This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 10.73 16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6
347.97935 12.95817 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 2 -1 2 9.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7162,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2162 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 11.64 16:38:08.14 -22:39:53.3
356.26038 15.99107 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 2 -0 2 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:38:08.14 -22:39:53.3: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:38:08.14 -22:39:53.3: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7162,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2162 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 12.36 16:33:22.45 -25:00:29.7
353.66815 15.32255 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 1 -2 2 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.45 -25:00:29.7: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.45 -25:00:29.7: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7162,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2162 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 12.99 16:22:13.31 -27:11:30.4
350.24849 15.74704 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis 1 0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:22:13.31 -27:11:30.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:22:13.31 -27:11:30.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7162,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2162 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 13.63 15:56:20.50 -23:32:35.5
348.68924 22.47734 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1204 Renzia 4 -1 4 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:56:20.50 -23:32:35.5: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:56:20.50 -23:32:35.5: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.7162,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.2162 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 12.78 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4
351.30774 16.33378 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J162321-2602.6
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.510 V Y 1.580 V 2452453.40000 148.743347000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4: 13.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J162321-2602.6,2461180.7162,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J162321-2602.6 20260520.2162 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.2162 2461180.7162 11.59 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8
353.31629 18.05471 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J162322.04-232802.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.280 V 13.820 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J162322.04-232802.1,2461180.7162,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J162322.04-232802.1 20260520.2162 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461180.71644631 20.05.2026 05:11:30.961 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5326
Objects passed selection criteria: 5324
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4734.5
Average stars matched: 4696.25 (99.1921 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:14:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
First image: 2461139.81765986 09.04.2026 07:37:15.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Last image: 2461180.71644631 20.05.2026 05:11:30.961 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55196
Objects passed selection criteria: 55120
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47821.2
Average stars matched: 47049.5 (98.3862 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 159816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed May 20 00:17:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.71598852
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01064 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.txUWGqhpzl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fU9xDUZ4c0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.05YBgRnSnS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ekCYBVSnzb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.627400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.627400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3884 to 253.5840 deg, Dec -31.5113 to -20.0797 deg
Loaded 8583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4654 out of 4825 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4825 out of 6377 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.4154 to 253.5845 deg, Dec -31.5353 to -20.0794 deg
Loaded 8596 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4065 out of 4156 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4156 out of 5296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.0 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.txUWGqhpzl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=6377
Got 6377 stars (including 5785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=284 n_q2=266 n_q3=255 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fU9xDUZ4c0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, passed=5296
Got 5296 stars (including 4896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=285 n_q2=243 n_q3=276 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.05YBgRnSnS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=188, passed=3514
Got 3514 stars (including 3324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=335 n_q2=190 n_q3=321 n_q4=113 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ekCYBVSnzb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, passed=3875
Got 3875 stars (including 3638 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=338 n_q2=167 n_q3=340 n_q4=116 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.310
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.332
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.356
reference average sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.3035
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:46:16.41 -24:15:51.3: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:46:16.41 -24:15:51.3: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:16.41 -24:15:51.3: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1963 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20092_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20101_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20101_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.20 -22:56:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20104_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.67 -26:54:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20105_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.57 -23:03:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20106_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20106_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.67 -25:08:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20112_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 20112_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20113_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20113_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.74 -23:46:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20115_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20115_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:53.76 -26:48:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20119_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20119_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:47.29 -23:11:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20121_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20121_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:19.27 -29:25:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20026_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20026_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.30 -22:53:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04777_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.11 -24:06:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:24:45.14 -30:41:57.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.320 -25:59:25.30
Second-epoch image center 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:22.218 -26:01:48.34
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:23.954 -26:02:18.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01064 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pEbfCEoJXk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aYi3F7Pl35
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6ckc3QInzF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KWgv4Fu97j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.413100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.413100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3318 to 253.5851 deg, Dec -31.5213 to -20.0064 deg
Loaded 8671 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6325 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 70432 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 56523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3388 to 253.5858 deg, Dec -31.5513 to -20.0429 deg
Loaded 8686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6533 out of 7007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7007 out of 56523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pEbfCEoJXk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3556, passed=70421
Got 70421 stars (including 66735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=299 n_q2=278 n_q3=240 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aYi3F7Pl35 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2201, passed=56517
Got 56517 stars (including 54204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.6 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=293 n_q2=251 n_q3=269 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6ckc3QInzF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=960, passed=31422
Got 31422 stars (including 30401 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=320 n_q2=188 n_q3=339 n_q4=118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KWgv4Fu97j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1068, passed=34312
Got 34312 stars (including 33196 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=323 n_q2=173 n_q3=349 n_q4=120 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-10-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-20_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_001208_TTUQ1b1x1_2360644_oLqTUWVb/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:38:08.14 -22:39:53.3: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:52:03.99 -22:17:36.3: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:02:39.51 -25:41:39.8: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:38:08.14 -22:39:53.3: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:52:03.99 -22:17:36.3: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:05.04 -20:17:26.8: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:03.99 -22:17:36.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7219 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:02:39.51 -25:41:39.8: 13.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:39.51 -25:41:39.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7979 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:05.04 -20:17:26.8: 12.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:05.04 -20:17:26.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2272 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:33:22.45 -25:00:29.7: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:08:50.34 -24:45:23.8: 13.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:37.47 -20:23:09.0: 13.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:48.40 -20:45:22.5: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:33:22.45 -25:00:29.7: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:37.47 -20:23:09.0: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:08:50.34 -24:45:23.8: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:37.47 -20:23:09.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5464 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:50.34 -24:45:23.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0613 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:22:13.31 -27:11:30.4: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:45.67 -20:26:01.3: 14.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:28.67 -20:44:02.6: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:30.59 -21:45:41.3: 14.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:48.40 -20:45:22.5: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:48.40 -20:45:22.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6446 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:54:54.87 -22:52:57.6: 14.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:22:13.31 -27:11:30.4: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:45.67 -20:26:01.3: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:28.67 -20:44:02.6: 14.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:30.59 -21:45:41.3: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:45.67 -20:26:01.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7288 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.67 -20:44:02.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7369 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:30.59 -21:45:41.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6302 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:54:54.87 -22:52:57.6: 14.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:35:02.54 -22:04:43.6: 13.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:54.87 -22:52:57.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5177 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:43.22 -20:28:09.5: 14.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:35:02.54 -22:04:43.6: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:02.54 -22:04:43.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1670 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:04.69 -20:53:46.7: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:55.56 -23:05:02.6: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:43.22 -20:28:09.5: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:43.22 -20:28:09.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8044 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:49:35.85 -23:02:32.5: 14.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:00.89 -24:04:05.9: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:48:30.57 -20:34:03.6: 14.62 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:55.56 -23:05:02.6: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:55.56 -23:05:02.6: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5495 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:04.69 -20:53:46.7: 14.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:04.69 -20:53:46.7: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7194 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:56:20.50 -23:32:35.5: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:49:35.85 -23:02:32.5: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:35.85 -23:02:32.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7104 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:00.89 -24:04:05.9: 14.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:48:30.57 -20:34:03.6: 14.09 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.89 -24:04:05.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5651 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:30.57 -20:34:03.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.8578 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:10:05.16 -24:08:12.6: 14.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:56:20.50 -23:32:35.5: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:52:45.77 -20:26:02.0: 14.71 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:10:05.16 -24:08:12.6: 14.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:05.16 -24:08:12.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4674 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:50:15.32 -21:13:13.9: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 15:46:18.98 -25:17:42.8: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:31:07.45 -21:58:41.5: 14.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:52:45.77 -20:26:02.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:45.77 -20:26:02.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.9278 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:50:15.32 -21:13:13.9: 13.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:15.32 -21:13:13.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9129 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 15:46:18.98 -25:17:42.8: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:27:04.73 -22:00:15.3: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:18.98 -25:17:42.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5327 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:31:07.45 -21:58:41.5: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:07.45 -21:58:41.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5999 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:27.58 -22:30:21.8: 14.41 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:27:04.73 -22:00:15.3: 14.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:04.73 -22:00:15.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5583 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:30:52.51 -22:14:16.1: 14.62 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:21:58.88 -22:41:11.0: 14.65 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:27.58 -22:30:21.8: 14.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:27.58 -22:30:21.8: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6264 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:30:52.51 -22:14:16.1: 14.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:52.51 -22:14:16.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5704 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:21:58.88 -22:41:11.0: 14.54 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:58.88 -22:41:11.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8156 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:29:45.19 -21:31:01.7: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:29:45.19 -21:31:01.7: 13.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:45.19 -21:31:01.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2810 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4: 13.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:23:21.48 -26:02:40.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.7824 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_02-37-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits at 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-55-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits at 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:23:22.03 -23:28:01.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5883 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82895.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82762_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82762_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82763_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82763_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82778_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82778_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:45.16 -30:41:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 82808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82812_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82812_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:33.39 -26:10:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82817_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82817_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.34 -25:39:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82822_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82822_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:16.29 -26:29:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82824_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.97 -21:31:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82833_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82833_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.56 -27:03:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82835_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82835_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.35 -29:15:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82836_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82836_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.50 -24:24:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82840_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82840_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:20.67 -29:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82846_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82846_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:52.04 -24:29:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82870_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82870_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:39.15 -22:11:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82873_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82873_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.35 -23:11:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82874_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82874_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.71 -25:17:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82881_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82881_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82883_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82883_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:22.08 -26:30:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82894_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82894_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.17 -24:54:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82895_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 82895_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82919_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82919_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82921_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82921_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:31.04 -25:42:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82922_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82922_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82926_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82926_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:17.22 -30:14:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82932_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82932_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:05.37 -23:25:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82933_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:16.52 -20:46:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82940_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82940_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82942_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:49.56 -23:08:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82945_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82945_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82951_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82951_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82952_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 82952_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82957_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82957_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82966_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82966_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82968_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82968_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82972_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82972_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:18.30 -22:12:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82975_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82975_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82976_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82976_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.35 -25:11:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 82992_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83002_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83002_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:33.72 -21:41:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83003_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:29.13 -22:49:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83030_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83030_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83037_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83037_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83041_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 83041_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83042_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83042_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83044_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83044_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83047_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83047_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:28.57 -27:58:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83048_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83048_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83060_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83060_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83077_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83077_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83098_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83098_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:36.16 -22:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83107_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83107_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83110_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83110_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83113_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83113_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83128_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 83128_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66589_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 66589_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.50 -21:50:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25304_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25304_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:05.10 -28:36:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 34125_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.29 -27:26:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53706_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 59244_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:46.57 -23:03:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 24486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:13.05 -28:34:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 67403_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.76 -23:46:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43974_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 43974_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29755_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 29755_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:50.60 -28:01:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.31 -22:53:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 33935_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.68 -26:54:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60579_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 60579_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48553_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 48553_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.67 -25:08:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81210_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 81210_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.86 -23:28:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07400_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 07400_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:56.75 -30:22:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57096_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.20 -22:56:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80793_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 80793_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:52.53 -27:57:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 35045_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:53.77 -26:48:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 69019_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:36.11 -24:06:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69173_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 69173_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:22.03 -24:18:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 64825_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-20_00-11-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
