Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6774,14.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1774 14.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1212089 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1212089 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits

renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 470.5140
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.8452
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1088.6130
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 473.5021
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1090.1338
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 472.8395
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.31367
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T23:14:57.4438687' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T04:14:57.4438687' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61180.1770537384 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T04:15:07.3489504' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61180.1771683795 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.996229051218 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002157289417 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.3 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 278.663333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.33826992850985 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20421 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20421 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 268.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits :)
Spent 0.516946 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.4499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T23:15:34.1904085' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T04:15:34.1904085' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61180.1774790511 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T04:15:44.0914315' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61180.1775936456 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 149.99622905692 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 30.0002157272965 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 48.1763888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 278.725833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.34084211728065 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20421 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20421 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.4499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.4499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 5.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.12 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 268.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits :)
Spent 0.531613 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits

fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.67716948
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77
Second-epoch second image center 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00192 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MpLA8CFeSn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2SPEoLLn8J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJCPRkV7sJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UU6q7iuf7t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg
Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec +24.2125 to +35.3503 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2855 deg, Dec 24.2125 to 35.3503 deg
Loaded 5549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4003 out of 4255 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4255 out of 7322 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.2059 to +35.3397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.2059 to 35.3397 deg
Loaded 5551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3994 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7299 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.2 pix Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MpLA8CFeSn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, passed=7322
Got 7322 stars (including 6763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=239 n_q2=209 n_q3=226 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2SPEoLLn8J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, passed=7299
Got 7299 stars (including 6711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=245 n_q2=211 n_q3=224 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jJCPRkV7sJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, passed=5751
Got 5751 stars (including 5342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5751 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=232 n_q2=234 n_q3=191 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UU6q7iuf7t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=5781
Got 5781 stars (including 5397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5781 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=222 n_q2=237 n_q3=192 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.162
ref2=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.125
new1=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.305
new2=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits sigma_overall=0.485 worst_q_ratio=1.280
reference average sigma_overall=0.4105 worst_q_ratio=1.1435
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (923 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:06:06.99 +29:01:41.6: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:05:30.20 +33:10:30.3: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:06:06.99 +29:01:41.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:05:30.20 +33:10:30.3: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:06.99 +29:01:41.6: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0285 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:30.20 +33:10:30.3: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8713 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20261_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 20261_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.17717 | 2461180.67717 | 12.03 | 10:06:07.01 +29:01:41.7 | 3983 3782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 12.03 | 10:06:06.97 +29:01:41.5 | 3985 3783 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20987_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 20987_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.17717 | 2461180.67717 | 11.84 | 10:05:30.22 +33:10:30.2 | 4078 1273 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 11.91 | 10:05:30.19 +33:10:30.4 | 4080 1274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.034 +30:00:18.88
Second-epoch image center 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:59:59.470 +30:00:00.77
Second-epoch second image center 09:59:59.997 +30:00:01.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00192 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QIefmfzHnD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gEaxHhjhQT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits &> /tmp/tmp.720PFcP6aA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IfxRstfbAX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg
Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec +24.1997 to +35.3652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3111 deg, Dec 24.1997 to 35.3652 deg
Loaded 5570 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3855 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38207 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 38198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec +24.1770 to +35.3601 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2251 to 159.2856 deg, Dec 24.1770 to 35.3601 deg
Loaded 5577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3842 out of 4322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4322 out of 38198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QIefmfzHnD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1809, passed=38188
Got 38188 stars (including 36313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=238 n_q2=210 n_q3=224 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gEaxHhjhQT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1825, passed=38181
Got 38181 stars (including 36290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=242 n_q2=212 n_q3=218 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.720PFcP6aA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1637, passed=28283
Got 28283 stars (including 26602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=242 n_q2=218 n_q3=205 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IfxRstfbAX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1562, passed=28021
Got 28021 stars (including 26419 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=240 n_q2=220 n_q3=201 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 09:54:53.42 +26:42:17.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 09:54:53.42 +26:42:17.8: 13.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:53.42 +26:42:17.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9934 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-43-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_23-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 52143_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.97 | 10:09:32.67 +30:58:18.3 | 3548 2603 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 52146_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.98 | 10:07:37.96 +33:04:34.9 | 3809 1331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52148_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 52148_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 20.17717 | 2461180.67717 | 14.09 | 09:54:53.44 +26:42:16.8 | 5491 5182 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-14-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0116.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.93 | 09:54:53.41 +26:42:18.8 | 5493 5181 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 52611_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 11.12 | 09:41:39.97 +32:36:57.4 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 53546_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 12.75 | 09:55:49.24 +27:00:08.6 | 5364 5003 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 53674_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 12.83 | 09:44:12.41 +26:19:34.0 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 53762_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 12.90 | 09:46:43.69 +31:49:38.0 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53816_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 53816_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.05 | 09:58:43.29 +27:20:34.9 | 4971 4801 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54032_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.25 | 10:14:52.28 +26:01:32.7 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54057_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.12 | 10:11:10.89 +30:26:11.4 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54110_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54110_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.07 | 09:42:52.90 +33:33:28.8 | 6939 0981 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54605_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54605_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.55 | 10:17:20.69 +30:28:56.8 | 2525 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54727_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.72 | 10:20:31.34 +28:01:40.8 | 2051 4349 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54780_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54780_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.69 | 10:15:28.04 +28:05:54.7 | 2731 4326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:15:28.05 +28:05:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54793_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54793_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.53 | 09:47:12.47 +29:24:29.3 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54855_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54855_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.69 | 10:04:34.20 +32:46:01.0 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54862_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54862_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.80 | 10:02:30.06 +26:02:36.1 | 4464 5593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54870_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54870_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.74 | 10:19:21.89 +29:27:16.1 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54901_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 54901_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.46 | 09:43:30.44 +30:19:51.5 | 6941 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55059_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55059_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.67 | 10:01:29.88 +28:33:21.1 | 4596 4069 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:01:29.89 +28:33:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55065_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55065_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.83 | 09:48:04.92 +31:15:14.0 | 6325 2406 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:04.90 +31:15:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55115_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55115_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.53 | 09:45:53.47 +33:49:04.9 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55149_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55149_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.82 | 09:50:07.72 +26:05:13.1 | 6148 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55166_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55166_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.83 | 09:47:40.84 +30:14:11.7 | 6397 3020 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55177_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55177_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.86 | 10:06:51.92 +28:55:06.4 | 3885 3848 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:06:51.88 +28:55:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55198_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55198_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.84 | 10:15:12.73 +31:28:46.8 | 2820 2279 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:15:12.75 +31:28:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55203_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55203_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.88 | 10:12:55.24 +34:05:50.9 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55324_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55324_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.96 | 10:06:46.14 +26:30:02.0 | 3885 5314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55348_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55348_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.95 | 10:18:55.82 +26:55:32.7 | 2241 5026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55408_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55408_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.04 | 10:17:47.93 +28:49:55.5 | 2433 3873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55435_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55435_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.16 | 10:19:37.22 +26:05:27.3 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55548_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55548_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.92 | 10:08:27.17 +25:51:47.0 | 3652 5700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55609_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55609_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.11 | 10:05:00.49 +29:44:36.2 | 4133 3351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:05:00.45 +29:44:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55651_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55651_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.23 | 10:08:03.08 +29:28:56.2 | 3732 3506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55653_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55653_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.86 | 10:04:55.77 +25:55:41.9 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55679_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55679_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.06 | 10:09:15.08 +33:12:18.7 | 3604 1250 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:09:15.07 +33:12:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55693_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55693_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.87 | 09:49:09.76 +30:14:54.8 | 6203 3019 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55757_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55757_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.19 | 09:50:20.08 +26:01:26.6 | 6121 5583 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55767_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55767_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.29 | 10:12:58.66 +33:52:38.3 | 3140 0831 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55814_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55814_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.27 | 10:05:22.36 +26:23:30.3 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55833_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55833_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 13.91 | 09:42:24.62 +33:14:45.0 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55870_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55870_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.26 | 10:07:06.55 +33:22:37.9 | 3877 1149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55901_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 55901_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.43 | 10:14:31.02 +29:26:22.1 | 2879 3517 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56121_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56121_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.29 | 10:18:45.81 +31:52:38.5 | 2368 2023 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56167_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56167_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.22 | 10:07:02.84 +30:34:51.8 | 3870 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56227_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56227_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.16 | 10:19:10.07 +31:53:14.1 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56231_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56231_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.09 | 09:48:44.46 +28:58:21.1 | 6282 3789 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56256_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56256_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.46 | 10:15:45.46 +31:02:41.9 | 2742 2541 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 10:15:45.47 +31:02:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56319_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56319_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.41 | 09:45:14.84 +29:13:51.3 | 6739 3617 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56405_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56405_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.29 | 09:50:50.79 +33:26:07.3 | 5933 1095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56413_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56413_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.31 | 09:40:59.62 +27:27:01.9 | 7355 4673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56414_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.16 | 09:45:08.93 +27:30:36.9 | 6793 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56487_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56487_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.26 | 09:58:54.55 +29:09:47.0 | 4936 3700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 09:58:54.54 +29:09:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56770_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56770_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.35 | 10:13:23.47 +28:31:48.3 | 3015 4071 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56774_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56774_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.41 | 10:16:10.62 +30:36:03.2 | 2680 2808 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56823_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56823_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.70 | 10:16:00.29 +30:58:54.2 | 2709 2578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56969_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56969_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.18 | 09:47:26.72 +34:09:51.0 | 6349 0637 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56971_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 56971_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 15.03 | 10:15:41.79 +33:35:12.2 | 2792 0998 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57021_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57021_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.54 | 10:01:27.23 +30:26:20.2 | 4598 2931 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57070_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57070_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.96 | 10:13:39.68 +33:01:07.8 | 3042 1351 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57166_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57166_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.70 | 10:12:21.14 +32:58:05.2 | 3208 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57313_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57313_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.54 | 09:58:36.97 +30:17:06.2 | 4968 3022 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
**** FOUND 09:58:36.96 +30:17:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57364_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57364_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.73 | 09:51:57.62 +27:03:15.6 | 5884 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57452_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57452_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.43 | 09:52:46.10 +32:58:00.8 | 5696 1386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57693_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57693_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.63 | 10:18:35.73 +27:13:49.8 | 2293 4842 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57710_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
Preparing report for the candidate 57710_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57723_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57723_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.66 | 09:55:25.97 +26:38:31.3 | 5420 5221 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57840_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57840_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.64 | 10:00:13.83 +29:06:26.1 | 4762 3735 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57846_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57846_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.90 | 10:20:14.86 +33:23:22.6 | 2210 1096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57881_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57881_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 15.02 | 10:08:20.56 +26:07:16.1 | 3669 5543 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57941_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57941_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.89 | 09:54:29.53 +33:30:48.0 | 5471 1059 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57989_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 57989_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.91 | 09:54:59.36 +27:34:31.2 | 5470 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58041_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 58041_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 14.82 | 10:02:20.08 +33:15:20.0 | 4481 1226 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19457_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117
The candidate 19457_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 20.17759 | 2461180.67759 | 11.60 | 10:00:06.56 +30:09:51.9 | 4774 3096 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_232915_TTUQ2b1x1_643046_e5UBnMXR/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-15-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0117.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7
########### Completed Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7
###################################################################################
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:06:25.48 +26:42:00.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.67716948 -observatory V36
04:13:51.32 +22:17:47.1 Mercury (-1.7mag)
06:04:19.70 +25:03:55.9 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:54:51.08 +10:58:40.9 Mars (1.3mag)
07:33:26.90 +22:06:29.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:11.45 +02:13:42.7 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:36.42 +20:11:58.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:42.61 +00:08:29.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:06.43 -22:58:17.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:07:46.88 +25:43:14.5 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 19 23:33 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.67716948:
07:33:34.80 +22:06:08.4 Io (5.9mag)
07:33:18.85 +22:06:49.1 Europa (6.1mag)
07:33:37.09 +22:06:07.5 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:33:59.21 +22:05:04.8 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:34:54.13 +21:43:28.5 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:33:29.25 +22:06:23.8 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:35:18.30 +22:07:14.8 Elara (17.5mag)
07:34:33.36 +22:28:27.8 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:40:47.36 +22:06:56.6 Carme (18.7mag)
00:43:04.11 +02:14:09.3 Titan (8.7mag)
00:43:14.37 +02:13:54.4 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:43:21.06 +02:12:46.4 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:43:16.81 +02:13:18.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:44:15.81 +02:18:19.0 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 19 23:33 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.67716948:
17:11:23.10 -31:55:35.5 JWST
21:15:03.65 -23:33:53.7 Chandra
08:13:06.49 -43:16:50.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 19 23:33 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.67716948 -observatory V36
13:26:26.93 -27:40:07.0 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:26:59.57 +30:48:36.4 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:31:50.58 +01:02:53.4 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:18:32.97 +24:24:58.1 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:47:58.20 +19:45:19.2 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:53:23.99 -31:11:00.1 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:35:15.22 -68:24:17.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:42:16.21 +31:44:27.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:05.09 +14:04:55.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:49.36 +30:46:21.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:10:35.39 +26:46:36.6 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:17:20.96 +31:39:03.9 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:41:19.87 +02:49:41.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:39:48.97 +20:55:41.0 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:26:59.13 -11:04:49.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:41.21 -07:17:42.8 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:15:26.02 +65:14:01.7 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:29:52.89 -05:05:42.6 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:10:46.84 +86:56:30.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:46:21.56 +63:47:29.8 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:17:01.96 +25:42:42.7 12.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:52:55.05 +11:29:16.3 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:44.18 +25:19:17.5 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:58:59.80 -17:51:17.5 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:47:58.21 +37:56:11.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:54:15.84 +53:25:38.2 16.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:10:49.22 -09:38:14.0 11.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:07.49 +04:30:13.1 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:23:57.27 +41:49:32.9 15.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:23.93 -11:52:51.4 16.2mag A/2026 E1
19:48:26.43 -08:10:07.5 9.8mag 10P/Tempel
14:22:02.36 -01:36:21.6 17.1mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:11.35 -00:52:21.6 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:47:34.68 -02:35:21.7 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:42:03.65 +22:57:26.4 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:19:31.17 +28:57:00.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:08:48.19 -07:50:06.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:42:44.97 +30:35:40.8 16.4mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:23:44.49 +14:26:51.1 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:36:37.11 +00:17:54.9 15.2mag 88P/Howell
03:53:37.58 +28:04:20.4 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:06:16.29 +33:20:22.4 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:18:01.04 +22:54:24.0 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:27:45.97 +17:47:17.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:55:32.37 +17:55:04.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:28:52.35 +19:40:34.0 12.3mag 141P/Machholz
04:31:58.92 +15:20:57.7 12.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:14:30.72 +12:10:04.3 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:43:40.74 -27:39:09.8 17.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:41:23.28 +15:27:23.7 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:17.77 -03:04:44.3 17.8mag 169P/NEAT
17:06:47.22 -09:54:48.2 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:51:17.18 +35:55:10.4 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:43:09.09 -10:03:23.8 16.9mag 260P/McNaught
03:14:57.93 +28:37:50.8 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
21:02:03.02 -34:02:47.0 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:25:03.40 +08:21:19.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:52:58.35 +21:08:35.8 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:29:01.01 +42:58:39.2 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 19 23:33 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 19 23:33 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 19 23:33 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
07:10:35.982 -68:41:17.89 AT 2026mli 2026-05-12.97 19.219
17:52:46.431 +47:52:46.86 AT 2026mlh 2026-05-08.38 20.1882
14:13:17.140 -79:34:21.34 SN 2026mlg 2026-05-13.16 19.098
13:01:56.482 -31:45:10.71 SN 2026mlf 2026-05-12.13 19.007
07:54:45.643 -77:42:34.01 AT 2026mle 2026-05-13.07 19.016
20:30:20.180 -54:23:56.77 AT 2026mld 2026-05-13.27 18.409
22:04:13.307 -62:36:12.13 AT 2026mlc 2026-05-13.37 18.826
05:26:12.032 -40:06:08.32 AT 2026mlb 2026-05-13.00 18.67
19:42:54.081 +00:48:22.14 AT 2026mla 2026-05-13.45 19.82
19:30:52.401 +01:28:25.46 AT 2026mkz 2026-05-10.43 18.98
19:16:53.816 +07:01:58.07 AT 2026mky 2026-05-13.38 19.79
18:26:55.952 +08:19:11.34 AT 2026mkx 2026-05-09.34 18.11
18:46:00.564 +05:06:38.95 AT 2026mkw 2026-05-08.40 19.71
14:09:28.410 +14:24:05.48 AT 2026mkv 2026-05-13.26 20.45
10:19:49.459 +35:57:58.03 AT 2026mku 2026-05-08.16 20.5914
08:06:09.530 +34:06:49.84 AT 2026mkt 2026-05-09.16 19.864
10:53:32.277 +43:02:13.19 AT 2026mks 2026-05-08.20 19.7954
18:01:16.824 +61:44:43.86 AT 2026mkr 2026-05-11.93 20.08
18:17:49.524 +02:21:23.22 AT 2026mkq 2026-05-09.38 19.93
18:01:57.479 +12:50:56.84 AT 2026mkp 2026-05-12.38 20.49
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 19 23:33 tns_transients_list.txt