This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 11.32 09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0
211.70127 39.93038 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.44 Nysa -3 2 3 11.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 11.57 08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2
210.13246 32.64603 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.39 Laetitia -3 2 3 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 13.72 08:58:31.04 +13:20:26.4
214.88745 34.13575 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.54 Alexandra -4 2 4 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:58:31.04 +13:20:26.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:58:31.04 +13:20:26.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 13.89 08:50:50.36 +18:55:53.6
207.77346 34.53823 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.91 Aegina -3 1 3 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:50:50.36 +18:55:53.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:50:50.36 +18:55:53.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 14.22 09:19:43.83 +16:08:01.6
214.18355 39.94814 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.203 Pompeja -4 1 5 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:19:43.83 +16:08:01.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:19:43.83 +16:08:01.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 20.1242 2461180.6242 14.52 08:44:47.49 +17:04:24.0
209.23323 32.52821 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.201 Penelope -6 1 6 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:44:47.49 +17:04:24.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:44:47.49 +17:04:24.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6242,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1242 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.70881877 22.02.2026 05:00:31.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461093.70881877 22.02.2026 05:00:31.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461180.62445536 20.05.2026 02:59:02.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10649
Objects passed selection criteria: 10637
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9932.5
Average stars matched: 9556.75 (96.217 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:05:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.70881877 22.02.2026 05:00:31.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461093.70881877 22.02.2026 05:00:31.942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461180.62445536 20.05.2026 02:59:02.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58412
Objects passed selection criteria: 58280
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 50560.5
Average stars matched: 49234.5 (97.3774 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 159228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 22:07:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.62402069
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81
Second-epoch image center 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81
Second-epoch image center 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38
Second-epoch second image center 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gh2i0e8rmi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RlzAZvwEzU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPJuPBQE4w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7jd3gFgJZ0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 124.9314 to 141.4767 deg, Dec +8.4743 to +19.3358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 124.9314 to 141.4767 deg, Dec 8.4743 to 19.3358 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5566 out of 5975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5975 out of 10946 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.918000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.918000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 124.9314 to 141.4767 deg, Dec +8.4743 to +19.3358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 124.9314 to 141.4767 deg, Dec 8.4743 to 19.3358 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5566 out of 5975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5975 out of 10946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 11451 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 125.1823 to 141.6676 deg, Dec +8.6254 to +19.2763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 125.1823 to 141.6676 deg, Dec 8.6254 to 19.2763 deg
Loaded 6846 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5627 out of 5925 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5925 out of 11451 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.3 pix Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.3 mag. Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Gh2i0e8rmi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=900, passed=10946
Got 10946 stars (including 10032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=261 n_q2=206 n_q3=276 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RlzAZvwEzU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=785, passed=11451
Got 11451 stars (including 10654 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=205 n_q2=307 n_q3=185 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WPJuPBQE4w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=8773
Got 8773 stars (including 8367 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8773 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=210 n_q2=273 n_q3=195 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7jd3gFgJZ0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, passed=8819
Got 8819 stars (including 8410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=217 n_q2=270 n_q3=190 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.195
ref2=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.140
new2=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.230
reference average sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.176
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cnc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21343.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21188_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 21188_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:10.50 +13:50:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21301_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 21301_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21343_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 21343_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20104_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 20104_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:01:03.25 +17:53:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cnc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:16:44.98 +17:53:55.0
08:46:25.69 +16:24:51.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81
Second-epoch image center 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:53:17.381 +14:00:11.81
Second-epoch image center 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0086 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:53:20.568 +14:00:01.38
Second-epoch second image center 08:53:19.344 +13:59:59.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aCrwkZx4HC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9y6JoIzAlc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pR7CYVRd1c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.heVEIHxWXU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 65663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 124.8891 to 141.4816 deg, Dec +8.4585 to +19.3406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 124.8891 to 141.4816 deg, Dec 8.4585 to 19.3406 deg
Loaded 7095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5107 out of 6037 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6037 out of 65663 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.801200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.801200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 65663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 124.8891 to 141.4816 deg, Dec +8.4585 to +19.3406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 124.8891 to 141.4816 deg, Dec 8.4585 to 19.3406 deg
Loaded 7095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5107 out of 6037 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6037 out of 65663 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 60940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 125.1657 to 141.6817 deg, Dec +8.6107 to +19.2787 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 125.1657 to 141.6817 deg, Dec 8.6107 to 19.2787 deg
Loaded 6873 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5184 out of 5969 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5969 out of 60940 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 116 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.2 pix Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.4 mag. Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aCrwkZx4HC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=4187, passed=65637
Got 65637 stars (including 61324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65637 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=256 n_q2=220 n_q3=263 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9y6JoIzAlc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3758, passed=60919
Got 60919 stars (including 57067 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=205 n_q2=301 n_q3=186 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pR7CYVRd1c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1752, passed=38377
Got 38377 stars (including 36581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=216 n_q2=271 n_q3=198 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.heVEIHxWXU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1747, passed=38820
Got 38820 stars (including 37034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37985 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=217 n_q2=271 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-58-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_220203_TTUQ1b1x1_2539885_WXpVEyXu/wcs_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cnc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:24:56.21 +15:21:45.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:24:56.21 +15:21:45.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:50:24.57 +09:15:38.6: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:56.21 +15:21:45.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8695 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:19:11.94 +12:01:06.1: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:50:24.57 +09:15:38.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:50:24.57 +09:15:38.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2899 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:25:27.94 +14:25:47.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:19:11.94 +12:01:06.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:58:31.04 +13:20:26.4: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:11.94 +12:01:06.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6694 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:50:50.36 +18:55:53.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:25:27.94 +14:25:47.6: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:27.94 +14:25:47.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7563 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:58:31.04 +13:20:26.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:04:22.00 +12:04:14.3: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:09:09.38 +15:14:22.6: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:50:50.36 +18:55:53.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:04:22.00 +12:04:14.3: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:04:22.00 +12:04:14.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0837 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:09:09.38 +15:14:22.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:09:09.38 +15:14:22.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9287 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 09:19:43.83 +16:08:01.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 09:19:43.83 +16:08:01.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-00-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits at 08:44:47.49 +17:04:24.0: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_23-39-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits at 08:44:47.49 +17:04:24.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80322.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80558.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79492_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79492_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79500_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79500_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79614_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79614_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:44.98 +17:53:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79655_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79655_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:46:25.68 +16:24:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79709_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79709_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79846_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79846_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79859_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79859_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79864_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79864_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79871_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79871_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:40.05 +10:06:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79895_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79895_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79921_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79921_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:21.00 +13:22:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79942_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79942_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79952_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79952_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:32.81 +12:08:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79957_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79957_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79961_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79961_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79976_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79976_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79985_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 79985_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80018_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80018_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80025_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80025_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80038_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80038_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80046_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80046_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80059_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80059_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80064_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80064_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80111_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80111_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80145_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80145_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80164_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80164_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80183_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80183_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80187_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80187_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:05:14.14 +14:15:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80200_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80200_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80203_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80203_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80205_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80205_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80206_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80206_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80212_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80212_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80218_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80218_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:55:21.14 +11:18:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80224_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80224_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80236_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80236_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80244_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80244_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80265_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80265_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:56.23 +14:48:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80267_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80267_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80293_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80293_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80298_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80298_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80301_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80301_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80304_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80304_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80308_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80308_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80315_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80315_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80320_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80320_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80322_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 80322_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80327_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80327_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:56:54.77 +09:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80330_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80330_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80338_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80338_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80354_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80354_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80363_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80363_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80378_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80378_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80385_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80385_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:05.97 +17:51:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80400_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80400_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80401_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 80401_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80409_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80409_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80414_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80414_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80428_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80428_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80430_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80430_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80441_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80441_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80445_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80445_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:09:51.97 +11:07:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80450_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80450_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80452_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80452_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80456_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80456_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80457_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80457_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80465_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80465_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80469_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80469_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80476_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80476_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:45:55.26 +11:26:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80477_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80477_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80482_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80482_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80484_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80484_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80500_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80500_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80507_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80507_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80529_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80529_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80533_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80533_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80541_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80541_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80555_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80555_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80558_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 80558_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80568_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80568_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80570_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80570_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80575_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80575_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80576_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80576_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80577_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80577_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80585_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80585_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80587_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80587_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80592_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80592_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80601_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80601_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80603_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80603_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80604_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80604_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80619_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80619_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80621_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80621_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80622_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80622_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80633_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80633_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80635_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80635_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80638_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80638_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80639_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80639_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80641_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80641_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80645_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80645_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80646_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80646_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80649_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80649_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80653_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80653_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80654_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80654_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80657_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80657_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80659_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80659_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80660_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80660_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80661_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80661_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80664_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 80664_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80670_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80670_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80672_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80672_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80674_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80674_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80677_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80677_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80682_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80682_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80684_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 80684_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12364_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 12364_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:56:59.04 +10:51:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44614_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 44614_fd_Cnc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
