This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2806 2461180.7806 13.08 13:25:08.59 +08:19:28.5
327.47978 69.57381 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.369 Aeria 2 0 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:25:08.59 +08:19:28.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:25:08.59 +08:19:28.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.2806* 13 25 08.59 +08 19 28.5 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7806,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2806 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2806 2461180.7806 13.78 13:48:43.48 +06:15:10.4
338.62782 65.07544 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.593 Titania 3 0 3 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:48:43.48 +06:15:10.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:48:43.48 +06:15:10.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.2806* 13 48 43.48 +06 15 10.4 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7806,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2806 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2806 2461180.7806 14.70 13:38:39.05 +10:01:04.0
338.21035 69.58786 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.888 Parysatis 2 0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:38:39.05 +10:01:04.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:38:39.05 +10:01:04.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7806,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2806 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2806 2461180.7806 14.74 13:14:23.61 +10:40:46.0
322.21175 72.68630 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1629 Pecker 2 0 2 15.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:14:23.61 +10:40:46.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:14:23.61 +10:40:46.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.2806* 13 14 23.61 +10 40 46.0 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7806,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2806 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
First image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Last image: 2461180.78090495 20.05.2026 06:44:20.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6207
Objects passed selection criteria: 6203
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6041
Average stars matched: 5789.5 (95.8368 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112036 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 02:25:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
First image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Last image: 2461180.78090495 20.05.2026 06:44:20.188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35253
Objects passed selection criteria: 35172
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34383.2
Average stars matched: 32041.8 (93.19 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 02:26:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.78036539
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xr0hIBliev
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UoGBHWV9lD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.doBSs83lov
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CkXgRdPoBd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec +0.6474 to +11.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec 0.6474 to 11.2864 deg
Loaded 4020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3440 out of 5924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec +0.6474 to +11.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6865 to 213.6018 deg, Dec 0.6474 to 11.2864 deg
Loaded 4020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3440 out of 5924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec +0.2173 to +11.6259 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec 0.2173 to 11.6259 deg
Loaded 4449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3353 out of 3481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3481 out of 5986 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xr0hIBliev (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5924
Got 5924 stars (including 5536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=234 n_q2=242 n_q3=242 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UoGBHWV9lD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=5986
Got 5986 stars (including 5594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=244 n_q2=232 n_q3=250 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.doBSs83lov (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, passed=6223
Got 6223 stars (including 5885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=254 n_q2=227 n_q3=251 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CkXgRdPoBd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=6172
Got 6172 stars (including 5825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=248 n_q2=231 n_q3=253 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.069
ref2=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new1=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new2=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.1205
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:38:58.84 +05:58:52.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:39:14.52 +08:14:53.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:38:58.84 +05:58:52.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:39:14.52 +08:14:53.4: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:38:58.84 +05:58:52.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3635 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:39:14.52 +08:14:53.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3955 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20598_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 20598_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 20599_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Second-epoch image center 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:42.605 +05:58:49.71
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:40.132 +05:59:19.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ykzKiaz8Ba
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fzHnpPAQii
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KtyaCx1O6I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lZny15dgFd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec +0.6245 to +11.2913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec 0.6245 to 11.2913 deg
Loaded 4036 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3220 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 32817 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec +0.6245 to +11.2913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6817 to 213.6024 deg, Dec 0.6245 to 11.2913 deg
Loaded 4036 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3220 out of 3471 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3471 out of 32817 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 34813 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec +0.1968 to +11.6784 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec 0.1968 to 11.6784 deg
Loaded 4490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3267 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 34813 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.1 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ykzKiaz8Ba (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1293, passed=32790
Got 32790 stars (including 31464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.468 n_q1=227 n_q2=252 n_q3=237 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fzHnpPAQii (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1275, passed=34792
Got 34792 stars (including 33449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=239 n_q2=229 n_q3=250 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KtyaCx1O6I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1146, passed=35502
Got 35502 stars (including 34302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=256 n_q2=228 n_q3=251 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lZny15dgFd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1136, passed=35473
Got 35473 stars (including 34278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=248 n_q2=233 n_q3=252 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-43-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0232.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_020525_TTUQ1b1x1_413072_EsT7Ngg4/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:54:09.80 +10:23:15.1: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:56:16.57 +06:34:40.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:29.12 +05:57:31.8: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:12.70 +09:53:32.8: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:59.81 +03:45:25.0: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:25:08.59 +08:19:28.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:48:43.48 +06:15:10.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.4: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:29.12 +05:57:31.8: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:54:09.80 +10:23:15.1: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:56:16.57 +06:34:40.8: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:12.70 +09:53:32.8: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:25:08.59 +08:19:28.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:29.12 +05:57:31.8: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6821 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:54:09.80 +10:23:15.1: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0652 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:56:16.57 +06:34:40.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6588 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:59.81 +03:45:25.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:12.70 +09:53:32.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9829 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:59.81 +03:45:25.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4245 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:49:58.24 +09:39:23.0: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:48:43.48 +06:15:10.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.4: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9862 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:49:58.24 +09:39:23.0: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:58.24 +09:39:23.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1679 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:02:52.66 +08:39:56.8: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:17.36 +08:30:45.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:00:26.89 +07:02:10.5: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:06:54.83 +07:13:40.0: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:24.78 +07:14:04.9: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:10:02.71 +05:25:58.0: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:47.13 +05:05:07.7: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:17.36 +08:30:45.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:02:52.66 +08:39:56.8: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:17.36 +08:30:45.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4655 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:00:26.89 +07:02:10.5: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:52.66 +08:39:56.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4368 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:54.83 +07:13:40.0: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:24.78 +07:14:04.9: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:26.89 +07:02:10.5: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4278 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:54.83 +07:13:40.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5982 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:24.78 +07:14:04.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6811 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:10:02.71 +05:25:58.0: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:02.71 +05:25:58.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6403 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:31.11 +00:57:01.0: 15.15 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:47.13 +05:05:07.7: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:47.13 +05:05:07.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6702 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:31.11 +00:57:01.0: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:31.11 +00:57:01.0: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7047 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:57:26.28 +04:48:13.5: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:43.40 +02:14:15.2: 15.43 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:19:13.82 +01:28:31.7: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.7: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:47:29.90 +03:16:41.9: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:07:46.77 +01:12:54.8: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:26.28 +04:48:13.5: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:26.28 +04:48:13.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6572 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:19:13.82 +01:28:31.7: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:43.40 +02:14:15.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:19:13.82 +01:28:31.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5518 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:43.40 +02:14:15.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7877 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.7: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:01.66 +06:04:03.0: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7232 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:47:29.90 +03:16:41.9: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:46.77 +01:12:54.8: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:47:29.90 +03:16:41.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7767 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:46.77 +01:12:54.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8502 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:07:57.41 +06:21:19.9: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:12:46.20 +02:01:19.9: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:01.66 +06:04:03.0: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:09:04.24 +02:32:28.1: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:37.88 +02:06:31.3: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:01.66 +06:04:03.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8036 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:57.41 +06:21:19.9: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:57.41 +06:21:19.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8250 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:02:26.63 +00:55:29.3: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:55:15.49 +08:36:54.7: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:45:34.12 +08:29:27.1: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:04.24 +02:32:28.1: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:37.88 +02:06:31.3: 15.27 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:12:46.20 +02:01:19.9: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:04.24 +02:32:28.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6703 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:37.88 +02:06:31.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9064 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:46.20 +02:01:19.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5664 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:02:26.63 +00:55:29.3: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:45:34.12 +08:29:27.1: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:26.63 +00:55:29.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8013 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:55:15.49 +08:36:54.7: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:34.12 +08:29:27.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7824 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.7: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:15.49 +08:36:54.7: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8125 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:05.85 +04:01:38.0: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:38:39.05 +10:01:04.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.7: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:55:38.84 +06:47:04.4: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:17.93 +01:32:23.1: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:26.20 +05:51:45.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7534 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:05.85 +04:01:38.0: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:05.85 +04:01:38.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9257 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:58:32.02 +01:37:04.0: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:55.89 +03:20:21.3: 15.26 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:11:44.66 +01:12:30.8: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:38:39.05 +10:01:04.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:55:38.84 +06:47:04.4: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:38.84 +06:47:04.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7368 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:17.93 +01:32:23.1: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:17.93 +01:32:23.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8999 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:55.89 +03:20:21.3: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:58:32.02 +01:37:04.0: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:44.66 +01:12:30.8: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:20.44 +08:09:06.1: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:12:03.13 +06:38:57.5: 15.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:55.89 +03:20:21.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8982 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:44.66 +01:12:30.8: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9546 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:32.02 +01:37:04.0: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:12:23.34 +02:01:01.1: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:57:03.60 +06:03:58.3: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:20.44 +08:09:06.1: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:12:03.13 +06:38:57.5: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:20.44 +08:09:06.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9459 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:03.13 +06:38:57.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9223 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:08:41.35 +05:55:04.8: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:02:52.06 +09:44:04.0: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:12:23.34 +02:01:01.1: 15.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:12:10.91 +03:09:36.7: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:03.60 +06:03:58.3: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:23.34 +02:01:01.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9344 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:03.60 +06:03:58.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8849 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:41.35 +05:55:04.8: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 14:01:07.14 +06:14:32.3: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:12:10.91 +03:09:36.7: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:02:52.06 +09:44:04.0: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:41.35 +05:55:04.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8523 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:10.91 +03:09:36.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7099 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:52.06 +09:44:04.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8751 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:14:23.61 +10:40:46.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:32:26.87 +02:24:21.6: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:17:27.62 +03:13:00.4: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:07.14 +06:14:32.3: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:07.14 +06:14:32.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8649 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:14:23.61 +10:40:46.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:23:05.81 +01:24:04.9: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:13:36.94 +03:45:06.7: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:32:26.87 +02:24:21.6: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:18:21.88 +04:04:36.1: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:32:26.87 +02:24:21.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7972 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:17:27.62 +03:13:00.4: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:27.62 +03:13:00.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8037 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:23:05.81 +01:24:04.9: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:18:21.88 +04:04:36.1: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:13:36.94 +03:45:06.7: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:23:05.81 +01:24:04.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8756 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:18:21.88 +04:04:36.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8184 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:36.94 +03:45:06.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8150 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:13:56.92 +11:00:39.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:13:56.92 +11:00:39.6: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:56.92 +11:00:39.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:20:59.00 +10:14:53.9: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:12:03.48 +04:58:16.5: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits at 13:16:51.31 +01:57:20.8: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:20:59.00 +10:14:53.9: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:59.00 +10:14:53.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8830 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:16:51.31 +01:57:20.8: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:51.31 +01:57:20.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9651 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:12:03.48 +04:58:16.5: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:03.48 +04:58:16.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8754 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55117_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55117_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:58:39.09 +05:28:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55118_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55118_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:48:16.07 +03:57:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55121_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55121_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55122_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55122_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55124_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55124_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55134_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55134_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55144_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55144_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:26.31 +05:03:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55147_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55147_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:55:36.59 +03:28:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55177_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55177_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55206_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 55206_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55263_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55263_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:07.41 +10:34:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55287_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 55287_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55307_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55307_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:49:38.50 +08:23:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55347_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55347_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55385_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55385_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:38:46.94 +09:57:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55393_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55393_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55413_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55413_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:51:22.31 +09:30:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55417_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55417_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55418_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55418_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55474_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55474_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55478_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55478_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55487_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55487_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55496_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55496_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55507_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55507_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55520_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55520_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55525_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55525_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:03.68 +05:52:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55527_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55527_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55532_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55532_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55540_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55540_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:49.77 +03:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55543_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55543_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55546_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55546_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:32.66 +02:39:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55547_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55547_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55550_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55550_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55551_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55551_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55560_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55560_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:39:16.01 +09:22:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55570_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55570_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55571_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55571_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55575_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55575_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55580_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55580_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55583_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55583_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55587_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55587_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55592_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55592_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55594_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55594_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55598_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55598_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55603_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55603_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55606_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55606_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55610_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 55610_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55612_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55612_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55616_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55616_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55624_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55624_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55627_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55627_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55631_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55631_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55634_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55634_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55642_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55642_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55643_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55643_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55654_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55654_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55657_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55657_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55661_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55661_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55664_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55664_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55670_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55670_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:00.79 +01:29:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55724_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55724_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55741_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
Preparing report for the candidate 55741_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55792_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55792_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55802_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55802_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55837_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55837_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55855_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55855_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55908_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55908_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55911_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55911_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:51.37 +09:58:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55936_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55936_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:45.34 +10:48:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55952_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55952_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55979_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55979_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55987_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233
The candidate 55987_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_01-44-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0233 did not pass the final checks