NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Lup-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 04 16.31685    2461146.81685    13.85    15:55:54.57 -32:57:55.4   6869 3920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 18.32494    2461148.82494    13.74    15:55:54.50 -32:57:56.6   6923 3744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.52    15:55:54.56 -32:57:55.2   6870 3912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.72    15:55:54.61 -32:57:55.1   6872 3918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 25.2096  2461185.7096  12.62  15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1
341.83136  15.63329 galactic  Lup  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.7 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 2"  ASAS J155554-3257.9           
Type: MISC|SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    12.700   V       Y     0.780   V         2452110.70000        103.734596000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1:  13.78 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1:  13.60 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lup-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lup-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Lup-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1033481 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1033481 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits

renamed 'Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2929.6199 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 815.1864 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6278.0195 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1783.5677 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6230.4990 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1776.7767 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14295 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T00:01:16.0511573' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T05:01:16.0511573' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.2092135535 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T05:01:25.9550477' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.209328183 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.781087944668 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9995959203433 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.8702777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.371111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.92002659253809 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29455 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29455 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 301.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits :) Spent 0.836151 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-25T00:01:57.7634084' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-25T05:01:57.7634084' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61185.2096963311 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-25T05:02:07.6612335' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61185.2098108912 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.78108794183 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9995959097512 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.9119444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.519166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.9142659261418 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29455 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29455 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 301.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits :) Spent 0.763307 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits


fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.70932929 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01116 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gMnSq65MDr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FPy0V57Zj2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GgrWquGG5n Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9FGTQtPwbX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg Loaded 10334 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4169 out of 4262 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 5034 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 3.0 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 3.0 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 13.4 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.gMnSq65MDr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114 Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7014 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FPy0V57Zj2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, passed=5034 Got 5034 stars (including 4686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=240 n_q2=225 n_q3=198 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GgrWquGG5n (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=4552 Got 4552 stars (including 4255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4552 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=247 n_q2=197 n_q3=223 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9FGTQtPwbX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=4547 Got 4547 stars (including 4253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4547 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4475 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4477 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=242 n_q2=196 n_q3=226 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.089 ref2=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.180 new1=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.314 new2=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.270 reference average sigma_overall=0.534 worst_q_ratio=1.1345 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 20256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.45    15:53:28.82 -36:17:53.3   6615 1904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:53:28.83 -36:17:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04751_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 04751_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    8.97    16:14:40.95 -32:23:25.2   9284 4267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:14:40.94 -32:23:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.59    15:36:35.31 -33:50:23.0   4467 3285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:36:35.29 -33:50:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05063_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 05063_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.13    15:12:15.10 -31:10:47.9   1220 4587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:12:15.11 -31:10:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 00641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.09    16:01:57.05 -38:46:46.9   7658 0414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:01:57.05 -38:46:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    9.92    15:54:30.74 -35:24:32.1   6728 2443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:54:30.74 -35:24:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.105 -34:00:43.80 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:07.308 -34:01:22.72 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01116 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J23dUZqTtC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9hD52TYXyM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ccfCAQdqW6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S3UQ6z55q3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 50301 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg Loaded 10431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8115 out of 8700 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8700 out of 50301 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.2 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 2.6 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 2.7 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.J23dUZqTtC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279 Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9hD52TYXyM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2052, passed=50294 Got 50294 stars (including 48166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50294 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49505 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=242 n_q2=233 n_q3=180 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ccfCAQdqW6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1328, passed=38450 Got 38450 stars (including 37062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38450 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=224 n_q2=189 n_q3=239 n_q4=303 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.S3UQ6z55q3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1357, passed=38397 Got 38397 stars (including 36988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38397 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37718 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=229 n_q2=188 n_q3=239 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:20:02.80 -29:56:21.2: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:45.52 -28:51:33.4: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:38.17 -29:27:49.6: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:12:50.89 -38:07:42.5: 12.24 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:41.80 -32:11:57.5: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:20:02.80 -29:56:21.2: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:02.80 -29:56:21.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1211 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:45.52 -28:51:33.4: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:12:50.89 -38:07:42.5: 12.22 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:42:41.80 -32:11:57.5: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:45.52 -28:51:33.4: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5681 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:50.89 -38:07:42.5: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2193 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:07:38.17 -29:27:49.6: 12.09 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:41.80 -32:11:57.5: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4609 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:38.17 -29:27:49.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3481 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:03.94 -38:56:30.0: 12.27 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:39:03.94 -38:56:30.0: 12.18 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:03.94 -38:56:30.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2529 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:26.92 -32:04:49.5: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:27:57.70 -33:32:32.5: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:10:24.86 -29:18:40.5: 13.10 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:12:13.51 -36:34:14.5: 13.32 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:48:26.92 -32:04:49.5: 12.48 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:26.92 -32:04:49.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7406 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:39.55 -29:18:57.8: 13.89 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:15:18.62 -31:34:12.0: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:10:24.86 -29:18:40.5: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:24.86 -29:18:40.5: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1684 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:27:57.70 -33:32:32.5: 13.31 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:57.70 -33:32:32.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8910 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:12:13.51 -36:34:14.5: 13.09 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:13.51 -36:34:14.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9325 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:26:26.67 -30:36:31.9: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:32:39.55 -29:18:57.8: 14.35 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:06:08.37 -29:39:52.2: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:39.55 -29:18:57.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4741 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:15:18.62 -31:34:12.0: 13.72 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:18.62 -31:34:12.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3633 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:16.07 -29:39:12.8: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:26:26.67 -30:36:31.9: 13.26 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:26.67 -30:36:31.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3282 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:20:18.72 -30:28:35.1: 14.61 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:06:08.37 -29:39:52.2: 14.04 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:06:08.37 -29:39:52.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4488 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:16.07 -29:39:12.8: 13.97 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:16.07 -29:39:12.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7277 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:20:18.72 -30:28:35.1: 14.56 +/- 0.34 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.21 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:18.72 -30:28:35.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.6959 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1: 13.78 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.6104 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49087.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83566_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83566_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.30    15:12:50.90 -38:07:41.6   1819 0415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.15    15:12:50.88 -38:07:43.4   1821 0421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83576_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83576_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    11.54    15:36:45.49 -28:51:32.8   4287 6279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.61    15:36:45.56 -28:51:33.9   4289 6286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83577_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83577_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    11.45    15:42:41.80 -32:11:57.6   5176 4309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.48    15:42:41.80 -32:11:57.5   5178 4316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83579_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83579_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.16    15:23:58.18 -38:39:27.5   3174 0259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:23:58.21 -38:39:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83581_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83581_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.47    15:38:51.10 -35:44:12.2   4819 2165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:38:51.08 -35:44:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83586_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83586_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.98    15:56:11.31 -31:45:52.2   6894 4643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:56:11.31 -31:45:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83587_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83587_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.13    15:20:02.77 -29:56:21.4   2147 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.11    15:20:02.84 -29:56:20.9   2148 5448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83588_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83588_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.33    16:07:38.13 -29:27:49.4   8389 6052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.37    16:07:38.21 -29:27:49.8   8391 6059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83590_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83590_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.25    16:01:23.28 -31:52:14.7   7565 4591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:01:23.31 -31:52:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83591_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83591_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.18    15:51:00.38 -35:11:17.2   6293 2564   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:51:00.37 -35:11:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.11    15:01:10.19 -36:01:02.1   0228 1483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:01:10.15 -36:01:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83593_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83593_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.98    15:26:26.60 -38:06:09.4   3435 0624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:26:26.67 -38:06:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83594_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83594_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.45    16:13:11.24 -29:38:19.3   9131 5949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:13:11.29 -29:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83595_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83595_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.45    16:01:23.60 -31:51:53.3   7566 4594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:01:23.63 -31:51:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83596_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83596_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.53    16:10:17.08 -30:14:13.4   8736 5586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:10:17.06 -30:14:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83597_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83597_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.31    16:10:19.80 -35:45:13.0   8685 2239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:10:19.80 -35:45:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83599_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83599_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.41    15:16:07.57 -30:43:49.1   1690 4917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:16:07.59 -30:43:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83600_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83600_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.78    15:41:33.38 -29:12:13.3   4934 6115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:41:33.41 -29:12:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83601_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83601_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.48    16:12:04.68 -31:37:09.4   8955 4742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:12:04.66 -31:37:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83603_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83603_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.25    15:39:04.00 -38:56:30.6   4960 0229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.25    15:39:03.89 -38:56:29.4   4961 0236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83604_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83604_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.67    15:47:59.83 -30:58:32.5   5824 5085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:47:59.85 -30:58:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83605_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83605_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.48    15:12:27.46 -35:55:36.4   1609 1740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:12:27.52 -35:55:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83607_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83607_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.92    15:55:38.19 -29:15:41.8   6794 6158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:55:38.19 -29:15:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83609_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83609_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.63    15:56:41.29 -33:16:45.7   6974 3731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:56:41.28 -33:16:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83610_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83610_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.74    15:48:26.95 -32:04:48.6   5906 4415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.74    15:48:26.88 -32:04:50.5   5907 4421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83615_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83615_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.93    15:29:26.02 -28:51:48.7   3320 6212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:29:26.05 -28:51:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.08    15:36:03.36 -30:25:26.6   4260 5333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:36:03.35 -30:25:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83619_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83619_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.18    16:10:24.80 -29:18:40.9   8762 6145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.16    16:10:24.93 -29:18:40.1   8764 6152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83620_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83620_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.74    15:17:02.42 -38:00:23.3   2312 0559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:17:02.50 -38:00:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83622_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83622_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.70    15:30:44.41 -38:20:38.3   3956 0525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:30:44.43 -38:20:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83623_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83623_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.20    16:15:36.88 -29:50:46.4   9454 5818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:15:36.86 -29:50:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.93    15:27:57.64 -33:32:31.5   3374 3373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.86    15:27:57.76 -33:32:33.4   3375 3379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83625_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83625_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.07    16:04:09.83 -35:08:26.4   7921 2617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:04:09.81 -35:08:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83626_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83626_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    12.92    16:12:13.55 -36:34:12.6   8910 1732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.95    16:12:13.47 -36:34:16.4   8911 1738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83629_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83629_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.36    16:13:07.85 -29:37:23.0   9124 5959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:13:07.82 -29:37:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83631_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83631_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.04    15:45:19.78 -36:27:22.3   5628 1775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:45:19.84 -36:27:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83637_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83637_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.89    15:47:58.54 -37:26:41.7   5972 1193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:47:58.58 -37:26:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83647_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83647_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.34    16:15:18.59 -31:34:12.1   9379 4759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.38    16:15:18.66 -31:34:12.0   9380 4766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83649_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83649_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.48    15:32:39.55 -29:18:56.7   3767 5964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.47    15:32:39.54 -29:18:58.9   3768 5971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83652_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83652_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.11    15:57:19.19 -34:25:53.0   7065 3039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:57:19.09 -34:25:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83653_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83653_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.31    15:26:26.67 -30:36:30.3   3021 5117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.34    15:26:26.66 -30:36:33.5   3023 5124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83654_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83654_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.37    15:06:08.47 -29:39:53.0   0292 5395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.54    15:06:08.27 -29:39:51.4   0292 5402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83657_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83657_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.72    15:07:46.60 -36:42:43.1   1099 1189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:07:46.54 -36:42:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83665_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83665_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.62    15:55:16.00 -29:39:14.2   6749 5912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    14.02    15:55:16.14 -29:39:11.3   6750 5919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83668_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83668_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.07    16:01:04.39 -32:48:34.0   7528 4023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:01:04.46 -32:48:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83680_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 83680_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 25.20933    2461185.70933    13.67    15:20:18.63 -30:28:34.1   2216 5121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    13.75    15:20:18.82 -30:28:36.0   2218 5128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.51    15:13:13.35 -34:51:36.8   1623 2392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:13:13.36 -34:51:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.67    15:36:35.29 -33:50:23.1   4467 3285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:36:35.28 -33:50:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 04406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    9.91    16:01:57.02 -38:46:46.8   7658 0414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:01:57.03 -38:46:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.19    15:35:40.51 -36:01:38.6   4443 1965   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:35:40.56 -36:01:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09028_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 09028_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.42    16:04:58.64 -38:09:11.3   8019 0793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:04:58.62 -38:09:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 67563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    9.14    16:14:40.93 -32:23:25.2   9284 4267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:14:40.92 -32:23:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24711_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 24711_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.08    15:17:25.56 -35:10:44.9   2165 2264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:17:25.56 -35:10:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65124_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 65124_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.22    15:12:15.11 -31:10:47.9   1220 4587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:12:15.11 -31:10:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08038_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 08038_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.34    15:06:53.10 -37:23:33.0   1047 0763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:06:53.11 -37:23:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13276_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 13276_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.76    15:01:08.22 -36:26:31.7   0263 1227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:01:08.25 -36:26:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    10.39    15:53:28.80 -36:17:53.0   6615 1905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:53:28.82 -36:17:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07440_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 07440_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.22    15:46:12.84 -38:17:20.9   5784 0674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:46:12.89 -38:17:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 58554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.32    16:11:55.78 -31:05:07.3   8943 5067   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:11:55.74 -31:05:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07602_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 07602_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.89    15:28:53.74 -37:59:53.7   3720 0714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:28:53.78 -37:59:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.02    15:21:03.90 -37:04:42.7   2732 1174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:21:03.92 -37:04:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    9.89    15:54:30.74 -35:24:32.0   6728 2443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:54:30.75 -35:24:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.88    15:25:47.73 -36:13:54.2   3254 1742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:25:47.64 -36:13:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23043_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 23043_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.33    16:16:25.40 -36:04:08.9   9440 2027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 16:16:25.40 -36:04:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11445_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 11445_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    11.48    15:09:25.28 -36:58:55.0   1320 1055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:09:25.32 -36:58:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65053_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 The candidate 65053_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 25.20981    2461185.70981    12.07    15:47:34.30 -31:50:56.3   5790 4556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-25_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_000333_TTUQ1b1x1_1164226_5DMesPnd/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits **** FOUND 15:47:34.22 -31:50:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 49087_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 Preparing report for the candidate 49087_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-25_00-01-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 ########### Completed Lup-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 ################################################################################### 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 15:55:54.59 -32:57:55.1 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.70932929 -observatory V36 04:58:45.85 +24:26:07.3 Mercury (-1.2mag) 06:30:48.01 +25:01:31.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 02:09:15.49 +12:18:44.8 Mars (1.3mag) 07:37:14.16 +21:58:07.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:44:58.06 +02:23:58.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:56:49.91 +20:15:36.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:08.91 +00:11:05.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:58.18 -22:59:45.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:35:23.05 +00:02:12.5 Moon (-10.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 May 25 00:05 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.70932929: 07:37:19.32 +21:57:55.3 Io (5.9mag) 07:37:19.10 +21:57:56.0 Europa (6.1mag) 07:36:57.90 +21:58:52.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:37:01.47 +21:58:34.4 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:38:22.87 +21:34:32.6 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:37:14.77 +21:58:04.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:38:42.33 +21:56:13.4 Elara (17.5mag) 07:38:38.56 +22:17:24.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:44:23.51 +21:58:53.3 Carme (18.8mag) 00:44:55.86 +02:23:43.0 Titan (8.7mag) 00:44:57.59 +02:24:13.6 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:45:18.87 +02:23:54.6 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:45:13.43 +02:23:53.9 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:45:56.81 +02:27:53.6 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 25 00:05 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461185.70932929: 17:16:24.85 -33:08:39.1 JWST 19:28:54.18 +09:45:14.0 Chandra 18:36:11.35 -23:55:52.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 25 00:05 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461185.70932929 -observatory V36 13:21:36.83 -27:09:38.3 14.4mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:35:40.11 +30:41:49.2 15.7mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:27:11.49 +01:18:29.4 14.6mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:26:36.88 +24:36:47.9 17.2mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 09:24:29.99 +15:25:41.3 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:51:27.22 -31:34:49.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:39:57.77 -68:17:16.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:44:00.77 +31:47:49.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:20:13.83 +14:28:38.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:37.04 +31:00:11.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:16:48.45 +26:50:45.2 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:21.46 +31:31:13.5 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:43:34.06 +03:09:28.4 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:36:56.22 +21:09:49.2 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:24:51.31 -11:02:37.2 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:16:08.88 +65:35:38.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:19:14.67 -05:27:37.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:43:22.66 +85:59:41.0 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:52:15.25 +63:54:16.1 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:25:18.67 +26:21:49.9 13.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:48:41.76 +12:05:48.9 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:20:09.69 +26:52:26.9 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:04:00.64 -17:18:23.0 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:52:44.33 +36:59:39.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:46:54.45 +53:21:44.2 16.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:22:56.65 -10:07:02.9 12.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:41:07.11 +04:36:05.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:34:21.79 +42:17:45.4 15.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:31.95 -09:26:08.2 16.2mag A/2026 E1 19:57:51.39 -08:07:19.7 9.5mag 10P/Tempel 14:19:12.28 -02:25:47.0 17.6mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:36.59 -00:51:50.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:50:40.81 -02:34:19.6 17.7mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:49:56.36 +23:41:44.0 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:30:10.74 +27:37:40.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:13:55.27 -07:24:08.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:58:33.73 +31:31:14.4 16.5mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:35:39.18 +15:14:29.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 00:48:50.20 +01:34:42.1 15.3mag 88P/Howell 04:09:39.60 +28:48:49.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 02:04:51.58 +25:10:14.4 18.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:17:45.19 +33:19:53.8 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:26:19.90 +20:41:41.1 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:36:00.42 +18:12:38.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:05:37.44 +18:16:56.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:53:57.83 +19:40:13.8 12.9mag 141P/Machholz 04:56:39.82 +16:14:03.0 12.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 03:41:21.12 +13:29:01.1 10.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:47:28.24 -26:48:40.5 17.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:56:52.38 +17:47:25.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:34:24.65 -01:56:28.6 17.6mag 169P/NEAT 17:03:05.77 -09:26:35.5 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 07:02:48.50 +35:52:43.2 17.3mag 240P/NEAT 23:56:03.14 -08:08:52.5 16.8mag 260P/McNaught 03:27:32.13 +29:43:03.7 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 21:55:24.48 -28:43:15.9 17.7mag 320P/McNaught 15:22:16.36 +08:21:53.8 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:56:30.96 +21:03:24.7 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:37:10.61 +42:39:05.0 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 25 00:05 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 2026-05-19.34 15.86 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K May 25 00:05 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 25 00:05 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:21:50.967 -07:22:18.86 AT 2026mwl 2026-05-10.42 20.48 11:55:49.750 -03:35:44.72 AT 2026mwk 2026-05-09.42 20.09 13:09:13.990 -35:00:02.50 AT 2026mwj 2026-05-15.42 19.65 17:41:09.150 +24:53:03.12 AT 2026mwi 2026-05-12.11 19.87 18:34:26.573 +28:07:34.91 AT 2026mwh 2026-05-12.12 19.72 10:37:55.222 +30:29:37.47 AT 2026mwg 2026-05-03.89 20.03 10:59:50.926 +31:45:28.48 AT 2026mwf 2026-05-16.90 20.34 11:12:52.387 +28:00:11.25 AT 2026mwe 2026-05-09.87 19.66 11:49:24.325 +39:45:30.36 AT 2026mwd 2026-05-16.91 20 13:08:05.160 +28:42:33.28 AT 2026mwc 2026-05-16.91 19.94 12:54:15.690 +22:21:59.47 AT 2026mwb 2026-05-12.90 19.8 15:29:43.973 +07:47:27.42 AT 2026mwa 2026-05-16.92 20.02 10:36:32.884 +36:10:35.42 AT 2026mvz 2026-05-16.93 20.33 10:58:31.157 +46:15:45.21 SN 2026mvy 2026-05-16.95 19.2 11:23:28.123 +42:54:37.41 AT 2026mvx 2026-05-16.95 20.42 13:52:46.812 +25:13:55.33 AT 2026mvw 2026-05-12.93 19.61 14:57:34.316 -37:33:06.58 AT 2026mvv 2026-01-28.65 20.53 04:26:22.023 +34:38:48.42 AT 2026mvu 2026-01-16.26 20.59 10:18:28.466 +13:07:51.06 AT 2026mvt 2026-01-20.44 20.55 11:40:21.075 -02:55:50.01 AT 2026mvs 2026-01-19.55 21.65 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 25 00:05 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 83 C