This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 10.45 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1
238.15292 46.57404 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.7 Iris -2 1 2 10.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 17 10.08 +04 02 28.1 10.4 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 12.70 10:35:20.56 +02:34:52.8
244.05170 49.23680 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe -1 1 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:20.56 +02:34:52.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:20.56 +02:34:52.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 35 20.56 +02 34 52.8 12.7 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 13.09 10:33:12.49 +07:32:45.1
237.35932 51.85861 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea -2 1 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:33:12.49 +07:32:45.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:33:12.49 +07:32:45.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 33 12.49 +07 32 45.1 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 13.61 10:22:59.72 +06:51:08.6
235.97814 49.38271 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga -2 1 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:22:59.72 +06:51:08.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:22:59.72 +06:51:08.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 22 59.72 +06 51 08.6 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 14.14 10:26:33.22 +04:02:27.0
240.23214 48.44669 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera -2 1 2 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:26:33.22 +04:02:27.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:26:33.22 +04:02:27.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 26 33.22 +04 02 27.0 14.1 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1714 2461180.6714 14.53 10:24:23.37 +09:32:37.1
232.74888 51.14419 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.808 Merxia -2 2 3 15.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:24:23.37 +09:32:37.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:24:23.37 +09:32:37.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1714* 10 24 23.37 +09 32 37.1 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6714,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1714 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461180.67161564 20.05.2026 04:06:57.591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4838
Objects passed selection criteria: 4837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4671
Average stars matched: 4532.25 (97.0295 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 23:15:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
First image: 2461146.71049043 16.04.2026 05:02:56.373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Last image: 2461180.67161564 20.05.2026 04:06:57.591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 176
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27882
Objects passed selection criteria: 27812
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26494.8
Average stars matched: 25270.2 (95.3783 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 23:16:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.67117240
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0989 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1017 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24
Second-epoch second image center 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7HdUgBMJxc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4P7XdMnqYG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjFih13vCL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oo4ZITHwrb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2032 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2921 deg
Loaded 4744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3795 out of 3932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3932 out of 6928 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec +0.1984 to +11.5941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec 0.1984 to 11.5941 deg
Loaded 5210 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3754 out of 3927 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3927 out of 6613 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7HdUgBMJxc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=6928
Got 6928 stars (including 6481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=212 n_q2=232 n_q3=222 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4P7XdMnqYG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6613
Got 6613 stars (including 6136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=220 n_q2=207 n_q3=235 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jjFih13vCL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=5635
Got 5635 stars (including 5286 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=220 n_q2=227 n_q3=224 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.419
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oo4ZITHwrb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=352, passed=5550
Got 5550 stars (including 5194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 507 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=217 n_q2=227 n_q3=223 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.181
ref2=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new1=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.419
new2=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.332
reference average sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.1625
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20494_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 20494_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0989 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:11.223 +05:59:22.20
Second-epoch image center 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1017 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:16:50.905 +05:56:15.24
Second-epoch second image center 10:16:49.947 +05:56:19.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1CFB23RaMx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xiNBlbi1mg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XQUMAcjc5W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jl1rUUE3XC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.642000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.642000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec +0.5952 to +11.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2543 to 162.2045 deg, Dec 0.5952 to 11.2954 deg
Loaded 4750 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4031 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4031 out of 36425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 39278 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec +0.1788 to +11.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec 0.1788 to 11.6671 deg
Loaded 5262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3705 out of 4075 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4075 out of 39278 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.4 mag. Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1CFB23RaMx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1564, passed=36406
Got 36406 stars (including 34804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36406 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=209 n_q2=241 n_q3=205 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xiNBlbi1mg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1637, passed=39258
Got 39258 stars (including 37533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=221 n_q2=212 n_q3=225 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XQUMAcjc5W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1537, passed=28337
Got 28337 stars (including 26761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=227 n_q2=223 n_q3=228 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Jl1rUUE3XC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1636, passed=29092
Got 29092 stars (including 27417 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=224 n_q2=226 n_q3=229 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.369
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-19_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0106.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_231316_TTUQ2b1x1_386588_xWkAwcWW/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:30:15.36 +02:00:47.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:00.39 +06:16:08.0: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:42:19.91 +08:08:49.0: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:42:30.00 +05:02:30.1: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:20.56 +02:34:52.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:30:15.36 +02:00:47.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:00.39 +06:16:08.0: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:42:30.00 +05:02:30.1: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:15.36 +02:00:47.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5181 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:42:19.91 +08:08:49.0: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:00.39 +06:16:08.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5565 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:30.00 +05:02:30.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4476 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:19.91 +08:08:49.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3230 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:33:12.49 +07:32:45.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:20.56 +02:34:52.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:33:12.49 +07:32:45.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:22:59.72 +06:51:08.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:22:59.72 +06:51:08.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:35:55.24 +02:40:04.2: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:17:40.93 +03:27:01.1: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:38:07.58 +03:28:37.4: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:35:55.24 +02:40:04.2: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:55.24 +02:40:04.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1830 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:17:40.93 +03:27:01.1: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:40.93 +03:27:01.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9977 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:26:33.22 +04:02:27.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:38:07.58 +03:28:37.4: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:07.58 +03:28:37.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2460 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:26:33.22 +04:02:27.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:24:23.37 +09:32:37.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:24:23.37 +09:32:37.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:34:51.86 +03:08:53.4: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:37:15.80 +05:47:19.1: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:34:51.86 +03:08:53.4: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:34:51.86 +03:08:53.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6746 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:37:55.70 +08:23:27.8: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:33:24.97 +05:24:30.3: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:37:15.80 +05:47:19.1: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:15.80 +05:47:19.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7616 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:37:55.70 +08:23:27.8: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:55.70 +08:23:27.8: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8310 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:33:24.97 +05:24:30.3: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:24.97 +05:24:30.3: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8371 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-02-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits at 10:17:23.63 +09:42:06.9: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:17:23.63 +09:42:06.9: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:23.63 +09:42:06.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7314 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54145.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54337.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54090_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54090_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:29:11.22 +04:38:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54091_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54092_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54097_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54099_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54104_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54104_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:10.08 +04:02:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54119_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54121_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:35.09 +05:05:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54137_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54144_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:28.22 +08:34:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 54145_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54147_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54147_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:23.31 +08:46:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54148_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54148_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54151_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54152_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54158_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54159_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54159_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 54161_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54163_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54170_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54176_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54176_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54179_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54179_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54183_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54184_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54184_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54188_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54188_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 54194_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54196_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:37.41 +07:19:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54197_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54197_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:15.54 +08:59:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54201_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54201_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54210_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54210_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:22.33 +08:41:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54214_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54214_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54215_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54221_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54224_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54225_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54228_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54228_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54231_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54231_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54235_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54235_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54236_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54236_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54241_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54241_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54242_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54242_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54244_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54244_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54248_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54248_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54249_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54249_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54252_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54253_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54253_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54256_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54256_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54263_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54263_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54264_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54265_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54266_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54266_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54269_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54269_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54270_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54270_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54271_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54271_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54273_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:10.64 +04:12:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54274_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54274_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54275_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54275_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54277_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54277_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54278_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 54278_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54283_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54283_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54300_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54300_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54308_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54308_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54314_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54314_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54329_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54329_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54330_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54330_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54336_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54336_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54337_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 54337_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54340_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54348_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54357_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54357_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54358_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54358_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54359_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54359_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54360_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54360_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54361_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54365_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54365_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54366_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54366_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54370_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54370_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54371_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54371_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54377_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54377_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54378_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54378_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54393_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54393_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54414_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54417_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54417_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54423_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54429_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54429_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54430_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54430_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54436_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54436_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54440_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54440_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54442_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54442_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54445_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54451_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54451_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54454_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54454_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54460_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54460_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54464_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54464_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54469_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54469_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54473_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54473_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54480_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54482_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54495_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54495_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54505_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107
The candidate 54505_fd_Sex-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_23-06-57_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0107 did not pass the final checks