1.102
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 21013_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 10.53 | 02:20:15.20 +78:45:36.1 | 1885 4455 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:20:15.27 +78:45:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21208_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 21208_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.05 | 05:00:07.68 +79:43:53.2 | 6318 4848 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:00:07.68 +79:43:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21265_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 21265_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.57 | 02:28:19.35 +76:43:48.6 | 1696 3216 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:28:19.49 +76:43:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09204_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 09204_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 10.33 | 03:12:18.01 +76:51:19.6 | 3188 2919 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 03:12:18.09 +76:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 941.0'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:41.403 +77:27:27.65
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:42.742 +77:27:25.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00139 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00139 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fw8yE0N7Le
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tgU6Sh53J8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b3xYXp72Gl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cPqHIJt40u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.773250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.773250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1563 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1563 deg
Loaded 18244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7245 out of 9101 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9101 out of 111565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fw8yE0N7Le (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=9167, passed=111229
Got 111229 stars (including 101869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=226 n_q2=264 n_q3=236 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tgU6Sh53J8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=9221, passed=111540
Got 111540 stars (including 102140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=228 n_q2=271 n_q3=223 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b3xYXp72Gl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1378, passed=27085
Got 27085 stars (including 25685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=267 n_q2=137 n_q3=312 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cPqHIJt40u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1461, passed=39505
Got 39505 stars (including 37984 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=280 n_q2=138 n_q3=281 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:10:04.25 +72:51:20.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 06:03:17.16 +78:07:00.1: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:11:03.78 +72:59:00.5: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:23:24.27 +76:43:29.0: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:02:46.55 +74:05:16.9: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:23:24.27 +76:43:29.0: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 06:03:17.16 +78:07:00.1: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:24.27 +76:43:29.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5046 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:17.16 +78:07:00.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0462 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:10:04.25 +72:51:20.7: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:02:46.55 +74:05:16.9: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:11:03.78 +72:59:00.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:04.25 +72:51:20.7: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8584 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:46.55 +74:05:16.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5484 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:11:03.78 +72:59:00.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7520 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5445 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54605.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130955_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130955_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.30845 | 2461185.80845 | 13.01 | 06:03:16.63 +78:07:01.3 | 8395 4761 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.07 | 06:03:17.68 +78:06:59.0 | 8395 4760 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130964_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130964_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.30845 | 2461185.80845 | 12.73 | 05:23:24.01 +76:43:28.0 | 7623 3401 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.46 | 05:23:24.53 +76:43:29.9 | 7622 3401 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130969_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130969_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.30845 | 2461185.80845 | 13.11 | 02:10:03.47 +72:51:22.8 | 0131 1296 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.81 | 02:10:05.03 +72:51:18.7 | 0132 1296 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.00 | 03:45:06.99 +78:02:19.1 | 4317 3536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 03:45:05.97 +78:02:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.30845 | 2461185.80845 | 13.07 | 02:11:03.56 +72:58:59.9 | 0204 1349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.70 | 02:11:04.01 +72:59:01.0 | 0205 1351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130977_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130977_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 25.30845 | 2461185.80845 | 12.56 | 02:02:46.40 +74:05:17.9 | 0162 2110 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-24-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.55 | 02:02:46.70 +74:05:15.9 | 0162 2111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130978_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 130978_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.59 | 02:28:03.03 +79:32:22.9 | 2260 4817 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:28:03.11 +79:32:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131122_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131122_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 10.04 | 06:07:14.06 +75:39:24.6 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131187_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131187_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 10.59 | 04:11:47.83 +80:17:36.4 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131250_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131250_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.10 | 05:00:07.69 +79:43:53.4 | 6318 4848 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:00:07.67 +79:43:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131436_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131436_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.50 | 04:27:48.22 +81:02:26.3 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131460_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131460_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.61 | 03:41:25.10 +81:55:51.5 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131481_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131481_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.48 | 05:17:50.61 +73:25:42.5 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131665_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131665_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.21 | 02:15:44.66 +72:16:19.3 | 0228 0868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:15:44.65 +72:16:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131813_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 131813_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.45 | 02:26:58.58 +72:25:03.5 | 0750 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:26:58.86 +72:25:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132010_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132010_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.47 | 03:30:27.95 +73:23:37.7 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132058_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132058_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.96 | 01:18:03.32 +79:03:44.6 | 0376 5506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 01:18:03.21 +79:03:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132060_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132060_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.27 | 05:16:51.64 +76:43:25.3 | 7411 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132093_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132093_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.00 | 01:49:56.35 +80:54:19.5 | 1702 5978 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 01:49:56.09 +80:54:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132186_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132186_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.87 | 04:17:23.49 +74:55:40.5 | 5551 1735 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132195_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132195_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.04 | 01:28:49.97 +77:56:52.4 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132209_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132209_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.10 | 01:09:10.90 +80:05:00.2 | 0565 6149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 01:09:10.98 +80:04:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132219_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132219_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.79 | 02:36:50.25 +74:55:16.1 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132332_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132332_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.64 | 05:19:00.97 +81:13:19.0 | 6458 5858 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 05:19:01.00 +81:13:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132408_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132408_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.00 | 02:24:18.44 +79:44:48.0 | 2207 4970 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:24:18.78 +79:44:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132507_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132507_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.21 | 02:09:12.04 +73:51:58.1 | 0352 1876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132510_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132510_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.27 | 02:16:13.59 +75:11:42.1 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132554_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132554_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.78 | 04:49:09.88 +75:57:34.1 | 6615 2570 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:49:09.62 +75:57:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132579_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132579_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.30 | 01:50:57.44 +79:58:39.4 | 1452 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132625_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132625_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.41 | 01:55:51.41 +74:53:20.3 | 0129 2673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132626_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132626_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.98 | 04:56:35.64 +78:21:53.3 | 6462 4031 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:56:35.83 +78:21:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132627_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132627_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.31 | 01:32:34.20 +77:23:33.4 | 0163 4414 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 01:32:34.10 +77:23:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.28 | 04:34:10.78 +76:36:25.0 | 6005 2830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132713_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132713_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.35 | 01:30:32.59 +79:21:11.4 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132781_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132781_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.06 | 04:15:13.73 +76:18:24.8 | 5373 2549 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:15:13.48 +76:18:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132785_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132785_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.34 | 02:38:13.89 +76:47:24.0 | 2034 3142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:38:13.76 +76:47:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132812_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132812_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.50 | 01:35:11.14 +77:11:29.6 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132849_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132849_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.80 | 01:49:35.81 +75:50:41.9 | 0193 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132851_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132851_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.91 | 06:15:20.10 +76:58:05.9 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132855_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132855_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.65 | 02:45:49.03 +73:17:23.1 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.64 | 02:22:44.73 +76:27:54.5 | 1455 3133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132873_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132873_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.12 | 06:01:21.59 +75:42:19.4 | 9133 3495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132913_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132913_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.56 | 02:02:50.08 +76:12:23.7 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132923_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132923_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.81 | 01:47:07.02 +76:37:34.5 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132951_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 132951_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.98 | 02:22:28.00 +74:54:37.0 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 10.42 | 03:12:18.07 +76:51:19.7 | 3188 2919 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 03:12:18.15 +76:51:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 49474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.33 | 02:56:05.72 +78:09:29.5 | 2815 3788 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:56:05.81 +78:09:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94539_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 94539_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.17 | 03:45:42.73 +74:16:00.7 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47131_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 47131_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.59 | 04:30:03.65 +77:32:46.4 | 5764 3359 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 04:30:03.51 +77:32:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72392_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 72392_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.51 | 02:52:40.13 +73:22:31.4 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 56452_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 13.39 | 01:49:14.26 +76:51:01.8 | 0482 3839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11544_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 11544_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 12.53 | 04:24:53.87 +81:18:18.1 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54605_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 54605_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 25.31055 | 2461185.81055 | 11.63 | 02:28:19.40 +76:43:49.0 | 1696 3216 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_024127_TTUQ1b1x1_2256222_OBgjpv3j/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_02-27-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 02:28:19.51 +76:43:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3
########### Completed Cam-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3
###################################################################################
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
04:52:06.38 +76:12:12.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.80845199 -observatory V36
04:59:37.95 +24:27:58.0 Mercury (-1.2mag)
06:31:19.36 +25:01:17.1 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:09:32.68 +12:20:17.6 Mars (1.3mag)
07:37:18.74 +21:57:56.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:45:00.13 +02:24:10.3 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:56:51.37 +20:15:40.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:09.42 +00:11:08.3 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:58.00 -22:59:47.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:38:48.57 -00:33:25.9 Moon (-10.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 25 02:46 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.80845199:
07:37:25.57 +21:57:39.7 Io (5.9mag)
07:37:25.42 +21:57:40.5 Europa (6.1mag)
07:37:02.92 +21:58:41.7 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:37:05.03 +21:58:26.8 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:38:27.10 +21:34:21.6 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:37:16.61 +21:58:02.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:38:46.45 +21:55:59.8 Elara (17.5mag)
07:38:43.49 +22:17:10.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:44:27.87 +21:58:43.1 Carme (18.8mag)
00:44:58.35 +02:23:54.1 Titan (8.7mag)
00:44:59.03 +02:24:25.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:45:21.13 +02:24:07.4 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:45:15.48 +02:24:06.3 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:45:58.76 +02:28:04.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 25 02:47 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.80845199:
17:16:02.73 -33:11:35.2 JWST
19:47:47.81 +01:53:08.7 Chandra
19:35:39.33 +07:34:58.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 25 02:46 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.80845199 -observatory V36
13:21:31.38 -27:09:00.6 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:35:50.56 +30:41:39.7 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:27:05.83 +01:18:45.0 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:26:46.50 +24:37:00.7 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
09:25:12.17 +15:20:17.8 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:51:24.52 -31:35:18.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:40:03.43 -68:17:08.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:44:02.88 +31:47:53.5 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:20:11.54 +14:29:04.9 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:36.66 +31:00:28.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:16:55.85 +26:50:49.5 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:20:25.14 +31:31:03.2 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:43:36.80 +03:09:50.7 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:36:52.69 +21:10:04.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:24:48.78 -11:02:35.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:16:09.34 +65:36:04.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:19:01.57 -05:28:04.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:42:58.86 +85:58:29.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:52:22.51 +63:54:24.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:25:28.40 +26:22:33.0 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:48:36.73 +12:06:30.4 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:07.50 +26:54:17.4 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:04:06.64 -17:17:45.2 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:52:50.03 +36:58:33.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:46:46.71 +53:21:34.1 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:23:09.18 -10:07:29.3 12.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:41:06.03 +04:36:11.0 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:34:33.91 +42:18:17.8 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:31.27 -09:23:22.3 16.2mag A/2026 E1
19:58:02.34 -08:07:20.4 9.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:19:09.19 -02:26:45.6 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:37.21 -00:51:51.0 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:50:44.64 -02:34:20.1 17.7mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:50:05.75 +23:42:35.8 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:30:23.41 +27:36:04.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:14:01.24 -07:23:39.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:52.66 +31:32:15.0 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:35:53.41 +15:15:24.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
00:49:04.52 +01:36:11.0 15.3mag 88P/Howell
04:09:58.75 +28:49:37.5 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
02:05:07.29 +25:11:21.9 18.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:17:58.96 +33:19:50.9 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:26:29.82 +20:39:03.9 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:36:10.26 +18:13:07.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:05:49.44 +18:17:21.2 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:54:27.07 +19:40:05.4 12.9mag 141P/Machholz
04:57:08.70 +16:14:58.2 12.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:41:52.91 +13:30:28.3 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:47:32.79 -26:47:42.5 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:57:11.00 +17:50:08.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:26.65 -01:55:05.0 17.6mag 169P/NEAT
17:03:01.04 -09:26:04.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
07:03:02.17 +35:52:37.7 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:56:18.54 -08:06:34.8 16.8mag 260P/McNaught
03:27:47.30 +29:44:19.2 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
21:56:25.41 -28:36:08.1 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:22:13.05 +08:21:52.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:56:35.26 +21:03:17.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:37:20.34 +42:38:41.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 25 02:46 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 25 02:46 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 25 02:46 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:01:49.510 +16:19:54.29 AT 2026mxc 2026-05-03.86 20.43
13:07:34.620 +48:36:49.59 AT 2026mxb 2026-04-28.84 21.35
12:41:13.920 +28:45:38.69 AT 2026mxa 2026-04-28.86 20.83
17:59:59.500 +26:37:11.25 AT 2026mwz 2026-04-27.89 21.34
12:28:50.550 +41:12:21.53 AT 2026mwy 2026-04-24.82 20.86
14:02:54.920 +52:50:36.73 AT 2026mwx 2026-04-19.86 21.51
12:33:02.940 +24:34:37.91 AT 2026mww 2026-04-15.87 21.01
16:40:46.740 +26:54:33.05 AT 2026mwv 2026-04-12.76 21.07
13:03:52.940 +23:49:42.82 AT 2026mwu 2026-04-03.87 20.84
17:45:23.200 +33:15:24.68 AT 2026mwt 2026-03-30.83 20.98
13:11:30.630 +21:00:44.67 AT 2026mws 2026-03-23.71 21.69
12:21:33.740 +27:53:15.15 AT 2026mwr 2026-03-23.70 21
14:26:34.570 +01:19:55.58 AT 2026mwq 2026-05-11.69 22.6
13:16:20.230 +02:48:58.63 AT 2026mwp 2026-05-03.68 21.84
13:17:52.545 -50:04:09.72 AT 2026mwo 2026-04-12.49 19.69
11:28:16.230 +42:22:52.41 AT 2026mwn 2026-05-12.89 19.9
11:41:30.831 -38:28:36.99 AT 2026mwm 2026-05-15.38 19.89
12:21:50.967 -07:22:18.86 AT 2026mwl 2026-05-10.42 20.48
11:55:49.750 -03:35:44.72 AT 2026mwk 2026-05-09.42 20.09
13:09:13.990 -35:00:02.50 AT 2026mwj 2026-05-15.42 19.65
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 25 02:46 tns_transients_list.txt