This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1443 2461180.6443 13.64 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4
149.90641 42.98229 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1443* 09 43 27.14 +63 00 55.4 13.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6443,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1443 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1443 2461180.6443 13.79 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4
160.34373 30.82959 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G2 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6443,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1443 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1443 2461180.6443 13.95 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4
151.48283 38.17548 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: L0 2011ApJS..197...19K WISEP J085938.38+634130.4
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1443* 08 59 37.70 +63 41 14.4 13.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6443,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1443 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1443 2461180.6443 14.10 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4
156.13083 38.63127 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 20.1443* 08 55 39.34 +60 02 48.4 14.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6443,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1443 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1443 2461180.6443 11.41 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8
150.57232 29.18403 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1089775559688178944 | 07:36:48.79 +65:35:41.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1089775559688178944,2461180.6443,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1089775559688178944 20260520.1443 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461180.64454701 20.05.2026 03:27:58.862 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9095
Objects passed selection criteria: 9080
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7664.5
Average stars matched: 7503 (97.8929 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:34:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461180.64454701 20.05.2026 03:27:58.862 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 156
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52755
Objects passed selection criteria: 52599
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40402.8
Average stars matched: 39168.5 (96.9451 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153428 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:35:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.64413858
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30
Second-epoch image center 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0692 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30
Second-epoch image center 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0688 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00047 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00047 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4NvR28IMAV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PBdxzYrdoy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xsMHY3Q1Mf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9CrU4dj7xx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4105 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4105 deg
Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5406 out of 5707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5707 out of 9619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4105 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4105 deg
Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5406 out of 5707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5707 out of 9619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5398 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5398 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4103 deg
Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5389 out of 5703 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5703 out of 9596 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
4.5 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
4.5 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
13.8 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4NvR28IMAV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, passed=9619
Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=221 n_q2=284 n_q3=180 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PBdxzYrdoy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=9596
Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=215 n_q2=294 n_q3=176 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xsMHY3Q1Mf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=5708
Got 5708 stars (including 5504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=239 n_q2=252 n_q3=197 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9CrU4dj7xx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=224, passed=5952
Got 5952 stars (including 5725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5952 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=225 n_q2=251 n_q3=222 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.307
ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.366
new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.326
reference average sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.339
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20576_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 20576_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30
Second-epoch image center 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0692 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30
Second-epoch image center 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0688 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:48.112 +62:01:57.75
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:47.979 +62:01:56.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00047 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00047 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xPHxHT3o7N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FXI1gxd2Db
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7UrEHtJ2SU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1zqfk8Av94
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5777 deg, Dec +55.3298 to +67.4117 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5777 deg, Dec 55.3298 to 67.4117 deg
Loaded 8951 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5042 out of 5784 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5784 out of 56661 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5777 deg, Dec +55.3298 to +67.4117 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5777 deg, Dec 55.3298 to 67.4117 deg
Loaded 8951 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5042 out of 5784 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5784 out of 56661 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 56645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5774 deg, Dec +55.3470 to +67.4190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5774 deg, Dec 55.3470 to 67.4190 deg
Loaded 8945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5051 out of 5777 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5777 out of 56645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 146 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
4.0 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
3.9 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xPHxHT3o7N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2986, passed=56640
Got 56640 stars (including 53554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=217 n_q2=281 n_q3=181 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FXI1gxd2Db (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2922, passed=56624
Got 56624 stars (including 53608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=212 n_q2=284 n_q3=185 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7UrEHtJ2SU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=950, passed=24461
Got 24461 stars (including 23495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=232 n_q2=248 n_q3=200 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1zqfk8Av94 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=989, passed=25211
Got 25211 stars (including 24198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=223 n_q2=248 n_q3=226 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_223158_TTUQ1b1x1_3284241_FevipCpt/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:35:50.36 +60:55:24.8: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:09:45.64 +56:34:11.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:35:50.36 +60:55:24.8: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:50.36 +60:55:24.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1743 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:09:45.64 +56:34:11.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:09:45.64 +56:34:11.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5345 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:56:07.58 +60:19:03.3: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:56:07.58 +60:19:03.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:56:07.58 +60:19:03.3: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0520 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 09:43:27.14 +63:00:55.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:53:36.65 +57:12:52.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:59:37.70 +63:41:14.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:55:39.34 +60:02:48.4: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:36:50.42 +65:35:58.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4082 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71384.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71394.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70765_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70765_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70767_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70767_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70841_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70841_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:06.32 +60:40:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70844_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70844_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70848_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70848_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70850_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70850_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70879_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70879_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70888_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70888_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70901_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70901_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70912_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70912_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70923_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70923_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70925_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70925_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70944_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70944_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70946_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70946_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70948_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70948_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70959_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70959_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70963_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70963_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70985_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 70985_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71003_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71003_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71005_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71005_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71011_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71011_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71014_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71014_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71019_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71019_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71025_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71025_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71034_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71034_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71037_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71037_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71046_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71046_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71050_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71050_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71053_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71053_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71058_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71058_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:47.92 +65:39:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71070_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71070_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71075_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71075_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71082_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71082_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71084_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71084_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71090_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71090_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71098_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71098_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71100_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71100_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71102_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71102_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71105_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71105_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71106_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71106_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71107_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71107_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71115_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71115_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71116_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71116_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71119_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71119_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71123_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71123_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71129_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71129_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71134_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71134_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71139_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71139_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71140_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71140_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71143_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71143_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71151_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71151_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71153_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71153_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71165_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71165_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71166_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71166_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:15:47.26 +60:21:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71171_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71171_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71174_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71174_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:51:52.94 +58:08:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71182_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71182_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71183_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71183_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71184_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71184_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71193_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71193_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71196_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71196_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71197_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71197_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71199_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71199_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71200_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71200_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71202_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71202_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71205_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71205_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71209_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71209_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71212_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71212_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71216_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71216_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71225_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71225_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71229_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71229_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71238_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71238_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71243_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71243_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71244_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71244_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71252_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71252_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71256_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71256_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71257_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71257_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71260_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71260_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71262_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71262_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71277_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71277_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71281_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71281_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71296_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71296_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71305_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71305_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71310_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71310_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71317_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71317_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71319_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71319_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71320_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71320_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71321_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71321_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71327_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71327_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71328_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71328_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71332_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71332_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71335_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71335_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71339_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71339_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71340_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71340_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71344_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71344_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71346_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71348_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71348_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71353_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71353_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71357_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71357_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71363_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71363_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71364_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71364_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71367_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
Preparing report for the candidate 71367_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71371_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71371_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71375_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71375_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71377_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71377_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71378_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71378_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71381_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71381_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71384_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
Preparing report for the candidate 71384_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71386_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71386_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71387_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71387_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71389_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71389_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71394_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
Preparing report for the candidate 71394_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71395_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71395_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71396_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71396_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71398_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71398_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71399_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71399_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71400_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71400_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71403_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71403_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71404_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71404_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71405_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71405_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71406_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71406_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71408_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71408_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71409_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71409_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71410_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71410_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71411_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71411_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71413_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
Preparing report for the candidate 71413_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71422_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71422_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71423_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 71423_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10566_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10566_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38151_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 38151_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16905_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 16905_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07404_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
Preparing report for the candidate 07404_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39240_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 39240_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14329_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14329_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10807_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10807_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10368_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10368_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15255_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 15255_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14174_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14174_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_22-27-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
