This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 11.19 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5
9.39109 23.43334 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 1 -1 2 11.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 11.82 16:51:20.11 -13:48:39.2
5.62789 18.88155 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 2 -1 2 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:51:20.11 -13:48:39.2: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:51:20.11 -13:48:39.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 12.19 17:09:34.14 -06:54:52.9
14.32244 18.96619 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 2 -2 3 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:34.14 -06:54:52.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:34.14 -06:54:52.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 12.96 17:13:18.62 -10:47:34.2
11.39752 16.11698 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 -1 2 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:13:18.62 -10:47:34.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:13:18.62 -10:47:34.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 13.87 16:43:15.74 -12:02:40.1
5.93564 21.50943 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 3 -0 3 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:15.74 -12:02:40.1: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:15.74 -12:02:40.1: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 25.1738 2461185.6738 13.64 17:02:52.01 -11:26:13.2
9.36980 17.91113 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -1 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:02:52.01 -11:26:13.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:02:52.01 -11:26:13.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461185.6738,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260525.1738 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461185.67409252 25.05.2026 04:10:31.594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5583
Objects passed selection criteria: 5578
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4428
Average stars matched: 4278.5 (96.6238 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 23:15:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
First image: 2461148.84898149 18.04.2026 08:22:22.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Last image: 2461185.67409252 25.05.2026 04:10:31.594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 153
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53299
Objects passed selection criteria: 53220
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44565.5
Average stars matched: 42570.5 (95.5234 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun May 24 19:55:43 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-81-g313b1a97
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 24 23:17:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461185.67350059
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10
Second-epoch second image center 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01314 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLTOaraP9H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xWTcjdcHON
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YemCzBe34Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tsDsWvhfyj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.665200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.665200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1339 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5570 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3239 out of 3334 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3334 out of 5737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1338 to 265.2840 deg, Dec -15.2443 to -4.5573 deg
Loaded 4155 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3332 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3332 out of 5776 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gLTOaraP9H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5737
Got 5737 stars (including 5384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.700 n_q1=184 n_q2=351 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xWTcjdcHON (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5776
Got 5776 stars (including 5426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=180 n_q2=353 n_q3=214 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YemCzBe34Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, passed=3141
Got 3141 stars (including 2950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=191 n_q2=321 n_q3=259 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tsDsWvhfyj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=192, passed=3210
Got 3210 stars (including 3014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=195 n_q2=319 n_q3=259 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.626 worst_q_ratio=1.249
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.587 worst_q_ratio=1.156
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.159
reference average sigma_overall=0.6065 worst_q_ratio=1.2025
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:33.90 -11:43:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.06 -06:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:24.48 -15:06:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.18 -09:57:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20511_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 20511_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20530_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.79 -14:14:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:28.27 -12:40:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 03187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.80 -10:28:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00622_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 00622_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.52 -14:35:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1053 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:28.018 -09:57:35.75
Second-epoch image center 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1156 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:02.464 -09:58:11.10
Second-epoch second image center 17:07:59.847 -09:57:43.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01314 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Prfvizftr5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e0cs4cddQI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZZIHgpvQJ0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NCoURC3bNS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.448600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.448600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1175 to 265.2927 deg, Dec -15.2552 to -4.5449 deg
Loaded 4170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3226 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 57367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.1323 to 265.3001 deg, Dec -15.2554 to -4.5454 deg
Loaded 4168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3611 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3611 out of 57367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 143 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Prfvizftr5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2917, passed=57752
Got 57752 stars (including 54750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.798 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=193 n_q2=361 n_q3=192 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e0cs4cddQI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2923, passed=57361
Got 57361 stars (including 54345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.676 n_q1=193 n_q2=358 n_q3=191 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZZIHgpvQJ0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=862, passed=32391
Got 32391 stars (including 31487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=194 n_q2=309 n_q3=262 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NCoURC3bNS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=855, passed=32363
Got 32363 stars (including 31458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=195 n_q2=306 n_q3=261 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-09-40_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-24_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_231329_TTUQ1b1x1_1452281_CPYMgR6G/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:52.69 -11:33:17.1: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:03:50.72 -10:37:28.5: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:41:57.42 -12:10:23.7: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:36:34.59 -14:48:50.8: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:03:50.72 -10:37:28.5: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:52.69 -11:33:17.1: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:41:57.42 -12:10:23.7: 13.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:50.72 -10:37:28.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6794 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:52.69 -11:33:17.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6586 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:57.42 -12:10:23.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8182 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:09:34.14 -06:54:52.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:51:20.11 -13:48:39.2: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:36:34.11 -11:41:31.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:36:34.59 -14:48:50.8: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:34.59 -14:48:50.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7899 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:38:49.03 -05:25:38.4: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:09:34.14 -06:54:52.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:36:34.11 -11:41:31.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:34.11 -11:41:31.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:51:20.11 -13:48:39.2: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:36:32.09 -12:59:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:38:49.03 -05:25:38.4: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:49.03 -05:25:38.4: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8535 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:36:32.09 -12:59:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:32.09 -12:59:51.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:21:39.11 -11:02:51.4: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:02:58.65 -06:22:16.0: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:31:09.33 -11:20:10.1: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:13:18.62 -10:47:34.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:02:58.65 -06:22:16.0: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:21:39.11 -11:02:51.4: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.65 -06:22:16.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1436 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.11 -11:02:51.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8778 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:31:09.33 -11:20:10.1: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:13:18.62 -10:47:34.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:09.33 -11:20:10.1: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7985 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:36:34.86 -14:26:50.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:28.36 -12:01:00.1: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:36:32.62 -12:31:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:27.28 -10:32:30.5: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:36:34.86 -14:26:50.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:34.86 -14:26:50.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:28.36 -12:01:00.1: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:28.36 -12:01:00.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3495 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:36:32.62 -12:31:10.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:32.62 -12:31:10.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:27.28 -10:32:30.5: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:27.28 -10:32:30.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4096 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:15.74 -12:02:40.1: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:38:01.71 -05:56:38.0: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:02:52.01 -11:26:13.2: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:15.74 -12:02:40.1: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:42:14.83 -06:48:28.9: 14.77 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:52:44.11 -11:49:18.0: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:38:01.71 -05:56:38.0: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:01.71 -05:56:38.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2144 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:02:52.01 -11:26:13.2: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:39:52.29 -06:06:37.8: 14.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:52:44.11 -11:49:18.0: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:42:14.83 -06:48:28.9: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:44.11 -11:49:18.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8903 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:14.83 -06:48:28.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2637 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:39:52.29 -06:06:37.8: 14.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:52.29 -06:06:37.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1944 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:38:07.56 -05:35:35.8: 14.39 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:35.92 -11:30:53.9: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:47:50.86 -07:38:04.7: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:38:27.25 -05:16:23.5: 14.43 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:38:07.56 -05:35:35.8: 14.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:07.56 -05:35:35.8: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2671 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:35.92 -11:30:53.9: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:35.92 -11:30:53.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1423 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:38:27.25 -05:16:23.5: 14.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:47:50.86 -07:38:04.7: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:27.25 -05:16:23.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4314 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:50.86 -07:38:04.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2237 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:02:21.71 -07:22:45.2: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:40:12.14 -05:31:38.4: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:40:18.90 -08:59:52.3: 14.64 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:02:21.71 -07:22:45.2: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:45:18.96 -05:54:13.9: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:21.71 -07:22:45.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1060 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:40:17.12 -07:50:10.9: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:40:12.14 -05:31:38.4: 14.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:12.14 -05:31:38.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2371 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:40:18.90 -08:59:52.3: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:18.90 -08:59:52.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1847 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:45:18.96 -05:54:13.9: 14.77 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:18.96 -05:54:13.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3803 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:40:17.12 -07:50:10.9: 14.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:17.12 -07:50:10.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3290 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:43:01.22 -08:37:41.8: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:56:33.03 -08:59:18.7: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:57:09.38 -08:39:36.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:43:01.22 -08:37:41.8: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:01.22 -08:37:41.8: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3330 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 17:00:33.23 -12:16:12.7: 13.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:56:33.03 -08:59:18.7: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:33.03 -08:59:18.7: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2863 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:57:09.38 -08:39:36.7: 15.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:09.38 -08:39:36.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3751 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 17:00:33.23 -12:16:12.7: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:33.23 -12:16:12.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1739 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:48:53.64 -10:15:29.6: 14.82 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-22-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0121.fits at 16:54:59.55 -10:44:22.0: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:48:53.64 -10:15:29.6: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:53.64 -10:15:29.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4155 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-23-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 16:54:59.55 -10:44:22.0: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:59.55 -10:44:22.0: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4894 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73493_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73493_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:47.88 -07:40:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73495_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73495_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:59.56 -08:14:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73500_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73502_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73502_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:03.49 -13:10:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73503_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73503_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73508_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73508_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:26.41 -05:25:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:04.23 -08:55:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73511_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73511_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.88 -14:22:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73513_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73513_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.58 -11:36:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73515_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73515_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:45.13 -05:17:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73517_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73517_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:37.20 -14:57:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.10 -12:50:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73544_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73544_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:33.92 -11:43:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73609_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73609_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.07 -06:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73654_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73654_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:24.49 -15:06:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73665_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73665_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:20.31 -08:19:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73776_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 73776_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73865_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:31.47 -14:34:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73892_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 73892_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73920_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73920_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.48 -05:56:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73954_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73954_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.53 -06:11:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.70 -08:14:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73973_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73973_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73979_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 73979_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:15.43 -08:35:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:14.87 -06:15:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74039_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74039_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:23.72 -04:58:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74126_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74126_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:43.31 -10:14:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74142_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74156_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74156_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.50 -14:09:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74161_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74161_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.17 -14:20:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74192_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74192_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:39.23 -15:05:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74214_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74214_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.64 -06:07:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74231_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74231_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:11.82 -08:24:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.76 -14:35:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74269_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74269_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.62 -14:16:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74286_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74286_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74291_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74291_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:56.65 -06:46:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74311_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74311_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74324_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:59.46 -14:07:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74331_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74331_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:20.34 -08:32:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74352_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 74352_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74369_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74369_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74380_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74380_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:09.51 -12:29:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:45.61 -08:23:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74388_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74388_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.83 -08:56:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74410_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74410_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.59 -08:52:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74413_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74413_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.11 -06:07:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74423_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74423_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:03.29 -05:58:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74443_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74443_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.65 -09:15:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74449_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74449_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.18 -08:49:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74455_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.14 -12:40:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.70 -07:07:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.55 -08:58:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.69 -11:28:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:22.32 -04:54:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74491_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74491_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.69 -07:33:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74526_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74526_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74535_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74535_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74596_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74596_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74643_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74643_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74649_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74649_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:00.22 -07:03:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:16.77 -08:18:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74725_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74725_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:19.90 -06:45:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74743_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74743_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:23.04 -14:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:24.80 -05:12:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74747_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74747_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:59.37 -08:29:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:11.73 -06:46:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74755_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74755_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:20.71 -07:06:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74772_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.98 -08:33:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:34.99 -09:18:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74793_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74793_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.75 -06:14:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.38 -13:55:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74833_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74833_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.79 -05:04:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74845_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74845_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:19.95 -10:46:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74862_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74862_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.12 -05:56:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74868_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74868_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:32.38 -11:18:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74878_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 74878_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74906_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74906_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:19.81 -09:09:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.73 -07:11:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:32.64 -09:22:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74938_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:49.80 -05:43:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74944_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74944_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74948_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74948_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:58.88 -06:58:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 74956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74958_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:42.57 -05:58:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74965_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74965_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:53.99 -07:21:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74986_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74986_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.07 -14:09:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74999_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 74999_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:08.35 -04:47:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75006_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75006_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75011_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75011_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75017_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75017_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:49.60 -09:23:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75023_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75023_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75024_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75024_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:47.72 -10:00:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75025_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75025_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:15.66 -09:33:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75030_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75030_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:30.30 -08:42:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75040_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75040_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:03.60 -06:24:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75043_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75043_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.96 -12:09:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75068_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75068_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75072_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75072_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:43.26 -05:15:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75076_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75076_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75084_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75084_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75086_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75086_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.58 -11:47:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75096_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75096_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:14.35 -08:47:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75131_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75131_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:36.63 -08:20:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75137_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75137_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75141_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75141_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75164_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75164_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75172_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75172_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:57.21 -06:41:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75181_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75218_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75218_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:58.73 -08:50:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75233_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75233_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.32 -07:46:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75269_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 75269_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05957_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 05957_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.74 -14:14:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 26157_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:29.41 -11:18:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35632_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 35632_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:26.57 -09:35:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04584_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 04584_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.52 -14:35:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 34095_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.16 -09:57:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 26061_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:30.30 -11:28:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 16254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:28.26 -12:40:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 26447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:09.70 -11:10:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02877_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 02877_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:59.58 -14:39:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05818_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 05818_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:49.27 -14:16:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69394_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 69394_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.67 -11:50:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 69385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:09.20 -13:24:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28235_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 28235_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.62 -10:59:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 56133_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.76 -08:16:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10023_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 10023_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:59.05 -13:32:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 15698_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.37 -12:51:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 36254_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.39 -09:32:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04518_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 04518_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.90 -14:19:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70918_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 70918_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:28.22 -12:56:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 31293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.80 -10:28:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 48016_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-24_23-10-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks